Why did we collectively decide to stop wearing robes?
>Robes are far more comfortable and breathable than pants, button-up shirts, suits, etc
>you don't have to worry about finding well-fitting clothes because robes are meant to be loose
>they look patrician as fuark
Seriously, where did western civilisation go so wrong?
>>37969739
Do you know what Jews are?
I already wear a chiton
Ever tried to move around in one? It's very clumsy.
>>37969739
I just read something about this last night, as it happens: https://qz.com/1013843/extreme-weather-has-driven-hordes-of-men-to-embrace-skirts-as-a-form-of-protest/
>Evolutionary biologist Peter Turchin blames horseriding. The idea that skirts were for girls and trousers were for boys began to take hold in Europe in the 14th century with the development of tailoring, according to the Victoria & Albert Museum. "Previously, both men and women wore draped or unshaped garments and tunics. As men's tunics became shorter and tighter-fitting in the 15th century, fashionable men began to wear hose or stockings as outer leg wear," the museum notes. By the 19th century, trousers were associated with masculinity.
I'm up to wear a robe or like that thing roman soldier wear. Pants are more for girls. Robes let your cock and balls hang free.
>>37969739
Speak for yourself, kafir.
>>37969739
You realize that the commonfolk has been wearing tunics since forever, right?
>>37969811
really though, how did we all get it the wrong way round? skirts for the gender with balls makes much more sense
I want to wear Avallac'h robes
>>37969827
Even still, they make way more sense that pants, especially in warmer climates
>>37969768
Nice anon, I may start doing the same, you've inspired me
>>37969821
These things are so comfy holy shit
>anons try to find acceptable excuses to wear dresses and skirts
>>37970141
Don't be afraid, anon. Dresses and skirts were the garb of choice for our mighty forefathers. Embrace your roots.
>>37970173
the real truth is that if you have stunning looks and you work out, then you will look good in a robe. Don't go thinking that you can wear that shit whilst being a fat neet.
Because the modern man has shit to do
>>37970244
If you have stunning good looks and work out, you will look good in everything, you skirt-wearing wannabe faggot
>>37970259
weren't they afraid of falling?
>>37969739
>Why did we collectively decide to stop wearing robes?
Harder to ride a horse when you're wearing a robe.
>>37970259
Not everyone is involved in physical labour. Most of our fat asses don't even walk that much these days.
>>37970278
that's exactly what I was getting at
>>37970310
You don't even have to be a labourer to be severely inconvenienced by wearing robes, try mowing your lawn in a fucking toga and see how you go.
>>37971821
Try just walking up a flight of stairs. I got an Arab robe for the hot months here and fell flat on. Y face walking up the stair at least three times.
white people enforcing arbitrary bullshit
see also chivalry
see also christianity
>>37972174
well obviously re-res have to wear safer clothes.
>>37970299
Yeah because we all do that to get around still.
Let's just wear these again.
Ropes and light weight breathable clothing was phased out because of Germanic fashion. When the Germanic tribes migrated in to Rome they naturally brought their pants wearing selves in large numbers, the Romans weren't strangers to pants however, they were usually adopted by the army and military inclined Emperors because it turns out pants are better for cold climates and for long marches through brush. It should also be mentioned that there was a period of global cooling during this period that added to the popularity of pants.
So a combination of military, weather, culture and fashion destroyed the image of robes as manly. Women weren't effected by such changes because they don't tend to join the army or go out when its cold.
>>37970297
It's photoshopped obviously
>>37972547
This, also didn't help that the Western empire collapsed
It's because you don't wear one. Go make your own or pay someone to make one if you want to wear one.
idk about robes, but a hooded cloak would be nice. much more breathable and easy to wear than a jacket or sweater
>>37972596
Yeah cloaks are cool but if we wore one we'd be made fun of.
It seems like something to be sold at hot topic.
tunics were best
>>37969739
Because they are shit for moving around and just doing normal stuff.
>>37970173
> my ancestor
>>37970297
actually they weren't, life magazine did an interview with all of them 10 years after the picture was taken (minus two of the guys who died during that time). you can find it at lifemagazine.com/archives/fuck/you/faggot/what/a/gay/question/you.homo
>>37972642
Exactly! Why does it seem like any time some group comes together just to wear some comfy cloaks, they get made fun of?
>>37972596
This guy has the right idea. A hooked cloak is quite nice indeed. Look how comfortable all these brothers are. Yet they were made fun of just for the clothing choices they had. I can't put on a white hood and cloak because the normies get all offended with my choices.
>>37969739
Northern tribes always wore pants to keep our dicks warm in the snow.
>>37972760
that's not a cloak though, it's a tunic and a separate hood
>>37972760
Those are cowards.
If you're gonna hate niggers be proud of it and don't hide your face.
>>37972910
> vigilante superheros are cowards
>>37972762
This is a roman depiction of a Thing around 200 AD.
>>37970259
Nice photoshop there /pol/.