Circumcision hate thread. >Tfw masturbating barely feels

File: kek.jpg (91KB, 720x757px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 720x757px

>tfw spic
>tfw can masturbate without lube and it feels good

File: 1211671438076.jpg (56KB, 432x288px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 432x288px

>tfw my dick is on here
>I didn't know it was a complication

Why was circumcision even a thing to begin with? No other culture would even thing to cut up an infant's dick.

>>37315799
Jews and Muslims do it. That's already a huge part of the world.

they just look so dried out. its honestly disgusting. like cutting the clitoral hood off a girl, the clit would become all dried and lose sensation.

>>37315799
kikes
/thread

>>37315773
Which one is your penis?

>>37315767
dont need lube.

>>37315799
they had to think of creative ways to pass the time before internet came around

We all know how it'll go, though
>M-muh washing and stamina
>Jews and mudslimes
>I wasn't molested as an infant; guess that just makes me better than cutfags
>Foregen will come through for us; I know it
>I want to get back at my parents
>If you pull at your shaft skin for 3-4 years, it will look and work almost like a real foreskin, minus frenulum functionality and all the sensitive areas
>Look at what it did to me *dick pics*
>Here is my suicide letter
>Thread archived

File: 20170527_170806.jpg (1MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1440px

I wish I wasn't circumsized

>>37315799

I think the Australian Aborigines also practised circumcision. It's some sort of bizarre ritual that goes cross-generational. There's a theory that it's actually about deliberately inducing trauma in a young boy to make him more submissive as an adult. In fact many of the Biblical verses that mention circumcision depict it as a form of submission or humiliation of an enemy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq_gmiJtJLA
What I don't get about circumcision is there are so many ways it can go wrong but it seems like there's no benefit.

Like, if someone came up to you and said, hey man, hold these scissors real close to your eyes and spin around in a circle, you'd say no fucking way. It's extremely likely you're going to hurt yourself, and it has no benefit.

>>37315767
because white people can actually grab the dick without also grabbing the head of the dick unlike you with the small dick

>>37315908
>>37315647

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530408/
what about Denmark finding circumcision may be related to higher incidnce autism spectrum disorders?

File: 1495051603484.jpg (75KB, 513x592px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 513x592px

>>37315647
Why are you people so obsessed with our dicks
>I can masturbate fine
>My dick looks nice
>I don't have to deal with dick cheese
>Less chance of STDs

I'm sorry your parents didn't circumcise you like normal people but don't lash out at us for your phimosis

>>37316055
lol who jerks off their shaft other than for show?
the head is where all the pleasure comes from

>>37316064
Not OP, but whats the whole deal with circumcisions? What is it and why is everyone talking about it?

>>37316086
circumcised people apparently but I wouldn't know anything about being that

>>37316108
if a doctor removed your toe at birth you'd be complaining as well

>>37316108
Circumcision is the removal of the foreskin and frenulum.

It removes part of your penis for whatever reason.

>>37316064
You will never know what sex was meant to be like as nature intended. Feel sorry for you.

imagine being so insecure about your own penis that you compile a giant dong collage and paragraphs of text shaming other guys about their dicks

File: hmmmm.jpg (48KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 800x800px

>>37316175

youre posting on r9k right now breh youll never know what sex feels like either

>>37316171
Why would someone want it? Does it make your cock look good?

>>37316204
take this back and delete it

>>37316056
guys don't be scared, you now have a reason to blame you autism of you carry the scar of the jew!

>>37316108
It removes the useless skin that hoods the penis
When people say it removes a part of your penis they're misleading, it's just excess skin All the normal penises you've seen (in porn for example) are circumcised

>>37316056
That explains a fucking lot...
...
I mean seriously, though; how are they struggling so much with regenerating a fucking layer of mucosal epithelium, smooth muscle, a little elastic blob, and some skin?
>inb4 difficulty innervating!
No, it's not fucking hard: just promote fucking axon and dendrite regrowth.

>>37316115
do cut guys not know this? do they cum from jerking their shaft? lol. i think maybe i could but whats the fucking point it would be more tiring than pleasurable

>>37316204
>youre posting on r9k right now breh
Yeah so are you.
>youll never know what sex feels like either
big talk for a virgin

uncut nice > cut nice > cut avg > uncut avg > anteater > botched cut

>>37315799
Originated in Egypt to display social status, kikes stole it for hygeine purposes because no water to clean with and later justified it with spooky vampire YHWH. Sometime later european christians read the bible and thought premarital sex and masturbation were evil, so the best course of action to deter these was destroying your genitals. The victorian era saw huge increases in circumcision, but it didn't completely catch on until Kellogg the cereal man. The thought of little boys feeling good made him fly into autistic fits of rage so he decided they should have their peepees cut up as punishment for it. He also advocated pouring sulfuric acid on little girls for the same aforemetioned reason but that never caught on.

That's about the most condensed version of its history.

>>37316222
>Why would someone want it?
Outside of the third world, cosmetic companies want it. And hospitals want it too so they can sell to them.

File: Circumcision And Medical Lies.jpg (62KB, 720x718px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 720x718px

Friendly reminder that neonatal circumcision was shown to permanently damage the limbic system of the brain in this study. And keep in mind that the vast majority of r9k mentally ill outcast robots like myself have symptoms of a deficient limbic system. And before anyone says "well a study can be wrong" (which is of course true) keep in mind The Lancelet is The Lancet is one of the world's oldest and best known peer-reviewed general medical journals. http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/taddio2/

And yet normies will continue asking "oh why did [insert Elliot Rodger-esque outcast male spree shooter here] go postal, I don't understand why he'd do that, he was so quiet and polite!" and continue being hopelessly blind to the truth. Below is our chain of causality.

>Infancy: Genitals mutilated without consent, not only ruining sex life but causing permanent issues in the limbic system of the brain. The limbic system controls emotions, i.e. an overactive limbic systems causes incredibly intense feelings of loneliness, depression and suffering. Not to mention introversion and anxiety.
>Childhood: Relentless bullying. Absent father or abusive father.
>Teenage: Experience constant rejection and mistreatment from women due to them being attracted solely to the top 20% of males (verified in the study ran by Okcupid.)
>Adulthood: At this point, most women have children, most normies have secure jobs, most everyone has social circles and life development. Robots like us are left with nothing.
>Suicide: Once our parents die, it's over. Our brain chemistry is damaged beyond repair.

>>37316266
im cut and i jerk off the shaft once im close to cumming in order to edge. if i touched the head at that time id cum instantly. and i death grip when i start cumming ofc

>>37316259
Because foregen are fucking useless and turned down pharma money that would have nearly fully funded them, and WFIRM only received enough funding to work on erectile tissue and shaft skin. They said that AFIRM wants them to eventually regenerate the entire bepis though. AFIRM III starts in Dec 2018 and depending on how much money is given they may be able to start working on the more erogenous parts.

>>37316310
Was the supreme gentleman cut? I don't remember him saying anything about it.

