Have any robots used photofeeler? It's a site where you

File: Tfw+when+no+gf+_7b64009d7b9b98ae914d8de89f7a9fdb.png (26KB, 584x700px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 584x700px

someone please reply and tell me they know this feel.

Never knew about this, I'll have to try it out. Are you sure you're a 4/10, or are you just not trying hard enough to make yourself look the best you can?

I will try it. How long did it take to get results?

>>39213626
Depends on what age group you select and how fast you can build up your karma.

The site actually has a cool strategy. When you rate pics of others, you get karma..a point system that build ups; to low, medium, high. Then your pic starts getting rated and uses up your karma. Then you have to rate more. So it doesn't allow you to just set back and get rated.

20 rates equal a standard rate. anything lower and the system tells you it might not be as accurate.

If you select all ages, you get rated in a couple hours. I changed mine to a smaller age range,and it takes a while longer.

>>39213610
Man I've did everything I can. I'm pretty fit now. Dress well, different hairstyle. Even went to photofeelers blog and tried to use their adjustments.

>>39213290

>1 vote
>Attractiveness nonexistent

A-at least you look smart right haha

>get anonymously rated

don't cry over spilled milk you stupid nigger, you can't even be sure any of those votes are from women, where do you even think you are? why do you think everybody on here is such an autistic cunt? anonymity

any human being + internet anonymity = the chance to be a huge dick just for fun

go out into the street and ask 57 women if you are attractive and if they all say you look like an inbred serial rapist then you can kys

>>39213290
I got to the phase where I vote on others and I'm putting down so many 1s, I think the internet ruined me.

File: scores.jpg (136KB, 1600x556px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1600x556px

They also break down your scores and give you notes. The scores are from my highest pic which said I was a 4/10...no kidding.

Second screen is the one I had the most notes in...I was a 3/10 on that one.

File: Capture.jpg (44KB, 818x365px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 818x365px

>>39213751
For what it's worth, I give all women 0 on trustworthiness...thanks /r9k/

>>39213765
Doesn't make much sense to me to try and translate this to the 1 to 10 rating system. I'm voting and the way I see it is: 0 is not attractive, 1 means average or needs work, 2 is attractive, 3 is hot as hell.

8 people found you hot and you complain, why anon.

>>39213290
god fucking damnit
the only picture i have of myself is in carl's junior with the artificial light glittering off my oily forehead, while i pose like smug pepe in front of the tendies poster
i hate myself so fucking much

>>39213290
how do you know it's woman?

Am trying it now.

>>39214215
You can decide if you want males, females or both to rate you.

>>39213290
Anon it all depends on angles and lighting, 80% of you autists need to visit a stylist and professional photographer

>>39213829
0-1 for smartness too.

>>39214255

So? Pretty sure it means how do you know people listed "women" are actually women.

There's no way of knowing actual females are rating you

Femannon trying this. I'll post results once I hit 10+

>>39214261
>professional photographer

Nobody fucking does this outside of people who do modelling. It's not something that real normal people do you gormless retard.

Professional photos also stand out like a sore thumb, just like fat girl angles do.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-21 at 8.14.34 AM.png (54KB, 815x465px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 815x465px

i was almost smart

>>39214386
>>39214374
There's a lot of average, awkward and ugly women(most real women fall into these categories) on the site and you need to vote to get rated so the idea that real women are voting on you is at least believable.

There only seems to be like 15 guys on this site under dating pics because when I'm rating them I get same dude different pose.

>>39214551
That's probably because the rest of the blokes are too lazy to keep rating

There are a lot of girls with tall foreheads.

>>39213290

>women caring about trustworthyness or smarts

There should be a fourth: character

>>39214652
Totally agree, there's a guy on here who looks like he plays with katana in his spare time and intelligence/trustworthiness don't really cut it.

File: fuck u r9k -(.jpg (128KB, 682x545px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 682x545px

why :(
originally, mean!

>>39214786
Show the pic!

File: IMG_20170821_163842.jpg (64KB, 667x562px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 667x562px

Femannon, 25, both guys and girls could vote.

>>39214805
too hurt :((((((((((((((((

>>39214857
What could anyone here say that's worse than what the ratings have already said?

>>39214840
It's 5/4/6 now.

