>>37429565 What makes an 18 year old girl take a 40 year

>>37429610
Cause she was probably paid?

>>37429610

Women in porn are all sluts. That's your answer. They go there to get treated in a certain way since they have no access to men who would do those things to them.

>>37429610

Hyper-sexual girl, probably borderline, with a meth addiction and daddy issues.

File: 1488858846111.jpg (54KB, 500x548px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 500x548px

>>37429565
I fucking love crystal meth.

>>37429635
Her family's rich, she didn't do it for money

>>37429635
Didn't she get something paltry like $200 for that video?

>>37429689

That's the lowest they pay. They pay as high as a 1400. There's also suggestions they throw in a lot of drugs on top of that as unofficial pay.

File: 1488415461570.jpg (29KB, 387x387px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 387x387px

>>37429664
>>37429689
No shit?

Guess she did it 'cause she's a ho.

hapas are insane

think before you racemix

>>37429565
who is this? i have no idea...

She is also yet more proof that women in porn face no social stigma at all. Whether amateur or professional, 99 percent of porn sluts can go on living life as normal and they will face absolutely no backlash for being sluts.

>>37429854
And they shouldn't

Seriously, appreciate the degeneracy

I do every night

>>37429870

I'm sure you do appreciate it. But people need to stop lying about slut shaming, it almost virtually does not exist at all.

>>37429897
Not on the internet, but come to the deep south and the old people will judge the shit out of you, but give it 10-20 years and this social justice shit will be over because the boomers will be dead and 99.9% of racism and sexism and wathever-isms will be ironic/satirical//pol/lacks

>>37429897
Porn is a job, though. I respect porn stars because they provide a form of entertainment. I do not think they should be shamed. They provide a service.

Plus, do you know how filming porn works? It isn't just "fuck on camera" it's actually a lot of takes and it's just like filming a regular movie. Unless it's amateur porn, but that doesn't pay as much

Other sluts who do it for free, though? Yeah, shame 'em.

>>37429937

How? Plenty of deep south women go into porn, I see no proof any of them are shamed at all. "Slut shaming" is an extremely rare occurrence blown out of proportion and women being in porn proves it doesn't really exist.

>>37429967

But porn is being a slut in it's final form. Regardless of if it's scripted or not, what they do on camera is far worse than a woman fucking Chad one drunken Saturday night. It goes much further in the realm of slutiness. Not the point though, the fact that all those women are not shamed just proves slut shaming is mostly a myth.

>>37429854

Why should there be any shame? It's the 21st century. If a woman wants to get into the sex industry, let her. She shouldn't be shamed for life for doing it. You can't jerk off to porn then say you have no respect for porn stars or those with sex tapes/nudes.

>>37429982
Yeah but most of those girls pretty much get shut out of their communities or they come from cities (For instance Nashville is incredibly liberal but the surrounding townships are conservative beyond belief)

You ain't going to get shamed on the internet but those old fuckers down the street are going to judge the fuck out of you, I should know because I've lived in bumfuck for literally two decades. Of course you aren't going to see the proof unless you live in the town but if word gets around you're having sex out of wedlock people judge the shit out of you.

>>37430044

I haven't watched porn in about 3 weeks, my point is that them not being shamed is proof that slut shaming is a myth.

>>37430030
>But porn is being a slut in it's final form.
Not really. There are women who do that shit for free OFF camera. They are the true sluts.

Porn stars provide a service, anon. They shouldn't be shamed. Imagine if society shamed them all, and then porn was outlawed. That'd be fucking terrible.

Also, there are several famous male porn stars too.

File: 70883676184299758642.jpg (139KB, 570x720px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 570x720px

>>37429854

Anon, it's just sex. Relax you fucking virgin

>>37430064
>3 weeks
But you do watch porn, don't you? Therefore, those porn stars that you want desperately shamed have provided you a service.

>>37430053

Can you show me some instances of that happening? Nobody is exempt from criticism, so if a slut in porn is being judged passive aggressively by old guys down the street, she'll just have to deal with it. She isn't being bullied or denied any opportunities by society.

>>37430066

If they do it off camera, that means we can't see it. Porn is being a slut on camera. They provide a service but what they are doing is the issue here.