>>37316222
Men usually don't want it and have it done to them at the infant stage without any consent or say in it whatsoever.

File: RedPanels on Circumcision.png (126KB, 710x870px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 710x870px

>>37316310
One other thing. I'm fairly certain every single robot on this board falls into this category.
>When the deep limbic system is overactive it sets the minds filter on negative. People who are depressed have one dispiriting thought after another. When they look at the past, they feel regret. When they look at the future, they feel anxiety and pessimism. In the present moment, they're bound to find some thing unsatisfactory. The lens through which they see themselves, others, and the world has a dim grayness.
Also, here is another study showing ritual circumcision is linked to increased risk of autism in young boys. Granted, I know correlation doesn't imply causation, but it's a fact that infant trauma permanently affects the brain. Normies have no clue that infants are fully awake while 3/4ths of the nerve endings on their penis are sliced off with a scapel.
>Circumcised boys are more likely than intact boys to develop autism spectrum disorder before the age of 10, new research suggests. Painful experiences in neonates have been shown in animal and human studies to be associated with longterm alterations in pain perception, a characteristic often encountered among children with ASD.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/01/150109093725.htm
>>37316441
It's likely, his father was Jewish. I wouldn't be surprised if Elliot simply never considered it a factor. Most people have no clue about neonatal trauma unless they're in the medical field.

File: 4L_1sfMyxEq.jpg (22KB, 401x401px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 401x401px

I'm restoring and am halfway there. The Jews won't try and steal my foreskin twice, r-right guys?

>>37316950
You can never get the nerves back FYI

>>37315647

So glad I was never cut, I don't even care if I nut in 10 seconds, it literally feels so unbelievably good especially after a week of no fap.

Cutfags will literally NEVER feel this

>>37317052
Foregen my man.

>>37315799
fuck off with blaming it on jews.
in anglo countries it came form the puritan obsession with sexual repression. and because boys are seen as tough and disposable and girls are seen as weak and needing protection it was only done to boys. in britain it was only practiced until early 20th century or so, but in america and also canada and australia it still has been common all the way into the 21st century because muh tradition, and lately so medical companies can make lots money off of it. which makes me want to vomit.

File: German Circumcision Protest.jpg (89KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 720x960px

>>37316246

That is nothing more than complete lies.

The foreskin isn't "useless skin". It's the most sensual part of the penis and fundamentally shapes how the penis moves and feels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmToXLVrZ7c

File: smugAnimeGirl4.jpg (28KB, 337x404px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 337x404px

>>37315647
Who else here turkey neck? My bottom side of my penis is 100% scrotum and if I pull it out, I can make my scrotum look giant. I find it rather funny because if I didn't, I'd probably kill myself

>>37317296
I was going to say nobody deserves genital mutilation, but faggots like you do for making already mutilated men feel even worse. and the doctors and (((medical associations))) who pushed it deserve it too.

>>37316086

>the head is where all the pleasure comes from

That's a common misconception. The head is one of the least sensual parts of the penis. Almost all the nerve endings in the head are unspecialized free nerve endings, which can only detect coarse stimuli like heavy pressure, scratching, and heat pain. There are a few specialized sensory nerve endings in the glans, but not a lot. They're mostly around the corona. So, while some men may find the glans erogenous to some degree, it's a gross overstatement to say it's where "all" the pleasure comes from. Almost all its nerve endings are nociceptors.

The most specially innervated part of the penis is the junctional mucosa of the inner foreskin (this would include the ridged band, the lips of the foreskin, the frenular delta, and the frenulum). The glans doesn't even come close.

>The glans penis is primarily innervated by free nerve endings and has primarily protopathic sensitivity [43]. Protopathic sensitivity refers to cruder, poorly localized feelings (including pain, some temperature sensations and certain perceptions of mechanical contact) [44]. In the glans penis, encapsulated end-organs are sparse, and found mainly along the glans corona and the frenulum [43]. The only portion of the body with less fine-touch discrimination than the glans penis is the heel of the foot [45]. In contrast, the male prepuce ridged band (Fig. 7) at the mucocutaneous junction has a high concentration of encapsulated receptors [46]. The innervation difference between the protopathic sensitivity of the glans penis and the corpuscular receptor-rich ridged band of the prepuce is part of the normal complement of penile erogenous tissue.

http://www.i2researchhub.org/wp-content/uploads/storage/TQ63QSHD/Cold%20and%20Taylor%20-%201999%20-%20The%20prepuce.pdf

>While the human glans penis is protopathic, the prepuce contains a high concentration of touch receptors in the ridged band.

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-mcgrath/

>>37316246
if your lips were never closed would your gums start to feel dry?

>>37317506
so is the junctional mucosa of the inner foreskin removed in a normal circumcision? where do cut dicks get most pleasure from?

>>37315773
Me too bro. I'm dead middle on the left side.

I remember when I was first tryin to masturbate that my skin was attached to the head and it was painful and a little bloody when I removed it. I thought that was normal. Now I'm 4 inches on my best day. First girl I ever got with told the entire high school. No girl ever came near me after that, and I left town after I graduated.

One time I asked my mom why they decided to do it, and she said "your penis is prettier circumcised!" I'll never forgive them.

File: just a piece of skin fgm youtube.png (306KB, 1154x735px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1154x735px

"It's just a piece of skin", these Bohra women are told, if they complain about having had their clitoral hood cut off.

Really brings to mind something close to home.

File: penor3.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>37315647
>Not posting the superior example

>>37317348
If foregen doesn't work, then I may just kill both my mom and the kike who cut me for leaving me mutilated forever.

>>37317665
That is if it ever happens. I lost all hope in them when they said no to huge pharma money on "ethical grounds". And even then, how many millions of men will be trying to get the procedure if they do succeed? Chances of it happening for us are next to none.

>>37317587

>so is the junctional mucosa of the inner foreskin removed in a normal circumcision?

Yes. The amount of it removed will vary because there's no universal standard for what "circumcision" actually entails--the amount and type of tissue removed can vary from one circumcision to the next. But generally a great deal of it will be removed.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847

>The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.

>where do cut dicks get most pleasure from?

It varies because not all cuts are the same.

Some guys still have part of their frenulum and frenular delta left, so they can rub that. Some rub the circumcision scar on the underside (the most sensitive part of a circumcised penis). Some rub the shaft (and in doing so they will be stimulating whatever's left of their foreskin, because the inner lining of the foreskin is generally turned inside-out to cover the shaft in most circumcisions--in those that don't do this, the inner lining is virtually completely removed and the scar is right up on the corona of the glans). Some rub the glans, for all the good it does them (there are a few sensual nerve endings there).

File: 3456757646980.jpg (357KB, 2048x1612px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 2048x1612px

>Denmark Doctors Declare Circumcision Of Healthy Boys 'Ethically Unacceptable'

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/58753ec1e4b08052400ee6b3?timestamp=1484242698606

>still have foreskin
>have never cum from PIV sex

I can't even bring myself to get pissed at this anymore. The family's all having dinner together tomorrow, gonna shoot myself in front of them.

