which pony is the best?
also can you help pinkie pie solve her polynomial time reduction?
>>5029797
ITT we summon you know who
Sorry I specialized in computer engineering not computer science (which is actually math).
>>5029802
farm kneecap
Your fortune: キタ━━━━━━(゚∀゚)━━━━━━ !!!!
>>5029802
FUN
>>5029802
who fluttercord here
>>5029797
Are you, like, not barney or something
Absolute faggot, piss off
>>5029811
who dubs here
Your fortune: Excellent Luck
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>5029812
>inb4 i'm called r00d
>>5029816
who're u quoting lole
Your fortune: Very Bad Luck
I could write an efficient parallel brute force solver and run it in a FPGA or GPU.
Also best pony is obviously Trixie because she can do magic (which she could use to punish me or restrain me while she rapes me) and is smug, narcissistic and dominant which is how girls should be.
>>5029819
>>/mlp/
Lemme guide you, dear friend
>>5029811
NO STOP THEY ARE JUST FRIENDS
>>5029822
Your fortune: Excellent Luck
>>5029822
But I don't even like MLP I just have a huge fetish for being raped or punished in creative ways by girls who can do magic or have superpowers.
>>5029836
Magic you say?
I sense lots of magic in these pseudodubs
>>5029831
Thank, nice girl
Literally no one has solved the polynomial time reduction :(
>>5029844
chuck is proud of u :^)
Your fortune: Godly Luck
Oh man
so many bubs
Granny Smith is best pony. Not a day goes by that I don't think about eating out her wrinkled horse cunt.
>>5029823
fluttershy will marry discord in season 7
MODS
*claps twice*
>>5029797
the independent-set version of the problem is equal to a sum (or difference) of a set of pairs numbering at most (nn+n)/2 according to the triangular number series. the problem doesn't state so, but I am assuming it means a polynomial run time in regards to n. thats about as polynomial as it gets.
you can do it constructively as well instead of destructively, by defining the independent sets as just finite number of checks of sequential pairs, the run time of which is always going to be just a coefficient of the run time of the original problem because it's just the same problem, but you have to check for pairs of pairs in order to ascertain a binary state of adjacent / not adjacent, instead of just pairs.
even if you brute force this approach, it's still going to be some form triangular number series, so it's still polynomial based.
>>5029871
Jesus christ
>>5029897
why, is this thread not fun enough?
>>5029923
try hard
>>5030049
I always try hard when it's to help my dear Pinkie Pie.
I like summer, but only as a season