>Implying stacies are going to let us have robot waifus

File: 1494540627770.jpg (22KB, 500x396px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x396px

>>38020101
>implying they can stop the revolution
it's already too late

>>38020101
Literally what I've been saying for ages.

Women and their cucks are not going to allow us to have power over sex robots because it would decrease their value.

A woman cannot survive without her orbiters.

>>38020101
Fuck the police, I'll get one anyways

If you are not winning to assemble herself illegally, you do not deserve your robot waifu.

File: 1482204989923.png (150KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 512x384px

>>38020355
>implying roasties can stop jews from profiting

If I ever through some divine miracle get rich I'll invest it all into setting up a sex robot business, 100%. It's the way of the future.

>>38020515
>winning
Willing, that is.

File: Ted.png (150KB, 338x368px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 338x368px

>>38020101
I don't want robot waifus either desu. That shit is Huxleyan. Even some womyn have been using sexbots.
They only petition against sexbots now because it will leave them without orbiters. With the way things are going the government will just step into fill that void, which only means more bureaucracy and less autonomy in this post-industrial shithole.

I'd rather just stay in my comfy secluded cabin in the woods.

>>38020578
By orbiters I should say providers.
Although, they're usually one in the same.

File: 1486327316552.jpg (106KB, 896x517px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 896x517px

>>38020101
We've already seen this battle before.

In the 60s and 70s, with the advent of both the sexual revolution and second wave feminism, we saw a massive schism between traditional women who wanted the right to work, and nontraditional women who wanted to deconstruct the power held by men. They clashed over pornography quite vehemently, which lead to well documented cases of 'strange bedfellows' where far-right evangelicals, traditionalists, and the establishment sided with hardcore feminists (like Andrea Dvorkin) to restrict or ban pornography at any cost.

Here we are today, where the majority of porn continues to show women in degrading positions. Demand for better and more porn far outweighed the decries of a vocal minority. We will invariably see the exact same thing this time around, where the demand for high-quality sex robots and male masturbatory aids far exceeds the risks associated with manufacturing and distributing these products.

Whatever vocal backlash there might be against such things, the technology and the market will progress. Eventually, sexbots will be seen as something 'every male does,' much like how today's young boys universally access pornography without much stigma.

>>38020684
>without much stigma.
The hell are you smoking? There's literally an ongoing shaming towards any male that watches porn, even in /r9k/ out of all places.

>>38020355

They made fake kiddie porn illegal.
They made small tit porn illegal in australia.
You think you're safe behind that robot?

>>38020684
>Eventually, sexbots will be seen as something 'every male does,'
I agree with everything you said except this. It may be legal, but that doesn't mean people will like it or accept it. Look at how normal sextoys are viewed now, except double the animosity, because with a sexbot it's not just a silicon hole to stuff your dick into, it's a simulation of a complete girl with limbs and hair and shit. It'll be seen as much more pathetic than just viewing porn or owning a fleshlight.

>>38020101
They list their main arguments as these:

>We believe the development of sex robots further sexually objectifies women and children.
>The vision for sex robots is underscored by reference to prostitute-john exchange which relies on recognizing only the needs and wants of the buyers of sex, the sellers of sex are not attributed subjectivity and reduced to a thing (just like the robot).
>The development of sex robots and the ideas to support their production show the immense horrors still present in the world of prostitution which is built on the "perceived" inferiority of women and children and therefore justifies their use as sex objects.
>We propose that the development of sex robots will further reduce human empathy that can only be developed by an experience of mutual relationship.
>We challenge the view that the development of adult and child sex robots will have a positive benefit to society, but instead further reinforce power relations of inequality and violence.
>We take issue with those arguments that propose that sex robots could help reduce sexual exploitation and violence towards prostituted persons, pointing to all the evidence that shows how technology and the sex trade coexist and reinforce each other creating more demand for human bodies.

The first three are simply variations on the tired old "objectification" argument. The fourth actually has some merit, though I doubt that men who could otherwise pursue 'mutual relationships' would use these bots. Other anons will have to read through their article to decipher their last two points, because I can't think of how sexbots would reinforce power relations of inequality and violence, or create more demand for human bodies.

>>38020979
NIgga you deluded.

File: dr-kathleen-richardson.png (252KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1280x720px

>>38020101
Now, why would this individual ever want to ban sex robots?
Hmmmm....

>>38020979
Majority of people watch porn now.
Its no secret anymore and access to it is extremly easy. Its already being used as a tool to ween men off from wanting physical sex.

>>38020101
not even stacy though

>>38021903
Roasties are coming at it from a roastie perspective. They don't understand that unless your a Chad you can't just decide to 'pursue a mutual relationship'. Women can always spread their legs and get fucked, so they don't understand this concept.

This also implies that a relationship with a woman is an inherently beneficial thing. There's plenty of potential pitfalls to relationships; it seems reasonable a man might opt out of seeking a relationship while still seeking sexual satisfaction.

