High Res #8

up

>>16533579
i love raisa... omg

>>16533597
Who is this? Wow!

File: MetArt_Chic_Fergie-A_by_Dolce_high_0073.jpg (2MB, 3744x5616px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3744x5616px

>>16534618
fergie a

File: 1436794888333.jpg (1MB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5184x3456px

Bring back /s/

No more shitty facebook threads
No more shitty threads about girls from a certain area
No more low res

File: 14367948883802.jpg (2MB, 3744x5616px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3744x5616px

>>16535118

File: ErroticaArchive_Sublima_Cristina_by_Ivan-Harrin_high_0007.jpg (2MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5616x3744px

>>16535121

File: 046.jpg (3MB, 4912x7360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4912x7360px

>>16535123

File: MetArt_Presenting-Christel_Christel-A_by_Koenart_high_0105.jpg (3MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5616x3744px

>>16535130

File: femjoy_116869_036.jpg (2MB, 4000x2670px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x2670px

>>16535134

File: 14367948883956.jpg (819KB, 4000x2667px) Image search: [Google]

819KB, 4000x2667px

>>16535137

File: AmourAngels-0096.jpg (4MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5616x3744px

>>16535357

>>16535118
You are asking a lot here

File: metart_estrell_katherine-a_high_0022.jpg (2MB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5184x3456px

>>16535516
na

anyone can download these awesome sets

>>16535556
Users' habits don't change easily

File: bailee420.jpg (3MB, 4928x3280px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4928x3280px

>>16535588
This board used to be nothing but good sets

File: 02434.jpg (1MB, 2667x4000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2667x4000px

>>16535118
>>16535588
>>16535604
How about making a new board?

Sexy Amateur Women /saw/

/s/ would be just pro sets

>>16535629
This is actually a really good idea, since some of the amateur photos are gems and it wouldn't be right to throw them all out entirely (the majority are garbage lowres angled photos of fat chicks' tits, but what can you do?)

>>16535629
Do you see ads on this board? (I don't because I'm a toxic adblock user)
Think about that while think about why new boards don't come out just from desire.

Think about new age playboy content too while you're thinking.

File: Domai_Ksenija-1_Ksenija_high_0003.jpg (364KB, 3750x2500px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 3750x2500px

>>16535699

>>16535963
Is this Ryonen? Because if so, she is a goddess.

File: ha_ryonen_a_beautiful_mind_036.jpg (277KB, 2254x3000px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 2254x3000px

>>16536034
yup!

File: 03230.jpg (494KB, 4000x2658px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 4000x2658px

>>16535699
1. This whole site came about from desire not need.

2. Why should I think about new age playboy content? Enlighten me.

>>16536127
Don't act like you don't think yourself is smart and reach for enlightenment.

File: 017 (1).jpg (7MB, 7360x4912px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 7360x4912px

Landscape is best orientation.

File: 56cb42373db3f.jpg (6MB, 7216x5412px) Image search: [Google]

6MB, 7216x5412px

A few more because OP is still going strong.

File: 539443ea1d7ed.jpg (2MB, 2671x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2671x4000px

>>16536281
Thanks but it wouldn't be the same at all without Stellify and other anons.

File: thelifeerotic_big-nipples_viola-o_high_0083.jpg (3MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5616x3744px

I'm starting to forget what I have or haven't posted, and reCAPTCHA has shown me palm trees and RVs four times now. I think it's time to go.

File: tilpzar8wzkb.jpg (2MB, 2668x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2668x4000px

>>16536311
I know what you mean, thanks for the contribution!

>>16536258
this girl is gorgeous but the photog that told her to keep her shoes on is too "creative" for his own good.

>>16536739

I love Gianna, but this picture makes her look like a tightly stuffed sausage.

>>16533612
This is not even high res.

>>16536258
Now I understand why they made fun of the Edsel's front grille.

>>16536802
sorry, drunk

>>16536828
Being drunk doesn't automatically shrink images in your computer. Try again.

>>16536869
no, but it can make you reply to the wrong image.

File: 1276034895641.jpg (6MB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

6MB, 6000x4000px

saved a bunch of these, so I'll 'boot a few back.

File: MET-ART_TMU_152_0065.jpg (5MB, 6668x4992px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 6668x4992px

>>16537254
All landscape, from my wallpaper folder.

File: jalila_s01_0034_l.jpg (1MB, 4368x2912px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4368x2912px

>>16537259

File: AV4e574.jpg (6MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

6MB, 5616x3744px

>>16537263

File: 10075105_157.jpg (1MB, 4288x2848px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4288x2848px

>>16537265

File: marya.jpg (847KB, 2178x3267px) Image search: [Google]

847KB, 2178x3267px

http://babesrater.com/babe-picture/69245/marya

File: MetArt_ATRACTIVO_ELLE-D_by_LEONARDO_high_0064.jpg (5MB, 7216x5412px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 7216x5412px

>>16537268

File: 51a34cc82a63f.jpg (1MB, 4000x2667px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4000x2667px

>>16537277

File: MetArt_OVERLISTA_SABRINA-D_by_LEONARDO_high_0130.jpg (3MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5616x3744px

>>16537284

File: MET-ART_THI_13_0046.jpg (6MB, 4000x2667px) Image search: [Google]

6MB, 4000x2667px

>>16537285

File: Marlina.jpg (5MB, 1378x1808px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 1378x1808px

http://hotnessrater.com/full-sized-picture/457289/marlina-moreno

File: 8227152_metart_acryl_rito_fe.jpg (5MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 5616x3744px

>>16537290

File: 23835_052_123_362lo.jpg (2MB, 5616x3744px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5616x3744px

>>16537293
All for now, enjoy!

