Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
What would philosopher think about traps ?
Here is what Voltaire said about "young boys". I think he wouldn t have find traps gay.
"Often a young boy, by the freshness of his skin complexion, by the brilliancy of his colors, and by the sweetness of his eyes, resembles for two or three years a beautiful girl; if we love it, it is because nature is mistaken"
>>
Wittgenstein, Leibniz and Hegel were all famously trapsexual.
>>
File: lord-alfred-douglas.jpg (24KB, 450x450px) Image search:
[Google]
24KB, 450x450px
>>39466509
>literally "it ain't gay if it's cute"
Fucking Voltaire
>>39466586
Witty was pretty much asexual.
Also pic related is Oscar Wilde's gf (male)
>>
File: ThomasMann.jpg (99KB, 452x600px)
99KB, 452x600px
Thomas Mann wrote a whole novella (Death In Venice) about his lust for the boipuss.
>>
>>39466509
>>39466586
>>39466601
>>39466675
Is there even any straight philosopher or are all somewhat gay ?
>>
>>39466717
Ayn Rand was straight
>>
>>39466717
It's important to remember that "gay" wasn't really a thing until two hundred years ago or so.
But Schopenhauer was pretty straight because he hated all things feminine with burning passion.
>>
>>39466717
Nietzsche was pretty straight.
>>
>>39466675
Here's what Mann wrote in his diary about his own biological son in July 1920:
"Delight over Eissi, who in his bath is terribly handsome. Find it very natural that I am in love with my son ... Eissi lay reading in bed with his brown torso naked, which disconcerted me."
>>
>>39466776
So maybe degenerates existed before the internet
>>
>>39466509
Shotas aren't the same thing as traps. Little boys are pure, traps are depraved degenerates.
>>
>>39467013
There wasn t tras people at the time, i took waht was the closest
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3