Why do women act like slutshaming is the worst thing? Why aren't

Because they too know being a slut is disgusting. Because women are children, they would rather have us modify what is seen as disgusting rather than modifying their own behaviour

Because you are not supposed to bother yourself with women's behaviours. It's take it or leave it.

Also the fact that whining is one of the most unattractive things a man can do.

>>37280132
roast or betacuck detectedlol

Women are inherently narcissistic

>>37279942
Like you've ever made a sexual decision. You'd probably start crying if you ever got your little dick anywhere near a woman.

What ways do they judge you for you sexual decisions?

>>37280147
>>whining is bad
>betacuck lol!
Really made me think.

>>37280171
Not an argument, slut. I hope you get raped.

File: bjcejxl1acpy.jpg (121KB, 520x588px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 520x588px

>>37280171

Oh look it's this again

Pic related

>>37280219
>>37280256
I love it when little boys try to act tough.

>>37280171
dumb roastie. I'd say think clearly but women can't go ten seconds without being weak, emotional babies.

>>37280356
a car that drove ten miles is still brand new

>>37280571
It's equivalent to driving ten million miles you ignorant fuck

>>37280356
>>37280555
Look how fragile and weak-minded you are, though. All I did was call you a virgin and you immediately took offense. All you know how to do is resort to namecalling and try your hardest to make yourself look big and superior.

>>37279942
As a semi-normalfag I kind of understand them, since men are allowed to have sex whenever and with whoever they want and not be shamed. But still, sluts are disgusting.

File: 1495742974692.jpg (104KB, 803x688px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 803x688px

>>37280603
>complains about namecalling
>call you a virgin

Holy kek.

>>37280656
Not complaining, just pointing out your go-to move.

>>37280603
only fragile one here is you, roastie

>>37280603
Your entire argument is based around calling your opponent a Virgin. Well I'm not a virgin, now what? I guess everything else you said is invalidated since you predicated it upon that one assumption?

>>37280171

>implying women make "sexual decisions"
>not "just letting the moment take me" when tyrone shows up

>>37279942
>while they judge us in a million ways for everything
FTFY amico.

>>37279942
Stop exaggerating things and asking stupid questions. Stop making such god damned idiot threads where other idiots pretend like the issue is something it isn't.

>>37279942

Women fail to understand that when a men gets a harem of women, he is praised because he is beating nature at its game. It's expected for women to gain more potential partners than men because a women's sex gametes is much much fewer than that of a man. Women don't have the same level of sex drive as men do and will never will.

>>37280171
So by not providing an actual argument, you just admit that women are vile, hypocritical scumbags.
Good to know.

>>37280571
A car is at least useful, even if it drove 10 million miles.

>>37280571

>a car that has had 10 owners is not brand new

ftfy

File: IMG_7926.jpg (39KB, 400x599px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 400x599px

If you're someone who believes in traditional moral values and traditional relationships, then youd value a woman with purity because a woman who is slutty spoils her purity and femininity.

It's not an opinion, it's just the way it's traditionally been seen. You're free to disagree but women have no right to shame men for believing in traditional relationships.

I slutshamed one of my friends and her attitude has changed ever since. Here's a pro tip, become a woman's friend before slutshaming them. They'll take it seriously

>>37280934
what's the best way to overtly slutshame? i wanna make some whores insecure, lol

File: 1495728934378.png (2KB, 102x91px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 102x91px

>>37280934
How to become a female's friend ?

There is an increasing amount of women who just sleep around, but don't act like total cunts to everybody, and they want to basically erase the fact that those other girls are usually total histrionic assholes so they don't have to be lumped in with them. Womyn power n shit.

>>37280653

If sluts were shamed as much as you and them say they are, then women wouldn't dare go into porn and there wouldn't be entire internet subcultures dedicated to hating male virgins and promoting how being a slut is a good thing. Not to mention the fact that sluts in real life are unapologetic about what they do.

Slut shaming is done primarily by women FYI

>>37281114
>There is an increasing number of vocal women trying to convince everyone they're not assholes while still being assholes whenever they can get away with it. The actual number of women who sleep around and aren't complete bitches about it is very low.
ftfy.

>>37279942
>Why do women act like slutshaming is the worst thing?
Because their ego feels a need to protect itself.

>>37281183
This is probably more accurate, yeah.

Because let's face it, even if you're not an asshole, sleeping around shows that you don't value sex, your own body, have low empathy, and need constant validation. It's hard to find any well-adjusted person who does it simply for harmless fun. They have to constantly convince everyone around them that they're happy and can still respect the people who don't choose to live like that.

>>37279942
only degenerated women do that.
avoid them

>>37281351
It's probably best to avoid anybody who does it. Let them contain the diseases and drama be contained by them and their ilk.

>>37279942
I can't tell you why, persay, because I'm a male. I would imagine, however, its related to the fox who lost his tail fable. Except, women are so weak that they play along with the women who lost their virginity, their purity, if you will, and proceed to do it as well with little to thought.

>>37279942
>Why do women act like slutshaming is the worst thing?
They don't

>Why aren't we allowed to judge them negatively for their sexual decisions, while they judge us in a million ways for our sexual decisions?
Promiscuity occurs between two consenting adults and hurts no one; shit like catcalling and rape actually hurt people physically or emotionally and are not desired by one of the people. I don't know what other 'million ways' you're talking about.

