Will girls ever become chaste and modest again? Will the great

>>38916022
Nope, shit's fucked.

I really really like asses and her's quite a nice one but I just can't appreciate twerking. It looks like they're having a stroke.

>>38916022
When Jesus comes back, women will be put back into their place. Because all the women who exalt themselves above a man and have hatred against males that fuel their female collectivism will be 3700 miles beneath the Earth in hell. With flesh that can regenerate and not age for all eternity suffering.

Human flesh use to be immortal until we sinned.

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/researchers-discover-switch-old-cells/

>>38916049
also /r/ing modernwoman1.webm

>>38916022
>Will girls ever become chaste and modest again? Will the great pendulum of time bring them back?


This wont happen if men don't sort themselves out.

>>38916022
There has never been a time when all women were chaste and modest. There have always been big ol whores running around in every human society. The only difference is that they weren't celebrated like they are now. You may be the descendant of a king but may not be part of the royal family because your female ancestor was some whore that got fucked at a royal gangbang and ended up pregnant.

File: 1500175179108.webm (1MB, 800x338px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x338px

Maybe they've always been carnal animals and the net only revealed their true form.

File: 8765123453t254.png (269KB, 640x412px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 640x412px

Soon my brothers.

>>38916132
Even they were getting it on. Read the Bible and the Quran and see what they were doing to whores back then. The fact that they felt like they had to go to those lengths proves that even religion won't stop a hoe from hoeing.

>>38916022
Only way to fix things is to bring back a puritanical society, and kill off all women who show any amount of promiscuity.

God twerking is the most disgusting shit in the fucking world

File: 1501550128851.jpg (26KB, 480x496px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 480x496px

>>38916209
It's literally a nigger mating dance. Shows you how fucked society is.
>tfw saw little girls doing it and their mothers laughing

File: kissgirls4.webm (2MB, 480x853px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x853px

>>38916203
It didn't work the first time around, they hide for hundreds of years and bided their time.

File: 1351187827184.jpg (25KB, 312x247px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 312x247px

>>38916102
delete this with originality

>>38916022
It's fucking disgusting.
Where did the all good women go?

>>38916022
I just want a respectable woman with morals and values. But I can't find one anywhere. Even the unattractive women who appear to are only so because they're unattractive. Should I just give up?

>>38916095
That's objectively untrue and we have studies on the subject, anon. Stop gaslighting history.

>>38916022
Eventually. Bear in mind that sexual liberation tends to correlate with civilizational waning or collapse. You were born just in time to try and carve out meaning in a decaying society.

>>38916022
I'm no expert on twerking but isn't she doing it completely wrong? She is moving her entire legs basically to make the fat on her ass shake - aren't you supposed to get that effect by simple using your thigh and butt muscles? :thinking:

>>38916383
You just use words you don't understand.

>>38916390
kill yourself you obnoxious nigger bitch.

>>38916102
I'm going to need a source or name on that. Been seeing this for a while but all of a sudden I'm curious. Mondays, you know, haha........

>>38916405
Great argument anon. Society today is far more promiscuous than it was years ago. Please go read ANYTHING on this subject, you complete fucking moron.

File: 7Tdj8QK.png (535KB, 936x662px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 936x662px

get on Agatha's chaste level

>>38916022
When the great brown wave of Islam covers the Earth, its about the only part im excited for

>>38916517
Now you are employing a strawman fallacy. You really are quite dim-witted.

>>38916573
You have to present an argument for me to strawman it, reddit.

Please, make your case I'm dying to see it.

>>38916022
No, not as long as Western civilisation exists, when it is uprooted and another order takes it's place it will reinstate decency among women, in whatever manner it chooses.

File: modern_female.jpg (65KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x600px

>comparing society from hundreds of years ago to now where we can (and do) broadcast sex all over the world with millions and millions of viewers

>>38916604
Try looking at the post you responded to:
>There has never been a time when all women were chaste and modest
Does this sound like:
>Society today is exactly as promiscuous as it was years ago
No? How about you graduate high school and then come back here?

>>38916647
So you're going to give NOTHING else, and present that statement alone as your argument?

Okay, well, let's take a look at the findings of Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey. Kinsey was a self-styled "sexologist" and one of the pioneers into the modern study of human sexuality and sexual behavior. In the late 40s-50s, Kinsey published some books on sexual behavior in America. His most notable works were: "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male," and "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female."

In these works, he presented a host of statistics regarding sexuality, orientation, behavior etc. One of the things he looked into was the status of one's virginity when they were married.

