Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6
>if you were born in a fantasy world, you could be an omnipotent wizard
>>
>>39612802
More like a peasant or a farmer.
Only chads get to be heroes
>>
>>39612844
>Raistlin
>chad
>>
I'd probably wind up being a scholar or something. a medieval librarian maybe.
>>
would try to become an artificer and make enchanted equipment.
Just because its what a like the most magical tecnical stuff
>>
>>39612897
Enchantment? Enchantment!
>>
File: necromancer-bathie-25373414.png (93KB, 500x499px) Image search:
[Google]
93KB, 500x499px
>>39612802
I'm already going to become a wizard in 7 years anyway.
Normies beware.
>>
>>39612844
>More like a peasant or a farmer
hell yes.
Vikings were made up of peasants and farmers.
>>
>be me
>omnipotent wizard
>could end people suffering
>cure diseases
>spawn harrem of little sex slaves everyday
>or randomly spawn Spaghetti in pockets of some random dudes
>change someone so he could only make "REEE" sound when on a serious meeting at ELF.inc or some shit
>Sky is the limit you guys guys
>>
File: nfwjLyM.png (353KB, 1633x1687px) Image search:
[Google]
353KB, 1633x1687px
Daily reminder M*rch is the bad guy
>>
Nah, I'd probably be a commoner, or a monk.
>Brewin' beer and wine
>Keeping Bees
>Strong religious life
>Don't have to worry about getting married
>>
No I couldn't. Wizardry requires intelligence, dedication and hard work.
If I actually had those qualities I could become a programmer/hacker/DIY type guy, which is the modern day equivalent of a wizard, but I don't.
>>
File: ThereAreNoWizardsInDreamland.jpg (392KB, 598x864px) Image search:
[Google]
392KB, 598x864px
>>39612802
>if you were born in a fantasy world, you could be an omnipotent wizard
Ah, Raistlin, a fantasy character any wizard could relate to, right? He was a sickly, ugly outcast no woman could ever possibly desire. Our pulp fiction Faust sold himself to darkness dreaming that it would provide him the power to achieve divinity and create a world in which he was actually loved. Vicious Nature had cheated him as bloodlessly as She does all Her mistakes. So why not usurp Her, drag Her from Her throne, and create a world in which there were no monsters, one in which no one had to go down to the dead unloved?
The amusing thing about the authors of Raistlin's tale is that they knew all too well that they couldn't tell the story of someone that was truly undesirable and expect it to be profitable. No one can relate to some monstrosity save for other abominations, and those are very far and few between. So a new character was introduced to the story of their sorcerer, a beautiful young woman who eventually fell in love with him. His ugliness was of the spirit rather than the flesh, his evil moral rather than natural. Had it been otherwise, the typical reader would have found his plight incomprehensible.
Were the repulsive old virgins we playfully call wizards here whisked away to some fantasy world, they wouldn't find themselves in Raistlin's position. Rather, they would occupy the role of the disgusting, inhuman creatures he incinerated with his spells while holding a beautiful priestess in his arms.
>>
>>39614018
She was only attracted to his power
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6