File: 45454365467548765.jpg (182KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1024x576px

>>37317907

don't do it man, don't give up

help save the next generation

File: tmp_13255-1433641205411-1896467076.jpg (150KB, 575x523px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 575x523px

Fuck, these threads always make me upset. Just the thought of this mutilation happening to babies and children every day, it's sickening. I hope this shit stops as soon as society will let it. If I ever give birth to a son I will, without any doubt, be hypervigilant about which doctor is allowed to touch him. He will never be circumcised. Circumcision should be a violation of human rights.

Oy vey, how are we supposed to make skin cream products without foreskins?

>>37317641
Is there a cure for that shit?

File: 676573654657765376.png (13KB, 460x201px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 460x201px

>>37317957

You also have to be careful about forced retraction (even "just a little bit").

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christiane-northrup/circumcision_b_3443415.html

>>37317953
Why, so there can be even more uncut chadlets that get to enjoy their sexuality and will never actually appreciate what intactivists do? Fuck that, let him get off the ride if he wants. I'm probably doing the same soon. Getting tired of waiting around for regeneration that's never going to happen.

File: 1494698215427.jpg (57KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x500px

Who /restoring/ here?
>Finally hit the half way point
>Couldn't be more glad that I decided to start in the first place

>>37317907
>>37318058
You're not alone brahs. Literally just waiting to see E3 and then I'm gone too.

File: Changed Mind.png (129KB, 323x393px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 323x393px

>>37318058

You don't know it's not going to happen. It's very possible.

And I think a lot of intact guys do appreciate what intactivists have done very, very much. I know one off the top of my head, Brian Herrity. He protests against circumcision all the time but he was never cut.

>>37317882
why dont they mention the autism!
>>37316056

File: 39219.jpg (74KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 640x640px

>>37317907
>>37318058
>>37318111

Please get some help and start trying to prevent this. I know it sucks but nobody else should have to go through this.

Genital mutilation needs to end but killing yourselves isn't going to help that.

It was only a year ago that one of the most prominent intactivists, Jonathon Conte, took his own life.

http://www.intactnews.org/node/1007/1463333466/memoriam-passing-my-personal-hero-and-friend-jonathon-conte

>>37318213

I don't think the evidence is strong enough to bother mentioning in protests, especially in light of the fact that the evidence of erogenous tissue loss and distortion of penile function as a result of circumcision is rock-solid (and even then there are nutjobs like Brian Morris out there trying to deny this by gish galloping).

In the future if some causal link is determined between circumcision and autism it might be worth mentioning in arguments or protests. But it's just the one study that found an association, and they didn't demonstrate that the relationship was causal.

one of my childhood friends i think got circumcised when we were young like 6/7 it was funny to laugh that he got part of his dick cut off. but we forgot about it didnt tease him relentlessly for it. i guess it was still ambiguous of who was normal or not. growing up seeing shows like seinfeld make fun of natural dicks, it was confusing. turns out majority of my generation is natural and not jewed

>>37318217
If I could get help I wouldn't be an heroing. There is nothing that can ever be done to fix this. If regeneration ever becomes a thing I'll be in my fucking 40s anyway. I don't care if more kids get cut anymore.

And you know what some of Conte's last words were? "Nobody cares." And they don't. Nothing is going to change for the forseeable future because people are too fucking retarded to realize they're being manipulated. I'm tired of watching it happen, I'm tired of trying to convince them otherwise only to have them get pissed at me, I'm tired of the cutfag bullying, I'm especially tired of seeing the scar every time I look at my dick. If you want to keep trying then you can have fun with it.

>>37318359

40 isn't even old though. A lot of people end up meeting the person they stay with for the rest of their lives around 40..I have friends that age who aren't even married yet but are hoping to get married, and they're doing all kinds of things with their life.

40 is the new 30.

Besides who knows, Foregen might develop sooner than you think. I heard tentatively speaking that they will be ready to begin trials on volunteers within the next 3 years.

>And you know what some of Conte's last words were? "Nobody cares." And they don't. Nothing is going to change for the forseeable future because people are too fucking retarded to realize they're being manipulated.

But this is becoming a topic of mainstream discussion. If you check the news for "circumcision" there's practically a new article every week against it. It didn't used to be like this; the issue is going mainstream RIGHT NOW.

People are finally thinking about this and talking about it.

>>37316064
It says 30% to 40% of cases, lucky man...

And the benis is everything

I jerk off just fine!

>>37318256
reading news articles i do find it interesting how dismissive of it "if circumcisions are decreasing in frequency why is autism increasing? checkmate"
but whatever environmental factors are causing the increase in autism (i only know of increased parental age), it is plausible circumcision amplifies the risk.

>>37318421
>40 is the new 30
except for parenthood

>>37316064
>dick looks better
cracked head from being so dry and a huge scar looks better
okay friend!

>>37316064
>my dick looks fine
it doesn't
hopefully you're muslim

>>37315647
Who here \ready to get rid of those pesky Jews\

File: smugAnimeGirl2.png (117KB, 372x351px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 372x351px

>>37319084
>Eggy bumped my thread
Feels good nugga.

>>37315647
Lol, I could should you my circumcised dick. It's not as pretty and pink as you would think. Mine is purple and all patchy ... discolored. I had phimosis until I was like 23. I fixed it myself in the shower. Also, when I first fucked a pocket pussy (like a fleshlight) as a virgin, I tore my frenulum.

I fucking wish i was circumcised from birth so i woulnd't have to deal with this phimosis, this shit's fucking terrible, literally hurts whenever i get an erection

>>37319084
Fuck off normie
Getting rid of that dumb trip is the only way you may be redeemed

>>37319284
I'll stop tripping when Jews stop chopping off baby dicks and eating them

>>37319268

A lot of guys with tight cuts also have painful erections. The difference is that phimosis can be fixed (and doesn't require circumcision).

A circumciser cutting a baby can't know how much the boy's penis will grow during puberty. Some guys were cut so tight their remaining penis skin splits and bleeds when they get hard.

>>37317406
Good that you can laugh at it, pretend like it's the sail of a boat and your tallywacker is the mast and run around making cool sailing noises.

Bonus points for nautical talk and talk of poop decks etc.

>>37316064
>I can masturbate fine
Without lube?
>My dick looks nice
Post an image and we'll be the judge of that.
>I don't have to deal with dick cheese
Neither does anyone else, now that showering is a thing. You would have to avoid touching your dick for weeks on end to grow dick cheese at this point. You would have to deliberately nurture it.
>Less chance of STDs
Debunked multiple times a while ago.

But overall, I agree with you.
/r9k/ shouldn't be this obsessed with circumcision. Nobody should. Although I do think it needs to end unless it's a medical emergency.

>>37319310

Only a tiny minority of Jewish communities have ever actually eaten the foreskin.

