would you consider losing your virginity to a hot roastie

I think a lot of people would, but most people are after intimacy, not casual sex. If they wanted a hot roastie, people would just visit an escort.

Why the fuck would i not?
I don't give a shit that she's had other dicks in her, so long as they're gone by the time get there
besides, not like i'm ever gonna get laid if i only fuck virgins

>>37401726

I'm sure most would be after the emotional validation of a hot roastie wanting to have sex with them, more than just the sex itself, so escort NO COUNT.

>>37401726
people that think they cant have intimate loving sex with someone who isnt a virgin are emotionally damaged and insecure.

File: 1244938417733.jpg (50KB, 500x449px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x449px

>>37401682
Probably not. I'm getting old and I don't care much about sex anymore.

The only thing I want is to find companionship and to be happy.

>>37401682
>losing my powers
>to a fucking roastie
>haha
>no
i prefer death

>>37401682
is this a real sujet?

>>37402295
I think most people here are aware that they are damaged. You're stating the obvious.

File: 1496143705366.jpg (141KB, 943x650px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 943x650px

>>37401682

I could get sex right now if I wanted with jewbucks.

But she ain't gonna help with breakfast, watch YuGiOh with me, and talk about illicit grade school card smuggling rings.

Roasties can't provide that level of comfiness.

>>37402295

Sex is one thing but you are delusional if you think a woman with multiple partners will make as good of an actual wife as a virgin one.

File: 1484738822432.jpg (219KB, 1273x1024px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1273x1024px

>>37403166
My crazy ass ex was a virgin and we even waited 13 months of dating before we fucked. She ended up cheating on me and had a slew of mental issues.

You don't know what you're talking about if you unironically think virginity has anything to do with being a decent person/partner.

>>37402295
I don't understand the contention here from either side. People have a tendency to bond better with others who have similar life experiences in general. It may not be absolute, but there's an undeniable tendency here.

Honestly you come off as emotionally damaged and insecure by your post. Someone who is secure is accepting of other's sexual preferences and does not see it as a character flaw and see it as a natural result of life experience.

>>37403416

>My crazy ass ex was a virgin

lmao is that what she told you? Its super cute that you believed that. She must have been so excited that it finally worked.

File: 6_o.jpg (255KB, 1079x1112px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1079x1112px

>>37403600
The problem is people here won't just say thats a sexual preference and leave it at that - they have to state it as fact and perform mental gymnastics like this guy >>37404260 that 'virgins are objectively better in ever way and can do no wrong' when that simply isn't true.

There are plenty of shitty people out there and to try and categorize them based on virgin or not is extremely naive and screams insecurity.

>>37404260
Denial: the post. I bet you're still waiting for your pure virgin waifu to appear in your basement any day now.

>>37404565

>it is extremely naive and screams insecurity.

lmao its the "if i say it first it will stop being what i am" desperation argument tactic. Nobody thinks you're le smart and le wordly because you like to suck the secondhand drippings out of herpetic vaginas. You're not fooling anyone.

Its the same as conceding the point. Thanks.

>>37403166
Source: debunked meme graphs of religious pro-abstinence graphs and wishful thinking of bitter virgin manchildren.

>>37404755

Don't get triggered sweetheart. This isn't your safe space.

>>37401682
I don't really care about that.
I can go see a whore any time, if I felt like it. But I don't really care about that.

>>37404775
>debunked

Surely you wouldn't make such a statement without providing source.

>>37404791
Don't get triggered virgin. This isn't your safe space. You need to go to wizchan instead.

>>37404850
The onus of proof is on the one making the claim. Those graphs don't provide a source. They simply say "muh CDC" but never provide actual data or methodology. So it's as good as making data up.

>>37401682
No, A roastie is still always roastie. She'll use this to publically humiliate me in some way.

>>37404260
I bet she lied to you about being a virgin.

File: 1496197764728.jpg (52KB, 500x352px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x352px

>>37405328
Of course! Because virgins can do no wrong. In fact all those shitty whore stacys must have been born having already taken at least 12 cocks.

>>37405389
>what is sex with pregnant women?
that's how staceys are made.