File: waHfDTo.jpg (53KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x250px

>attractiveness
"no"
k t-thanks

File: IMG_20170821_172154.png (119KB, 1080x1076px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1080x1076px

It's like they're looking into my soul!

>>39215529
that's why I hate photos, it's a half step to letting people read your mind.

>>39215637
That's why I never post pics here desu

File: ri3z7tz9043fuog0.jpg (43KB, 1035x562px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1035x562px

welp

orignalo

>>39215880
harsh I'd give you a 2. what were the comments

>>39216036
"would prefer if it didn't look like a selfie"
nothing else

For an experiment I put up another picture but wearing my glasses and with books in the background. My intelligence score went up but my attractiveness went down. Same angle, same lighting same clothes just glasses and background. I guess guys don't think smart girls are pretty *shrug*

File: Capture.png (42KB, 866x567px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 866x567px

i dont think i look dumb

File: cry.jpg (18KB, 600x238px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 600x238px

why does every one think I look young? am I just cursed with a baby face, can I fix this? Not just this site but IRL people say it too. If they would at least just say I looked ugly I'd understand but what the fuck is this.

>>39216424
bruh you dont need brains, halo effect will do the work for you

ive had like 8 people ask if i was depressed

File: 2017-08-21 13_53_25-Photofeeler - My Tests.png (34KB, 1446x789px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1446x789px

>>39213290
How am I such a divisive person

what comments are you all getting?

>>39216930
Lame stuff.
>Seems a bit too close-up. Would prefer if it weren't cropped as tightly.
>Would prefer if it didn't seem like a selfie.

>>39216930
>Would prefer it shot from a different angle.
>Would prefer if it didn't seem like a selfie.
>Great smile!
>I would date them!

>Would prefer it cropped differently.

File: 1425720773388.jpg (85KB, 804x802px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 804x802px

>>39216930
>I think they seem a bit young in this photo.
>I think they seem a bit timid in this photo.
>Smile seems a bit forced to me.

I actualy don't know how to smile anymore it just looks like pic related no matter what I do.

>>39217154
Exactly this. My normie friend was trying to get me to take pics and be more social. Everytime he tried to snap a photo, he was like smile. Anon what are you doing? I don't even know how to do it.

>>39216930
>Finally post a pic where I'm smiling
>I think they seem a bit young in this photo.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I'm loving seeing all the obviously robot pictures!

File: Screenshot_2017-08-22-04-32-45-1.jpg (859KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 1440x2560px

Fucking under average, noice.
Time for that black pill.

>>39217502
Only one vote!

File: gg.png (38KB, 873x586px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 873x586px

Im doing better than i thought to be honest.

>>39217960
Post those notes mang

>>39217960
yea going to need to see those notes

>>39217977
>>39218093

This is me: >>39217083
You have been muted for 4 seconds, because your comment was not original.

Guys on this are loads more picky than they are online dating.

>>39218135
because you don't need to take your own atractiveness into consideration.

>>39218160
So online dating it's relatively but this is all objective... Neat!

>>39218200
Yeah, it's pretty interesting, women can be objective in dating sites while men are forced to be more relative.

>>39218326
Isn't that inherently flawed though, us girls would never find anyone because our opinion on where we sit in the 0-10 scale is probably wrong meaning we'd always pass up on those contacting us.

>>39218493
every one has to weigh up maxing out their partners atractiveness vs probability of actualy finding a partner. Probably someones got their phd in game theory on this very subject.

>>39218549
One day AI will be advanced enough to just auto pair you with someone of equal objective beauty.

Alright so I just went on there and every time I got an asian I added the note "I think they seem a bit tired in this photo" and every time I got a nigger I added the note "Would prefer if it weren't so dark"

>>39218608
Senpai please teach me to be an edgelord just like you!

File: ag.png (6KB, 253x128px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 253x128px

I know im hot but wow didnt expect this

>>39218608
i put "Would prefer direct eye contact." to a girl who had crossed eyes

File: 2f7.jpg (94KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 601x508px

>>39219223
haha y-yea, m-me too bro. haha cant keep them back r-right? it's like b-back up ladies one at a time haha

File: 1792.png (278KB, 376x379px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 376x379px

I was rating normies and this fucking nigger shows up. I spilled my water on my keyboard kek.

File: 1.png (247KB, 1219x579px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1219x579px

I think this system is rigged

>I think they look a little sad in this photo. [...] If they were wearing something nicer, they'd look quite handsome.
closest thing I've had to a complement, how does one look unsad?

