Why do you guys care so much abotu circumcision? I don't

I had part of my sexual organ forcibly removed from me without my consent.
How would you feel if your parents cut off your ears when you were a baby because "it looks better"?

>>37409341
I wouldn't really care, to be honest, if it really does "look better".

>>37409328
dude I know

some /pol/tard probably made a joke about it years ago and it snowballed into an actual movement because you're all autists

>>37409373
0/10, apply yourself next time.

>>37409374
That goes for you too.

brb removing the right eye of every newborn I see because eyepatches are cool and they can still technically see

>>37409415
That's not a fair comparison, but removing an eyeball has no real purpose, while removing a part of your foreskin has medical benefit, and only really affects your ability to masturbate and have sex.

>>37409402
I'm not trolling. This must be some kind of cognitive dissonance.

>>37409492
now you can't get dirt in your right eye anymore
or cataracts
or cross eye
or glaucoma

do you want to spread glaucoma?

>>37409532
>any of that
Of course, you can't get illnesses in an eye you don't have. Circumcision is different, as it has actual benefit.

onece again you retards can't help but sperg out
Who cares if having a foreskin is odd or bad or anything. Circumcision (or lack of) altered literally nothing in your life up until the point where some retard on the internet told you that it's oh so important

desu I don't care that much because I still have my frenulum and I cum in 30 seconds anyway. but there is definitely reason to be pissed about it, first of all that your parents let you get cut in the first place. and I'm a brit so I used to feel insecure about if a girl ever saw mine, but now I know that'll never happen lol. also if you are cut tight I hear it can really suck, again thankfully I wasn't.

>>37409604
I doubt you can name any
especially not as important as right eye removal, which stops the spread of pink-eye

>>37409492
>while removing a part of your foreskin has medical benefit
This is a bait thread.

>>37409328
to anyone in this thread, remember that the circumsicion entry on wikipedia was sabotaged for years by a gay israeli with a circumsicion fetish, removing real info and adding fake data about its benefits

>>37409634
>stops the spread of pink-eye
And what about the other eye?

>I doubt you can name any
http://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/circumcision/basics/why-its-done/prc-20013585
http://www.today.com/health/circumcision-benefits-outweigh-risks-cdc-says-1D80331010
tl;dr
>easier to clean
>Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections
>Prevention of penile problems
>Decreased risk of penile cancer
>Most women think it looks gross

>>37409769
>easier to clean
you know what's really easy to clean? an empty eye socket
>decreased risk of disease
1) those findings are found to be inconsistent on a yearly basis
2) no more pink eye
>prevention of problems
1) lol 2) no more glaucoma I'm tellin ya
>decreased cancer
no more right eye cancer
>most women
think eyepatches are cool

>>37409373
>if it really does "look better".
I've asked girls in my country about this (normie so I can pull this off)
they always say it looks weird as fuck
I don't know what's going on in America but nobody else thinks cut looks good

>>37409842
Funny how cutting up kiddie cocks is the only thing which people think is a good thing to trust to the appreciation of aesthetics of the masses.

>>37409769
out of all pro-circumcision memes, "easier to clean" is the one I understand the least because I counted and I spend 5-10s per shower on my dick. Even washing my chest is harder. What the fuck do jews think you do to wash a dick anyway?

>>37409900
yeah try cleaning a vagina sometime
can't even use soap or your shit will get fucked up
kikes are retarded

>>37409839
literally none of those are arguments except

>those findings are found to be inconsistent on a yearly basis

And your analogy is flawed, because the other eye can get the illness instead.

>a country where circumsicion is average
>(((medical industry))):hey you roastie! do you like average dicks appearence? leaving size and color aside
>roastie: yes i like average dicks appearance

the next day in every (((media)))
-women all over the country prefer circumsiced penises dicks, new study reveals-

>>37409972
dicks are still there to get cancer and disease
I'm just reducing the risk ;)

File: 1473793615709.gif (494KB, 646x466px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 646x466px

>>37409769
>CDC
gee I wonder
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Schuchat
>Schuchat grew up in a Jewish family in Washington, D.C., the fourth of five children
Guys what the fuck this isn't funny
I fucking hate /pol/ for teaching me to google names

>>37409900
Idiot mothers think that they need to clean their baby's glans. There's a huge amount of misinformation about penises spread throughout the USA. Anatomy textbooks usually don't even mention the foreskin.

