So guys, I just figured it out. Women are and will forever will be biologically inferior. The only reason for the females existence is to be a prize for the man. See the females natural want in life is the best possible male to catch her. They make themselves a prize and demonstrate their value through makeup, clothes, jewlery, teasing, etc. The male naturally wants to catch the female. In order to do this he must search outside of his social realm and interact with the universe to bring things in to the female to show his value. This creates the inspiration for art and science or any form of education really. I guess inferior might be the wrong way to describe it, They just simply don't have the mental or physically capacity to improve past their current social state in which the male makes.
very redpill bro
oreganopaste
>>37745212
i just come here for the philosophy conversations about social constructs that I would get ridiculed and ignored if shared anywhere else.
haha right guys
there were two different sexes before humans came into the picture
women exist because our method of reproduction depends on two different sexes
i feel it op. are there any women who would like to comment on this?
They have the mental capacity but no need to cultivate it or improving, so many of them simply don't do it since it makes no difference in regards to what they're mainly valued for. Women who practice self-cultivation don't do it out of necessity, so it has some additional merit.
>>37745467
I understand that. That's the reason for reproduction in all animals, because the female is the prize. Their "prize" value is very obviously demonstrated in all forms of animals, and easier seen in cognitive animals, which is why it's so obvious in humans although we choose to ignore it.
>>37745179
they're basically just beta men with a pussy.