>>37430096
So basically would you think it was better if porn was outlawed and performing in a porn film was illegal?

>>37430077

But you do agree those women are not shamed, right? They face absolutely no stigma at all.

>>37430083

I've cut down on it a lot since I've been trying to change my habits. Once every 3 weeks/month is much better than once a day like I did years ago.

>>37430096
Oh no i agree with you don't get me wrong, the gossip in towns isn't affecting anyone's career unless they try to work in their small town, which they shouldn't because no career opportunities. What I'm saying is it's the judgemental as fuck baby boomers who are incredible cocks and need to just go away

I agree with you on the sentiment that slut-shaming isn't as bad as people make it out to be, but the social stigma in small towns still exists and you'd see a rise in very talented stars if we could get rid of it

>>37430127
>They face absolutely no stigma at all.
Not professionally, but most female porn stars have been disowned by their families and friends. No father wants to hear that his daughter is a porn star.

The social stigma isn't obvious, but it's still there. Most guys think porn stars are hot, but actually wouldn't date one.

t. someone who used to work as a sound guy for porn

>>37430127
>But you do agree those women are not shamed, right? They face absolutely no stigma at all.

You're dumb, they do get ostracized. Bree Olson even said she had a hard time finding a husband. Belladonna has said porn ruined her personal life and her friendships

>>37429610
Because she's a woman.

All women want to be conquered.

Once you accept that fact, every action taken by women is clear.

>>37430225
>>37430235

So your only argument is that women in porn can't get a cute boy to date them, and so that means they are oppressed? No, it means that guys have standards and women are not entitled to social validation. That is not them being oppressed or facing any stigma. Guys don't have to date sluts if they don't want to.

>>37430157

I don't see how a few old people gossiping means these women have it hard at all though. If the worst they experience is a few old people gossiping, that just proves they have it incredibly easy.

>>37430546
>So your only argument is that women in porn can't get a cute boy to date them, and so that means they are oppressed?
I doubt you read anything about their families disowning them or their friends not wanting shit to do with them,

So tell me, do you think society would be better if porn was outlawed? You didn't answer that question.

>>37430575

I see no proof that happens and if it did, then so what? They are not being denied any opportunities, they are not being whipped or beheaded for being sluts. If a few porn women lose friends over it, then tough shit. If nobody is owed validation then women certainly aren't either. Assuming that happens in the first place. I didn't answer your question because my only point is that these women face no stigma for being in porn. It has nothing to do with outlawing it.

>>37430546
it sounds like to me you don't live in southern towns of >1500

If someone important doesn't like you you're pretty much fucked

>>37430632
So you think porn is okay and should be legal?

But women should be shamed and oppressed for doing it? Like getting whipped and shit?

I would respect your opinion if you thought porn was immoral and that porn stars should be shamed for participating in immoral acts, but it sounds like you're just bitter and you wanna see women shamed, regardless if they're porn stars or not.

>>37430645

>Someone important

I thought they were irrelevant old baby boomers? The thing about people against "slut shaming" is they all circlejerk in groups about how hard sluts have it and their only arguments are virgin shaming and "haha just look around women have it so hard haha". I need more than that. Guys not dating porn sluts is just men having standards, it's smart.

File: 1469775623892.jpg (132KB, 795x1036px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 795x1036px

>>37430632
So your idea of social stigma is getting whipped and beheaded?

>>37430671

You're completely going off base because you have severe autism. I made no comment about porn being illegal or legal, and my point here is that they face no social stigma beyond a few isolated pockets of passive aggressive judging. If women in porn were really shamed they would be actually punished for being sluts and there wouldn't be legions of autists jumping to their defense like is happening right now. Women who are in porn in western society don't face any stigma for what they do.

>>37430715
So what's your idea of "suffering social stigma"

what should happen to them?

>>37430705

That's one way of facing a stigma, but a certain amount of guys not dating you and old boomers making passive aggressive comments behind your back is not repression on a societal scale. It's a non-issue.

>>37430695
irrelevant on a grandscale, in a small town fucking Mr. Eisenberg down the street can pretty much piss on you socially if he wanted, that's the geist of small towns when it comes to sexual activities.