>>37409492
>while removing a part of your foreskin only affects the main ability that you have a reproductive organ in the first place

>>37410046
>>37409996
>an eyeball
>you literally use it every moment you're awake

>a small part of your dick
>only for sexual pleasure

quite the comparison

>>37410001
Can we quit it with your Jew shit? Here, a different article with similar points.
http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/guide/circumcision

>>37410001
the jews are behind a lot of things but circumcision in western countries isn't one of them. people often ask, why would you circumcise, only religious nutheads do that. but that's literally the reason it was adopted in otherwise civilized countries. for the same reason jews and muslims did, sexual repression. and it only survives today because of tradition disguised as medical expertise.

>>37410153
you can still see, silly, you have another eye touse all day
I'm just preventing cancer and infection
Oh wait, was your argument that you don't value pleasure? Too bad my degenerate friend, that isn't an argument.

unnecesary literal millions of procedures
billions of dolars every year
implying the medical industry in the usa will stop this cashcow

>>37410184
>jews thought it up and continue to do it and continue to encourage it along with their sister sandreligion and the people that do it branched off from judaism, and all the jews in medical and publishing positions encourage it at every possible moment and the organizations they run shut down competing studies, but they aren't behind it because there are other factors n stuff
not really buying it

>>37409769
>And what about the other eye?
Risk of infection via touching the (now removed) eye and then touching the healthy eye is reduced vastly.

>>37410212
>you can still see, silly, you have another eye touse all day
as well as you can with two?

>I'm just preventing cancer and infection
you seem to have poor reading comprehension

>Oh wait, was your argument that you don't value pleasure? Too bad my degenerate friend, that isn't an argument.
I never said that; I'm saying that sexual pleasure is not a big part of your average life unless you're a robot who spends all day masturbating ;)

>>37409769
>>Most women think it looks gross
Most American women, that is. I guess it makes sense to cut your ears off if you live in a barbaric country where it's fashionable.

>>37409341
I would probably be happy, my ears are huge as fuck and goofy-looking.

>>37410350
bullet_ant_hands.mov

>>37410345
So you admit that circumcision at an early age decreases sexual pleasure.
That's bad enough in my book. I'll risk having to teach my kid how to clean his glans.

>>37409328
>Why do you guys care so much abotu circumcision?

People are concerned about the legal status of infant circumcision. It's a civil rights issue, not an arbitrary difference of opinion. If someone lobs off your foreskin before you're at an appropriate age to offer informed consent, that is a violation of your rights. Just because it doesn't bother you doesn't mean it should be legally permissible to do it to any other guy.

>>37410345
>as well as you can with two
haha you only use eyes for sight, it doesn't matter. You can still see, why are you complaining? Eyes are'n useful for anything besides sight, the benefits of removing one eye greatly outweigh the "problems"

>>37410272
of course not you're a /pol/fag who blames everything on da joos. no doubt they help keep it alive but they didn't cause it to spread in anglo countries.

>>37409492
>removing a part of your foreskin has medical benefit
it doesn't

>>37410345
oh wow, only losers care about their dicks, great one, jewboy

>>37409492
There are ZERO medical benefits to circumcision. Any claims made are based on data that is dubious at best and fucking worthless at worst and are being pushed by shills who profit from barbarism.

>>37410436
I'm not saying they were the only factor, but they are the indisputable root cause of the problem, and I don't know what you think is the huge difference between "encouraging and continuing" and "spreading" such a practice. Why pretend they aren't not only part of the problem, but a rather huge part of the problem? Which part of that is the problem here?
I'm serious, don't bother with the
>lelele polfag
I don't care

I'm one of those people whose foreskin has been removed shorty after being born. Do I give a shit? No
Can't miss what you've never known.

>>37410518
eyepatches are the future

>>37410447
when did I ever say that?