>Why can't we have standards or deal breakers
Not what slut shaming is

Any more dumb questions?

>>37281086
>I HATE WOMEN FUCKING WHORES REEEE
>b-b-b-b-but hwo do i becum frends w one

>>37281155
>women wouldn't dare go into porn
Only a tiny minority go into porn, and those that do are generally not known to be porn stars by the people around them

>there wouldn't be entire internet subcultures dedicated to hating male virgins
there aren't

>>37281304
>sleeping around shows that you don't value sex, your own body, have low empathy, and need constant validation
It shows none of those things.

IME wymyn are much more sensitive to social judgement than males. They would love to just go out, have a good time, and then get spit-roasted by Chad and Tyrone (or her dogs) and remember the evening as a fulfilling and empowering experience. But instead they feel guilty because they wonder if even those lowly virgin men might be right. Maybe she IS used goods. Suddenly she's not in the afterglow anymore. Now she's just feeling dirty and ashamed, leaking semen out her holes. And it's all because shitlords such as yourselves couldn't mind your own business. You had to go and judge her, and make harmless, pleasurable sex into a big deal. You had to go ahead and ruin a beautiful evening.

>>37281569
>constructs fantasies in which he, the virgin shut-in loser who interacts with no one, somehow has power over women
yikes buddy, get help

>>37281588
Hit a little too close to home, roastie?

>>37281466
what part of "virgin shaming" don't you understand?

>>37280356
>That pic.
Literally one of the most retard things I've read on /r9k/. And that's up against some stiff competition.

>>37281612
>anyone who disagrees with me is a woman
the classic "I don't have a defense" defense

>>37281628
virgin shaming is not done by women, by and large; it is done by men. also, if you ask any anti slut shaming activist whether they endorse virgin shaming, I guarantee you they are against it

>>37281628
lmao nobody cares if you're a virgin, dude. Slut shaming HURTS women.

>>37281664
Why, because they're forced to confront what they really are? How about the old saying "sticks and stones will break my bones but words will not hurt me"?
Or does this child's rhyme only apply to men?

>>37281658
>virgin shaming is not done by women, by and large; it is done by men. also, if you ask any anti slut shaming activist whether they endorse virgin shaming, I guarantee you they are against it
Of course if you ask a woman if she holds a controversial opinion, she will always deny it.
Women are the primary shamers of male virgins, as male virginity is social proof of low sexual market value. Men shame male virgins only as a consequence of this, as part of the male hierarchy struggle.

>>37281658
>calls people who disagree with xim virgin shut-in loser
>tries to play the "not an argument" card when someone who disagrees with xim calls xim a wimmin
My friend, I am not suggesting you are a w!m~n because you disagree with me. It is because you immediately resorted to name-calling, which is an extremely female tactic.

>>37279942
They dont want to take responsiblity for their life choices, especially the shitty ones, sex being a part of that. However they will happily critcise a mans life, shit job, no money, shit clothes, no luck with the ladies. they are happy to mock men like that in their groups

>>37281727
>Women are the primary shamers of male virgins
Not having sex with someone is not 'shaming' them. It is simply expressing your sexual preference.

>>37281736
>accuses me of name-calling
>literally the first thing he does in response to my post is name-call
maybe you shouldn't act so high and mighty - also, your post already basically stated you were a virgin, and being a shut-in loser is basically the ethos of this board

>>37281749
>t. someone who's never spoken to a woman or knows what they talk about

>>37281717
Slut shaming hurts men too. Nobody should be made to feel ashamed for enjoying their body consensually with another adult.

>>37280664
the joke
-----whoosh-----
your head

File: 1494944277475.png (93KB, 250x237px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 250x237px

>>37281658
>Trusting females "unbiased" opinion

>Trusting hitler when he said he won't start a war

Kek. From 1 to cuck, how much of a cuck are you ?

>>37281761
Roastie, roastie, roastie. Nobody is acting high and mighty here except for you. I insulted you because you insulted me. I'm not going to complain about name-calling, but if you're going to take delivering an insult as an admission you have no supporting argument, you should at least ensure you didn't lead off with an insult yourself.

>>37281761
>Not having sex with someone is not 'shaming' them.
Ok, so you are in fact completely oblivious to the phenomenon of virgin shaming, seeing that you have no idea what I'm talking about. I'll interpret this in the best possible meaning, namely that you never shame male virgins yourself and can't fathom why other women would do so.
Now, please imagine for a moment that other women do actually shame male virgins, for example by using "virgin" as an insult. This actually happens very frequently, at least on the internet (where the women are protected by distance).

>>37279942
Because if men started having standards, then they couldnt exploit men for their own selfish needs(Betbux/Alphafucks) and their army of white knight enablers and beta orbiters would disappear overnight. I think most women realise that the only real power they have is their vagina. By curbing their promiscuity, you diminish their power.
I also think women subconscously feel oppressed if society made them repress their hypergamy instincts.

