>is the CEO of Intel >is also Jewish >Intel sells

Are their processors underperforming now? They were never a good value to be honest.

t. someone who hasn't seen gaming benchmarks

File: 1474523046389.png (116KB, 295x490px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 295x490px

>>38440103
Krzanich is of Croatian descent, not jewish

>tfw /g/ is leaking

https://www.google.com/amp/www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/10/intel-cuts-300m-in-jobs-research-education-and-talent-to-fund-feminist-frequency/amp/

Intel is a meme. I only bought my 4690k because AMD's offerings at the moment were shit.

>>38440277

AMDs offerings were never shit. They were just overshadowed by Intel because MUH GAEMING and MUH SINGLE CORE SPEEEEEEEEDS

We should have 16c/32t consumer processors at this point, but because shitheads need their instant gratification and buy into Intel's lazy and nihilistic crap, they think they can just kick back with the same old shit every year and nobody is going to protest.

If you seriously chose anything intel produced over an FX/Athlon then you don't deserve a Ryzen processor.

>>38440527
b-but fx's and athlons were geniuenly shit

>>38440527
FX WAS shit, though. Single core performance actually matters. I owned an fx 6300, upgraded to a fx 8350, then to a 4690k. Ryzen is a viable choice now, but FX was awful.

File: 599.png (20KB, 165x115px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 165x115px

>>38440603
That's what you'd hear from PC building forums in an Intel-dominated internet.

Thankfully, with Ryzen's release, the shills got pushed out and the others stopped drinking Intel's Kool-aid and joined the winning team.

>>38440799
I literally owned 2 fx cpus and used them to run games. Fx was shit, just admit it.

>>38440823
I'm not here to argue whether or not FX was shit. I'm just here to celebrate how intel is a dying brand.

Can we just get back to laughing at people who unironically buy intel processors.

File: 1496325684368.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>38440103
Stay mad pajeet.
7600k beats even a Ryzen 1800x @4ghz in 99% of Gaymen

>>38440977
>intel
>dying brand

Intel is definitely losing market share, but they aren't going anywhere. They have an established brand name and normies have no idea what amd is.

>>38440985
I'm not mad at all, it's fun watching intel dickriders try to justify their shit squeezed into a processor shell's existence.

File: 1498426047170.jpg (207KB, 900x657px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 900x657px

>>38441216
whatever you say rajeesh
i5s are still massively outselling all the Ryzen lineup combined.

Ryzen=FX with a 10% increase in IPC

>>38441290
Normies gonna norm.

Give it time, you'll find yourself running a Ryzen-2 16c/32t processor while Intel will fade into obscurity, still pumping out the 6700k with a different name and pretty box. It's gonna feel good, man.

>>38441437
>implying anyone will make use of that many cores
4 cores is all you need

File: 1499949113942.jpg (53KB, 500x737px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x737px

>>38441526
>4 cores is all you need
No, 2 cores is all you need as the G4560 shows.

Stay mad corefags

>>38441526
>4 cores is all you need

Welp, time to pack it up 3d animators and modelers and photo and video editors and streamers. Evidently you only need 4 cores for your CPU-intensive work. Let's all just buy a 7700k and hope for the best so we don't cause all of the Intel fanboys don't fly off the handle over their Gods having some competition.

File: lierally anon.png (156KB, 750x285px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 750x285px

Why do lower IQ plebs always bitch about their higher IQ masters?

Should i get a i5 7700k or something else? For a gtx 1050ti build

>>38442314
>i5 7700k
its an i7
>7700k with 1050ti
no.
get a ryzen 5 1400 or a Pentium g4560.

>>38442611
>pentium g4560 for games
can we stop it with this meme already

>>38440103
>Israeli company has jewish CEO
*thinking*

PC gaming is fairly jewish in general. Most of them pirate games.

>>38440527
Why do you think more cores are better for the average consumer? A 4c/8t processor is still overkill for many outside of work related shit (e.g video editing, etc).

>>38440103
I'd rather by an intel, but AMD serves a very niche purpose, which pretty much requires me to have one.

>>38443127
it's basically an i3 6100, it'll be fine for the next few years for gaming.

Always though Intel had the better processors just more expensive, less of a value. Its just the law of diminishing return. Its no different from sports car engines, it might take only an extra 100hp to go from 150mph to 200mph but another 300hp to go from 200mph to 240mph and the costs will reflect that.