>>37410492
>>37410443
perhaps you should read through the thread some more. could you provide a source on why these studies are bullshit?

>>37410431
The mental gymnastics here are insane. Are you even reading anything I write?

>>37410518
Replace "foreskin" with "arms". What a dumb argument.

>>37410575
>u are mental gymnasting!
sorry buddy, the benefits of eye removal are too large for you to ignore, and you're all out of arguments

>>37410575
>Mental gymnastics
You clearly see that he's paralleling your argument and the arguments of many pro-circumcision people to point out the stupidity of your points, right? It's like saying

"Hurr I had my left eye removed when I was a kid and I never cared. What's the big fucking deal? Losers just care about their eyesight too much lul"

>>37410642
>>37410604
I've made all the arguments I can; you don't seem to be thinking about any of them. Whatever, it's not on me if you guys can't tell the difference between an eyeball and a penis.

File: 1494287671357.gif (2MB, 207x174px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 207x174px

This thread is pure gold...
OP-Stein and all of the/pol/acks sure are duking it out today...
Just as a quick reminder: in Europe, the only civilized continent on the world, we don't cut baby dicks. Really nogs the jog...

File: 1495373058258.png (48KB, 461x458px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 461x458px

>>37410685
>the only civilized continent on the world

>>37410680
This is willful ignorance. It's not "you guys can't tell the difference between an eyeball and a penis", are you daft? It's a comparison, dumbass.

You say:
>You can't see just as well with two eyes as you can with one.
He says:
>Lol who cares about sight anyways and it's only a minor difference

You think this to be ridiculous. At this point you should make the connection between this and circumcision:
They say:
>You can't feel as well without your foreskin
Idiots say:
>Lol who cares about that anyways and it's only a minor amount of nerve endings

See?
>inb4 you say "eyes aren't the same as the penis" and miss the point entirely

>>37410680
your grandson is gonna look great in an eyepatch

>>37410685
no it can't be true! tell me that %99 of british, nordics, germans and australians are circumsiced it HAVES to be that way

>>37409769
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/hivrisk/decreased_risk/male_circumcision.html
So basically the foreskin is very weak to HIV.
You know, you could just not have casual sex, talk to your partner, or... use a condom. I know it sounds revolutionary, but I think I'm on to something.
So we have
>easier to clean (meme)
>gross to women (brainwashed women maybe? even so, not related to health)
>STD prevention (if you are in the risk population you have bigger problems than a foreskin)
>prevents penile problems
I want to ask about this. What problems? Phimosis? I don't see why doing the surgery after you're diagnosed changes anything.

File: 1494289720756.jpg (49KB, 590x525px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 590x525px

>>37410790
>Less than 20%
Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom
>between 20 and 80%
Albania, Kosovo, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina
>More than 80%
Turkey

Guess cutting dicks is only done in the most retarded countries on the planet...How surprising...

File: 1397704252660.jpg (245KB, 1280x1080px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1280x1080px

>>37410885
I refused to believe in this! circumcision is literally the first sign of human civilization

File: 1496182896619.jpg (6KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 240x240px

>>37410940
We're just breaking the conditioning.

>>37410861
even that info is funny, you already have a hole in your dick connected to the entirety of the reproductive and urinal system, yet removing some skin can lower your chance of HIV.
such "study" can only be a statistic trick

>>37409492
>and only really affects your ability to masturbate and have sex
yeah that's kind of a big deal

>>37410762
I see that he's trying to make a comparison. The problem is that it's a stupid comparison, as an eyebal and a foreskin are clearly different. Textbook strawman.

Cutting out an eyeball removes your sight in that eye. That means you have no depth perception, your field of view is shit, and you generally can't see as well. This affects you every single moment of your life, because you can't see.

Meanwhile, cutting off part of your dick helps protect against all kinds of illnesses, and makes your dick a lot easier to clean, at the expense of some sexual pleasure, which is really not something you should care about all that much, since you are not masturbating 24/7.

>>37410861
>not have casual sex, talk to your partner, or... use a condom
That's implying that all those things can completely prevent STDs, which they cannot.