>>37281079
Become their friends and reject them before they reject you. Be honest from the beginning and NEVER show any kind of interest or show your value. Be a good person to her but don't go out of your way for her. After she has it seeded inside her head that you're an honest guy and a good person you can tell her anything. If she asks you sexual questions be honest about it(don't tell her you're a virgin if you are, just say you've had 2-3 sexual partners and dislike hookup culture).

>>37281809
>Roastie, roastie, roastie
>he still thinks calling anyone who disagrees with him a woman somehow bolsters his "argument"

>I'm not going to complain about name-calling
literally what you just did

>if you're going to take delivering an insult as an admission you have no supporting argument, you should at least ensure you didn't lead off with an insult yourself
I led off with a statement of fact. This board is full of virgin shut-in losers. Virgins are people who have not had sex. Shut-ins are people who don't go outside and interact with people. Losers are people who are not doing well in life. All three of these things are constantly talked about on this board and from your post it was not a leap of any kind to assume you were a typical /r9k/ poster.

>>37281551
Care to explain why you think this without using anecdotes?

>>37281833
>other women
Not a woman, retard

>>37279942

Why are you listening to this shit? Find someone who doesn't buy into this bullcrap.

>>37281842
>betabux
>alphafucks
>white knight
>beta orbiter
>only power is their vagina
>hypergamy
jesus christ could you be any more of a brainwashed redpilltard
try having your own thoughts once in a blue moon instead of spewing the same tired bullshit over and over again

>>37279942
Women slutshame way more than men do anyway.

>>37281848
I was watching a MDE video where Sam starts to slutshame and she told me to take it off. I've shown her articles that state people who've had multiple sex partners have higher divorce rates and tend to be unhappy people and say shit like:haha look how stupid this is. Knowing deep inside she feels bad about it. Seriously senpai do it by pretending you're not slutshaming. Deep inside she'll realize she can't have you because she's a slut.

File: téléchargement (3).jpg (8KB, 226x223px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 226x223px

>>37281761
>someone who's never spoken to a woman or knows what they talk about

Giving a fuck about what women talk about. Stop the keks

>>37281854
Pointing out your hypocrisy is not a complaint about name-calling, it is a complaint about your hypocrisy.

An assumption is obviously a leap. For all you know, I could in fact be male to female trans, making you guilty of an egregrious crime: misgendering.

>>37281856
The burden on proof is on you; you are making the claim that doing something (sleeping around) indicates a million random bullshit things about you. To me, sleeping around would logically indicate that you enjoy having sex with a variety of people, since that is what you are doing. Any further conclusion would need some sort evidence.

>newfags ITT responding to obvious bait
Quick show of hands in here lads. Be honest. How many of you are trolling? And how many are playing both sides in this argument?

>>37281917
>acts like he doesn't care what women say
>cries endlessly about virgin shaming and other mockery by women

>>37281854
>he still thinks calling anyone who disagrees with him a woman somehow bolsters his "argument"
He is crudely stating that your argument is unconvincing, and is an attempt at trolling either for a better answer or just to razz someone whose views are wrong and won't change.
>literally what you just did
Just? He said more than just "YOU'RE AN UNCARING HARLOT AND NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR IT"
>I led off with a statement of fact.
>>Not having sex with someone is not 'shaming' them. It is simply expressing your sexual preference.
Opinion.


You're clearly bad at arguing and should just post tits

>>37281925
>Any further conclusion would need some sort evidence.

The evidence is in the fact that 9/10 people who sleep around all happen to fit one or more of the criteria listed, and get predictably defensive when called out on it.

File: 1492464103677.jpg (107KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1000x1000px

>>37280132
>Whine about it, women see you as unattractive.
>Man up and take the abuse, women see you as a cuck.

Theres no winning. Why even bother at this point.

>>37281921
You said I "resorted to" name-calling and that it was an "extremely female" tactic. Both are clear complaints about name-calling.

>For all you know, I could in fact be male to female trans, making you guilty of an egregrious crime: misgendering.
good one

File: 1495735815083.jpg (17KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 225x225px

>>37281854
>assume you were a typical /r9k/ poster.

>coming to /r9k/
>try to shame the losers by calling them virgins

>going to the africa
>try to shame the inhabitants by calling them nigger

It's as if you are stupid. So cute.

>>37281765
Quite the spooks you've got there honey.
>enjoying
>consensual
>body
Why don't you call it what it is, which is having sexual intercousre with as many people as possible for a small dose of dopamine.

Now, originally I was responding to how you said slut shaming "hurts" people. I may have been too specific with just women, but regardless, calling them what they are shouldn't affect them unless, maybe, they shouldn't be doing it. I'm not saying there is a should and shouldn't in the world, but if you feel guilty for doing something, there may be a cause

>>37281943
>He said more than just "YOU'RE AN UNCARING HARLOT AND NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR IT"
No, that's basically exactly what he said in this post:
>>37281612

>I led off with a statement of fact.
>>Not having sex with someone is not 'shaming' them. It is simply expressing your sexual preference.
Not the fact I was talking about. Learn to read.

>post tits
>he still buys into the 'anyone who diagrees with me is a woman' meme
I feel sorry for you bud

>>37281947
>The evidence is in this claim I'm pulling out of my ass
You were on the short bus in school, weren't you?

