Any questions? I think this graph will prove useful in combating

>>37648523
How do ye say "bullshit" in your language ?

>>37648600
You are privileged with ignorance.
At least try.

That first graph makes no sense

File: 3456346346234652.png (16KB, 880x660px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 880x660px

solid stuff op

I'd like to add one more graph, based on my observations too

>>37648523
What the fuck is the top graph? It makes literally no sense. You have two different "Received Hostility" measurements for the same level of "Ugliness", which cannot be right, since if you have two different amounts of received hostility, wouldn't you just add them?

>>37648675
I think if the x and y axis were switched it would make sense

beautiful people and extremely ugly people don't receive hostility (the extremely ugly because people instead feel "pity" for them and virtue signal to gain good goy points)

>>37648717
While I personally disagree with the sentiment, I do think that you're right in that OP meant to switch the axes.

>>37648675
See
>>37648717
Is exactly right, thank you for correcting.

>>37648628
Confidence vs arrogance and how they are perceived, too many factors involved to be that clear cut, trend might be correct if other factors are assumed to be favorable.

File: fixedgraph.png (8KB, 512x389px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 512x389px

>>37648625
Fixed it for OP

>>37648791
It makes perfect sense as it is.