Traditionally in the communities that practiced it, it would be swallowed by a woman. By eating the foreskin, she was supposedly increasing her fertility (of course there's no scientific evidence this works; it's a superstition).

This practice was never that common among Jews as a whole. Don't confuse this with metzitzah b'peh btw, which is different and more common (though nowadays rare, but more common than eating the foreskin).

File: IMG_1550.png (76KB, 830x844px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 830x844px

>>37315647
>>37315773
>>37315926
>>37316310
>>37316950
>>37317605
>>37317665
>>37317907
>>37317957
>>37318058
>>37318359
>>37319084
>>37319310
All you goyim BTFO'd, we will never stop snatching baby penises until the cattle submit to G*d's chosen people

File: Women's March vs Circumcision.png (118KB, 928x336px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 928x336px

>>37319840
>Traditionally in the communities that practiced it, it would be swallowed by a woman.
Holy shit, the parallel is insane.

Thousands of years ago, infant males would have their foreskin forcibly sliced off with a knife for the benefit of a spoiled woman to ingest and gain youth.

In this present day, infant males currently have their foreskin forcibly sliced off with a knife for the benefit of a spoiled woman to use as anti-wrinkle cream and gain youth.

And the sad thing is, it's completely true. Foreskins get sold by hospitals for $400 each. Our sex lives (and possibly brain) are ruined for just $400. http://knowledgenuts.com/2013/09/23/the-bizarrely-profitable-business-of-baby-foreskins/

>tfw aussie
>tfw americans will never know just how good life is even with humble pleasures like fapping

ya got jewed

>>37320048
like half of aussies are circ'd too dumbshit
I know because I'm one of them

>>37320048
~50% of Americans are cut.
~50% of Australians are also cut.

What the fuck are you trying to pull

>>37320125
it's more like 75% in kikemerica. 50% is the CURRENT circumcision rate.

File: 1486857182454.gif (21KB, 312x253px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 312x253px

>>37320048
>only 10% of kiwis are cut
>tfw I'm one of the 10%

>>37320024

That's a really good observation anon. I admire that you noticed that connection.

Be thankful for your curcumcision. Your parents made the right decision, but maybe for the wrong reasons. I have frenulum breve which means my dick will rip and bleed profusely if I ever get to have sex--I think I would prefer lesser sensitivity if it means I can actually have sex.

>>37320048

And yet Australia is home to the likes of Brian "Compulsory Circumcision" Morris and Guy "Cut Up" Cox. S M H.

File: fgm.jpg (65KB, 530x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 530x600px

>>37320125
>tfw australian and uncut
Feels good lads.

>>37320163
m-me too lad. I had it done at age 7 I think cause of phimosis. at least I'm not completely alone in this.

>>37315767
>tfw spic
>got circumcised at 8 years old
Worst of both worlds. I curse the kike doctor everyday for convincing my parents there was no other way to deal with an overly tight foreskin.

>>37320211

>phimosis

>age 7

You got screwed. The foreskin is fused to the head of the penis in most boys until around 10.

Unless you were having some issue urinating, there was no need for them to do anything to your penis. And even if you were having some issue, there would've been a way to treat it without cutting off your foreskin.

>>37316064
Uncircumcised dicks can be rolled back and look almost like circumsized too.
>He doesn't have a convertible
>best of both worlds

>>37320261
oh fuck. I guess my parents just hate me. maybe circumcision is what creates many robots.

>>37320230

It's normal for your foreskin to be very tight until around puberty. It's supposed to be that way. It takes a while for the membrane that fuses it to the glans to break down enough to allow retraction, and also the opening of the foreskin has to mature and relax enough to allow it to roll back. Again, this usually happens around 10 (but sometimes even later).

Circumcision for tight foreskin just doesn't make sense. And in young boys a tight foreskin is NORMAL. Even if an issue with the foreskin develops (maybe due to scarring/inflammation/muscle tension) that doesn't require amputation to fix; a lot of the time it can be fixed with a little cream or coconut oil.

>>37320304

Your parents probably just listened to the doctor. They had no way of knowing the doctor was full of crap.

Hospitals are run by Jews. They encourage everyone to circumsize.

I FINALLY HAVE A PLACE I CAN SHARE MY HORROR STORY ABOUT MY OWN CIRCUMCISION.

This is all true you guys so please bear with me

>be me, currently 25 year old kissless permavirgin autist
>did not start masturbating until I was 24 years old
>because of no sexual attention/experience/etc, I began to post pictures and videos of my penis online
>would get a lot of compliments that it looked nice and looked huge (its above average size)
>would need to use lotion to masturbate because I'm circumcised, and the only way I can finish is by focusing on just my frenulum so i masturbate really weirdly

>fast forward a year, only masturbate once a week to avoid wet dreams
>suddenly my penis begins to get red and irritated after masturbating right around my circumcision scar
>underside also gets rid since i need to focus on frenulum
>have to begin using a glove/boxers to masturbate with because lotion irritates it a lot
>post about my predicament online along with a picture of what it looks like
>people tell me i need to see a doctor and that i had a terribly botched circumcision
>they tell me i need to try something called foreskin restoration

its just not fair guys. even masturbation has been taken away from me. i never thought in a million years this would happen to me, but then again with how every facet of my life is shit, it doesnt surprise me at all.

sorry for the blog

>>37317348
Nah, the nerves are lost. I went through all of that, and sure I have a flap of skin now, but it feels numb like scar tissue.

>>37320315
Exactly! This is why I fucking hate the doctor that recommended circumcision to my parents, and they, not knowing any better, followed along with it.

It's that I wasn't able to urinate properly, and some urine stayed stuck between the penis head and the foreskin so I would always stink of piss.

>>37316289
mfw it's actually true.

>>37320211
Wait are you kiwi as well?
Us cut kiwis are turbo robots surrounded by uncut chads

>>37320356
>24
Yeah I don't buy that for a second, but you might as well go get it confirmed by a men's health specialist.
And if you want to look into foreskin restoration just remember it will take a couple years to get the results you want

>>37315647
Fucking degenerate jews.
Imagine been a kid an have a penis like this.
Disgusting.

File: 787565767.png (161KB, 1145x725px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1145x725px

>>37320356

>have to begin using a glove/boxers to masturbate with because lotion irritates it a lot

This is common among men with tight cuts. It's basically using a cloth or glove as a prosthetic 4skin.

Without the gliding, you need to use either lube or a prosthesis because jerking at your immobilized dick can injure it. The penis wasn't meant to be straitjacketed by its own skin, and never meant to be jerked that way without gliding action.

Circ distorts the way the penis works, in rough proportion to the severity of the cut.

>people tell me i need to see a doctor and that i had a terribly botched circumcision

People overuse the word "botch" in this topic (of course botches do exist, but not every circ that someone is unhappy with or that has impinged upon their sexual expression is a botched circ).

Circ is sexually crippling, to varying extents depending on severity. That has generally been the POINT of circ. Unless it looks like the doc made a serious mistake that disfigured the penis in a way the doctor clearly did not intend, it wasn't a botch. Just (from what you've described) a really fucking tight/extreme circ. Unless there's something you haven't mentioned in this post, of course.