>>37281995
Post dong or move along

>>37281983
Not trying to shame anyone, just stating facts. I'm sorry the basic data about who you are is so painful for you. Maybe you should learn to accept yourself instead of sperging out at the slightest provocation.

>>37281854
Holy shit, did you read that? You really typed all that out and posted it?

>>37281966
>You said I "resorted to" name-calling and that it was an "extremely female" tactic. Both are clear complaints about name-calling
I led off with a statement of fact. This board is full of hypocritical roasties who lead off disagreements with insults. Roasties are women. Hypocrits are people who say one thing but do another. Insults are unpleasant things directed at another person. All three of these things are constantly talked about on this board and from your post it was not a leap of any kind to assume you were a typical /r9k/ poster.

>>37281989
>calling them what they are shouldn't affect them
'Slut' is a pejorative term. Put another way, a black man punching you in the face when you call him a nigger does not mean he is ashamed of his race.

>>37282008
If I'm pulling it out of my ass, what reason would all these people have to hate promiscuous women? If all they did was sleep around, didn't bother anybody or act superior for sleeping around, they'd have no reason to project blame onto people who don't bother fucking with them or endorsing their behavior.

>>37282047
This. Thank you! You phrased it better than I ever could xoxo

We already have a word to describe somebody who has a lot of consensual sex: normal. We don't need your insults.

>>37282023
You first, friend.

>>37282033
You're going full 'carl the cuck' on me.

>>37282038
>This board is full of hypocritical roasties
This board is extremely male-dominated, and you believing that everyone you argue with is female really speaks to the level of disconnect with reality in your mind.

>>37282026
is this the same woman?
>Look, I'm not trying to shame you.
Goes on to insult to the best of her abilities

>>37282063
>what reason would all these people have to hate promiscuous women?
Because they're bitter they're not getting any.

>they'd have no reason to project blame onto people who don't bother fucking with them or endorsing their behavior
That's true, and they do not do that. Men who do not fuck sluts or actively endorse their behavior are not slut shamers.

>>37282047
You can't help being black, how stupid do you have to be to unironically compare the two?

And also, yes it does.

>>37282078
>let me just go ahead and double down on the ol' "you're a woman" defense because I have literally no argument

>>37282086
Not every single thing has to line up to make a reasonable analogy. The point (which you missed) is that the term is pejorative. Being offended when someone actively goes out of their way to offend you does not indicate anything other than an understanding of the language.

>>37282066
>guessing one person I argue with is female means I assume everyone who argues with me is female
I notice you haven't actually stated you are not female, so perhaps my guess was correct and I am not so disconnected after all.

>>37282064
>We already have a word to describe somebody who has a lot of consensual sex: normal

Oh wow case closed. You're getting insults and you're going to either own them, like an adult, or reconsider your life. If what you're doing is socially acceptable, the vast majority of people wouldn't have a problem with it.

>>37281854
>Losers are people who are not doing well in life
All your other points I let go because they are more a matter of objectivity. This one, however, is entirely subjective.

The obvious question is, what is doing "well" in life? It's based solely on the individual asking the question, who has been largely influenced by a society.
Now, I'm going to assume (as you already have about others) that to you, doing well is
>having a job
>having a car
>having sex regularly
>partying
>funding a significant other

To some people, none or some of these things have no appeal. What if a man decides to move to the woods and live a hermit? Is he doing well? He is probably happy so I'd say yes. To me, "doing well" is being content with your situation.
Once again, it's a subjective definition, but it's much more universal than a checklist of material things. The average virgin shut in could be "doing well" if they don't list for a "normie" lifestyle

Just because not everyone has sex with whatever catches their attention, doesn't mean they are a loser

>>37280196

White knights go back to plebbit

>>37282094
It's not worth arguing with someone that has a sack of nuts for grey matter, no matter who you are.

>>37282109
If you can take 1000 dickings, surely you can handle some banter. If there's nothing to be ashamed or insecure about, there's no reason to take offense.

>>37282115
The vast majority of people don't. Look, you're on the wrong side of history here. There is nothing wrong with promiscuity. It's time you lot acted like adults and just accepted it. Just because you can't do the same doesn't mean we should be punished for enjoying ourselves.

>>37281884
I'm not him, but I've seen what women do to men. My dad had me at 18, went off the deep end, and slowly has risen back to a stable level. He remarried a few years ago and his mental health has slowly deteriorated again, and I have no reason to believe it's not because of his wife.

My mom also remarried and the poor soul has to feed her children (including me) and for what? She is several years older than him, had kids, and was essentially dirt poor. "Love"? I don't buy it. She has a pussy and she was willing to let him in exchange for him taking care of her.

I cannot support this game women play, so I am free to call them whores

>>37282117
>What if a man decides to move to the woods and live a hermit?
He's probably the Unabomber, Anon.

>>37282156
>so I am free to call them whores
No, you're not. I don't care what ONE WOMAN is doing to your dad. It does not give you the right to call other women whores.

>>37282094
I'm not the person you were replying to. I didnt insult you for being a woman. Just because you used a green arrow doesn't change that. In the post I replied to, you said
>I'm not trying to shame you
But then you said how everyone on here is a loser. That's an insult. You can insult me however much you want, you can't just blatantly lie about our conversation in your posts. Every woman who comes on here to argue says the same stupid shit. it's pathetic. It's kind of an inslut their, but it's based on fact. Most of the people here know this to be true.

