If you aren't an AnCap or a National Socialist you're

Communism is the future not your boot licking of capitalist terrorism.

Don't believe me? wait 10 years when you cant find a job because they are all being done by robots and AI's

>>39611455
I'm not a wageslave, I'm self employed. Tell me when robots can own and manage land or sales, maybe I will fear automation like you peasants then LMAO

File: Superintelligence-Paths_Dangers_Strategies.jpg (353KB, 843x1257px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 843x1257px

>>39611455
Anyone who doesn't believe this anon should go read this book.

I've never swallowed a harder blackpill. There is no longer a way for humanity to grow outside of the digital mind. We are generation soylent. Doctors, CEOs, engineers, politicians, etc. will all be replaced by neural networks as time goes on.

Yeah, maybe you can be a welder for the next 20 years. That might last. But a whole lot of much more intelligent and capable people than your average retard trades workers are about to go hungry looking for work, and let me tell you, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to make two pieces of metal fuse together, but they will be ready to do the job. Maybe your union will save you? Within 10 years america will see 10's of millions of truck drivers go out of work. What are they gonna do? What happens when doctors stop getting hired because a computer and a technician can do a better job at diagnosing a patient?

>>39611495
http://www.globalfuturist.org/2017/04/wall-street-traders-are-getting-crushed-by-ai/

Buying and selling garbage in reaction to market forces is so trivial for a networked brain with instantaneous reaction times, it's actually hilarious that you suggested the position of "buying and selling" to be a defensible human job.

>>39611599
>stocks
Your life is a meme, my friend.

>>39611630
Outside of stocks, what's so complicated about "buy low, sell high" that you think people won't just push a button to let the decision making machine do it, especially when they have a proven track record of consistent profitability?
The only problem we have now is that a computer cannot legally own property. When that changes (and it will) you will be shitting your pants as large groups of computers fuck over your property valuation to force the hungry human (who needs an income to survive) to sell.

>>39611717
>>>/x/
The machines are coming! The machines are coming! Buy your water filters!

>>39611774
The machines are already here you dingus. Read the book I suggested. Do you have any idea how much of a big deal it was that a computer can beat a human at Go? This wasn't a trivial "guess and test" thing, it proves that computers have abstract reasoning skills. Self-driving cars are here today. Not tomorrow, not in 10 years. This isn't a case of "predicting too early", AI development is actually advancing faster than we expected. That Go game wasn't supposed to happen for 15-20 more years by every single AI experts' opinion.
>>>/g/
>>>/sci/
Business people are so fucking retarded holy shit.

>>39611422
>if you're not an idealist shithead who think government regulations are evil and the free market can regulate everything, you are a brainlet

no, if you have lead, mercury and other heavy metals in your environment, goods, food, you will be a brainlet.

>>39611846
>Business people are so fucking retarded holy shit.
Then why am I better prepared for the machines then you dirty peasants could ever be? Really jogs my noggin.

>>39611906
Capital will last until the hungry decide to eat the rich. Read a history book, it has happened a lot. If you think you are immune, or that there will be people coming to your defense, you are naive.
I would advise keeping your net worth under 8 figures (of today's money), and perhaps investing in property up in Alaska. That area is stable against climate change, and in fact as the northern areas warm, the land will be more fertile. It will also be profitable as the northwest passage opens. The only consideration is how much you trust Russia. If you wish to extend your family beyond 2 generations, it is probably the smartest decision you can make.

>>39611422
Reading that fantastically sincere position really made me reconsider a thing or two.

File: 1438007558259.jpg (109KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 600x800px

>Brainlets and cowards are not robots
Funniest part of this post

>>39611455
You under estimate capitalism it's always been good at finding meaningless jobs for people

>>39612105
Normalfag detected. Robots are psychopaths and are much more successful than normalfags.

