Being white wouldn't be so bad if a huge portion of white

>>39419813

Its not about what white men think of themselves, its about what other people (especially white women) think of white men.

Its just that its hard for white men to get that info without distortion, that's what creates all of the cultural kerfuffle.

>>39420063
It doesn't matter what other people think of white men. Nothing excuses white men who talk badly about all white men.

>>39419813
Probably a large percentage of this board is white-men down-talking theirselves.

What is the point of this thread? Plenty of white men still have it very easy. Plenty are still masculine. Look at the losers in porn, for instance.
I still firmly believe western society hates white men, yet EVERYONE - /pol/, feminists, /r9k/, reddit, tumblr, real life, etc - employ reverse psychology tactics on us.
People think it's the greatest tragedy ever that young white men opt out of society and aren't 'real men'. Even minorities and feminists who hate us think that. They are trying to shame us into upholding the west so they can keep living comfy lives. If white men go, so does the west. But western society is evil anyways so that would be a good thing.

>>39420356
If were expected to lead then we should have privileges. And that's all there is to it.

>>39420385
I'm not sure what you're getting at. I agree, but my ideal society is one where women have no rights and minorities are almost non-existent. I say this as a guy who talks to people now more than ever. I have a lot of respect for the non-white friends of mine, but I can't bare to see whites replaced.

>>39420420
Well if you want it to happen were going to have to do something about it.

>>39420445
Do what? /pol/ is an absolute disappointment. An effeminate board full of porn watching race mixers. They LARP as saviors of the west but they are everything wrong with the west. It's like a sick joke.

>>39420469
Well at least they want to do something. Trump is doing something.

>>39420469
>save the west
ewww why would I want to do that? let it burn

>>39419813
White men are actually masculine in a balanced form. The modern asian man is physically smaller, weaker, and more effeminate than white men. White men are routinely the strongest in strong men competitions, and excel at swimming. Blacks excel at running. Blacks are perceived as more masculine, and they may be slightly so, but they lack controlled masculinity, so their culture struggles. I will try to keep it as not racist as possible, but I think that's really part of the issue. Mexicans, or rather indigenous peoples of that area, are often short and actually not very masculine at all. While the cartel may do some savagery, it's not all that different from what their ancestors, the Aztecs, were doing. White people are the goldilocks of races, which is why we excelled in conquering the world. We may not be the most "physically" masculine (debatable), but we had the intellect and creativity to impose our will on everyone else, for better or for worse. With great power comes great responsibility. If it came down to a race war, whites would win, because guess what? We've been winning throughout all of history. We beat the middle east in the crusades, we beat the native americans, we enslaved the africans, the British Empire planted it's flag all over the globe, and the majority of vast empires have been from White people. To deny this is simply silly.

>>39420958

Excellent post.

White men are the Mario (from MarioKart) stats-wise.

>>39421124
Thanks for putting it In terms I can understand

>>39420958
We didn't beat the middle east in the Crusades you fucking mongoloid. We won the First Crusade by sheer luck, and every Crusade in the Middle East after that was a fucking failure.