>>38020101
>Implying autistic screeching can stop a multi-billion dollar industry from popping up
Even if the first world bans it, there'll be second world countries that'll gladly make them and get rich off the retardation of the rest of the world.

>>38021903
>We propose that the development of sex robots will further reduce human empathy that can only be developed by an experience of mutual relationship.
I hope someday someone uses that argument on me so I can throw back at her : "Actually your gender doesn't want a relationship with me which is why I want to try the sexbot."

>>38020101
Holy shit I hope I get be alive when women are in the streets begging men for validation.

>>38022172
Not just sexual satisfaction. Robots will be able have children when artificial wombs and they will clean your house and make whatever meal you want whenever you want it.

The future looks bright.
That is of course unless a bunch of jews use AI to create a robot any enslaving all the goys until fully automated production is possible.

>>38020535
Tfw no Mandy sex robot

>>38022923
But sexbot won't give you a relationship either...

File: 4b23b983dd13e9b4ba5c5179bee4fbbf--middle-fingers-school.jpg (30KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x500px

>>38020101
if i want a sexbot, i'm gonna buy a fucking sexbot

try and stop me bitch

File: 1475956362972.jpg (199KB, 666x800px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 666x800px

trust us stacies, you aren't going to miss out on chad just because /r9k/ is sticking their dick in a computer

>>38023880
Nice try.

But even at a low level sexbot gives me sex and I can hug them. Real women deny me all of that.

>>38020101
> https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/

I'm betting that if you read everything on that site, you'll eventually encounter someone who claims that robots have a right to not be raped.

>>38020101
>Implying stacies are going to let us have robot waifus
If I was a woman I would be terrified as well when I can be replaced by a few hundred Dollar love doll/robot. It means I will no longer have a man to provide for me.

>>38020101
The widespread availability of sexbots that look like little girls will help reduce child rape.

Why do they want to ban something that helps protect against child rape?

They are basically pro child-rape.

I have to reason to be afraid of a male sexbot replacing me.

So women should not be afraid of female sexbots replacing them.

File: 397.jpg (63KB, 447x400px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 447x400px

>>38020101
>"The average robot will be able to afford a sexbot!"

Women shouldn't have any say in men's sexuality, just like the other way around. If sex robots = rape culture, then any phallic sex toy is a sign of toxic masculinity, and dragon dildos encourage bestiality.

>>38024978
Look at the comments on the canadian court with the loli-dolls guys facing sentences.
Normies believe that dolls are the same as little girls and that you should kill yourself for that.

But of course if you like anime they're going to make fun of you by stating that she's not a real woman.

>>38024978
If you are not allowed to fap to a pic of a kid then you won't be allowed to screw a doll of a kid
sorry bro

>implying it's about the sex
It's about the companionship. How do they not realize that?

>>38020101
>Implying stacies are going to let us have robot waifus
>https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/

I understand why these sorts of articles would strike the unloved as sadistic. There will always be a miserable minority of men Mother Nature has decided is unfit to experience what the majority take for granted. So human ingenuity has found a way of defying Her. Not entirely, of course. The unloved will never truly be desired, the ugly will never authentically be considered beautiful. However, with these sophisticated poppets, they can experience some vague facsimile of affection. A hazy and unconvincing vision, but the best some could ever hope for. Yet, these cruel women want to rob from such wretched men the tiny drop of morphia that could provide them, if only for a second, a dream of what it would be like to live as an actual human being. The damned will never step foot in Paradise; is Heaven so vicious that it would deprive them even glimpse of it?

However, one must remember that the angst expressed by the women who tremble at the prospect of sex robots don't have grotesque men in mind when they do so. They envision desirable men seduced away by these dolls. Playing with toys that provide sexual gratification without the trials of an actual relationship, the men these women want will have no incentive to leave the nursery.

The women screeching about sex robots don't have unlovable men in mind, ones who could derive some petty comfort from such things, when they offer their hysterical arguments. After all, they don't consider such abominations men at all. If only these women saw sex robots for what they would actually be: cheap substitutes for actual affection that would pacify monsters and prevent them from leaving the dark ghettos all disgusting things belong. The moment these activists did so, they would cease decrying these sophisticated playthings as harbingers of Hell on Earth and begin praising them as heralds of the New Jerusalem.

>>38020355
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1pvrrD0m0o

>>38021377
Sex toys are seen as really bad? I mean I knew it's not something to share with everyone, but no worse than something like fucking lot's of different girls or having stuffed animals in your bedroom.

>>38025721
>Yet, these cruel women want to rob from such wretched men the tiny drop of morphia that could provide them, if only for a second, a dream of what it would be like to live as an actual human being.
This. THIS.

If this doesn't show how evil women are then I don't know what will.

>>38021903
So, they assume every man is a misogynistpedophile, and vehemently avoid the fact that women also can be pedophiles and objectify men, and will probably also use sexbots themselves?

Also, what's wrong with child sexbots if it keeps the pedophiles away from the actual children?