File: IMG_2894.jpg (56KB, 640x569px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x569px

expected to be saddened by results. im actually ok with this.

File: eet.png (16KB, 794x438px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 794x438px

>>39219279
yeah bro, ahaha im just here to laugh at losers, i bet you're the same, right anon? you're not one of these losers are you?

File: m8.png (20KB, 893x514px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 893x514px

dont know what to think of this

>>39216930
Not getting votes and the shit site doesn't allow me to vote and lies there are no more photos left and wants me to buy its shit credits, but I won't because I am not a retarded normo

how long do get votes?

>>39219910
it takes hours to get votes if you are just doing it off karma

>>39214082
Literally this
Either OP is autistic or is just an attention whore. Says he got a 4/10 yet was considered attractive and very attractive multiple times? I would get a 0 for attractiveness through all

File: 1.png (241KB, 1098x559px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1098x559px

Why are normies so fucking serious? Don't they get that it is a fucking meme

>>39220285
I think the person actually got the joke and went on with it thats why he made the comment and not just voted your pic and moved on.

>>39219560
>you will never be shifty retard Chad

File: Capture.jpg (44KB, 630x562px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 630x562px

"eh could be worse" the man said in an attempt to be original

Who posted the Spartan guy

Been up for about an hour at max karma, still no votes.

What does it mean?

>>39221083
it takes ages come back to it in a few hourse

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-21 at 5.01.36 PM.png (66KB, 821x576px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 821x576px

I'm honestly confused on how you rate someone's intelligence via photo? Nonetheless, I'm surprised by the results.

>>39216421
You act like I don't love girls with glasses

File: ri2alm1okb9k4kk0.jpg (45KB, 1035x562px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1035x562px

the truth hurts :C

File: 1404098287212s.jpg (7KB, 250x222px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x222px

So many ugly white girls

How the fuck do I change my pictures category, I accidentally left it in social.

File: 1stvote.png (26KB, 849x590px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 849x590px

YYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH

They think I'm dumb though

>>39221843
I voted you as unattractive only because I don't like the color red

>>39213765
Stop wearing sunglasses.

File: 2017-08-21 19_51_35-Photofeeler - My Tests.png (14KB, 1383x359px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 1383x359px

I'M 22 REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: 1488320716658.png (71KB, 1547x902px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1547x902px

>>39213290
the notes were "they look tired/sad" :(

File: IMG_2902.jpg (39KB, 640x477px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x477px

feels good. OREEEEGEEEINAAL

File: Screenshot_2017-08-21-20-36-56.png (819KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

819KB, 1440x2560px

>>39213290
Only 6 voters so far. Females only
>tfw part of the 20% for 80/20 rule

>>39224900
why are you even here? The be confident meme was litterally made for people like you

>>39224931
I despise the modern female. I could probably get sex whenever, but I want a loyal, wholesome wife. There's nothing but immature sluts fucking around and I won't be another Chad contributing to the issue.

File: 1482630330705.png (42KB, 655x509px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 655x509px

>2 votes
>Smart: 23%
>Trustworthy: 13%
>Attractiveness: 49%

>>39225242
Give it time, my son

>>39225145
search in rural areas/outside the US/westernized world

File: 191458.jpg (10KB, 261x195px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 261x195px

I got six comments saying I was young. The ratings weren't that good either. Maybe they thought I was jail bait, but I'm not. Love me anonymous girls, please.

File: Laura.png (1021KB, 742x469px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 742x469px

>>39225283

It's been like 3 or so hours though

>morning time
>nothing but 5/10s and below
>10 PM
>at least 3 qts for every average/so-so chick
Was getting tired of giving nothing but 1s, it's soul crushing.

File: [sage]_Daily_Lives_of_High_School_Boys_-_02_[720p][10bit][2030E489].mkv_snapshot_07.27_[2013.09.19_02.55.12].jpg (88KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1280x720px

>>39225283
>>39225513

Nevermind it's at 4 votes numbers sit at 57,36,43

I'm getting uglier.

