how libertarian is /r9k/?
i'm 84% libertarian
http://www.celebritytypes.com/libertarian/test.php
tfw fashy goy
>>38697624
I got the exact same result.
>>38697624
0%!
not one point of agreement
sir you need to relax your anus
strongly agreed with a few things actually
>>38697374
98%, was expecting 100% desu
only 56%. Probably because I don't want to abolish monarchy
>G-God save the Queen
Got 40%, which makes sense since I'm a libertarian leaning centrist
>>38697374
20% exactly
i dont like the state, but libertarianism is too liberal for me since it enforces things dictated by classical liberalism which i staunchly oppose
49%, I've changed from my past
>>38697374
the perfect amount
makes perfect sense desu
>>38697374
100%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38K9X5PMLRU
>>38697374
61% first time, 81% second time (messed up answering some questions the first time.) Basically here is how it went:
not for abolishing monarchies. Constitutional monarchies are a good idea. monarchies retain history and culture
people should have a right to healthcare, but if medical licenses are no longer required, maybe it would be a lot more affordable without intervention
Why shouldn't assisted suicide and prostitution be legal - robots would love this
Companies can reasonably replace most things governments do right now. What if entire cities, counties, or even state-sized regions were run by one company and its subsidiaries?
people should be able to hire whoever the fuck they want and serve whoever the fuck they want in their own business
legal drugs please, maybe that would improve my life a little if I could pick up pot at the local store
religions can exist, but shouldn't be favored by governments
not on the test, but I think parents have the right to teach their kids whatever they want and kids should be protected property up to a certain age, with limited rights; they should be able to do jobs their bodies and minds can handle
>>38698964
Actually on second thought, abolish monarchies, but allow chairmen/ceos to be called kings since they would serve the same purpose in corporate feudalism
>>38697374
I got 0%
What the hell were these questions?? Is someone trying to make libertarians look bad or do they actually want to live in some giant fantasy Wal-Mart?
>>38697624
Proud statist here, got 0% too.
>>38699906
>>38700158
>>38697729
>>38697624
are you a fascist or a communist?
bretty much what I expected desu
>>38700279
I'm kinda Nazbol-ish. I agree with a lot of points of both the far-left and far-right.
>>38697374
You are 0% Libertarian, which makes you
Not Libertarian.
>falling for the libertarian meme
>not being natsoc
>You are 0% Libertarian, which makes you
Not Libertarian.
Thank God.
You are 78% Libertarian, which makes you a
Medium-core Libertarian.
fuck off edgy teens and fags
Got 0% libertarian thankfully.