>Solid 9/10 >still a virgin A fembot needs to correct

inb4 Stan coincidentally arrives at the same time

>>39492588
Stanley/Vulpes is actually a very attractive guy.
He just needs a new personality.

File: 1503890325727.png (112KB, 700x498px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 700x498px

>>39492588
Reminder that sex outside of marriage is ALWAYS sinful. Transgressors burn.
And to the non-religious, it is still condemning your material life to magnified suffering.

File: 1503873745744.png (15KB, 646x325px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 646x325px

>>39492632
This is now a
>tfw no gf
thread.

File: 1503874536716.jpg (78KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x600px

>>39492653
One thing I've noticed from lurking the arguments on this board is that femanons and leftists especially seem to conflate prerequisites with reasons for loving someone. That is, if I say I want a virgin gf, they assume I want a woman BECAUSE she is a virgin, when that couldn't be further from the truth. I want a smart, compassionate companion, but she has to respect herself enough to stay chaste if I am to consider it.

>>39492632
>>39492653
both are those are horrible holy fuck, i don't want a baby trapper gf, having to keep an eye on 360 for alimony raped when a bigger better chad swings around

>>39492588
more like 7/10 desu. Your eyes look downy, and your moth is too far down from your nose. And jesus those eyebrows are nasty.

File: 1503875849067.png (374KB, 1504x677px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1504x677px

>>39492686
Another thing is that modern society has deliberately driven a wedge between the genders, and then insidiously wraps that as "freedom"--in other words, women now have the (((freedom))) to work, but in so doing, it is almost impossible for other women to stay at home when they choose.
But the most damaging consequence of this forced equality meme is the direct sexual impact. Allow me to elaborate:
Since the sexual revolution, the social and legal repercussions of unhealthy promiscuity have been removed, meaning society in general has devolved into a degenerate fuckfest. Men (Chads) chase around women with the sole intent of "scoring" while women spread their legs for just about anyone.
The end result, of course, is that the few of both genders who value morality and traditionalism, are badly isolated and cannot afford to take the risk of relationships. For men, we cannot be assured of a virgin woman who values herself, while for women, they arguably have it even harder, because they can't be sure if the guy just wants to fuck her and leave.

Flee sexual immorality. While women may have it harder on the surface, they also have an excellent tool to turn it around. They can filter out all the Chads and assholes by simply being clear that they are waiting until marriage.

>>39492603
A new personality is not enough. He needs a new brain.

File: 1503872378593.jpg (59KB, 1068x622px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1068x622px

>>39492690
Second one is a bit iffy, yeah, and NatSoc gfs sadly don't exist. But neither would divorce-rape you.
I may be a traditionalist, but I don't understand the obsession with shitting out kids faster than rabbits. Sustainability and purity above all.
Anyway, progressive gf is objectively the shittiest.

File: 1503875391442.jpg (28KB, 956x809px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 956x809px

>>39492802
imaginary gf coming through.

File: 1503878933236.png (270KB, 1178x909px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1178x909px

>>39492809
Well, that's all I have worth posting. So, anyone here have a chance at getting a decent female in your life? I do, but it probably won't work.
At least I can fight to secure a future better than the shit we're in right now.

>>39492588
Haven't browsed r9k in a while, but I'm pretty sure this is an ironic post.

The guy looks like the average beta that was served too much tap by his single mom.

There is nothing terribly ugly about the guy, but he doesn't exhibit any attractive features, and for a woman attractive features mixed with a few ugly ones are more appealing than a perfectly average face.

>>39492603
is this a joke?

he is pretty ugly

>>39492588
i would rather kms than have sex with you, you are very ugly

t. fembot

>>39492831
Is meant for
>>39492603

I should also add that his face doesn't have any masculine features

>>39492828
One more thing I've noticed among femanon posts: they seem to have taken the redpill of women's capabilities, and hate the feeling of inferiority.
This only happens because they are coming from the incorrect standpoint of equality. And this is a male-structured society (even though we have lost power in it, we still created it), so these depressed femanons evaluate their worth by comparing themselves to men. Obviously, women can't be men as well as men can, just like the converse is true. Traps aren't good women, and they kill themselves at high rates because of it.

The traditionalist response to these women who feel inferior is that the genders are complimentary, and they usually go on about "the gentler sex" and nurturing and whatnot.
That doesn't cut it, because it is passive. True, in a traditionalist society, everything "clicks", and even men act somewhat passively because of the structure. But we aren't in a traditional society--we desperately need to bring it back. And that's where women come in. They alone have the power to nudge us back into that direction, by actively using their power of selection.
As I have said before, it is within every woman's capability to weed out degenerates and shift social expectations. You are NOT just gatekeepers for sex. You are gatekeepers for morality. A man doesn't meet moral standards? Shoot that fucker down. Sex doesn't even matter, just the fact that he thinks about it does. Moral women are essential in casting aside the useless, degenerate men, while they can inspire the

And by all means, they can and should improve themselves. Not by the meme university route, but by reading for themselves and gaining their own insight. Intelligence does not equal a piece of paper or manager of the month at McDonald's. Intelligence, to me, is the ability to navigate this corrupted world while staying true to yourself.

>>39493001
A woman who can do that is infinitely more attractive to me than some dumb Stacy that just managed to stay a virgin by chance.
Remember: purity is just a qualifier to sort out who I would consider. I truly do want a woman for who she is, not what she is.

>>39492802
I always imagine the "communist gf" as talking in that women-tries-to-sound-like-a-gruff-man voice.

>>39493001
>>39493039
you guys are literally me but I don't think it's up to women to stop degeneracy, men have to realize they are shitty too

>>39493148
Both sides have work to do, yes. But women have a huge amount of power to show men the shit they've become.
Men, meanwhile, need to get ready to fight, because (((some))) won't let us fix this mess without pushing back.

>>39493001
I forgot to add:
equality of function is a meme. Equality of worth as members of a people, that is precious to Western civilization.

>>39493223
> what if we let eugenetics decide who has to breed? I mean, not that evolution matters anymore. People could just adopt the children that they genetically like.

>>39493699
That is opening a horrific can of worms that is best left untouched. Passive eugenics--discouraging defectives from breeding--is the way to go.

File: christ-pepe.jpg (46KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 499x499px

As a christian I find it interesting how many are realizing what they're doing isn't working out and start advocating for christian ideals all the while still not being christian, really activates the almonds

>>39493740
This is the lack of an opportunity. I mean, look at all the jobs that we could create by paying people decide which is the correct idea to follow! I mean, I would do that job.

>>39492632
Jew here.

I have always wanted to fuck a neo nazi babe, not even a domination fetish, just like for the irony

>>39493740
Where can I talk or read about that choice?