I have a question for all of you. Does being a Lolicon make

>>38518880
>Does being a Lolicon make you a pedophile?

YES YES YES AND YES. You find little girls sexually attractive you're a pedophile 2D or not.

>>38518913

... so fictional = real then?

>>38518913

I've heard a lot of Lolicons say that they would never even think about sexual interaction with real children. Many of them only see Lolis as anime characters, not real children, and would never become real life paedophiles.

Would you say your point still stands against these people? I'm not arguing, just asking.

>>38518935
No, but fictional is representative of a reality.

Just like how fapping to 2d traps is gay, fapping to lolis is pedo. Fapping to hentai with "'"""""17"'""""" year old girls is fine, because they all look like adults.

Of course, being a pedo isn't necessarily bad, it is only acting on it in real life that is bad. As long as you keep it to 2d pictures, and not pictures of real little girls or fucking little girls, everything is A-OK.

>>38518978
Like being gay, being a pedo is not a binary system. If there was a Kinsey Pedo scale, where 0 is no pedo ant 6 is only pedo, a loli-only fapper might be a 1.2, where they show pedo-like qualities, but are extremely unlikely to ever act on them in real life.

>>38518980

I may not fully agree with you, but your ideals are surprisingly logical. Thank you for your input.

>>38518978
If you can fap to the physicality of a little girl you're a paedophile. Its fucked up on a whole new level, its just as bad as real CP.

>>38518980
What if I fap to real 17 year olds that look like adults?

>>38519031
The issue with porn of 15+ year olds isn't necessarily the pedophile aspect that is wrong, but it is considered sexual abuse due to their underdeveloped maturity. You can have a person who, at both 15 and 21, look exactly identical, but act with completely differing levels of maturity.

So, fapping to a 17 year old is probably not very pedophillic, but it may, depending on the circumstances, promote the sexual abuse of the immature, which is bad. Stick to 2d.

File: IMG-20170721-WA0011.jpg (439KB, 1195x1600px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 1195x1600px

I feel the extreme need to get this straight since a lot of retards inhabit this place.
It's easy so follow me:
There is a big difference between being a pedophile, aka liking kids, and being a pedophile predator, aka diddling and fiddling kids and by such violating the law.
Are you a pedophile if you like lolis? Yes, because if CP was legal you'd fap to that.
Is it illegal?
No, because you are satisfying your primordial instincts without doing harm to anyone.
The anon before me was spot on, it's easy.
Does watching gay anime make you gay?
Yes

>>38519008


>it's just as bad as real CP

That's a very bold statement. If you had simply said "yes, Lolicon does make you a paedophile" that would be logical.

But saying that Lolicon and CP are the same is simply not true. CP takes REAL children and forces them to commit sexual acts. Lolicon hentai may have the physicality of children, but no real children are harmed in any way.

Comparing the two makes sense, I even if I don't agree with it. But saying they're both just as bad can't be true, as CP does things to REAL children whose lives are affected because of it.

But I do understand what you are saying. The physicality makes it just as bad for THE WATCHER is what I'm sure you meant.

I don't agree with your statement, but thank you for your input anyway.

I personally think there is a big difference between Lolicon and CP. I've heard many Lolicons say that they would never touch CP. Some people see Lolis as anime characters, not as real children. They like smaller, cuter character designs for their hentai. That doesn't mean they want real CP.

Of course, this doesn't apply to everyone. Some Lolicons ARE real paedophiles, but it's person to person. I wish everyone would understand this fact.

File: IMG-20170721-WA0020.jpg (248KB, 1195x1600px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1195x1600px

>>38519195
All lolicons are pedophiles, not all pedophiles are child predators

If you find certain things attractive in 2d you'll likely also find them attractive in 3d. That said, there's all sorts of reasons why someone could find 2d loli attractive, and many of those reasons don't apply to real children.

Besides, labels like "gay", "straight" and "pedo" are huge simplifications of something as complex as sexuality. The word "pedo" in particular has a ton of negative implications, so I can understand not identifying with it.

I don't know anon, does liking Doom make me a potential murderer?

File: 1500433114300.png (578KB, 758x1058px) Image search: [Google]

578KB, 758x1058px

>>38518880
they're drawings so no
i find 3d lolis fucking disgusting

It makes you a 2D pedophile

But given the fact that it's the childlike features you are attracted to it's likely you're a 3D pedo too