Some parents actually specifically request "tight" cuts like this for their sons because they think it looks better. Historically, anti-masturbation docs would do tight cuts on purpose to make it harder to fap.

>In all cases [of masturbation] circumcision is...the physicians' closest friend and ally...To obtain the best results one must cut away enough skin and mucous membrane to...put it on the stretch when erections come later. There must be no play in the skin after the wound has thoroughly healed...it must fit tightly over the penis, for should there be any play the patient will be found to readily resume his practice, not begrudging the time and extra energy required to produce the orgasm.

E. J. Spratling. Masturbation in the Adult. Medical Record 1895;24:442-443.

>>37317406
is that normal or what because ive been confused my entire life

>>37320479
what benefit would i have to gain froom lying about something like that anonymously on 4chan

it was either 23 or 24, but it is definitely true. i rarely if ever watched porn my entire life before i started masturbating and i would basically just have wet dreams every few weeks and even though i hated them, i still wouldnt masturbate.

even now i dont watch normal porn, i hate it. basically all i watch is porn of girls peeing or squirting/masturbating

>>37320391

The fact that urine was getting trapped between your glans and foreskins implies that they were in the process of separating.

When you're very young, there is no space between them for urine to get stuck in because they're one structure (they develop that way in the womb--which by the way completely blows out of the water the BS idea that the foreskin is "vestigial"--not only is it the part of the penis with the most specialized pattern of innervation, but without it the glans of the penis wouldn't even form correctly. That's why guys born with incomplete foreskins have the end of their urethra positioned wrong (hypospadias).

So if pee was getting stuck in the space between them, it means the membrane fusing them was well on its way to breaking up. Otherwise there wouldn't have even been a space to begin with.

Really sucks that you got fucked over anon.

File: David Reimer Before Suicide.jpg (161KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 1200x795px

>Some parents actually specifically request "tight" cuts like this for their sons because they think it looks better.
I've never been more enraged in my entire life. Humanity is vile, I fucking hate roasties and normies. The most horrible, anger-inducing circimcision story is that of David Reimer. He was born a boy, but the shitty doctor botched his circimcision to the point where he surgically removed his entire penis to stop the bleeding. His sex like was permanently destroyed. And you know what the corrupt doctor did? He fucking gave David female hormones and had his parents raise him as a female. He killed himself at age 38, but I wish so badly he would have killed the doctor who performed the forced infant genital mutilation. No doctor should ever, ever consent to circumcision on a healthy baby.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_examiner/2004/06/gender_gap.html

File: 435.png (116KB, 1149x985px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1149x985px

>>37320634

I believe it. The point of circumcision historically has been to impede male sexuality and it seems to have done just that in your case.

Rabbis and Jewish Sages of the old times were very up front about it. Doctors in America were very up front about it and some are even today. Male circumcision is at a very fundamental level about impinging upon and controlling male sexuality.

You seem to have been cut very severely too from how you describe it, similarly to how Dr. Spratling over there would have done it.

>>37317641
Hey dry peepee anon

File: Penis lost.png (40KB, 1189x510px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1189x510px

>>37320708

There isn't any data available on how many circumcisions in North America lead to loss of more than the prepuce/shaft skin. But it happens every year at least. There are guys out there missing half or more of their entire penis because they were victimized by this barbaric and destructive practice.

It's very sad.

>>37320590
how d i know if i have a tight cut? just is theres very little skin movement when i masturbate?

File: 18620009_934283473381151_5716027355189129784_n.jpg (8KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x250px

>cutfags will never know this feel

>>37320838

Yeah, pretty much.

Here's a video of a tight cut, for reference.

https://www.xtube.com/video-watch/Too-tight-circumcision-18957992

If yours is like that, then you were cut very tight. Notice how his skin almost doesn't move at all. His penis skin is constricting his erection, even before he begins to pull at his penis. This isn't a "botch" (unless the doctor was intending to do a loose cut and did a tight one by accident, but I see no reason to assume that was the case here). Just a very tight circumcision.

It is however a very profound and severe distortion of how the penis is supposed to work. Compare it to how a whole penis with a mobile foreskin works. The difference is enormous.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foreskin_gliding_action_in_masturbation.ogv

Looser circumcisions will be somewhat in-between the two extremes of a tight cut and an intact penis. There will be some gliding action, in proportion to how much skin and mucosa remain.

>>37320024
In my experience, the nurses at the hospital are incredibly pushy about circumcision. I don't know if it's because the hospital is turning a profit or if it's because the nurse themselves are uneducated.

When I was getting settled into the delivery room after my water broke, the nurse started asking me questions about how I wanted the delivery to go (pain meds, any special religious things, etc) and when she asked if I wanted to do the circumcision at the hospital before we were discharged it turned into a bit of an argument when I said I wasn't going to circumcise my son. To this day it gets under my skin that someone who should be supporting your decision is arguing with you and rolling their eyes at your decision.

>>37315647
when will clitoridotomy be mandatory for newborn girls?
it's so much cleaner and healthier.

>>37320976
The profit they make is absolutely massive, to the extent that hospitals will even circumcise for free if the parent can't pay, simply because it's a quick, easy surgery that nets anywhere from $400 to $900 in reselling the foreskin. And no, I'm not joking. I was I was. http://www.foreskin.org/f4sale.htm

>>37320976
I talked to a mother who told me that after she gave birth and refused to have her son mutilated the nurse told her "I would never give oral to a non-mutilated penis."

I'm telling you, there are a lot of doctors and nurses, both male and female, who are just plain pedophiles who mutilate children for their own sexual gratification.

Never let any doctor anywhere near your son's genitals.

>>37321171

That is sexual harassment. What a fucked up thing for her to say.

Imagine if a male nurse said, "I'd never go down on a girl with roasties" if he were trying to convince a mother to cut off her daughter's labia/clitoral hood. It would be an outrage.

People seem to be willfully blind to the way that males are treated, even in infancy. Females aren't the only sex to be "objectified".

>I'm telling you, there are a lot of doctors and nurses, both male and female, who are just plain pedophiles who mutilate children for their own sexual gratification.

There are doctors who have attended "circumsexual symposia". These are conventions circumfetishists have every few years and they have people give speeches about circumcision.

>>37321295
>People seem to be willfully blind to the way that males are treated, even in infancy.
The way that you treat a boy reflects the kind of man he will grow up to be.

File: Circumcision Brain Damage.jpg (540KB, 1008x1580px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 1008x1580px

>Research carried out using neonatal animals as a proxy to study the effects of pain on infants psychological development have found distinct behavioral patterns characterized by increased anxiety, altered pain sensitivity, hyperactivity, and attention problems (Anand Scalzo, 2000). In another similar study, it was found that painful procedures in the neonatal period were associated with site-specific changes in the brain that have been found to be associated with mood disorders (Victoria et al 2013).
If you're a NEET aspergers outcast, or any severely depressed introverted anxious robot, then blame your parents for ruining your brain via forced infant genital mutilation.
>https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage

File: strap that baby boy to the table.png (10KB, 472x92px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 472x92px

>>37321393

Case in point, pic related.