File: 1495733958.jpg (87KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1080x720px

>>39218608
absolutely epin

>>39225536

6 votes: 40%

They're so cruel

File: 2017-08-21 22_41_03-Photofeeler - My Tests.png (63KB, 1664x1201px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1664x1201px

>Rated attractive by a girl who normally rates low
Wew

also I have the trust of the normies in the palms of my hands, muahahaha

>>39225536
>>39225856
>>39225528
>>39225468
Don't say it prove it cucks
Post your stats

>>39225887
I was talking about voting others, not my own votes.

>>39225870
You were also rated low by a girl that rates everyone else high
Let that sink in

>>39225932
Nah pham, left is high voter, right is low voter. She's picky toward everyone.

File: 1499515407178.jpg (157KB, 731x630px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 731x630px

>tfw I dont have a decent picture.

>>39217502
are you the mop of hair guy?

File: votes.png (6KB, 268x133px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 268x133px

>>39225887

Things are actually coming up

>>39221843
I voted you 2,1, and either 1 or 2. To be fair you had men on voting and you wouldn't really be my type if i was a faggot. kind of girly

I'm almost convinced being photogenic is a feminine trait.

Most men aren't photogenic since they spend less time meticulously posing for selfies. The chad models need a team of people to make them photogenic.

I know a guy that models for j crew and he looks like a fucking dweeb irl. Obviously he has some good features, but it takes a skilled photographer to make him look good chad like in photos. Otherwise he looks like your run of the mill metrosexual.

File: Screenshot (9).png (23KB, 633x266px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 633x266px

What did they mean by this?
>rate some roasties 0 on everything
>there's a qt that i like so rate her higher than the others
>this shows up

File: hjhj.png (207KB, 1292x663px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1292x663px

I'm doing good so far

File: Capture.png (17KB, 864x147px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 864x147px

Yes, apparently I'm an untrustworthy retard with some good looks

File: QuickMemo+_2017-08-22-09-10-22.png (91KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 540x960px

24 y.o. khv reporting
why is this happening to me?

>>39213528
I posted my dick in a cock rate and I was told I would never please a woman. When I asked what I should do someone replied "reincarnate". Face is cute apparently so maybe that will save me.

>tfw one I would date them

>>39215880
>>39216094
holy fuck anon im sorry, youre not even bad looking this is literally why im not posting on that site

File: photofeel.png (145KB, 1195x593px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1195x593px

What's the quality supposed to mean?

>>39213765
Fuck off with the sunglasses, the eclipse is over.

>>39229028
Possibly the sum of the smart, attractiveness and trustworthiness qualities. Kind of a retarded system since it doesn't account for being absolutely fucking retarded but as hot as Chad. Or the fact that pretty much everyone has the "Rough" quality. This website is absolutely fucking flawed. Not to mention all of the qualities listed majorly correlate because of women's tastes. For example, horrible trustworthiness may make you (psychologically) less attractive to a female, as is hot nerds to ugly nerds.

>>39229028
>>39229209
Sample size = Quality

You retards know that this is rating the quality of the photo, not how attractive you actually are right? I've uploaded different pics of me and gotten everything from 9% attractive to 85%.

File: fd.jpg (37KB, 810x500px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 810x500px

I mean, I don't know if I should just shut it down at this point.

>>39221843
Aaaah what a CUTIE
Would rate you 2/2/3 no homo

this seems like a really great way to hate myself a bit more
I'm on the fence about doing it but will definitely remember

File: IMG_20170822_091134.jpg (101KB, 1079x586px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1079x586px

Left it going for 12 hours.

File: Screenshot from 2017-08-22 10:13:17.png (15KB, 554x134px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 554x134px

the premise of the website is right, it all depends on what photo you use. personally i prefer the picture that didn't test well but the other one is more normie-friendly because i'm outside, smiling, and wearing better clothes

Smart: 51%
Average
Trustworthy: 49%
Average
Attractive: 93%
Top 10%

Only 2 votes in about 6 hours though, what the fuck? I even maxed out that karma shit

File: dj-khaled-you-mine-vid-2015-billboard-650.jpg (50KB, 636x421px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 636x421px

>>39229028
You smart. You loyal.
You smart. You loyal.

File: D70822-123326.png (223KB, 720x1184px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 720x1184px

Are people lying to me when they say I'm a 7?

>>39231201
It would appear so. Also consider your attractiveness relative to others in your area. Im a British 8 but American 5.

