Hey robots, what are your political views? Why do you hold them?

Libertarian

Crypto-Fascist

I'm mildly conservative on social issues and far left on economic issues and I believe in a strong, all powerful government.

Minimalist social contract, libertarianism nearly to the point of anarchy.

>>39372063
Anarchism is the true form of socialism with no government and no capitalism, not American "libertarianism" which is just private tyranny

>Libertarian
>private tyranny

Nice Bait Desu

hyperbenevolent dictatorship

Leftist authority questioning scum, but also libertarian ( not the US's pussy libertarianism) which values personal work and investments.

I believe that those fortune enough to have much are responsible for helping those that are not, but those that don't try to change don't deserve help. I believe in the value of education, a controlled albeit mostly free market and the preservation of privacy.

File: 1502931294231.png (532KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1000x1000px

Right-wing libertarian. Leftists are self-destructive mentally ill degenerates, and history shows us a government should never have too much authority over its people.

File: e30.jpg (209KB, 1856x887px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1856x887px

>falling for the "left-right" meme
>being a slave to the archons
>not rejecting politics spectrums in lieu of spiritual spectrums

>>39372282
>Right-wing libertarian. Leftists are self-destructive mentally ill degenerates, and history shows us a government should never have too much authority over its people.

interesting, care to explain the right wing thingy? I most likely am one of those "leftist scum" and I really enjoy listening to other viewpoints. Why do you enjoy the politica right more /why do you condemn the left (also do you mean the left in general or the american left).

>>39371748
In short, I guess I'd say a moderate libertarian.

Except that sex slavery should be legal.

>>39372298
> it's stupid to try and fit people in the "left right" spectrum
> let's abandon the bad but not completely shit 2 dimensional system of left/right,authoritarian/liberal for a random 1 dimensional much less accurate one to be different
"spiritual spectrum" my ass, and I even took the bait

>>39372400
>In short, I guess I'd say a moderate libertarian.
Good question, is slavery liberal or not?
Con: The slaves certainly arent free and have no rights
Pro: In a free market a near-slave relationship can start and technically freedom would include the freedom to take others to some extent wouldn't it

>>39372377
I don't agree with socialism because I don't want to pay for other people's shit, like taxpayers' money going towards funding the NEET lifestyle and sick people's healthcare. I don't agree with other leftist ideas such as big hulking men who demand to be referred to as women because they're mentally ill.

>>39371748
Feudal-Monarchist-Fascist-Imperial-Traditionalist

>>39372429
I believe libertarianism would suggest that it must be at-will employment. But then it's not really slavery.

>>39372458
>taxpayers' money going towards funding the NEET lifestyle and sick people's healthcare. I don't agree with other leftist ideas such as big hulking men who demand to be referred to as women because they're mentally

Sounds like american leftism then. It's interesting to see the american viewpoint on this, thanks for the answer.

(If you don't care about my view, stop reading here you're welcome)
personally I'd say the whole Cis-gender SJW bullshit has nothing to do with the left, and wrong arguments certainly don't either ("paygap 20%"etc).
While I agree that paying for others who don't work is shit, wouldn't you agree that it makes sense to help those that have no choice (disability for example)? Also shouldt society help those that helped but can't anymore (for example someone who lost an arm and worked with his hands, who paid taxes all his life)?
Doesn't it make a society stronger to pay together for those in need and in expect be able to be helped when they need said help?

If you don't think society should do those things, what's the point of society at all? Might as well live in an anarchist country.

>>39372567
So libertanism isn't archievable?
"at will employment" contradicts the basic concept of a free market, where you work because you want money. Slavery also of course must be seen in the bigger sense, as the need to serve, not necessarily by conventional force

I'm economically quite left and even consider myself anti capitalist but I want white ethno-states and minimal degenracy.

You should have to take a test to vote. You should have to display that you have a basic understanding of the person you're voting for, and aren't retarded. I honestly think 90% of Hillary voters would have been weeded out if asked simple questions about her "platform" because she barely had one besides FUCK DRUMPF and MUH GAYS AND BLACKS.

>>39372855
Ah, I meant "at-will" in the sense that you have the ability to choose whether you work somewhere, and slavery in the sense that you are literally being forced into one particular position with no ability to leave.

If you're referring to slavery a broad sense like "you have to work to survive," then I suppose you could say that's just an extension of nature. Like if cavemen and bears didn't catch fish, they'd starve.

I'm a monarchist. I am one because I don't believe most people should have the right to vote. A monarchy that only allows the educated, male and employed members of society to vote would be optimal. Aristocracy could be based on a personal income and not on birth, just to avoid decadence.

If I can't have a monarch I would at least like restricted voting rights to employed men.

>>39373230
Hail fellow Monarchist. I'm this guy >>39372520

>>39373160
Interesting argument, didn't quite think it through.
I'd say it becomes unnatural and turns into slavery when people using the system force you into certain works. Say a banker who has more economical power than you creates jobs with low pay, buys the company you work at and moves it overseas, wouldn't this force you to work in a restricted manner and a worse job?
Sorry if I'm just talking shit about nothing, I just enjoy these thoughts.