>>38020101
I mean, sex robots are logically not a good thing for society.
>Will reduce the change of men having sex with real women, and could hinder reproduction rates dramastically.
>A whole new franchise for robot and sex robot building would be made, with hundreds of companines, and they will become extremely successfull.
>It's "morally" wrong to have only have sex with a robot, and real girls will despise you for it (the moral part might not happen, I'm just guessing).
>Malfunctions that could leak weird things into your dick.
>illegal robot making.

And that stuff, although all of it might not happen, sex robots aren't all that great.

But what do I know.

>>38025923
They are perfectly fine for women to have, but even a simple fleshlight will get you ridiculed by females.

>>38026374
>Will reduce the change of men having sex with real women
Who do you think will buy the sexrobots?

Chads will be absolutely pleased because it will mean less competitions for them to get the real women.

>>38026521
Give me an example of robots who earn enough money to buy sex robots? Most working robots are stuck as "wagies".
And some Chads would buy it, just cause it's easier pussy than anything else.

>>38026374
>not a good thing for society
Why bother thinking about what will happen to society when society doesn't think about you?

>could hinder reproduction rates
Fertility rates are in the dumpster, even without sexbots. (I'm talking about whites, of course. Shitskins aren't human)

The current system will fall eventually under the weight of all the accumulating deviancy and decadence consumerism and women's rights caused.

>>38020101

People are campaining against sex robots yet no one is doing shit about jobs getting automated?

You know what this world is fucking full of shitty hypocrites that deserve to get nuked. I'd gladly watch our species become extinct by an apocalyptic event.

>>38024978
they think if they shriek loud enough all rape will go away eventually. no sex bots necessary

>>38026374
>Will reduce the change of men having sex with real women
Chads/stacies/normies will continue to have regular sex regardless of sexbots, and us robots will at least have some comfort. If anything, having sex with actual women instead of a lump of silicon will be used as leverage/a bragging point.

>could hinder reproduction rates dramastically
And that is bad how? We're 7.5 billion people in this planet and growing, most of that population being poor and dumb as all hell. I wouldn't shed a tear if things went Dan Brown's Inferno tomorrow

>A whole new franchise for robot and sex robot building would be made, with hundreds of companines, and they will become extremely successfull
And, how exactly, are a new industry and more jobs bad for society? Are you a neo-luddite or something?

>It's "morally" wrong to have only have sex with a robot, and real girls will despise you for it (the moral part might not happen, I'm just guessing)
As if robots were the kind of people who gave a single, dogshit-stained fuck about this. Normal people already despise us regardless of sexbots.

>Malfunctions that could leak weird things into your dick.
And an original, mint-fresh Samsung cellphone might explode in your pants, but it won't stop you from playing Robot Unicorn Attack, or talking nerd shit with your friends on WhatsApp while at work. Are we going to stop using planes because they sometimes crash?

>illegal robot making
What's the point here? Buying a Sony sexbot will be okay, but the bootleg chinese one will make children point at you in ths street and laugh?

>>38024978
you dumbass. this is why woman think men are dumb, because of shit like this.

woman want to limit your sexual options much as possible so the competition for local pussy will increase = more resources for the local woman.

wrap your head around this. woman don't give a fucking fuck about what toy you are banging. they care about limiting your sexual horizons and blocking any possibility that doesn't involve an engagement ring and a 100,000 wedding. with sexbots/mail brides you are sort of bypassing that.
no woman on this planet, no matter how sexy or beautiful she is, can compete with a 100$ hooker.

>>38026566
>Most working robots are stuck as "wagies".
Anyone can save money. You underestimate how many things we will cut from our daily routine to be able to get one in the long run.

File: 03_1.jpg (525KB, 1280x1871px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 1280x1871px

>>38020684
Seems likely. Given what porn is popular its clearly not the case that women that are concerned with the view of their gender have any power over it (presuming their perception is that porn reflects the real world view, which I don't agree with but that's the way they angle it).

File: 03_3.jpg (529KB, 1280x1865px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 1280x1865px

>>38026974
They come as a set. Can't just post the one page.

>>38025721
Nigga, what the fuck is this prose post doing here. Pearls before swine yo.

>>38025721
>Nordic model
That's a female supremacist movement. It puts women above the law and makes them capable of framing people with virtually no risk to themselves.

Fight this evil wherever you see it.

>>38020445
I really don't think so, at least not in america. Too many people have a ingrained political preference for personal freedom.

>>38020979
t. mormon or something

I really don't know where the hell you got that from.

>even in /r9k/ out of all places.
>The hell are you smoking?

definitely not what you're smoking.

File: jeww.png (218KB, 501x521px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 501x521px

>>38020101

This is something I'm actually okay with the Jews for. GO JEWS

>>38026566

A lot of divorced men will buy sexbots and I'm sure Shekelberg will give you financing options like when you buy a car if you can't save up enough to pay for your waifu all at once

File: OE724Rx.png (241KB, 339x280px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 339x280px

>>38021258
>They made small tit porn illegal in australia.
oh god, i just looked it up and those absolute cretins actually did it. that's fucked up
>flat is justice nevertheless