#81: >>16904236
>>16918659
wow wow anyone know her name
>>16918695
denisa heaven. she's usually a redhead though.
behold
Carisha is the best
I remember awhile back somebody posted a story about her. Anyone have that?
>>16923049
very sexy
>>16923054
Some early erica campbell?
>>16923554
it's erica. i'm not sure how old it is though. she does look pretty young.
You know, it's considered common courtesy to link to the new thread in the old one.
Who wants more?
>>16924905
if you got nudes sure
>>16924365
you know, it's considered common courtesy to contribute to the thread if you expect others to help you.
>>16924967
not that guy, but the last 81 threads had backlinks, faggot
>>16925000
nothing is stopping you from posting them
>>16925036
It's really, really not that hard to go back to the thread you just came from, and make a single post linking to your new thread. I've been an OP for multi-part threads before, and I always do so.
It's especially considerate on boards like /s/, which have been hijacked and turned into shit. Nobody wants to have to visit /s/ to find the next High Res thread. It's disgusting.
It's not my intention to shame you. I'm just suggesting that you do so in the future. It's a simple act of kindness, and the reward is that anyone who was following the old thread is now drawn to your new thread. You get more viewers, more contributors, more posts. It's common sense.