File: 1525059_796478243796888_2485178960088350105_n.jpg (54KB, 448x750px)

54KB, 448x750px

FUCKING STATEKEK


daily reminder that ALL forms of civilisation and ALL Forms of states deny you freedom and responsibility

National Socialism and Ancap both are against freedom and self responsibility


daily reminder that the ONLY ideology with any worth is Ethno-Tribalist Might is Right Anarchism


stupid stateloving degenerate weak faggot

File: image.jpg (52KB, 333x355px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 333x355px

>>39611422
>any kind of Socialist
>"""""freedom and responsibility"""""""

>>39611422
No, no, anons think about it

>every single country in the world adopts national socialism overnight
>Every person with majority (country) genes is sent to that country
>USA however, stays a neutral ground where you can move to if you want a mixed race relationship with Children
>Countries run on regulated democracy where sneaky Politicians and NWOs are kept in check
>People are encouraged to help other people in need and wealth gaps are closed through the socialism
>If some countries are having a hard time developing, the highly developed countries all chip in to aid that country
>everyone has a true Identity and feels belonging to their fatherland
>Almost every single country is different
>Every country has it's own unique culture
>Every country has it's own unique lifestyle
>Every country has it's own unique architecture
>Every country has it's own unique History
>Every country has it's own unique Traditions
>Trade is distributed to each to their needs, but with the country owning those resources taking a slightly larger portion
>The weak are slowly bred out because women are encouraged to breed with strong and valuable men
>The whores, sluts and roasties are also left to die out because family traditions, values and monogamy are strongly encouraged
>Changes in demographics and birthrates are kept in check and affirmative action is taken if something is too high or too low
>Once the dust from the massive change has fallen and the populace has settled international programs like planet colonizations and massive strides in technology can be worked on

Support NatSoc now!

>>39612321
You have an insanely warped view of NatSoc unless you're talking about Mussolini which I'm almost certain you aren't.

>>39612352
I'm talking about what I think a view of nat soc should be

I'm not an NSDAP, I hate Nazis, I hate Hitler and all they did to my Country (Poland) but now that I see what is happening to Western Europe I can't help but sympathise with those views

>>39612434
My bad, thought you were like the countless other inbreds deepthroating Dolfy himself. There's a lot of good points made but NatSoc itself isn't the peaches and cream it's made out to be.

>>39611846
>/g/
>/sci/
>reliable
I don't think you're in any position to call others retards anon.

File: 1503593442523.jpg (60KB, 1245x642px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1245x642px

>>39612306
Brainlet detected EL EHM AYY O

>>39611846
didn't that one guy dying in that self driving car set it back a couple years back?

>>39612321
I don't want to go to the British isles though, it just sounds horrible there. my ancestors left for a reason.

File: 1504600153405.png (262KB, 614x716px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 614x716px

>>39612544
>NatSoc itself isn't the peaches and cream it's made out to be.
>one country goes from the gutter to fighting the entire world at once and almost winning

>>39612670
>almost winning
It's the "almost" that's important here.

>>39612670
>almost winning
>can't even invade a fucking island
>French were utter retards
>Poland/etc. were overrun either because lack of resources/manpower or have been neutral for years
Oh yeah they were close to winning alright. And memes aside they were completely doomed once the US got involved with troops. Also the Bismarck got roflstomped by an obsolete wooden piece of shit triplane.

>>39612711
Exactly. We just have to push a little harder next time.

>>39612728
What I was saying was that it didn't matter how well they did if they fucking lost. If it's all about survival of the fittest, then Nazism has discredited itself by its own criteria.
There also hopefully won't be a next time.

>>39612670
>almost winning
not really,
the Germans had an unsustainable economic model,
it pretty much required them to be constantly invading and stealing shit from other countries just to sustain itself .

File: 1485931769826.jpg (90KB, 655x600px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 655x600px

>>39612711
>>39612721
The economic power is the point. The ideal is not to go to war with the toilet scrubbers murdering your people and then literally everyone.
>>39612771
>There also hopefully won't be a next time.

>>39612771
>tiger isn't the strongest and best specimen of his specie if he fights 3 other tigers at once and almost wins
And besides survival of the fittest rely on large sample sizes you faggot. I.E far more attempts at natsoc.

