If love can transcend gender and race, why can't love

Because Jews and feminists

love doesn't transcend anything
it's the simple result of attraction calculus

File: 1443216786207.png (787KB, 633x947px) Image search: [Google]

787KB, 633x947px

i hope one day hebephilia will be more socially acceptable in the west again

Because she'll eventually grow up into a vapid old hag. Lolis are for pump and dump, nothing more.

>>39142259
>Lolis are for pump and dump

that's awful

>>39142311
if you don't take that comment seriously and think of it as a crude joke, it's kind of hilarious.

>>39142199
No you fucking sicko.

It can. When they are fully matured.

File: dissatisfied caitlyn j.jpg (35KB, 525x288px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 525x288px

>>39142199
Because children don't have developed personalities?

That picture is top cute. I wish I had a naive loli gf who loved me and only held childish expectations of me.

>Baby sucks nipple
>Perfectly natural and beautiful
>Baby sucks penis
>Most evil thing in the world

>>39142565
Some races develop less than others. Does that make it wrong to flirt with an African bushgirl?

File: image.jpg (180KB, 1024x710px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1024x710px

>>39142218
First post best post
Orinalding

nice bait fool

origigaga

>>39142585
Do you really need to be told why those are not a fair comparison?

>>39142199
>muh age meme
Kids aren't fertile. This isn't natural or evolutionary. You are a faggot and a degenerate.

>>39143587
Dumbass redditor actually seriously responded.

>>39143598
Are you implying a relationship is only legitimate when the couple is capable of producing children? Then what about gay marriage and old couples who've outgrown fertility?

>>39143657
You're right. A relationship is about the emotional connection. There is no one on this planet so capable of love as a little girl or a lonely young man. Lolicon liberation now!

File: 310px-NAMBLA_logo.svg.png (6KB, 310x60px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 310x60px

>>39142199
I concur. Hopefully the NAMBLA movement takes off someday. The Libertarian party is our best point of entry.

>>39143657
>B-but gay marriage!
That wasn't the argument, faggot. Pedos, fags, trannies are all degenerate.

I think anything from 13+ should be legal for dating and socially accepted, but sex should be from 15+. Obviously it'll be behind closed doors, but the social stigma should be killed; once they're a teen they should be allowed to explore their sexuality however they want

the real question is can you transcend their fathers beating the dick off of you?

>>39143801
Part of your argument was that kids weren't fertile. Neither are old people past a certain age, yet they can marry.

Besides, homosexuality probably is natural, considering there's evidence of it existing throughout history, unlike some fad like gender spectrum theory.

File: scurry.png (47KB, 147x149px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 147x149px

>>39143801
>I hate degeneracy!
>But I spend my time on 4chan
Get a load of this guy!