>>37282168
a+ normie response

>>37282171
Anon can say whatever they want, it's on them if it impedes their social life. Why should normals be a protected class?

>>37281950
>be handsome or rich
suddenly nothing else matters

really gets your joggin noggin

>>37282177
I'm arguing on behalf of the robots, I'm tired of fucking reddit coming here and whiteknighting their shitty "open" relationships and alternative lifestyles. Their superiority deters actual freethinking people from ever wanting to be associated with progressivism.

>>37282047
>nigger; born a black man. They call each other it all the time
>slut; born a virgin, and then chooses to let any number of men into her

I uh, well, you really got me

>>37282189
Anon can say whatever he wants, but he is wrong. Having a lot of sex doesn't make you a whore. Normal people are not a protected class. The same rules apply to everyone: they should not be insulted just for living their lives how they want to.

File: 1478898251670.jpg (12KB, 344x217px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 344x217px

>>37282187
Are you upset that I came up with a simple and valid counterexample to your lousy argument?

i know i'm basically just shouting in to the void here but i'm going to try my best to explain it

>Why do women act like slutshaming is the worst thing?

the concept is inherently sexist, you are evaluating women as if they are property. really take in that last statement and try to conceptualise that women are people just like you, not objects.

if the woman is disease free then you have no legitimate reason to be concerned about her history, it stems from your own insecurity about your sexual abilities compared to her past lovers, actual, literal misogyny and possibly a fear of vaginas.

>Why can't we have standards or deal breakers?

most women in my real life experience are fine with the concept of a deal breaker, both physical and personal, as long as it is not specifically misogynistic in any way.

eg if you say you don't like black chicks or you don't like tall girls that's fine. if you say you only want a traditional, demure, submissive housewife it's not fine.

>>37282227
Offense is taken, not given. Why not direct focus toward the people who endorse the lifestyle instead of trying to convince everyone to like you?

>>37282229
pay attention to IP count, nigger

>>37282231
>if the woman is disease free

So it's ok, until after the fact? Do you think these people get regularly tested, what makes you think they give a shit if what they do affects anybody, they don't even check to see if these people are in relationships. They are deliberately inconsiderate of the world around them.

>>37281884
>I have no counterargument so I'll just call him a brainwashed redpilltard! That'll show him!

>>37282247
I do what I want.
In the game of Anonymous Argument, one anon can swap in for another at any time, so that the two sides of the discussion can continue in general s ad infinitum. Fun game until some newfag spoils it by refusing to play.

>>37282231
>if the woman is disease free then you have no legitimate reason to be concerned about her history
If she has previously been with a lot of men, could you really expect her to form a stable relationship with you? It's unlikely you are so much better than her last 30 lovers that this one time she's going to "settle down".

>>37282168
And? Ted is smarter than me, probably you too. This doesn't detract from what I said and you have no actual response to it.

File: promiscuity.jpg (330KB, 1221x1570px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1221x1570px

>>37281925
>any further conclusino would need some sort of evidence
Do you even lurk this board?

>>37281925
>To me
So, you can't back anything you said up. Every time someone disagrees with the objective truth they say some garbage about "To me the definition of something is this therefore I'm right."

File: 1481470768731.jpg (43KB, 300x271px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 300x271px

>>37282294
>it's smart to seclude yourself and come up with plans to bomb normies
really gets the ol' walnuts clacking

>>37282213
Was that meant for (me)? I ABSOLUTELY agREEE

>>37282277
Looking over the posts here I think it's fairly obvious we have at least two trolls trolling each other here. There is no way we're getting this kind of bait naturally.

>>37282171
Sure it does. There is no evidence saying women are some sort of angels who do no harm, so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. Between the internet, and what limited interaction with them in real life I have, I feel it fit to assume all are whores, at least in nature. Prove me wrong if you like, but I don't expect you to.

>>37282008
>Literally pulls out of his ass in his previous posts
>resorts to name calling
lmao fuck off normalfag slag.

>>37282268
>So it's ok, until after the fact?

it's definitely not ok to shame someone for being sick, but it's ok to say that's a deal breaker

>Do you think these people get regularly tested

everybody should get tested before having unprotected sex with a new partner. if you don't you are retarded and deserve everything you get.

>>37282282

i wouldn't really consider that slut shaming, if the woman is not the relationship type then so be it, it's her life. you are not obligated to marry her or date her but don't judge her for it.

>>37282296
The first one is simple probability. But you can't deny the last 3 are the aftermath of a lifetime of slut shaming.

>>37282229
Is it really a counter argument? There are plent of murderers and shit who stay within cities and do a lot more harm than Ted did, without producing a manifesto at the same time.

>>37282334
>it's definitely not ok to shame someone for being sick

Is it ok to shame someone for intentionally failing to disclose that they're sick? I'd prefer to set the bar a little higher myself.

>everybody should get tested before having unprotected sex with a new partner.

They don't though.

>>37282334
I'm not talking about slut shaming here, I'm just saying that there are reasons to be concerned about/interested in her history. It's not some irrelevant stat like how many bounces she has made on a trampoline in her lifetime. Not to say you should find out just so you can call her a whore, but if it turns out one day she blew the entire rowing team then maybe you shouldn't expect fidelity from her like you would an archetypal church girl.

