>the one part of the body where size has to differ wildly

God got bored

File: 1486603598244.gif (439KB, 245x180px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 245x180px

>>38232076
A dicklet, eh? How big(small) are you?

>>38232095
5.7 inches
M-MOTION OF THE OCEAN

File: 1486451282339.jpg (32KB, 334x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 334x400px

>>38232178
>5.7 inches
Perfectly acceptable. You won't be destroying any vaginas with it, but it's more than adequate to please a woman.
Not a dicklet, just average.

>>38232238
I was told the cutoff point was 7.5 tho. who do i believe

File: 1475120141882.gif (202KB, 500x404px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 500x404px

>>38232248
And where did you hear that? Here? From someone saying dicklets should just kill themselves and you aren't a thundercock you're worthless?
Believe whoever the fuck you want, dude, chances are anyone here isn't gonna get laid anyway.

>>38232076
Most body parts vary a lot, but people don't obsess about forearm length like they do about penises.

>>38232076
>balding genes are usually inherited from mothers side
fucking dont even try to justify that

>>38232076
I'm happy that I'm a manlet. That way no woman will ever see my small penis anyways!

>>38232076
yeah and nobody wants a roastie. works both ways op

File: 1498237441810.jpg (122KB, 728x868px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 728x868px

A small dick simply means that you were meant to be a cute trap.

File: 2017-07-07-marco-diaz-2.jpg (2MB, 1100x3511px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1100x3511px

>>38233032
Speaking of Marco, new page hit this morning.

>>38233049
Where the source though. I see he wants that BBC in the last panel

>>38232076
Is there an actual reason permanent surgery doesn't seem to be an option, why are temporary pills the only thing?

File: 925953.jpg (483KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1024x1024px

>>38232294
And which do you like better?

4 inches in difference is fucking nothing, the difference in weight, height or wing span is usually way more extreme.

File: 2017-07-05-marco-diaz-1.jpg (1MB, 1000x3285px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1000x3285px

>>38233097
Shadbase.

>>38233102
Because the penis is a tube of muscle and skin that engorges itself on blood to harden. There's nothing to take parts suitable to enlarge it from. It'd be like trying to give some another arm or a new leg.

>>38233117
Dicklets or Thundercocks? I like both, I put the visual appearance of dicks first, not size.

File: SK(9).jpg (189KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1024x768px

>>38233143
Yes, and assuming both look perfectly nice. Which?

File: 1490370157337.jpg (69KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 720x1280px

>>38233184
That's a damn tough question. I'd say it's an 70% chance of me choosing the bigger one if I'm horny as fuck and they both look good.

>fags have infested the thread
>too late to delete it now
you fuckers helped kill the board

File: 96969.jpg (317KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1000x1000px

>>38233229
Is it really tough though?

File: 1497495985652.gif (2MB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x188px

>>38233302
Yes, it is. Like I said earlier, I do enjoy both, but big dicks are a rarity.

File: OBbwgYP.jpg (56KB, 600x849px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x849px

>>38233267
The only people interested in talking about dicks are gay dudes. Women don't care about dicks they only care about money.

>>38233383
kill yourself you fucking faggot, fuck off to /lgbt/ or something

>>38232076
That's obviously untrue, you only not notice the other parts that differ equally because you're fixated on penises.

>>38233399
Jeez, anon, you start a thread about dicks and now you're getting angry? Are you still in the closet?

I've thought about this.

>>38233804
Penis size was a wider relative range.