File: 1439382897237.jpg (55KB, 860x645px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 860x645px

Bumping to get rid of shitty 'local skank' threads

>>16537779
Ha, clicked the wrong one. I'm dumb.

/s/ needs this bump

>>16539158
I'm not sure it does.
Aren't you getting tired of this uber-shopped, super-clean, hi-res stuff? The exaggerated posing? The fake smiles?
This is not particularly good taste. This is mainstream.

>>16539900
>uber-shopped, super-clean, hi-res stuff? The exaggerated posing? The fake smiles?
Yes, I'm tired of this too. Can you tell me where the good taste pictures are?

>>16539900
What the fuck are you in about
What exactly is wrong with high res pictures of professional models

Or do you prefer the absolute garbage that is getting posted these days
The low res pictures with shitty lighting of fat and ugly women???

>>16540488
Maybe 500x800 blurry pictures are his fetish. Who are we to judge? The weird thing is that he came into this thread just to say he doesn't like it

>>16539900
nope.

>>16539900
Friend, I remember when /s/ was full of "mainstream" sets. Most MetArt, Femjoy models are goddesses with genuine beauty. I can feel the sexiness. Besides that, the actual mainstream pornographic models do the exaggerated posing and fake smiles. These girls love what they do, the confidence in their bodies is the sexiest part. The natural scenic landscapes back that up. Maybe a couple of flash reflectors and a nice camera here and there but this is not bimbo, NaugthyAmerica or Brazzer's quality. Don't get me wrong, those outlets are powerful with their girls too but that type of pornographic is crude in my opinion, nothing sincere about it, just to blow a load and carry on. Most of the girls in ie: this thread are the heaven's gift. I appreciate your opinion and to answer your question... solid no.

>>16536283

You know, if anyone wanted to post the rest of this set - perhaps in a new thread - it would cheer me up no end.

>>16539900
what a nice bait

>>16540497
>Who are we to judge?

It says sexy beautiful women at the top. Not "blurry pictures of my wife".

The last 2-3 years has seen a ridiculous increase in the amount of wife/gf posters. I'm getting sick of people thinking that's /s/ norm.

>>16541370
I shared my lovely wife's photos to everyone. How dare you said she is not sexy or beautiful.
Go eat a dick nigger.

>>16540791
most of the girls from MetArt and Femjoy are from the eastern European bloc and desperate to find any kind of way out of the shitholes they've grown up in. your fantasy is a nice one, but don't kid yourself that these girls aren't being just as exploited as anyone in east Hollywood.

We gonna have a new thread soon?

>>16539960
There is no certain place for good taste. If there was one, it would inevitably drift into mainstream. Good taste always looks for new and better things.
You have to find the good pics and sets individually by actually putting effort into the search. Don't expect them to be delivered by Met-Art, regularly, by the dozens.
>>16540488
I never said something is wrong with hi-res pro pictures. I'm just claiming they are not particularly tasteful because they are all similar.
Those girlfriend and wife and regional threads are all worthless. Reasonably low res and sub-optimum lighting is not bad per se though. It can have its own charm.
>>16540630
Ok. Thank you for the conversation.
>>16540791
Thank you. I appreciate your opinion as well. I'm not against these photos at all. They just bore the shit out of me. The girls all look like dolls with their perfectly shopped skin.
>>16541316
Ikr?

>>16541524
Dunno if I would call what's happening with the women over here exploitation or not. Some of them? Sure, a few get mixed up with the wrong crowd - but for the most part they're modeling by their own free will and making a relative killing in the process. The average salary here for unskilled labor is the rough equivalent to $3, and a lot of these girls work in bars / retaurants / etc. fulltime while going to school or whatever, then kinda stay in that lifestyle for whatever reason. Hell, they're young and hot and live the party lifestyle as long as they can I suppose....

When I had my studio here I would do open castings for about 40 euros per hour and they would come out of the fucking woodworks. Normal girls from all walks of life. Looking to be exploited? Nah - more like looking for vacation money, downpayment on a flat, paying off debt, etc.

They're VERY liberal with their bodies , you can go damn near anywhere over here in the summer and see them "exploiting" themselves for free in the parks, pools, lakes, etc. Why not get paid for what you were going to do anyhow? lol

>>16537787
Whose this? Google and tineye dont know.

>>16541756
Why don't you go collect some pics of other ppl's mom?
Sure they have their own charm, great natural smile and the most important is, no excess make up or airbrushing because they are not some try hard pro models.
You can always stick your head into a trash can, taste out every bit of shit for your exaggerated good taste.

Bump in hopes of someone posting a #9

>>16544456
nope

>>16544456
I gotchubro! >>16547209

up