>Better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at

>>38396216
The idea is that the benefits outweigh the risk.

Your analogy makes no sense.

>>38396216
You messed up your analogy. Love is the good thing, losing it is the bad thing. You tried to map getting stabbed to the good thing and healing to the bad thing when it's really the reverse.

Yeah I hear that.
>>38396448
It's more like going blind after being able to see for years and years. Wouldn't it be easier for those who have never seen at all to cope? They have no point of reference for what they're missing.

>>38396485
No it wouldnt. You would hear story's about the beauty of colours and shapes always wondering what your missing.

>>38396567

Wondering something you can't grasp empirically wouldn't have even 1% of the negative impact of losing it in the first place. This is the most retarded argument normies always make - "you only regret the things you don't do" Bollocks. You'll regret but it won't tear you up nearly as much as the shit you did do. Anybody claiming otherwise is deluded or lying.

>>38396653
Your arguing against yourself.

Yes it'll hurt more. Only because it feels so great in the first place.
That's your own argument.

>>38396216
love is forgettable, then you find somebody else.

File: COOLIOJPEG.8461817_std.jpg (21KB, 279x420px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 279x420px

>>38396216
Time is so depressing. I didn't want to see a balding, grey-haired Coolio today.