>>37321171
I'm incredibly happy that my son's pediatrician is all about keeping boys intact, when I first met her and told her that my plan was to keep him intact and she started telling me how proud she was/how her own boys are uncut.

>>37316246
>It removes the useless skin that hoods the penis

>It removes the useless skin that hoods the eyeball
>It removes the useless skin that hoods the teeth
>It removes the useless skin that hoods the testicles

>All the normal penises you've seen (in porn for example) are circumcised
lol, next time you go for a cheeky porn-wank, actually check the dicks. intact penises are on the rise (pun intended), amputee.

>>37317052
why have you guys ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS emphasize that?
Guess what, WE FUCKING KNOW THAT, buzzkill.
Instead of encouraging your fellow bros on their journey of recovery, you're beating us down.

>>37322206
it never ends. roasties and uncutfags alike laugh at us when they should if anything be grateful that they weren't mutilated like us. but instead they just try to make us suffer even more. we should genocide both of them.

>>37318421
>But this is becoming a topic of mainstream discussion. If you check the news for "circumcision" there's practically a new article every week against it.
saw the news about that southafrican getting a dick-transplant due to losing his to a "botched" circumcision?

not ONE article said anything negative about it.
"circs are cultural part of the tribes' tradition blahblah", the end.

Women got their laws and bans, case closed.
What about men? Ha, get fucked, walk it off, suffer in silence like a real man.

>>37322206

A lot of people think that the best part of the foreskin is that it protects the glans, but the fact is that the foreskin itself has way more specialized nerve endings than the glans does; it's not even close. The glans has some and I'm not saying restoration can't help restore a natural appearance to the penis and maybe restore some sensitivity but it doesn't really RESTORE the penis to the way it was.

So it's important to emphasize that you actually cannot undo circumcision, because parents will use that as an excuse to circumcise their kids ("Well if he doesn't like it he can just grow it back")

This guy talks about that too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj_nYcumC0c

He restored but emphasizes that it's nowhere near as good as the real deal.

Parents need to understand that when they make the "decision" to circumcise their son, they are taking a part of him irreparably away. Maybe he can regain a semblance of it but it cannot actually be undone.

>>37320125
i have never met a cut australian

File: 5654645.png (284KB, 479x483px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 479x483px

>>37322402

>saw the news about that southafrican getting a dick-transplant due to losing his to a "botched" circumcision?

Yeah. Isn't he going to have it tattooed so it matches his skin tone?

>not ONE article said anything negative about it.
>"circs are cultural part of the tribes' tradition blahblah", the end.

Well this article isn't about that incident specifically but this references the FGM case going on in the US now.

http://www.startribune.com/we-re-appalled-at-genital-mutilation-of-girls-what-about-boys-and-circumcision/422052673/

Granted the comments section is absolutely painful to read. The ignorance is staggering.

>>37319268
https://phimosisjourney.wordpress.com/guide/


asdasdas

>>37320174
Frenuloplasty.

>>37320174

There are cut guys who also rip and bleed when they even try to masturbate.

Circumcision, especially in its more extreme forms, produces a distortion of the penis. The foreskin isn't just some extra bit hanging on the end; it's so well-integrated with the unit as a whole that removing it affects the whole thing.

This guy was cut so tight that when he started to masturbate his skin split apart and he bled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DRsJXJop5I

>>37322422
>So it's important to emphasize that you actually cannot undo circumcision, because parents will use that as an excuse to circumcise their kids
then emphasize it to people who think about mutilating their child, not to those who do it to undo its damage.

it's like telling a sober alcoholic that booze is bad. DUH.

>>37322473
apparently there's more and more muzzies pushing for female circumcision, saying it's a religious right. and most are saying that they're going to win these court cases seeing as how male circumcision has already set a precedent (and precedents are a huge deal in the legal system). congrats roasties, by letting male circumcision go on unchecked, you're set to allow female circumcision to become legal (not all types, just a couple). I say good, fair is fair. cut off those girls pussy lips.

>>37322688

If you look here >>37317626 you'll notice how they use the "it's just a flap of skin" line on FGM victims in India among the Bohra society, where traditionally they cut off the clitoral hood.

A lot of women who had their hoods cut off are coming forward saying they're angry about it and people keep telling them "get over it, it's just a flap of skin, it's useless, we all had ours cut off and we're fine".

I believe the woman getting prosecuted for FGM over in Michigan is a Borha and she had been performing that type of FGM.

>>37322688
>I say good, fair is fair. cut off those girls pussy lips.
I'm at that stage now, too.

When Germany was passing the circ-law in 2012, almost no women were crying out.
They benefit from foreskin too (at least the hetero women), but hey, they have their laws for FGM, why care about what MEN want?

Fine, enjoy the boomerang to your face. I'll be over there in the frontrow-seat enjoying the freakshow.

File: 565465.jpg (39KB, 658x417px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 658x417px

>>37322688
>>37322723

Personally I think it makes more sense to draw parallels between FGM and MGM because they are so much more alike than people want to believe.

Circumcised women overwhelmingly DEFEND FGM. Most of them don't know anything about the tissue that was removed (if it was a type of FGM that actually removes tissue) or even know there's a whole movement against it.

They think it's normal and they can't imagine that they're missing part of the sexual experience.

The western narrative (that women in FGM cultures all hate it and they're all trying to escape and it's the big evil men that are 100% behind it and all the women in FGM societies will say they can't feel anything at all) is a lie.

>>37322788
pretty much. women mostly push and defend FGM in those countries. and when they come to the west, they want to do it to their daughters. westerns cry tears over FGM but don't give a shit about MGM. hopefully in the future we can have a big increase in FGM to even things out. after all, a cut pussy is cleaner and looks better

File: Flag_of_Nigeria.svg.png (456B, 255x128px) Image search: [Google]

456B, 255x128px

I hate it. I'm probably one of the few Africans with enough awareness to hate it. My mom is cut (rite of passage, the hood) and she's adamantly defended the practice. Her arguments are eerily similar to "it's just a piece of skin. "

File: german circumcision protest 2.jpg (77KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 720x960px

>>37322896

I'm really sorry for your loss and your mother's loss too, even if she doesn't consciously realize that she's lost something.

There actually are some African anti-circumcision organizations though, look up "Intact Kenya". Pic related is the founder (or president or something along those lines) and he recently gave several speeches.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG5CLK6Rfd4

(Didn't watch the vid but I know he's in it).

Not sure if there's anything similar in Nigeria yet.

Westerners by and large think that no women defend FGM and that if they do they're "culturally brainwashed" and shouldn't be taken seriously. They say this while defending MGM and somehow the cognitive dissonance doesn't hit them, at least not as hard as it should.

