ITT: times when you went full autism in public
>be 16
>sophomore year of high school
>have a bunch of pseudointellectual "friends" who are basically edgy atheists and feminists
>we always make fun of religious people and try to sound smart
>one day we're discussing racism
>it's bad, uneducated christian rednecks amirite, etc
>they ask me what i think
>Institutionalized racism is bad, yes, but black people are clearly less intelligent than other races. Why can't we simply accept the fact that the human races are genetically different and move on?
>instantly everyone gangs up on me
>i'm an evil xenophobic racist nazi etc etc
>so uneducated xd
>basically tell me to kill myself
>lose almost all my friends
are you still 16
>>38483355
Thats what you get for being a little faggot, OP.
>>38483438
nop that was 5 years ago.
I still don't have friends
>>38483491
You have friends here on /r9k/ anon
>>38483934
y-you too
origgiano
>>38483355
>totally not racist meme
>>38483355
This isn't full autism, you just stated fact in a way that isn't palatable to the general public. The more socially acceptable way to say it would have been to acknowledge that evolution is just the geographic grouping of genes, and that traits can be grouped by region in response to evolutionary pressures. The mistake was using intelligence as the example. Even if normies know it to be true, they won't be able to accept it because of their years of conditioning (i.e., brainwashing) in public schools. They are generally more accepting of different skin "talents" or skin color as inoffensive in those sorts of discussions.
>>38483934
>That incomplete squint
Does anyone else's eyes do this? I think it has something to do with my contacts
>>38483355
That's beyond autistic, why did you think that?
Even if it's true, that's one of those things you just can't say in public.
Also, it still isn't established how much of IQ is determined by environment and how much by genes. Epigenetics complicates the matter even more. Studies in this area don't get done anymore so all we have to rely on is previous data.
I mean, IQ in some African countries is in the 60s and black people in the US have average IQs in the 80s. Jewish people have IQs in the 110s. It stands to reason that wealth is not only a result of intelligence, but that the relationship is causal in both directions: that IQ and wealth create both positive and negative feedback loops depending on which side of the inequality divide you initially find yourself on.
>institutionalized racism
what does this even mean?
>Be paired with Chad in litterature poetry project in high school
>Friday night, start working, nothing else to do
>Text Chad on his cellphone because I'm missing some papers
>Chad calls me
>Hear several people
>Ask him nervously about poetry papers for the homework
>Hear roar of laughter
>Turns out he was at a party and I was on speakers