Alright hear me out robots >if a 13 year old boy takes and

Child porn has to display the genitals or pubic area. Pictures of topless lolis and jailbait are legal in America.

Doesn't transgender mean that they WANT different biology, not that they HAVE different biology?

you can find pics of 13 year old girls vaginas and tits online legally

I forget the name of the relevant case law for this but this is actually a little bit of a gray area, the judge in this case famously said "you know it when you see it" regarding child porn

>>37879139
>Child porn has to display the genitals or pubic area.
Wrong. If it draws attention to the genitals area, or sexualises the child in any way then it's CP. So pictures in a brochure for a nudist resort are ok, but a nude girl holding her hands in a heart shape at pelvis level is not.

>>37879159
They "identify" as said gender

Not all nudity is pornography. You can see countless of naked lolis by looking up nudism.

>>37879159
Nobody even fucking knows with the trannyfaggots anymore

Fuck
this
gay
earth

>>37879187
The law says "Lascivious display of the genitals or pubic area". I know this by heart, because I'm a pedophile. There are some intricacies, like the Dost test and judges pulling shit out of their asses, but my point is that nipples are never enough to make something child porn.

>>37879591
>Lascivious display of the genitals or pubic area
Exactly. I was going one step further and saying mere display of pubic area isn't enough either, since that would mean many medical texts are guilty of it. "Lasciviousness" is defined as overt/offensive sexual display, as can be seen by drawing attention to both the pubic and chest area.

>>37879591
is it true that there is a large number of females who are pedos?

>>37879706
where did you hear this? all the data suggests otherwise. both pedophilia and fetishistic sexuality in general seem to be very rare in women.

>>37879843
>the data
2 people without sources

>>37879706
Self-confessed female pedophiles practically don't exist as far as I can tell. I've only ever seen a couple. With how much stigma there is against pedophiles now, there pretty much has to be something wrong with you to admit that you are one. Women are even more repressed and pedophobic than men, so it's no wonder that female pedos are so rare.

>>37879872
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Epidemiology

Its about the intention of the image. For example, a non-sexual image of a family at a nudist colony isnt CP, while a creepshot of a kid in a bikini probably is.

>>37880529
It's not about the image either. A picture can be legal on a nudist website, but if you copy it over to a pedophile website it might become illegal. Essentially the clause means "Is the person we're arrested a pedophile?".

>>37879102
Only if the person viewing that image is male.

Alright, hear me out robots:
>if a dog bites a man, then it isn't news.
>but if a man bites a dog, everyone goes crazy (outside of China).
>but get THIS guys! If the man identifies as a dog, then is it a crime? It's a dog, right?!?!
KYS

>>37879706
My ex is one, but she was also sexually abused as a child, so that could play into things.
Also she is crazy as fuck and I am only recently getting over how much she fucked me over. So if you wanna find a pedo-GF, take that into account.

>>37880166
>there pretty much has to be something wrong with you to admit that you are one
besides the fact you like children?

>>37879706
There are a large number into DD/LG play. I was really autistic and just thought my gf was being cute, I realized as I got older she was literally role-playing as a child, and wanted me to treat her like one. Women can be degenerate just as much as men.

>>37881969
Liking children isn't unusual, and it wouldn't be wrong if society didn't make it wrong.