I am very strongly in favor of population control. I think a lot of other problems could be solved, simply be reducing the population and applying some form of eugenics.

>>39371748
Honestly, top right and bottom left should be switched.

I'm pretty liberal on how I view public policy but I'm fairly conservative in my own personal values. For example, I'm not really in favor of abortion but I think that it should be legal for practical reasons. I guess you could call me pro choice but people seem to have this all or nothing mentality. I'm also this way on most social issues. I honestly think that social issues are a waste of time desu.

On economics I want a more mixed and regulated economy. Single payer healthcare, etc. For this to happen we have to remove corporate influence.

File: stirnerpost.png (44KB, 422x414px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 422x414px

guns are harmful, so are drugs. I vote liberal where i am, even though i couldve voted right because our guns were very regulated for a long time.
>>39373230
how do you feel about ancient greece style direct democracy?

>>39371748
Anarchy is best

>>39373302
Yeah, it's always interesting to talk and think about for me.

You could say that you may be "forced" into taking (or at least starting off with) shitty jobs in some cases, but I think there's a distinction worth acknowledging when we compare that to, say, Egyptians who would get killed and whipped if they didn't build pyramids.

Ideally, the market would produce other options (and the guy may be forced to pay more if nobody competent enough took the shit jobs) and you can move up from one point, or make your own business, but it makes me think about how it's possible that a house slave or someone forced to pick cotton gets food and lodging.. so they may actually be better off than in some cases where a homeless guy who uses his freedom to not work dies on the street from eating an infected cheeseburger he found in the trash

I'm a totalitarian patriarchal Fascist/National Socialist. I also unironically believe that Catholics should be actively persecuted and repressed but I'm okay with other forms of Christianity.

>>39371748
I voted for Trump. Western values ftw... and who legit wanted another Clinton

>>39371748
after a decade of studying politics, ive found that i hate politics

>>39371748

Filthy leftist degenerate whore of the elite. I tried to go in more detail but couldn't keep it short.

tl;dr capitalism is bad but decentralised innovation is necessary, fuck the ultra-rich, democracy and free speech are useful tools, non-liberal religion is a scourge, regulate sex industries, leave the gays alone, science will set us free.

Economic leftism is probably doomed though and I'm currently working on coming to terms with the fact that capitalism grows ever stronger at the expense of practically everyone.

>>39373463
The thing with the ideal market is that it assumes everyone plays by its rules, which in reallity doesn't have to be the case.
It's always hard to decide where one's freedom stops and another person's freedom starts. Thanks for humoring me with the argumentation, have a nice day anon.

Non ironic anarcho capitalist here. Fuck collectivism and statism.

>>39371748
catholic theocratic distributist republic

R A D I C A L C E N T R I S M

>>39372711
Not him but I believe that it is not the role of the government to be compassionate. If private individuals wish to donate time or money to helping the poor or downtrodden I, and I'm sure the original poster, would be more than happy to see that. It is merely the act of forcing upon people to pay for someone else that we have a problem with.

>>39373794

How's feudalism working for you?

File: thinking-face.png (53KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 256x256px

>>39371748
I literally don't have any political views. I'm not a smug moderate, I literally do not care. I haven't voted in a decade.

Politics are for people who lack a real sense of self and identity. They also get off on being mad and outraged at whoever they decided is their enemy. alt right vs sjw modern culture is a real retard circus. It's some pro-wrestling spectator-sports mass hysteria shit.

At most I care about like what goes on in my city. I don't give a shit about what goes on in the next town over or the rest of my country or the world and I don't associate myself with whoever might be voted into power in my country or someone else's. Then again I don't care about that, I also haven't voted in municipal elections in years. If you think that you're in charge and your vote matters and voting in general matters and that "your guy" getting into office is going to do what you would do, you're a little dumb child who thinks that fairy tales are real.

>>39373853
Feudalism is dependent on the lord being able to compel their vassals by threat of force to remain on his lands, otherwise there would be no way the feudal lord could assure his source of wealth. That isn't voluntary and violates the NAP. Anarcho capitalism is founded on non agression and voluntarism.

>>39373917
So let's say someone violates the NAP

then what

Libertarian. Though I hold fairly conservative views personally, I don't believe in forcing people to live a life that they won't accept with open arms.

File: maxresdefault (2).jpg (59KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1920x1080px

>>39373942
Ehm, that would be UNETHICAL?

>>39373080
This.

Frankly I think a white ethno-state with minimal degeneracy would be a happier society and more peaceful than any existing one, regardless of the economic policy.

File: poster hitler.jpg (505KB, 1654x2339px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1654x2339px

National Socalism

Don't have any

Voted for Trump because I thought it'd be funny, and it has been

Don't plan on voting again in my life unless some other celebrity does some stupid shit

Fuck politics, I vote for myself

>>39373942
You kill 'em. The NAP is basically the golden rule + self defense. This also applies to trespassing on private property,stealing etc. It's like the wild west - state sponsored sherrifs. The wild west was actually quite peaceful. Also bring back duels.