If you ever want to drown in rage, find a popular Facebook post about circumcision and read the normalfag comments

File: Dirty.png (8KB, 387x162px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 387x162px

>>37322991

Oh, I've been down that road.

The ignorance really gets to me.

>>37323038
the one with "oh, he's a trooper" always accomplishes to rustle my jimmies.
cognitive dissonance up to 11.

File: 39922.png (94KB, 478x319px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 478x319px

>>37323080

Isn't it crazy how there are all these tropes?

This one is really fucking out there though. The doctor should be sued. Foreskins don't cause heart attacks. Fucking quacks!

File: Sans titre.png (85KB, 238x221px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 238x221px

>>37316086
Uncut here, most of the pleasure comes from the frenulum and the corona. Stroking the shaft means pulling the foreskin back, which stimulates the nerve endings in the foreskin, frenulum and corona, that's how I perceive it at least.

I wonder how cut guys are interested in lewd stuff at all. I suspect that if I were to get cut now, I'd lose like 80% of the sensation. I guess cut guys rely more on their minds to sustain arousal.

>>37316086
cutdicks rubbing the head is (mild) pleasure.
uncutdicks rubbing the head is just short of torture.

it's like pulling a hair form your scalp vs pulling a hair from your nose.

>>37323170

>I wonder how cut guys are interested in lewd stuff at all. I suspect that if I were to get cut now, I'd lose like 80% of the sensation. I guess cut guys rely more on their minds to sustain arousal.

Funny you mention that. This fellow who was cut as an adult says pretty much the same thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtN7JmMUfZE

>I lost about 40-50% sensation. Now I have to put most of my mind into it instead of feeling it.

>>37323232
isn't it close to like being incomplete paraplegic in that department?

>>37323309

In a small way, yeah

File: wha.png (9KB, 805x90px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 805x90px

>>37323232
What the actual and original fuck.

File: 453.png (7KB, 784x112px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 784x112px

>>37323551

Nomopoly is a circumfetishist creep. He's always on Youtube videos leaving comments like that.

>>37322317
You laugh all day at manlet europoor, and we have even less control over it/can't chance it without a suoer painful surgery that have shitty result, have some taste of your own medicine, ameritard

>>37315647
Would I be stuck in a cycle of prone masturbation if I wasn't circumcised?

>>37323782
no, what? why? how's that an issue either way?
>>37323758
>and we have even less control over it/can't chance it without a suoer painful surgery that have shitty result
what are you talking about?

>>37323782

If you weren't circumcised you would have a lot more ways of being able to masturbate, period.

http://www.can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_multipleforegasm.shtml

http://www.can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_fremgasmlengthwise.shtml

Some guys also use a technique where they pinch their foreskin between their fingers and pull it (not violently but enough to activate the stretch receptive corpuscles). I've seen some videos where the guy came from doing that alone.

>>37323804

I think he's talking about bone-lengthening surgeries or something.

>>37323832
oh, ok.
>>37323821
>I've seen some videos where the guy came from doing that alone.
saw that too. never been jellier.
used it like a built-in cocksleeve.

>>37323804
The only "cure" for short height is a leg lengthening surgery, which involves breaking both of your legs, stretch them and wait for them to heal, apparently the foreskin restoration is a thing and seems really less painful (also cheaper and with less risk that a surgery has)

>>37323852

It's something of a misnomer though because it doesn't actually restore the foreskin.

>>37323883
Yes, but it's still a cosmetic improvement. Also, with the leg lengthening surgery you will have fucked up proportion because your arms will be shorter. Overall, in both cases your options are shitty, i just feel the manlet option is shittier

>>37323883
I just take it as slang with am optimistic slant. Really all you get back is the glide and a moist glans, and it's better than nothing for the moment. I do see how it can obviously come off as false advertising.

>>37323969
>i just feel the manlet option is shittier
unless you're suffering for malnutrition during the childhood/adolescent-years, you can't do anything about it.
not mutilating is easy, on the other hand.

>>37323883
why?
you're restoring _A_ foreskin aka skin covering the glans.
maybe "foreskin reconstruction" would be be a better phrase, akin to the breast-reconstruction after a mastectomy.

>>37320708
Holy shit.....I was already familiar with the basics of the David Reimer story but decided to check the wiki link out of curiosity. I read this at first....

>David Reimer was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba. He was originally named Bruce, and his identical twin was named Brian. At the age of six months, after concern was raised about how both of them urinated, the boys were diagnosed with phimosis.

This part caught me off-guard at first. I unexpectedly felt new-found sympathy for the parents and thought "Phimosis? Oh, so they DID have a legit reason for circumcising him...."

Then I read THIS:

>They were referred for circumcision at the age of seven months. On April 27, 1966, a urologist performed the operation using the unconventional method of cauterization, but the procedure did not go as doctors had planned, and Bruce's penis was burned beyond surgical repair. The doctors chose not to operate on Brian, whose phimosis soon cleared without surgical intervention.

...WHAT THE FUCK

So if they had just left it alone, then the issue would have most likely resolved itself and he wouldn't have been forced to be a child tranny?

And then THIS shit:

>Reimer said that Dr. Money forced the twins to rehearse sexual acts involving "thrusting movements", with David playing the bottom role. Reimer said that, as a child, he had to get "down on all fours" with his brother, Brian Reimer, "up behind his butt" with "his crotch against" his "buttocks". Reimer said that Dr. Money forced David, in another sexual position, to have his "legs spread" with Brian on top. Reimer said that Dr. Money also forced the children to take their "clothes off" and engage in "genital inspections". On at "least one occasion", Reimer said that Dr. Money took a photograph of the two children doing these activities. Dr. Money's rationale for these various treatments was his belief that "childhood 'sexual rehearsal play'" was important for a "healthy adult gender identity".

Jesus Christ....

>>37324079
Sounds like a horror movie

>>37324079

>This part caught me off-guard at first. I unexpectedly felt new-found sympathy for the parents and thought "Phimosis? Oh, so they DID have a legit reason for circumcising him...."

Nope. There is no need to circumcise a baby, period.

The foreskin is SUPPOSED to be fused to the head of the penis in infancy, with a very tight opening at the tip, too. That's how it is almost all the time, and it's not bad at all for it to be that way. In fact it keeps the penis cleaner because it prevents feces and other contaminants from getting into the urethra.

The average age at which the membrane that fuses the foreskin to the glans breaks apart enough and the opening of the foreskin matures enough to allow retraction is about 10, but in some boys its earlier and in others its later.

A lot of the time boys will pee funny as their foreskin starts the separation process. Sometimes the newly-forming space sbetween the foreskin and glans fill up with urine like a balloon; this too is normal.

Yes, if David had been left alone he would have been fine.

He was a victim of malpractice on so many levels. The medical/psychological systems absolutely failed him, and his brother too (his brother died of a drug overdose, possibly suicide).