>What problems? Phimosis?
"Prevention of penile problems: Occasionally, the foreskin on an uncircumcised penis can be difficult or impossible to retract (phimosis). This can lead to inflammation of the foreskin or head of the penis."

>>37411029
To whom? You don't masturbate all the time. And even if you did, it's not like you know what is WITH your foreskin. You can't miss something you never had.

>>37409328
Because I got bullied by it as a kid, and people thought i was a jew

>>37411084
you are a jew, you just convinced yourself otherwise

>>37411054
>To whom?
to me. Its my genitals, I should be able to decide what happens to them.
>it's not like you know what is WITH your foreskin.
Stupid argument. That's like saying someone born without arms can't feel bad about not having them.

>>37411031
>No depth perception
False, just reduced depth perception. Cues such as shading, lighting, height within relative field of view and linear perspective are all monocular cues rather than binocular.

>Every single moment of your life
It could be argued that it only REALLY affects you when you're actively looking out for things rather than all of your life, but I won't nitpick.

>helps protect against all kinds of illnesses
meme

>a lot easier to clean
meme, and only a problem for literal (in the literal sense of the word) toddlers.

This isn't even a fucking conversation we're having. You could argue all day about the benefits or detriments to removing your appendix, removing your tonsils, removing your wisdom teeth or removing your fucking legs, but at the end of the day it's always your decision. Why have we as a society collectively agreed that such a controversial decision and such an irreversible change is allowed just because "lol they're baby boys who the fuck cares? if they're mad they're just bitter I had it done and it never changed me"?

>>37411104
I am literally a lutheric protestant who goes to fucking church

>>37411031
why do you care about your vision so much?
what, you you some kinda robot weeb loser that uses their eye to look at porn all day?

>>37410997
The only valid point I've seen is rinary tract infection (UTI)
Or was until I found this
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/UTI/
>Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a complication of circumcision
>>37411031
As said before, I don't see why surgery after being diagnosed with phimosis would make it any harder. I'm not going to cut a kid's dick just in case he may have such a disease, and I don't oppose surgery in this case.
>That's implying that all those things can completely prevent STDs, which they cannot.
Ways to be infected with STDs that don't involve sex wouldn't be related to the penis, while sex-related STD problems would simply not happen if you don't have casual sex and don't marry a whore.
If this sounds like I think STDs might as well be divine punishment, you're reading correctly.

>>37411131
but your parents aren't

>>37411054
>To whom?
Considering sex is the second biggest divorce issue, I'd say it's very important. Marriages are based on sex and friendship to create a deep bond, it's why marriage and sex counselors have a job.

>>37411162
My father is atheist, and my mother is a protestant. There are no jews in my bloodline, I checked.

>>37411054
>it's not like you know what is WITH your foreskin
What the fuck this literally sounds like gaslighting

>>37411112
Your arms are infinitely more important than your fucking penis.

>>37411117
>It could be argued that it only REALLY affects you when you're actively looking out for things rather than all of your life, but I won't nitpick.
Your eyes are open and looking at stuff every moment you're awake. I'm not sure how you don't realize this.
>meme
You should become a lawyer and say that at every hearing you go to. See how that turns out.

>>37411218
did you forget you only need one eye to see? you don't NEED two eyes, it's as simple as that
do all the seeing you want, plus now you won't get cancer in that nasty right eye

>>37411218
I don't care.
Give me one reason why I shouldn't be able to decide if I want part of my dick sliced off or not.
My body, my choice.

>>37411218
Remove your appendix ASAP then.
>prevents diseases
>is useless anyway
>all doctors say it looks gross
It doesn't matter whether you're sick or not, apparently.

>>37411117
Just as a side note: I have only one eye working, and the monocular clues you mention either don't exist or are very inaccurate.

And not being able to have this capacity affects my everyday life a whole lot: I can't walk straight, I can't grab objects thrown at me (and I'm not talking about things thrown fast...) I have difficulties grabbing objects in unfamiliar territories, I bump into things...
The list goes on and on. So definitely more of a big deal than you claim it to be...

choose one

-teaching you preteen kid how to clean himself, at the age his foreskin is naturally starting to detach from the shaft thus preventig issues like phimosis

-just cutting his dick after born

Because it's something that has affected generations and now we can choose to do something about it.
I've been "restoring" my foreskin for a couple weeks now and I can't wait.

