Leggings are not pants, you wear then underneath shorts, or skirts.

They make my peepee hard so I like them. They're never going to fuck me either way so they might as well display their degeneracy for me to revel in.

You're wrong. Leggings are stand-alone. Tights go under clothes.

>>39573905

Fuck off stupid roastie, go beg for attention on instagram

>>39573905
They're still for dumb roast beef whores.

>>39573843
>point of post is to call someone stupid
>posts about an article of clothing with a misguided opinion and a sideways picture of a girls butt

P U B E R T Y I S S O H A R D

>>39573930
>>39573934
Today you learned something new! Knowledge is power!

File: 1503708037069.png (773KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 1280x720px

>>39573843
yea but nobody actually treats them that way.
they allow these whores to wear these in public schools, at least where I am. Its actually disgusting how far we have fallen

File: IMG_0731.jpg (200KB, 640x920px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 640x920px

>>39573905
You aren't fooling anyone, you just want to show off your crotch meat.
This is why we pay women less
>it's okay because he label says leggings
Btw they might look fine in your mirror at home, but they all go see through when they stretch when you bend over in bright light

I like wearing them under short-shorts, it looks cute on me desu

>>39574586
Also wash them once, and they are see through, leggings or not

File: IMG_0732.jpg (105KB, 602x865px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 602x865px

>>39574613
And the illustration for the point

I live for VPL and granny panties desu

>>39573843
What about under loose tops that go past the butt?