>>37324079
>This part caught me off-guard at first. I unexpectedly felt new-found sympathy for the parents and thought "Phimosis? Oh, so they DID have a legit reason for circumcising him...."
Pretty much no boy before the age of 10 has pathological phimosis, for which any kind of treatment is indicated.

They had to do studies in countries like India etc. to find out the average age at which the foreskin becomes fully retractable without intervention, because, well, in the USA such a study was impossible to.
Probably still is.

>>37324164

There are a lot of studies on this from Japan and some European countries too. Pretty much all of them put the average age of retractability at around 10, give or take.

And yet even today some doctors think that if the foreskin of an infant or young boy doesn't retract, this is a medical problem requiring amputation.

It is absolutely a failure of the medical system. A non-retractile foreskin in a young boy is NORMAL. It evolved to be that way.

They need to start teaching real, intact male anatomy in medical school. I feel like part of the reason they don't is either because they don't want to offend people who have been circumcised/circumcised their kids, or circumcised guys who know nothing about foreskins and don't want to know anything about them are the ones writing the textbooks. Whatever the case is, this needs to stop.

Should say thanks to mum and dad for not jewing me.
MFW dad used to call his peen his caped crusader

>>37315773
americuts getting wrekt as usual

File: 343243.jpg (110KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1000x750px

A lot (not all, but many) intact guys find this kind of foreskin stimulation very pleasurable. There are lots of videos online of guys either pulling their foreskin this way or a woman doing it for them, either with her fingers or her mouth.

Just as many women often find stretch-stimulation to be a pleasurable part of sex, many men do too. But circumcision cuts off this entire aspect of sensuality because the only really "stretchy" part of the penis is the foreskin. It's sad enough to destroy this aspect of sensuality for oneself but forcing it on a child is unconscionable.

File: David Reimer Rest In Peace.jpg (70KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x399px

>>37324079
Man, I'm just so goddamn saddened that Reimer didn't snap and go postal. I know that's a horrible way of thinking, but I'd imagine circumcision could be banned if Reimer went on a serial murder spree (killing both the doctor who removed his penis, and Dr Money who removed his testes and pumped him full of estrogen) and left a video monologue citing the genital mutilation as the reason. Also, both doctors should be charged for their heinous, disgusting fucking crimes.
>Born in 1965 in Winnipeg, Reimer was 8 months old when a doctor used an electrocautery needle, instead of a scalpel, to excise his foreskin during a routine circumcision, burning off his entire penis as a result.
Reimer should have kidnapped the doctor at gunpoint and removed his penis with the same fucking electrocautery needle, while giving the doctor minimal anesthetic just like he got.

File: Shellshock2.jpg (49KB, 600x463px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x463px

>>37324298

Man, look at his face.

Really reminds me of the gentleman on the bottom left of this pic.

>>37324222
>It is absolutely a failure of the medical system.

> A recent survey of U.S. medical books, for instance, revealed that only two out of 42 pediatric, nursing, neonatology, and urology texts as well as family health encyclopedias, detailed the correct (minimal) hygiene needs for male infants. The rest featured obsolete, misleading, and potentially injurious advice directly traceable to 19th-century sources.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201110/doctor-ignorance-male-anatomy-harms-boys

Can't know what you've never learned.

File: carmack.png (106KB, 320x311px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 320x311px

>>37324396

Absolutely unacceptable.

It seems that intactivists are the ones who have to pick up the slack and teach doctors who are still in the dark.

Another problem is that unfortunately a lot of doctors don't want to learn things from patients/non-physicians. Their egos get in the way.

At least not all doctors are like that.

>>37324298
I'm actually amazed that such a mutilation-killig-spree hasn't happened yet.

>>37324348
>dat "It's fine."-face

File: 1488831732946.jpg (93KB, 560x577px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 560x577px

>when it's just a useless flap of skin but americans think getting it removed means they don't have to wash and won't catch STDs

File: 7f845113b0303aace007f3e0751a7c1f3cbff116f10b25a74a134ad2be197989[1].jpg (30KB, 400x299px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 400x299px

>8 months into restoration
>underside(?) of corona and sulcus completely covered for a few weeks now
>intermittent short tingling and unpleasant sensation
>pic related
not sure if some nerve-endings are starting to be sensitive again or if that's just a sign of permanent damage due to tugging

>>37324489
>useless
why do you lie on the internet?

>>37324489
>"Oh don't worry, it's just a useless flap of skin, your son will be fine."
>Dr Shekelstein walks out the room
>"There's been a slight setback, I 'accidentally' used a fucking cauterizing needle and burned off your son's entire penis. But don't worry, I know a great surgeon who can chop off his testes and forcefeed him estrogen, as long as you have the shekels to pay for it. Oh, and you can't sue me for ruining your son's life because you signed the agreement."
The beginning of this video shows the estrogen doctor's face, a picture tells it all. https://youtu.be/noqRhuE8_XA

>>37324571
>This video contains content from BBC Worldwide, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.
>Sorry about that.
t-thanks.

>>37316246
You only think it's normal because you were cut. The first time I saw a circumcised dick in porn I was weirded out, and thought it had some kind of weird medical condition or something

>>37324739
I would consider foreskin amputation a weird medical condition

>>37322317
Women, or at least American women, seem to go in the other direction for me. I knew one who would insist if we ever had kids that they had to be cut despite the fact that I'm uncut, just because it's 'normal'.

>Muslim doctor performs labiaplasty
>gets locked up for life for "genital mutilation"
>Jewish doctor performs circumcision
>shrugging tim heidecker.png

>>37323115
I wouldn't be surprised if that's bullshit, considering that's almost healing crystals level of quackery

>>37322456
Only cut lad I know is a mudslime.

>>37324942
Healing-crystal wackos are generally against circumcision
>t. uncut amerifag with a healing-crystal wacko mom

>>37324937
>Muslim doctor performs labiaplasty
>gets locked up for life for "genital mutilation"
I HOPE the attorneys for the suspects in the FGM-case in Michigan will use the usual pro-male-circ-arguments to defend their case.
feminazi-SJWss won't know what to do.

>>37324984
>feminazi-SJWss won't know what to do
Yes they will. They'll scream "IT'S NOT THE SAME REEEEEEEE VAGINAS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PENISES" and everyone will agree because we're all brainwashed cucks

>>37324998
if that leads to revisions and a hearing before the supreme court, so be it.

>>37315647
I fucking hate being cut. The skin just feels too tight.

>>37315647
I normally don't post but I'm a girl whos also a huge roastie whore and old and I've slept with like 30 guys literally and have had over ten years of experience having sex and I genuinely think that cutting the foreskin off is mass mutational created by the jewish religion to try and repress sexuality. I base my thoughts off all my experience with cock, the uncut is always so much more sensitive its scary really that human beings have done such a horrific thing to each other.

>>37325270
>that cutting the foreskin off is mass mutational created by the jewish religion to try and repress sexuality.
See the pic of >>37320755

File: IMG_0569.gif (18KB, 671x1103px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 671x1103px

>>37316064
Extremeely origianl post