>vote no no no on every asian picture
>"our system has detected a pattern with your voting, poor quality votes earn less points"
asians are gross and ugly, deal with it cunts

File: 1447801988837.jpg (357KB, 775x502px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 775x502px

>>39229028
>he wears glasses so he is smart

this looks fun

maybe i can try this instead of getting rated on a shitty /soc/ thread

>>39231562
>Email signup is temporarily unavailable. Please choose a social signup link below.


wtf i dont have facebook how do i sign in then

File: fucks.gif (614KB, 242x200px) Image search: [Google]

614KB, 242x200px

>>39213290

Either most users are faggots

Or just bots pretending to be girls

Knowing how these sites get their initial traction and "users" through spam and click farms (airbnb did it, reddit did it, etc) it must be that

>>39230469
I think the interesting thing is trying to find an honest answer with out "cheeting"
ie not slapping glasses on and some books in the background to boost "smartness"

or seeing how bad of a photo you can bost and still get good results

File: Screenshot_20170822-133925.png (384KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 1080x1920px

They think they seem a bit too agressive in this photo
They think they seem a bit too agressive in this photo
They think they seem a bit too agressive in this photo
The fuck am I supposed to do?

File: just as planned.png (6KB, 260x125px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 260x125px

Pretty much what I expected, even the smartness being underestimated because of the old "if you're good looking you must be dumb" trope.

>>39231896
Might have something to do with the grimace and pointing???

File: 1434958546449.png (78KB, 308x320px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 308x320px

>>39231896
pic somewhat related?

>>39231955
And this anon is right.

File: Screenshot_20170822-152526.png (124KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 720x1280px

Is this a joke ?

Xkxkdkdkd

Op here, I've tried about 10-20 pictures and only had one that I was rated average in (4/10). This site is killing me.

File: fd.jpg (34KB, 782x277px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 782x277px

>Cryingpepe.jpg

File: fd2.jpg (46KB, 812x439px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 812x439px

>>39233811
I don't feel bad about this though

>>39232923
I love this game. Shoot up the normies.

File: Capture.jpg (22KB, 807x166px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 807x166px

>>39233816
what's your percentage though?

This gave me a 43 which is still low, I don't know how they calculate it.

>>39233793
Why aren't I getting rates ? Got one in 3 hours.
The only filter I enabled is females, all ages.
My karma is max.

File: 2.png (308KB, 1300x681px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1300x681px

Nigga pliis. I have 164 IQ

>>39233985
If you're a free member, they intentionally slow your results down. Sometimes it's slower depending on how many women are on.

I usually wait a couple hours and come back and all my karma is gone with a bunch of votes. And then I either redo it (if the pic has potential) or just delete and start over.

File: 1.png (344KB, 1270x594px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1270x594px

I hope this is presentable enough.

File: Capture.jpg (11KB, 549x81px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 549x81px

is standard the highest you can go on quality? Or does it have a different level with more votes?

>>39234006
So you're a paid member ?

>>39234038
wouldn't mind seeing someone try with a chad.

>>39234064
No, but I think I read that somewhere on their site. I could be wrong.

There might just not be a lot of women on that site. It is a little unknown. On top of the fact women are validated 24/7 that they don't need websites like men do.

>>39234064
also, i think if you vote on business photos, you accrue karma faster. then social. dating is the lowest, or that's how it feels to me.

>>39231896
kek you fuken sperg i rated you 0,0,1. Did you try to look like a demon henchman?

File: IMG_20170822_171958.jpg (47KB, 330x525px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 330x525px

>>39234105
Lmao I just uploaded my photo wearing my uncles military uniform which is tight on me a bit.
Scored 80 percent attractiveness and 90 percent intelligence.

A normal photo was 50 percent on both.
Pic related

>>39234446
Just one vote though. I can tell you from experience it can drop big time with a few more votes.

File: IMG_0214.jpg (106KB, 750x1096px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 750x1096px

t-t-this can not be t-t-true

File: 2017-08-22 10_56_29-Photofeeler - My Tests.png (57KB, 1628x1157px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 1628x1157px

>11 women find me attractive
God damn, I'm really surprised by this. Should I stop being a hermit NEET and start going outside?

File: long arm dude.png (1MB, 929x667px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 929x667px

>>39219301
wtf is this real? He looks like a darkdweller from Dark Souls 2

>>39231562
>>39231630
fucking reply to me reeeeee i want to use the site

>>39219301
Hope you rated 3s across the board.

