Robots should start a revolution. If everyone takes part

I'm a normie but I nominate myself as leader

I think you grossly overestimate robots. They'd maybe get 1 or 2 random kills in by randomly driving someone over then get a hole blasted in their skull. If it was an organized effort I doubt they'd even get that far since all they have going for them is the surprise factor. They have neither numbers nor weapons.

This is all discounting the ethics of a robot revolution anyways.

>>38320239
>maybe get 1 or 2 random kills in by randomly driving someone over
the amount of kills by ISIS is estimated by ~1200, it wouldn't be too hard to get that done

File: adolf-hitler-mit-hund.jpg (80KB, 940x529px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 940x529px

>>38320187
dude if there'd be a leader then it would be pointless, nowadays anarchy is what makes it so hard for enemies to intervene

>>38320270
I reiterate, you have neither numbers nor guns.

Meanwhile ISIS was a subgroup of Al Qaeda which in turn was originally funded to fight back the Soviets. Even the local police would have more firepower than a union of neets.

File: 6256523.png (6KB, 264x191px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 264x191px

>>38320239
can't a surpise if you're on a watch list

>revolution by depressed passive cunts who only care about themselves

yeah no