Now, I'm sure you're getting ready to tell me how people lie, how promiscuity was frowned upon back then, etc. so let's look at the types of people Kinsey interviewed. When looking at Kinsey's interviewees, one will find that Kinsey oversampled:

>Homosexuals (notably more promiscuous than heterosexuals)
>Sexual abuse victims (notably more promiscuous)
>Prison inmates convicted of sex crimes (more promiscuous)
etc.

Kinsey did all sorts of things like this. In fact in SBitHF, he even redefined marriage as 'living with a member of the opposite sex for over 1 year.' This led to a handful of literal prostitutes living with their pimps being included.

Beyond that, though, Kinsey's work relied solely on volunteers, and a later Stanford study found that volunteers for sex studies are ~2-4 times more promiscuous than average.

Yet, even when looking at Kinsey's data, which is skewed towards immodesty and indecency, one finds that people were less promiscuous then, than they are now (Methodology for studies like this was largely fixed by the 1970s). The rate of people losing their virginity to their spouse has been on a steady decline.

How about you bother reading something about a subject before coming here and rattling off your guesses as fact?

>>38916022
Remember when twerking was strictly a Black thing?

>>38916102
more like this pls originality

>>38916022
I think you guys got it wrong on a base level.

Women were never chaste and modest to begin with. They had to pretend because it was the only way for them to prevent people for beating the shit out of them for being sluts.

Slut shaming and whore killing was an accepted thing in the past. You all fucked up the moment you allowed a few minority or rich women to fuck up our society with all the female rights bullshit.

In fact, our society is a live-record of what happens when you let women run free. They fuck up everything.

>>38916904
Are you capable of reading a very simple sentence? There has never been a time when all women were chaste and modest.
Does this sentence mean people today are not any more promiscuous than they were in the past?
I'll give you a gold star if you can answer this one, big boy.

>>38916022
>Will girls ever become chaste and modest again?
Only if it's become fashionable. Women are dependent on what other women do.

>>38916022
Looks ok to me, flamingo.

>>38917033
>I s-said "all"

So we're at a point now where, either you're trying to pretend your statement had no implication, or you genuinely didn't mean to imply anything, but instead made a statement that has no value whatsoever.

>>38917097
>There have always been big ol whores running around in every human society. The only difference is that they weren't celebrated like they are now.
Try reading before you respond lil nig. It will save you a ton of embarrasment.

>>38916022
The Puritans and Victorians were right.
Things will be fucked until the western empires collapse.

>>38917113
>There have always been whores.
Technically true, but absolutely meaningless on its own. What matters is how many. When the OP talks about "women" he's talking about a generalized collective, the average. Whores existing in a tiny minority simply aren't relevant to that statement.

>The only difference is that they weren't celebrated like they are now.
>people actually think this.

>>38916362
I gave up years ago. Originally.

File: FearfulOpulentFoal.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

I don't know why women worship girls like this. I really don/t

File: lsa.jpg (713KB, 1280x1655px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 1280x1655px

Where did they all go... I want to find them.

>>38917169
It is female nature to be whores. A little peasant lady in the middle ages couldn't whore around, because her husband would disown her or worse. Even then, if you look at some the oldest churches in Europe, you'll see that a lot decorations have been removed later for being found debauched. Even with all the repercussions, people sleeping around and spreading sexual diseases was still a common occurrence back then.

>>38916022
Twerking is fucking disgusting and I'm a huge ass man.
A butt has to move smoothly, slowly.
But alas nigger culture destroys everything.

>>38916102

what is the point of this webm? that cute 'innocent' looking girls like to get pounded by chad? no fucking shit

>>38917319
well I like it

>>38917283
So now we've progressed from
>There has never been a time when ALL women were chaste and modest
back to the original implication, now clearly spelled out:
>people sleeping around and spreading sexual diseases was still a common occurrence back then.

With that out of the way, please go reread the previous post where I actually talk about the data we have on the subject. Things are objectively worse now, than they were previously. There have been times when promiscuity was a common occurrence, too. J.D. Unwin noted that such periods correlated heavily with civilizational strife or collapse.

>>38917372
I think you have a serious problem with reading comprehension, and with the meaning of words.

>>38917234
>women worship porn actresses

No, they don't.
They like acting like whores because that's what men are expecting from them.
Porn and internet as a whole ruined everything.

>>38916022

the only reason people think like this is because they can't get any themselves, I bet they wouldn't be complaining if they were the one fucking and having all the women fall in love with them


even if they were you still wouldn't have a gf

>>38917411
>>38917234
Except she has almost 10K viewers. Just look at the comment section. Basic bitches bonanza. Granted I don't think they know she shot porn
https://www.youtube.com/user/soccerrdancerr

File: 1501640615070.png (79KB, 563x517px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 563x517px

>>38917411
>i-it's men's fault!