>>39235124
Email worked on my PC :^)

>>39235162
i wonder why it won't let me sign up then

i'll change my ip and see if that helps

>>39234446
Honestly you're probably getting attractiveness votes because his uniform fits your frame really well. The outfit is on-point.

File: images (13).jpg (17KB, 355x415px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 355x415px

When did this board turn into soc. Jesus Christ

File: reee.png (3KB, 554x91px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 554x91px

reeeeeeeeeee rate me

>>39235270
Used to be worse before the second sticky.

>>39235394
>get a rating
>all "somewhat"

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>39235451
holy shit this was a mistake

i got a good rating now and i am addicted already

hello yes
when do the votes come in?

>r9k
>still hasnt learned to steer clear of the minefield that is social validation
Where did all the robros go?

File: no fair.jpg (39KB, 804x447px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 804x447px

noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo


help me

File: Capture.png (6KB, 259x123px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 259x123px

Iife on easymode

File: Screenshot_14.png (103KB, 552x449px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 552x449px

I'm surprised, always considered myself 7 at best... I guess selecting good photo helps

File: 1501951646219.jpg (48KB, 865x526px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 865x526px

>women are too stupid with computers to know how to reverse image search
>post pic of Chad from Google images
>profit

File: 1434309037074.png (19KB, 503x644px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 503x644px

women underrate guys, their standards are stupidly high

so yeah don't think too much about it if you get rated badly

>>39235956
that has more to do with the nature of dating sites and suply/demand

File: 1423436713642.png (30KB, 801x324px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 801x324px

>>39235989
yeah what's that nature?

it's filled with ugly people and males are overrating females and females are rating males honestly?

I tried three photos and all of them just get one vote during the first 30 minutes after posting. Something scummy is going on. I suspect it is all bots and there are very few real users.

>>39235247
I guess so.. The pants were so tight they almost burst. He's much thinner than me.

File: Laura.png (201KB, 1281x539px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1281x539px

let us see howeth this goes

>>39235270

>Anything that isn't constant self loathing is soc

Fuck off

>>39236079
And they all remain on 1 vote after that.

>>39236079
or maybe it's because people are spamming it with troll shit like >>39236084 >>39234550 >>39234038 >>39233009 >>39231896

>pity rate ugly people as somewhat
>get rated poorly

fuck u roasties im going all out

File: Screenshot_20170822-191413.png (250KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 720x1280px

Lmao thanks uncle F.

>>39236077
they are all chocka-block with guys and a handfull of girls so the guys have to get what they can, rating those woman higher to boost their ego "she's not that bad"

where as girls can generaly take their pick.

men are rating the majority and lumping the top few in the hotest catagory where as woman are rating the hotest few and lumping the rest in the bottom catagory

File: 1502910889193.jpg (91KB, 336x442px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 336x442px

>>39236084
BAHAHAAA
I just voted on that one dude, hit all nos.
I commented "Very funny"

File: Screenshot_20170822-192444.png (282KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 720x1280px

>>39236084
Faggot, you are ruining the site. Pic related.

File: 1467875522420.png (17KB, 633x772px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 633x772px

>>39236160
I also pity rate people I would normally rate as stupid or not trustworthy at all as somewhat.
If I start getting nos I'mma be hitting those nos too.

I've never even heard of this pathetic site. Do you guys honestly think there are actual women sitting on this pointless site rating the attractiveness scores of sub-par people that are insecure enough with themselves to upload photos to such a unknown website?

It's probably to test some algorithm that mimics female preferences.

File: gae.png (256KB, 1162x512px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1162x512px

>>39235151
high chance he didnt

>>39236410
I was using it and rating guys. Then clowns started posting memes and now there's no point.

>>39215880
looks alright 2 me senpai, but get some better hair and try to give a legit-looking smile instead of giving that autism look

>>39236410
>It's probably to test some algorithm that mimics female preferences
whats the difference?

>>39236084
This isn't appropriate but I keked so fucking hard

File: Screenshot_20170822-095058.jpg (49KB, 635x399px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 635x399px

I think i'm doing pretty good. I'm surprised they rated me so high.

File: 12313845_1649135775337988_8214827210700314551_n.jpg (35KB, 640x463px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x463px

>>39229028
>negro
>trustworthy

So apparently girls think im reasonably hot, but also a fucking idiot and not trustworthy.