>>37411218
Wow, great fucking response retard. You took the most meaningless parts of my post and made the most banal, obvious responses possible.

>hurr your eyes are open all the time
I know that dipshit, but I'm not checking the depth of something when reading a book, for example. It was literally just me conceding a point to you and you had to make this fucking idiotic response.

>You should become a lawyer and say that at every hearing you go to. See how that turns out.
Not an argument.


This is the guy you were responding to, by the way.

>>37409900
Well there was a time where indoor plumbing wasn't a thing. But yeah, cleaning a dick isn't really a concern anymore.

>>37411249
>my body my choice
haha no sweety, that's only a thing for womyn

>>37411280
It can be restored?

>>37409341
Different. My ears function constantly, and are a vital part of day-to-day life, harming their function would be greatly detrimental to my life. My penis, sexual pleasure in particular, has a very small, insignificant part in my life. Hurting it rarely affects a normal person, though I suppose someone who has nothing better to do but engage in sexual desires may feel differently.

>>37411289
>Not an argument
But saying "meme" is?

File: 1489189245861.png (879KB, 1177x876px) Image search: [Google]

879KB, 1177x876px

I will make sure my son has it done because it looks better

t. soon to be mom

>>37411297
It's actually quite interesting to look into the reasons for certain religious practices. Even today, many arabs ferment meat as a conservation method, and we know pork can carry far more disease than beef if you don't cook it correctly. Of course, whether I should do the same desert dwellers did two millenia ago or not is another issue.

File: Monocular_Cues_by_akenon.jpg (117KB, 1017x786px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1017x786px

>>37411257
>the monocular cues you mention either don't exist or are very inaccurate
False. While I feel bad for you your anecdotal experience does not disprove the study of vision.

>>37411331
>because it looks better
So when are you slicing off your roast beef flaps? It'll look better.

>>37411331
Well atleast you had it done after birth. And not while in school. And not getting called mr. fakedick all the time.

>>37411322
wrong
your inner ear, including your eardrum and cochlea, do the hearing
your outer ear is mostly cosmetic and simply redirects sound to make you hear a little better
you would still hear just fine, and no more ear cancer, but just not as well
why do you care about your outer ears so much? it's just skin ;)

>>37410046
The main purpose of the entire reproductive system (including the penis) is - reproduction. Last I checked, being circumcised does not affect your ability to produce viable sperm.

>>37411324
Do you really fucking believe that "easier to clean" is a legitimate point? The main argument of the post was at the bottom anyways, I was simply responding to what he was saying.

>>37411362
eye removal doesn't affect your ability to sense light

do you know why it's banned in a majority of 1st world countries?

If you knew, you'd realize what you're arguing for. The foreskin is connected to the penis for a natural reason; and for a reason.

It's cutting off a finger, a naturally developed finger, at birth because the threat of 'potential' skin cancer. And the trade off is just "having one less finger!"

The foreskin is not part of your penis, it is an organ in itself providing huge benefits. Unlike the appendicitis which actually serves no purpose anymore.
And getting it removed provides a health benefit.

To put it simply; if there was no use for it, we'd notice; just like the appendicitis.

>>37411362
No, that's what testes do.
It does, however, affect your ability to copulate.

>>37411322
The thing here is that the only benefits to circumcision seem to be
- prevention of phimosis (and you still haven't said why you can't just circumcise your kid AFTER he's been diagnosed), which I think no one is arguing against
- protection against STDs, so there is no reason to sacrifice any pleasure at all. What is better?
>fucking many HIV whores with reduced pleasure
>masturbating with optimal pleasure
There, I'm not even arguing for having a good wife. Choose.

>>37411359
For terrestrial organisms, the ear lobe affects hearing by essentially "focussing" sound into your ear, allowing the sound to be amplified, though it would not entirely destroy hearing. I suppose cutting the ear lobe, at least partially, is a fair comparison to cutting the foreskin, except hearing is always used, and is more important to function, compared to sexual pleasure. Also,
>ear cancer
Really? I get the point you are trying to make, but try harder.