>>38917397
I don't, if there's any miscommunication here, it's entirely on you, considering that you're trying to bounce back and forth between "There has never been a time when ALL women were chaste and modest" and "sleeping around was a COMMON OCCURENCE."

Your initial statement, and defense, relied solely upon the assertion that, despite something not being the norm, exceptions have ALWAYS existed. Your second statement (which is really just the implication of the first, put into words) declares that such behavior is "common."

>>38917446
It's porn and internet's fault, can't you read?

>>38917411
Modern sexual liberation happened before the internet, anon. You can make plenty of arguments about porn, this isn't one of them.

>>38917421
Unfortunately, this isn't the case. The problem isn't sex, it's about quality relationships, you massive retard. Promiscuous women don't make good girlfriends and wives. Study after study has shown that previous partner count is highly predictive of likelihood to cheat and/or divorce. Are you entirely incapable of long-term thinking?

>>38917455
Again, your reading comprehension is either at the level of a 5th grader, or you are being willfully obstinate, because you're argumentative.
Saying it was common does not mean as common as it is today. I already covered why that is. Repercussions. Today there is no punishment for being a slut, you are encouraged to be one. That is the sole cause, as was outlined in the first post.

>>38917502

exactly, high quality attractive men can pick and choose who they want to long term date and who they just want to fuck

>>38917027

pretty much, they were just railroaded into being that way, this is their true nature

>>38917549
And yet, if you look at Kinsey's work, which were slanted towards promiscuity, you would see that just a few decades ago, promiscuity wasn't common at all.

You can't just redefine the word "common" arbitrarily.

>>38917554
Not really. Current data suggests that ~15% of women ages 18-22 are virgins. Beyond that, things get even more bleak. Some high quality attractive men (especially those planning on going to grad school, who will find themselves with a slightly older dating pool as they can't just date College Freshman), will have to settle for less-desirable women.

Beyond that though. It's not porn and the internet, because these things were happening before porn and the internet.

>>38917636

but humans are just sluts that love to fuck, nowadays you are allowed to be a free as you want and do as you please and people want to fuck, so they will, forcing girls to be less promiscuous through shaming them doesnt seem like a great idea, I'm surely any really attractive man could find a decent non slutty girl, attractive men are meant to breed, unnattractive men are not, its pretty simple

>>38917636
>a few decades ago, promiscuity wasn't common at
Not as common today doesn't mean not common.
>You can't just redefine the word "common" arbitrarily.
The word common is open to some interpretation.
It is common for people to die in traffic accidents. It happens regularly at a steady pace. Most people don't die in traffic accidents, but it is still a common occurence.
If a meteor crashed into the Earth and killed more than half the Earth's population, it still wouldn't be common to be killed by a meteor.

>>38917481
No, it's women's fault. They could just not act like animals.

>>38917446
Women only have as much power as men let them have.
Letting women vote was a mistake.

>>38917329
Because most robots worship chicks like this and doesn't realize this truth.

>>38917714
>
but humans are just sluts that love to fuck, nowadays you are allowed to be a free as you want and do as you please and people want to fuck.

Yes, that's why women's happiness has plummeted and why 1 in 4 U.S. women are on some form of antidepressant.

>forcing girls to be less promiscuous through shaming them doesnt seem like a great idea

Why not?

>I'm surely any really attractive man could find a decent non slutty girl, attractive men are meant to breed, unnattractive men are not, its pretty simple

No, it's really not, and the fact that you think otherwise suggests a High School level education.

Civilization itself occurs when sexual behavior is regulated. Why? Because functioning societies require the participation of more than just the highest echelon of men. "Betas" and "robots" need to participate.

When sexual regulation doesn't exist, these men find fewer incentives for societal participation. You start seeing men opt out (Everything from MGTOW to the ambitionless, commitment-phobic men who would rather drink with the mates after work than take women out [Read blogs targeted at late 20s career women, they're noticing this is becoming common[).

It shouldn't be hard to see why that doesn't work long term.

Beyond that, there's the fact that previous partner count is predictive of likelihood to cheat and divorce. When married couples divorce, that again is objectively horrible. Custody of children is often awarded to mothers, and children of single mothers are statistically far more likely to engage in criminality, have lower academic performance, report higher rates of mental illness, abuse illegal substances more frequently, and have their own kids out of wedlock.

Single mothers, whether they're divorced, or gave birth out of wedlock, also typically have children with far lower parental investment.

I've mentioned him previously, but go read anything by J.D. Unwin. Sexual liberation doesn't work. "Freedom to fuck xdxdxdxd" is a meme.

