>>39644644
Is this the state of r9k now? Not just traps, incest and lolis, but daily scat threads now?
>>39644656
It is not any worst of that anon.
>>39644644
Depends, does she want my poop or does she want me to want her poop?
>>39644684
What's the best case for you?
This happened to me with one of my exes. I unloaded The Logical Argument Against Scat, and then basically topic-banned it by romantic ultimatum.
It worked! I got dumped a year later for wholly unrelated reasons, and the only time the topic had come up in the interim was in the form of, "I'm unsettled by having liked this before." I gave someone whose sense of disgust was failing them outright a reminder that it has real world uses in protecting against disease.
>>39644644
That would depend on whether she's into the poop itself or the act of pooping. The former is just gross but the latter I could maybe get on board with.
I would poop on her
>>39644644
man, that would be the shit
>>39644644
it depends on how beautiful she is, like pic related there's no problem at all, if she's a lardwhale hella no
I'd shit on her mouth then dump her.
Scat, cuckolding, and race play are the only fetishes I couldn't accomodate. I don't know why, but those disgust me on a moral level, not just "it's gross", I find them actually despicable.