>>37282337
As the other anon said: Choosing not to marry sluts isn't slut shaming; it's simply sexual preference.

>>37282360
You can be socially isolated inside of a city. Why would anyone choose to take the route of violence instead of trying to connect with the people that might have been their victims?
Is making friends the new predatory behavior?

>>37282337
>Sluts who marry usually end their marriages in divorce
>this is somehow a product of slut shaming
>nothing to do with their slutty nature and disposition towards cheating

>>37282114
Nah, I said I wasn't earlier in the thread.

>>37282117
I agree with everything you said here, but most people here are miserable, depressed, suicidal, and wish they had a GF or some shit.

>>37282131
Slut shaming is not banter; it's not light-hearted ribbing, but actual insult. There's every reason to take offense at an insult, because insults are meant to invoke offense.

>>37282216
Maybe you should read the thread instead of making the exact same mistake the first guy who replied to me made and got called out on. Again: pointing out that the two situations I'm comparing are not literally identical does not mean that the analogy does not serve its purpose.

>>37282329
But you don't know they're all whores. Isn't it likely that there are at least some innocent girls you are hurting with these insults and assumptions?

Sluts should be shamed because women aren't smart enough for their own good. I won't say I view women as people because I don't. Never were never will be. Don't respond to me. I'm not arguing this dumb shit thread. Women are nothing. End of story.

>>37282231
You do realise DNA of past partners remain in women, assuming they had unprotected sex (that is, no condom)? And since most females are on a form of birth control, a lot allow no condom? If you ever plan on having a kid with a woman, and unless you are fine with raising a chimera of different men, you should seriously look for a virgin

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/16084184/

>>37282365

>Is it ok to shame someone for intentionally failing to disclose that they're sick?

yes if they know it i think they are both morally and legally obligated to tell you. that behaviour is unacceptable.

>They don't though

no sympathy for them, they are the ones who are wrong

>>37282376

I was specifically posting on the topic of slut shaming

>>37282276
sometimes a post is so bland, dumb, and derivative, it is just simply not worth arguing with

>>37282394
>please read this entire thread
Does anybody actually do this? Jesus Christ, you may as well ask me to read every YouTube comment.

>>37282143
I think a lot of people here can agree with this

>>37282394
Everybody gets insulted at some point in their lives anon. The issue is that the women in question think what they do is worthy of praise and if anybody has anything less than nice to say about it, they think that is behavior that deserves correction. They don't recognize people who don't endorse their life choices as other adults who are free to say and think what they want. It's just as pointless as complaining about racism, if you don't like racists, don't reply to them.

>>37282296
These graphs do not show any of the things listed in that anon's post. Try again, honey.

>>37282305
I didn't say the definition of something was anything. I made a statement about what DOING something was INDICATIVE of, and why. Please learn to read. I also notice that you conveniently failed to back up your ludicrous claim.

>>37282424
this is not a work safe board
all posters will be required to identify publicly in a stickied thread by posting genitals
these ids persist across threads

>>37282416
>no sympathy for them, they are the ones who are wrong

Yeah that is over 90% of people who sleep around. Clearly causing way more damage to society than a few unwashed wizards.

>>37282314
The fact of the matter is, "doing well" is entirely subjective. Did he do what he wanted? How is doing what he wanted any different than doing what normies want (casual sex)? If all "doing well" is is doing what we want, then there is no way to call someone a loser.
>inb4 casual sex doesn't blow people up

I don't necessarily think Ted should have hurt people, but I can't blame him either.

>>37282331
I'm so, so sorry that you're incapable of comprehending that a man could disagree with you. It must be hard to be so dumb. I hope you're getting autismbux.

>>37282411
>You do realise DNA of past partners remain in women

yes i know this, i do not understand why you think it is relevant other than as a cool factoid. if it grosses you out you should consider that pretty much everything you have ever eaten contained poop. the world is not a clean place.

>If you ever plan on having a kid with a woman, and unless you are fine with raising a chimera of different men, you should seriously look for a virgin

that's just not how conception works, and even if it was how conception worked it is obviously supposed to be this way and again has been for millennia

>>37282447
You're not responding to the same anon anymore, nobody wants to deal with your retarded mental gymnastics.

>>37282405
>I'm going to state a bunch of bullshit as though it was fact but don't argue with me silly boys <3

>>37282459
Re-read the reply chain you inept newfag. It's obvious you have an agenda to virgin shame here.

>>37282426
>The issue is that the women in question think what they do is worthy of praise
No, they just don't want to be shamed for it. Try again.

>>37282387
My original point was asking what "doing well" meant. Someone picked one very specific example based off of a question I asked. I personally don't care how you feel "doing well" is. If you feel you exhaust all options and still want to change the world, then yes, violence is an option.
And for people like me, trying to make friends is a predatory activity so I refrain from doing it.

>>37282502
>they just don't want to be shamed for it
Prove it.

>>37282456
>can't blame a murderer for murdering
maybe you should rethink your worldview

>>37282456
I don't think that he got what he really wanted. Have you actually read his manifesto? It describes the current state of society as producing people with "low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc."
We still don't have a society that really does anything about that.