Top kek

>10 women who fucked a guy for money, so basically whores


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mario-antoine-man-kansas-tricks-women-into-sex-fake-porn-films-a7735591.html

>>38917764
>Not as common today doesn't mean not common.
This is why you use words like "relative."

With regard to the word common, if we're setting modern behavior as the mark for "promiscuity being common" (As the OP did), why suggest that such behavior, despite it being far less prevalent then than now, was "common?" Why go out of your way to say that "There have always been X," when you're now acknowledging that was far less prevalent?

>>38916022
not unless we make them. when all is lost because of them they'll blame us for not stopping them.

>>38917967
Because it isn't women who have changed, it is the culture.

>>38916022
No, this won't happen. Women are all stupid animals with no ambition or morality. They consume, they don't create. They don't strive to better themselves, they just want "stuff" and are willing to lower themselves to any level to get that stuff.
OP's webm for example, let's think about why she's done this. She's scantly clad, and dances in a way that accentuates her butt, a sexual feature. Why's she doing this? Because of the way men are naturally, and the way reproduction works in sexual creatures. Simply put, 1 man and 20 women can have 20 babies in 9 months, while 1 woman and 20 men can only have 1 baby in 9 months so men are wired to want to bang everything in sight while women need to select the best mate they can to ensure strong and healthy offspring. However, having a child is a large commitment, a commitment which modern day (white) women are choosing more often then not to have. So by ruling out them having a child, this means women don't have to focus on finding a good mate. This allows them to just gobble every single cock they want in a 40 mile radius at any given time. On top of this, since she is approached by more than enough suitors, she can pick and choose the most desirable men. This gives her even more of an ego, because she has something men want, but has the power to deny them it, giving her a sense of power over them. This has created women like we commonly see in the west today. Back to the topic of the webm, If she flaunts herself sexually on the internet she knows that men will see this and desire her and like explained previously will give her a sense of pride in being desired, that she is wanted. She does it for the attention. Nothing more, nothing less. She's willing to get next to naked on the internet, in tight revealing clothes, just for attention. Pretty vain and worthless pursuits, don't you think? She doesn't add anything to society with this webm, it's purely for selfish gain. She is a parasitical leech like all women.

>>38917872
>Yes, that's why women's happiness has plummeted and why 1 in 4 U.S. women are on some form of antidepressant.
They depressed because they realised that they have nothing to add to society but their used bodies and depreciating looks. And that the market is so over saturated that there will always be someone younger and more attractive than them.

Wtf? ...she is clearly not a dancer because she is skinny fat. I think this video was designed for trolling.

>>38918253
>No, this won't happen. Men are all stupid animals with no ambition or morality. They consume, they don't create. They don't strive to better themselves, they just want "stuff" and are willing to lower themselves to any level to get that stuff.
>OP's webm for example, let's think about why he's done this. He's scantly clad, and dances in a way that accentuates his butt, a sexual feature. Why's he doing this? Because of the way men are naturally, and the way reproduction works in sexual creatures. Simply put, 1 man and 20 faggots can have 0 babies in 9 months, while 1 faggot and 20 men can only have 0 babies in 9 months so men are wired to want to bang everything in sight while faggots need to select the best mate they can to ensure strong and healthy offspring. However, being a faggot is a large commitment, a commitment which modern day (white) faggot are choosing more often then not to have. So by ruling out them being a fag, this means men don't have to focus on finding a good mate. This allows them to just gobble every single cock they want in a 40 mile radius at any given time. On top of this, since he is approached by more than enough suitors, he can pick and choose the most desirable men. This gives him even more of an ego, because he has something men want, but has the power to deny them it, giving him a sense of power over them. This has created men like we commonly see in the west today. Back to the topic of the webm, If he flaunts himself sexually on the internet he knows that men will see this and desire him and like explained previously will give him a sense of pride in being desired, that he is wanted. He does it for the attention. Nothing more, nothing less. He's willing to get next to naked on the internet, in tight revealing clothes, just for attention. Pretty vain and worthless pursuits, don't you think? He doesn't add anything to society with this webm, it's purely for selfish gain. He is a parasitical leech like all men.

>>38918325
I thought it was because of the chemicals the government is putting in the water to make us complacent.

>>38917329
I think robots assume they enjoy cuddling in a wool sweater and a hot cup of tea while listening to The Mountain Goats vinyl

>>38916022
Hello fellow robots, I really appreciate the content of this thread. Could someone perchance provide a source for the Original Post?

>>38918488
how about you fuck off, reddit.

File: 1501686704282.jpg (465KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1500x1500px

>>38918488
Don't enable women like this by giving them more views.

>>38916049
Only black assess look good when twerking