>>37411338
this makes sense if you're looking at trees tens of meters apart or giant rabbits, but when judging a ball hurtling toward you or similar sized objects close to each other, it falls short

>>37411362
Reduced pleasure affects your ability to ejaculate.
But why would I lose even a hundredth of my body anyway?
>STD prevention
>so I can fuck sluts all day
I see.

>>37411338
It's not that they don't exist, but that they are pretty much worthless in everyday life. Compared to what you'd normally be able to see with both eyes, the inaccuracy of these methods do not allow for any kind of precise estimation, which means that they are only useful to get an idea of how far they are, but are not helpful to interact in the real world.
I could tell you with an uncertainty of 20-30cm where an object is, but that vague estimation is not usable by my brain to actually translate in into useful actions.
This results in people like me having to learn a lot of "tricks" to interact somewhat normally and get past this problem. But even today, after taking years of training with professionals, I still can't catch an object being thrown at me at a slow speed, and I will most likely never will be able to.

>>37411441
my ex had phimosis (i think), it didn't seem to be a big deal he just never wanted the skin back
what's the big deal nayway?

>>37411479
Do you know how rare cancer of the foreskin is? It's fucking infinitesimal, especially compared to cancer of the prostate and testicles, which nobody is in a hurry to remove from children.

>>37411441
I'm not saying its entirely moral to circumcise a child without permission, but it is not nearly important enough to start as heated of an argument as it does here. If sexual pleasure is that vital to your existance, there is an underlying problem.

>>37411514
big deal of what, phimosis? In some cases it can hurt when you get erections so all sex is shit. This is a small percentage of the small percentage of kids who get phimosis, but just in case we should circumcise all kids.

>>37411540
>barbarically mutilating children's genitals is not important enough to start as heated of an argument as it does here

>>37411394
No, but it does affect depth perception. I dare you to try driving a car with one eye. Or doing anything else that acquires coordination.

>>37411540
>why u care about childrens rights that much lmao only losers like pleasure
k

>>37411331
>women are protected by law from genital mutilation
>Dr Noseberg gets protected by law from the consequences of fucking up a man's dick

>>37411540
>If sexual pleasure is that vital to your existance, there is an underlying problem.
This. This right here is the argument for circumcision that I hate the most.

Have you ever had someone slight you in a minor yet very deliberate way? You look like the asshole when you get mad. "Oh anon, it's only one dollar, do I REALLY have to pay you back?" Shit like that is the worst, and that's the argument you're making.

If you think it's only about sexual pleasure then you're wrong. It's about being able to fucking make decisions for yourself. Everyone seems so content to just accept this thing that happened to them that they never had any say in just because they don't know any other reality. It's literally a civil rights issue, but I sound like the faggot who's overreacting for saying that. And fucking forget ever trying to discuss this in real life. "Oh, he says we shouldn't circumcise children? LOL, what a bitter loser!"

>>37411540
You are entirely missing the point, and I'm not sure if you know it.

What is the point of absolutely traumatizing your child at birth ? Why would you put your child through the 8 days of torment when the circumcision is healing ? How can you still argue "oh it's just sexual pleasure" when sexual pleasure is what drives every god damn being alive today ?
Why are you this way ? Who taught you these heinous ideas of life ?

>>37411540
>If sexual pleasure is that vital to your existance, there is an underlying problem.
Or maybe some men don't like the idea of being physical violated while they're a helpless child, and maybe they don't like that fact that nobody cares about it because they're too busy being hypocritical and crying over female circumcision in some backwards african shithole.

>>37411590
lots of people with sight in only one eye have drivers licenses

>>37411540
It's not important to you, ok. As stated before, the problem is based on civil rights. I don't like being told I was cut something off without my permission.
The argument is that health supercedes civil rights, and we're looking into whether the health benefits really outweigh my right to keep my body whole. What if we see a genetic defect that attacks the right test in .1 percent of males? Would you then advise all parents to cut off one test, just in case? Even if the disease is treatable and won't risk your life (like phimosis)? Wouldn't you let the person decide?
I'd rather let the kid decide.

