The year is 2100
Alice and Bob are married.
They are both adults and they frequently have sex.
Alice has lung cancer.
Her body is dying but her brain is healthy.
A 16 year old girl, Claire, recently died of a brain tumor.
Although dead, her body is still healthy.
Claire is an organ donor and her parents allow her body to be used for transplants.
Alice's brain is transplanted into Claire's body.
Claire's parents accept that the resulting person is Alice, not Claire.
Bob and Alice have sex again.
Claire's parents find out and are disgusted, as they have not considered this possibility.
They sue Bob and have him charged of statutory rape.
---
Should Bob be convincted?
Suppose Claire's parents find out Bob and Alice have since been making porn featuring Alice [in Claire's body]. Does Bob get convicted on related charges?
In my opinion, yes
While mentally she's a consenting adult, body wise she's still a 16 year old girl. Easy way to fix this problem is to give 16 year old bodies to 16 year Olds and not to an adult who is married and also who is in a sexual relationship
>>38022330
It entirely depends on how they determine age. If you go by only the birth date then it would depend on which birth date is used after the transplant. If it's based on body age then yes. If it's based on brain age then no. I'd say that it should entirely be based on the age of the brain though because that's really what determines whether or not you can consent.
>>38022330
What kind of Jewish bullshit is this?
Just transplant the lungs into Alice's body instead of transplanting Alice's fucking brain into Claire's body.
Then use the rest of Claire's organs to save other people's lives.
Kikes are fucking crazy and it's blatantly obvious that they are behind this question.
Should not be convinced. The byte reason why you can't have sex with minors is because they're not mentally mature enough to consent. If people became mentally mature at, say, 5 years old, there would be nothing wrong with having sex with a 5 year old. The actual age of the persons body is immaterial.
Also, presumably Claire's parents no longer have any rights over the body of Claire. If that was in the contract then perhaps it would be different.
>>38022513
It's just a hypothetical question to get you to think about the implications you autist
You can have sex with people 16 or younger over more than 90% of inhabited land in the world this question is irrelevant
>>38022619
It was obviously developed by Jews trying to spread degeneracy.
Jews at universities come up with questions like this to "provoke thought", but in reality it's to push degeneracy.
Notice how they never come up with questions about anything that could harm Jews.
>>38022740
OP here, I'm not Jewish. Don't know why you're getting in a fuss tbqh
>>38022768
((("I'm not Jewish")))
>not original
>>38022768
Bob has sex with Alice.
Should 6,000,000 Jews be physically removed?
he can only fuck his brain. let the body alone you monster
>>38022330
yes. he banged a 16yo female without her actual consent.
that's rape.
also, brain transplant is a faggotry even worse than transitioning from male to "female".
Body ownership matters, mind age matters, body age doesn't matter.
Bob should be fine.