>>39612818
>unsustainable economic model
Oh really what were they going to run out of before the war? Where was their debt? That's right it was nonexistant you're full of shit.

>>39612579
Oh wow, someone actually made this graphic for the unironic purpose of defending Hitler against disingenuous "Nazis were socialist and therefore leftist" attacks from the right. Jesus christ

>>39612944
I use that "attack" irl because it's funny despite being a NatSoc. I just call my NatSoc>NatCap or National Republicanism for brainlets.

>>39612819
>economic power
You mean how Germany was in complete shambles 2-3 years in the war? Yeah they had an impressive rebound from the Weimar failure but then threw it away come 1942/1943. And then have the audacity of getting pissed at being blown to bits even though they were doing that left and right in the war.
>>39612862
>where was their debt
Half of the reason why they started the war in the first place was because of debt. In 1939 they had the equivalent of over 200 billion current US dollars worth of debt.

>>39613014
>In 1939 they had the equivalent of over 200 billion current US dollars worth of debt.
Interesting. [source]?

>>39613014
After preparing for a war sure, it's not like they raised an army overnight. I was talking mid 30s ish. Saying they they started the war because of the debt however is ridiculous.

>>39613045
www.globalresearch.ca/war-reparations-and-germanys-1952-debt-reduction-plan/5438502
It's a bit farther down in the article but the point is that Hitler's reichbux didn't just appear out of thin air.
>>39613048
The debt wasn't the only reason, but definitely a big one.

>>39613048
He's the toilet scrubber, everything he says will be ridiculous.

>>39613119
This article is talking about post-WWII (((debt))). Do you have anything specifically talking about their debt and it starting the war?

>>39613119
That ridiculous they manage just fine with no debt at first. If anything I am just saying whatever the fuck they did in those firs few years clearly worked.

>>39613169
It is mentioned at the bottom
"The amounts owed in 1939 were: 840.7 million dollars, 51.5 million pounds and 2,775.2 million French Francs"
Not sure how these debts were acquired though, not sure if they are bogus paper debt from WWI reparations.

>>39613119
the only debt they had was from Versailles

>>39613169
Since you probably didn't read the article, here's a direct quote: "The amounts owed in 1939 were: 840.7 million dollars, 51.5 million pounds and 2,775.2 million French Francs, to name the debts of the leading three creditors. In 1939 constant US dollars the equivalent would be 206 billion dollars." And as I told the other anon it wasn't the sole cause in the war but played a big factor nonetheless.
>>39613195
Hitler started spending money on everything later on which is what accumulated the debt. It's also why he and his people heavily pressured Mussolini into helping him in the war in Europe.

>>39613266
I tried following the "source" for that and it literally just linked to the same article on another website.

>>39613273
>Hitler started spending money on everything later on which is what accumulated the debt
But then what he was doing initially was fine then.

>>39613273
Hitler undoubtedly got the economy running through war preparations and fighting the war, but it would have sustained itself if they hadn't lost/made some huge tactical blunders (Barbarossa)

>>39613279
Oh lol, interesting.

>>39611422
Being a coward isn't a robot trait

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA (labored breathing) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

lol

>>39613273
So can you provide a source for their debt and it being half the reason they started the war, or were you just going off this one page?

>>39613365
https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany
You can search the refrences of this article. Basically they handed out glorified IOU's to everyone which eventually caught up to them, especially after the failure of Operation Barbarossa which had they taken Stalingrad and other key places could have undone the eventual damage. And for the last time, it was a factor in their invasions.

ITT
>haha stupid communists, don't you realize that you've failed every time your system has been tried?
>fascism will work next time I swear
Face it lads, neoliberal capitalism is here to stay.

>>39613575
That was during the war. Are you conceding that your statement saying they started the war over debt was false?

>>39613575
I distinctly remember my history teacher saying that they managed to get themselves out of debt completely, and I did well in that class. Strange.

>>39613616
Apparently they were also in debt and running a deficit pre-war.

>>39613616
>also in debt and running a deficit pre-war.
Was that debt over 800 million and reason to start war out of desperation as was previously suggested?