>>37411517
See this on morality of it. >>37411540

>>37411488
>>37411513
I have no clue who's even trying to make what point anymore. Yeah, having one eye isn't as good as having two. That was the original point, you were supposed to make a comparison between the left eye and your foreskin. I wasn't even the guy who originally made that comparison, I was just pointing out that one eye wasn't as useless as some people might believe. If you recognize that one eye isn't as good as two then you should also disagree with circumcision under the same principle.

>>37411636
And trust me, it was really hard to get it...

>>37411540
The only reason why the argument is this heated is that people like you come up with such retarded counter arguments that you start to suspect you want or need people to circumcise and that's very strange.

>>37411540
If you're aggressively defending circumcision, you are either a jew, a muslim, a faggot who fetishizes cut dicks, or are a cutfag in denial trying to keep the depression about it from entering your mind.

These are the only reasons to be a pro-cutfag.

>female mutilation is illegal
>male mutilation isnt
what why

>>37411540
you been totally BTFO after this, just end it man, take your fetish elsewhere

File: manson giggle.gif (1MB, 285x242px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 285x242px

>>37411694
Because females don't get phimosis, their beef flaps are attractive to men, and losing the flap doesn't remove the cells that STDs can use to enter the woman's body (beef flaps are not made of the same thing a foreskin is made of)

>>37411757
>and losing the flap doesn't remove the cells that STDs can use to enter the woman's body
neither does removing the foreskin. Phimosis usually clears up on it's own too, but nah lets just cut the baby's dick instead. Nevermind the fact that these are issues for a pubescent kid, not a prepubescent baby. Easier to force it on a baby.

File: 1307313767662.jpg (63KB, 622x521px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 622x521px

>>37411823
Congratulations, you solved the code.

File: 1416671344049.jpg (7KB, 256x257px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 256x257px

>>37411694
>what why

The jews are the reason it's not illegal. The rabbis gotta suck those freshly circumcised baby jewdicks. But surprisingly the biggest reason today the rest of us goyim get it are the (((insurance companies))) covering circumcision, and Dr Noseberg recommending it. In states it's not covered in, the rates of circumcisions go steadily down. Since most people refuse to do it if they have to pay out of pocket for it, Dr Greenberg doesn't feel like pushing it so much anymore.

File: 1491303180037.jpg (129KB, 937x686px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 937x686px

for wimmen

>>37411895
>The rabbis gotta suck those freshly circumcised baby jewdicks
It's disgusting how this isn't a metaphore or an exaggeration at all

>>37411938
i told a friend of mine about this before i knew he was a cut jew
because i used to work for the only doctor in town who did the procedure, and he made so much fucking money selling the foreskins he literally had a polar bear rug with a growling mouth open head and a elephant foot waste basket kind of madness

the friend is a doctor and doesn't believe me and probably thinks i'm mean and weird now

>>37411823
60% reduced contraction of HIV.

http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/

I was circumcised at 10, don't feel bad about it.

>>37412045
now you can bareback all the junkies you want with only 40% chance of getting aids! cool1

>>37412045
oh yes, the africa example, sure is working for them

>>37412045
Have you tried a condom ? I've heard it's more than """"""60%"""""" effective

>>37409842
>nobody else thinks cut looks good
That's because cut doesn't look good at all. Anybody that says so is a dumb girl or a dumb cutcuck. Sorry for the redundancy.

>>37412126
Don't need condoms when I'm a KHV robot

>>37412160
even my auntie who is the biggest, weight lost surgeriest, dumbest, white bmw driving, starbucks frappacino drinking retard you've ever met, wouldn't circumsize a baby even though she thinks it looks better (and admits it's because it's what she's used to)

Uncut and have a short foreskin, i actively try to stretch it. I ended up with vitiligo because of the mechanical stress... fuck. my . life.

File: image.jpg (281KB, 831x705px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 831x705px

>>37409328
It depends. My boyfriend is the first uncircumcised guy I've been with, the only down side is that his dick is smelly when he first gets hard. His foreskin will air out though. The strange part is that his penis smells like sweaty pine trees...