It's not an issue its a fact, doing porn can fuck up social relationships in a small town. But i mean if that affects those relationships why would you want them in the first place

>>37430733

They already face no real social stigma so that's my point. It's not about me suggesting any punishments for them or outlawing anything.

>>37430715
If women in porn were punished for being in porn, then there probably wouldn't be any porn (at least mainstream porn)

God, you're fucking stupid. I agree that slut-shaming is a myth, but you're targeting the wrong people.

>>37430750

So why do the women choose to go into porn, why do they stay in those towns? I doubt an old man in modern western society could do anything to a young woman who was in porn. If words hurt someone that much then they need to toughen up. This thread is just a circlejerk about women being victims when they are not.

>>37430632
Do you know what the word stigma means? They're not being oppressed but they are stigmatized

>>37430788

>If women in porn were punished for being in porn, then there probably wouldn't be any porn (at least mainstream porn)

Exactly. They are not punished at all, hence they feel free to go do it so often in such vast numbers.

>>37430796
Nobody said porn stars were victims lmao.

They just shouldn't be shamed for doing their jobs and providing a service. We all like porn. It's the true roasties and sluts that do it for self-validation and to fuck with us that should be shamed.

Whats her name? I fapped too many times to her being slapped to not know.

>>37430816

Nobody here has proven they are stigmatized at all. It's just a circlejerk full of insults. How are they stigmatized? Are they denied jobs? Are they harassed in the street? A guy not dating a slut in porn is his choice, nobody is entitled to someone else's affection.

>>37430757
>brainlet misuses the term stigma

>>37430796
they don't they lose family and friends and move out west and do and shit ton of drugs and die at like 40

Extreme case but you see it alot, family disowning their kid because he or she, mostly she, did porn

Wasn't it Lawrence Fishburne or whatever his last name is who disowned his kid becuase she did porn

and he's from Augusta Georgia which is a pretty big southern city

>>37430834
This. I have a love/hate relationship with porn. I hate women, but I respect porn stars for giving me fap material every night.

>>37430834

This thread is full of people saying women in porn get shamed when they don't. People here do think they are victims.

>>37430854

How would you define stigma? Nobody can even prove to me they are stigmatized in the first place.

>>37430866

So if those women choose to make terrible decisions, that's someone else's fault? They face no societal repercussions at all. A father disowning their daughter because she was in porn is his own choice and no proof that society at large shames those women at all.

>>37430879
top kek lol

>>37430866

He's from Georgia but I'm pretty sure he lives in LA, because he's an actor

>>37430910
So basically you have no argument? You're just trying to get someone to say "Porn stars don't get punished for being in porn,"

Well, then that's true? Porn stars suffer no punishment...

>>37430910

and why is porn a terrible choice? i thought society was fine with it? and getting disowned is a pretty big social repercussion

>>37430910
>women in porn get shamed when they don'
Nigger ANYONE in porn is shamed. Even directors. My older brother is a porn star and he can't even come home to our family because my mother and father are very religious.

Just because people aren't lopping porn stars' limbs off, doesn't mean that they don't suffer social stigma. There are ORGANIZATIONS dedicated to stopping porn and people even tried to get porn outlawed.

>>37430910
>How would you define stigma?
I'd say its the extreme dissaproval on a whole of someone or a certain group of people that would distinguish them from other people in society. Like if you're an autist and everyone laughs and points at you that you're an autist, you're suffering social stigma for being an autist.

You seem to confuse social stigma with human rights abuse. Getting whipped and beheaded isn't getting stigmatized.

>>37430940

Yes, that's what I'm saying.

>>37430941

Western society is fine with porn, but if those women choose to be fuckups and do drugs and abuse alcohol, that's their own choice.

>>37430991

Wah wah wah. If "SOCIETY" was so against porn, then the internet wouldn't have constant circlejerks where people like me are outnumbered 5 to 1. How much of society would you say is very religious? If parents have kids that choose to go into porn and it's against their moral religious beliefs, it only makes sense that they would be disappointed. Violate the teachings of something and make it's followers upset. It's not rocket science.

>>37431080

And yet nobody has proven that women in porn face that stigma. All I'm getting is replied insisting it happens peppered with one or two instances of alleged excommunication.