>>37282477
>nobody wants to deal with your retarded mental gymnastics
a.k.a.
>I have no counter-argument so I'm going to accuse your post of being dumb

>>37282487
>Female poster unable to detect when another female poster role plays as a male to try and pathetically prove her point that slut shamers hate women
Roast levels: unstable

>>37282497
I never virgin shamed in this thread. You guys are just so ashamed of being virgins that you go nuclear the minute anyone mentions your virginity.

>>37282402
It's not like I'm outside shouting "whore" at every woman I see. In he back of my head, I remind myself that they are, until proven otherwise, whores. Since none want anything to do with me, they all remain whores. Your appeal to emotion isn't going to work here. If you want to prove otherwise, go ahead

I would fuck this bitch until her legs get numb

>>37282579
And rightfully so if they are 20+. Men should be experienced in the sack.

>>37282534
That is literally what it means to decry slut shaming: to say that being shamed for being a slut is bad. Why don't you prove that they think promiscuity is worthy of praise?

>>37282579
Sluts and virgins both deserve "shaming" as much as anybody else. No one is innocent, everyone is an adult who needs to own their shit and stop screaming for the world to lend credibility to their world views.

>>37282586
>in the back of my head
Oh, that's completely fine then.

>>37281466
>Promiscuity hurts no one
Tell that to the people being cheated on.

>>37282595
>Why don't you prove that they think promiscuity is worthy of praise?

Because they expect people to either like what they do, or not talk about it at all. It's literally "stop not liking what I like"

>>37279942
Women hate taking responsibility on anything be it their own finances, their children, their past mistakes or even their last night decisions
Women have been stay at home nanny / maids for centuries, now that they have freedom they expect the same carefree lives they used to have, but what's this? men don't want women that have frivolously spread eagle to every men they wanted to shag?
Should i own up to my mistakes or blame the men for not wanting a wanton slut? the fact that there is a term coined for mens refusal to fuck sluts is hilarious and sad at the same time

>but muh studs
Being a stud requires effort, being a slut requires spread legs and consent

>>37282602
If your stance is simply "you shouldn't complain about slut shaming because no one should complain about being insulted for anything", I can't really argue with you, but you should recognize that most people do not hold that belief.

>>37282462
Or I could find a virgin and not have to worry about her being dirty? The difference between shit being in everything and a woman being a whore is that former is unavoidable and the latter is a choice.

>>37280603
>weak-minded

says the one that is constantly contradicting him/herself.

>>37282626
>you should recognize that most people do not hold that belief.

Most people are insecure as fuck. Especially the types of people I mentioned.

>>37282613
You can't be "cheated on" because you do not own anyone else's sexuality. They are always free to explore and enjoy. You don't get to restrict that.

>>37282613
Strawman. Slut shaming activists do not endorce cheating on people. The complaint is with being shamed about having sex while not in committed relationships.

>>37282622
No, they expect people not to shame them for what they do. They do not expect people to praise them. It's possible to talk about something without shaming someone for doing it.

>>37282641
>Two people dating with each other under the promise to stay true
>"You don't own me, i want dick and i shall have it"
>"I thought you loved me?"
>"I love dick more, stop oppressing me!"

>>37282604
But online I do. The internet has much more power than Face-to-face interactions, at least for someone like me(autistic). "Slut shaming" (aka calling whores whores) is a necessity in achieves ideal world. There wouldn't be as many whores in a (my) perfect world. I will do whatever I can to achieve this, just the same as the normie who goes and fucks 3 girls over the weekend.

>>37282641
>You don't get to restrict that.

If you have no respect for the verbal contract people sign when they enter a monogamous relartionship. Language and communication are a part of nature too. You don't get to choose what people are biologically wired for.

>>37282646
>Slut shaming activists do not endorce cheating on people.

Don't speak for all of them. One is in this thread.

If your intention is to paint a picture of a fictional woman who is the perfect role model for those who would sleep around, you need to understand that it is just that: fictional.

>>37279942
Bitch, if you can be that easily shamed about being a slut, then maybe you should stop being a slut. Dumb ass bitch hoe.

>>37282552
I have read parts, but a while ago. Once again, my point is that I'm asking what "Doing well" means I regard to the definition of "loser". I wouldn't call Ted a loser. He did what he thought he could and that's the same as normies acting promiscuous. Once again, I'm not condoning it, but I think we're all trying to achieve something in life and he did what he could.

>>37279942
Because girls want their cake and eat it too. They are that entitled.

>>37282537
>can't blame a slut for being a slut
That's this whole thread pal
I don't want to head about how blowing people up isn't comparable to fucking every attractive guy you see. I only want to know what is considered "doing well" and why being a slut shouldn't be criticised beyond muh feelings

>>37282716
Everyone is. Guys want to sleep around, then settle with a girl with low mileage.

>>37282727
There's a loophole, it's ok to call them a slut if you're actually fucking them. You have to LIKE that they're sluts.