>>39374104
There is no organization. You would be easily conquered by any Banana Republic or even just a medium sized criminal gang.

>>39373842
>overnment to be compassionate. If private individuals wish to donate time or money to helping the poor or downtrodden I, and I'm sure the original poster, would be more than happy to see that. It is merely the act of forcing upon people to pay for someone else that we have a problem with.
Reasonable. Then again it's not really paying for someone else as you can expect others to pay for you as well when you are in need... Thanks for clarifying though.

>>39372043
subtIe bait

File: 1289969644911.png (4KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 300x300px

>>39373749

>fuck the ultra-rich, democracy and free speech are useful tools, non-liberal religion is a scourge, regulate sex industries, leave the gays alone, science will set us free.

MY MAN. Yes, that's what I like to hear. I'd take it a step further, too - fuck conservatives and liberals, the the only thing that will ultimately save and redeem humanity is technology and free + fast access to information. Science can make mincemeat of some of our worst moral conundrums.

Do we allow abortion? Well, far enough in the future, we'll have contraceptives that are so reliable and easy to use, that unwanted pregnancies just won't be a thing. You could literally just tap a button on your smartphone to make yourself shoot blanks, or close up that uterus.

Is it okay to eat animals? Who cares, when you can get piles of vat-grown meat for pennies on the dollar? It can even be as lean or fat or marbled as you want!

Is welfare morally justifiable? What does it really matter, when EVERYTHING is automated, there's no real work of any value left to be done, and rich + poor are all just mooching off robots, anyway?

I'm excited for the future, bros. Regardless of which retards are running things, Moore's law and human ingenuity ensures we're on the right path.

>>39374136
>not using a McChine gun to defend your turf
It's like you're asking to be invaded.

>>39374136
First off there's no gun laws so almost everyone old enough will have a gun for self defense. Anarcho capitalism results in many communities of individuals bound together by contract who are in charge of who comes in and out. Borders will be replaced with property rights. I do agree that a superpower can easily seize ancapistan. It's one of those ideologies that works when everyone is practicing it,like communism but actually moral.

>>39374231
>walking to your job one day
>you unknowingly enter the MLP federation's territory and is gunned down for not being in a ponysuit.

>>39374167
Even then I believe that the government does it less optimally when compared to private charity. There will be cases in which the private charity is money laundering and I believe that these charities should be sue able for malpractice.

>>39374228
Technology will give us the tools to perfect ourselves. But I'm almost certain we won't use them right and will just make a mess out of everything.

>>39374186
I literally do believe that. Capitalism brought us a lot of great shit, but it's chewing me up and spitting me out. Right now's about the time to pull the plug on capitalism before it pulls the plug on the human race. Also I believe in nationalism, since America is the greatest country the world has ever seen, and it is America's responsibility to spread socialism (the authoritarian sort, fuck democracy) to every corner of the Earth. Oh and fuck degenerate faggots and victimhood culture.

>>39374242
I don't see how lack of government is moral. It is a step back to a more lawless time.

File: 1502508195982.png (10KB, 77x77px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 77x77px

>>39374087
>
(very high content and oregano comment)

File: 1503282673231.png (28KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 657x527px

Liberal secularism with an emphasis on individualism. So Classical liberalism I suppose. People should generally be free to live their lives the way they want as long as they aren't breaking any laws and paying their taxes. Religion and state should strictly be kept separated as god has no place in politics. I believe the best way to help people is to empower them by giving them the proper tools and information they need to make their own informed choices in life. Everyone MUST have equality under the eyes of the law, regardless of your sex, race, ethnicity and sexual orientation as well as equality of opportunity.

>>39374337
The government has a monopoly on force and uses coercion to make individuals comply with bullshit (ex: IRS). The income tax is basically a form of legalized theft that no social contract can justify.

File: 1446853321484.jpg (32KB, 467x581px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 467x581px

minarchist
big government can FUCK RIGHT OFF
dog bless these united states, but they have been taken over by totalitarian neocon trotskyists. it's time to take the country back to how the founding fathers wanted it.

>>39374392
If you don't have a centralized power structure people end up fighting each. That is how the centralized power structure was established in the first place.

>>39374416
Now this is a type of guy I would drink an illegal drink with.

>>39374335
What shit has capitalism brought us? Many of this degeneracy can be attributed to culture not capitalism.

>>39373916
no, with pro wrestling everyone is having a good time and not plunging the world back into the pre WWII facism v communism pissing contest

>>39373754
Yeah, you can never expect everyone to follow the rules, regardless of what they are. You too, anon.

File: 1496801642270.jpg (57KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x500px

social-liberal centrist... idk.

the government should make sure no one gets fucked over, and ensures everyone has the mean to succeed, and also ensure people are given enough to bounce back when they get fucked.

pretty much welfare is replaced with workfare. Unemployment is the biggest threat to my society.