I'm not a sexist but we have to address the elephant in

File: 1501896811876-0.jpg (29KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x400px

Because we're still the same stupid apes from million years ago, me and you are no exception

I don't know, it is so blatantly obvious that women are worse than men at everything.

Women are better at giving birth man
You wouldn't even be here if not for a woman
Show some respect you piece if shit

>>38889198
That's some solid bait famalam

>>38889198
>women can't even jack off
fucking pathetic. are holes even human?

File: 1495483074678.jpg (87KB, 601x601px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 601x601px

>I'm not a sexist
>proceed to express very sexist views

>>38890453
Sometimes sexism is the truth.

>>38888787
They're a LOT better than men at complaining.

>>38888787
There's nothing to address, it's the same as how children and animals are inferior, that's just nature and common sense. Women get taken out of commission for nine months when they get pregnant and for most of history they didn't have a very good survival rate when delivering the children, so it makes sense they wouldn't have developed as much as men either mentally or physically.

>>38890538
This. OP is just a retard.

Human women have and will always be weaker than us. It's nature. Humans have no sexual dimorphism unlike some other animals.

>>38890455

I think it's possible to be correct and sexist, or prejudiced generally.

>>38888787
>how can society just turn a blind eye?

Because so much of our modern society is built on denying obvious truths.
We worship the false god of "Equality" despite equality never existing in nature.
Everything is based on the premise that equality is the neutral state, and any inequality must be because of our interference, with one group oppressing another.

>>38888787
Theres nothing wrong with being sexist.

>>38890663
>"An appeal to nature is an argument or rhetorical tactic in which it is proposed that "a thing is good because it is 'natural', or bad because it is 'unnatural'".[1] It can be a bad argument, because the implicit (unstated) primary premise "What is natural is good" typically is irrelevant, having no cogent meaning in practice, or is an opinion instead of a fact."

>>38890815
Replace "nature" with "reality" then, you sperg.

Constantly struggling against reality creates tension.
The idea that inequalities are due to oppression creates resentment, possibly leading to conflicts.

>>38890897
if you're using "reality" in such a way that it functionally means the same thing as "nature" you're still engaging with the same fallacy, you dipshit

don't bother responding; i don't intend on reading it anyway

>>38888787
>how can society just turn a blind eye?
Because men have higher sex drive. If they'd be asexual except when it comes to procreation then women would be unnecessary.