>>39235270
Fuck off, read OP.

As long as they aren't posting their own pics here looking for ratings, it's not social. They're posting screenshots from a rating site.

He asked for permission in first post, and mods have left it up for over a day. That means it's all good.

>>39236419
>>39235151

I did infact rate this 3 across the board.

File: 23832bf1e92cc37f072c068c79098ad6d6dfc1e57faf54d039e263399443670e.jpg (124KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 633x758px

This site really is the final black pill. These are women just rating you with no pressure. It's not a dating site. You can't see them. They know you can't harass them if they rate you low.

I've tried multiple pics and can't even get average.

The site says it's not your face, but the photo. We all know that's bullshit.

I can't believe I even tried in the past on apps like tinder or OKC.

File: 1870.jpg (46KB, 680x684px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 680x684px

>>39234425
>demon henchman
>>39236137
>>39232923
>>39231955

Wtf is wrong with you? I was just making a funny expression.
I was the scary clown that beat up normoids in hs.
And I am the scary clown again rated by people that don't even know me?
The fuck is this shit?
I thought I was scary in hs because I bullied faggots, but I guess I am just a creepy kiddo.

>>39238056
If you're not good looking you can definitely drop Tinder, but OKC can still work since there's a lot more place for words in the profile and it's easy to send long messages.

File: IMG_1087.jpg (48KB, 429x679px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 429x679px

GUESS WHOS TAKING THE FIRST TRAIN OUT OF ROBOTVILLE. JOKES ON THESE WHORES THOUGH, IM WAY SMARTER THAN I AM ATTRACTIVE AND IM NOT TRUSTWORTHY AT ALL HAHAHAHAAH CHAD TOWN HERE I COME

>>39238550
How long did you wait for 19 votes ?

File: Screenshot_20170822-144553.png (95KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1080x1920px

Ouchies, this really hurts, a lot.

>>39238585
Pretty much a full day. I made it yesterday afternoon. I had no karma though, I didn't know how it worked so I only voted on like 10 people. Came home from work and was greeted by above average.

File: wtf.png (9KB, 631x259px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 631x259px

let me just get my normie friends to take a picture of me

fuck u roasties

>voting a bunch
>see a really sweet looking cute girl
>about to leave my contact info in a custom comment
>chicken out

>>39238877
thats honestly creepy and beta so its good you didnt

how do i sort my ratings by gender

>>39238890
>creepy and beta
only if you're an uggo manlet

>>39238925
it wouldn't be creepy if it was allowed and there was a way to contact but there isnt

you are a creep

>>39238877
what did she look like?

You have been muted for 4 seconds, because your comment was not original.rtrtrt

File: qt.jpg (39KB, 343x413px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 343x413px

i saved 2 pics from the site heres one

>>39239017
I bet 1 billion dollars she's a cosplayer

File: qt2.png (219KB, 320x313px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 320x313px

>>39239028
heres the other one

she is cute too

>>39238961
whatever, I should have done it anyway
>>39238995
dirty blonde, very slightly manly face but feminine, pale skin, dark red lipstick, almost brown. Looked like the perfect wife.

>>39213290
reminder to never upload a pic of you on sites "casually" shilled on this shithole

"antifa" aka many three letter agencies are farming retards to dox

>>39239064
it's a popular site though look at it

>>39239064
fuck off /pol/ god damn i'm so tired of the antifa vs white trash feud.

>>39239017
Goddamn I saw her too

T H I C C

there was a girl with long brown hair and big smile, too bad she looks like a typical stacy.

>>39239017
post more arcanine is a pokemon

>>39239185
dont have any dude you get 1 pic to rate

File: d.png (37KB, 887x641px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 887x641px

o okay then

>>39227770
post pic faggot iop h uoh

>>39238651
> I didn't know how it worked
> hahahahah I AM WAAY SMARTER HAHAHHA

I thought I was more attractive than anything else but I guess I was wrong

File: smrt.png (7KB, 263x125px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 263x125px

>>39240375
Forgot to include this here pic

File: p1pc8s1gcbmg0cck.jpg (53KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 600x600px

>>39239754
who is her???
found while voting

>>39240424
>who is her??
My mom

>discreet smile with just lips because I have busted teeth
>"Would prefer if they were smiling more."
f-fuck you too