>>37282641
>They are always free to explore and enjoy
Go ahead and say that to someone in a relationship or married, I'm sure they'd agree with you.
>>37282646
>The complaint is with being shamed about having sex while not in committed relationships.
But that's where you're wrong. They complain that they're being made fun of with anyone, regardless if they're in a relationship or not. Promiscuous women advocate dumping their partners if they're not okay with them having a "fun time". They also advocate that they're just as good as a virgin, and should be seen as equals.

>>37282751
>They also advocate that they're just as good as a virgin, and should be seen as equals.

Wrong. They want to be seen as better. And they are, by hapless failed Chads and old men.

>>37282750
That's essentially it. Sluts don't mind being called sluts if it's chad doing it and in private. They like to be degraded, in private. In public, where their image is at stake, they must do whatever they can to save face, like shame slut-shakers. No amount of makeup makes a whore whole again.

>>37282805
Slut-shamers
ReeeeeeseeeeEEE

>>37282798
>They want to be seen as better.
That depends on the girl and her self esteem.

>>37282094

Why would anyone want to argue with a woman?
The vast majority of women aren't objective and therefore aren't worth arguing with.

>>37281656
How is it retarded? It only puts female sexual activity into a perspective.

>>37282899
If I ever decided strange dick was worth investing in over monogamy, I would own that shit and never bother acknowledging the opinions of anybody who tried to convince me otherwise. But for me to get to that point I'd have to be a seriously jaded person. That being said, I'm getting pretty close.

Women don't realize this, but most of the people that are hardline misogynists or redpillers are the ones that loved and respected women the most. It's only after getting perspective on the world that they realize their adulation was unwarranted and the subsequent vortex of feelings of betrayal, anger, and sadness that they become what they are today.

Roasties and normies btfo AGAIN
Why won't they just leave REERErereEREEEEEeeeEEEEEEEE

>>37282991
>most of the people that are hardline misogynists or redpillers are the ones that loved and respected women the most

lol

You mean they love the idealized view that they created in their demented heads. Most of those fuckers only love themselves.

>>37282296
I like how the depression rate goes down slightly from 20 to 21+. As if those last couple of dicks were what they needed to feel a little better.

>>37283024
There it is, those disgusting virgin creeps right?

>>37282991
even Tupac went down this journey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AHH0bdNKyM

>>37279942
Because 10,000 years ago slut shaming would have effectively led the woman to being shunned from the society at worst, and at best, she would have to raise a kid on her own.
Both of those things would likely result in death for the woman and/or the child

File: jester.jpg (12KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 300x300px

>>37283024
>>37283034
Are sluts the female version of edgelords?

>>37283024
>idealized
>demented
>fuckers
quite the objective worldview you have there senpai

>>37279985
>Because women are children
no they aren't if you don't go after actual children fucking pedo
kys, scum

>>37283099
>no they aren't
Retarded skank detected.

So looking at this thread, is it safe to say the girls won this one? :D

>>37283175
Of course, the guys can't came up with a single original thought in this thread. I wonder why the robot is still in place. People are just adopting meme opinions and keep repeating them like mindless robots.

>>37283199
This post is heavy with irony.

>>37283231
In the end the whole thread is nothing but irony, trolling and shitposting. There may not be even a single anon ITT who was being genuine.

>>37283252
lmao retard fd

Sluts are unfaithful, have high chance of carrying STD's and are loose
Why would a man choose that over a faithful decent girl?

>>37283275
A real man knows it's not about who she loved before, it's about who she loves now. I hope one day you will understand that.

>>37283339
>A real man knows it's not about who she loved before, it's about who she loves now.
Sluts don't love the men they sleep with. He was talking about easy women, not girls who've had sex before. A real man knows his self worth and knows when to walk away from someone unfaithful. I hope one day you will understand that.

Because women live and die by double standards and men's only power over them is to call them out on this shit. Every time a woman complains about something and you call her out, they feel brought down and that is what hurts them the most.

Never relent and never compromise with cunts.

>>37281466
>They don't
They do
>Promiscuity occurs between two consenting adults and hurts no one; shit like catcalling and rape actually hurt people physically or emotionally and are not desired by one of the people. I don't know what other 'million ways' you're talking about.
Don't change the subject.Those are not sexual decisions.
>Not what slut shaming is
Yes, yes it is. You fucking retard. I am far more likely to get an STD from your used up toasty roasty.

File: bwiah.jpg (8KB, 320x283px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 320x283px

ITT: women who want to fuck around a lot, but get upset when people don't want to date people who fuck around a lot
Who is trying to control whose sexuality again?
You want to fuck around be my guest, but have fun dating men who also fuck around, birds of a feather and all that

>tfw average dude
>roleplay as a girl in this kind of threads because the amount of buttmad is incredible
>tfw called white knight for telling you guys that you shouldn't care about what they do
>tfw at least I'll never be as beta as the guys calling me roastie for pointing at self evident truths
feelsgoodman.xcf

>>37283722
>girl larping as a guy larping as a girl

inb4 man/virgin

>>37283740
>girl larping as a man asking not to call he(r) a virgin
Good job my fellow fembo... I mean dude.

File: autistic spinning.gif (362KB, 357x278px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 357x278px

>>37283760
>t-they're not a virgin! you're on the wrong side of history!

>>37283836
>gif
christ that was literally me in high school, literally autism

>>37281906
Which video was it? I've found chicks can't handle MDE in general