Why are women so much more mature than men? Whenever I talk with

File: smug.jpg (238KB, 1141x1227px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1141x1227px

>>36995352
>brings up philosophy, something legit started by men
Hmmmmmm really makes you think.
And consider that men don't want to talk about philosophy or politics with a pseudo-intellectual cunt like yourself, you give actual smart women a bad name.

>>36995352
Women think subjectively while men think objectively

>>36995397
but I'm not a woman
and I'm talking in generalities here.
the average woman just seems to be much more capable of interesting dialogue than the average guy

>>36995352
You have been talking to the wrong men and with the right women about those subjects

>>36995471
Ah, I see.
Point about you being a cunt still stands though.

Perhaps you're just interested in different things, making the women you talk to seem much smarter in comparison to the men you talk to.

>>36995352
I have never spoken to a woman who gives a shit about politics, philosophy or history beyond surface level arguments.

File: 1494594133016.jpg (65KB, 500x378px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 500x378px

>>36995352
Men talk about interesting/serious things with interesting/serious people. If they talk about simple things with you. That you means you are a simple person and not worth talking to about those things.

>>36995352
>>36995471
I used to think the same way, but then I found out the reason why men seemed to only be able to hold shallow conversations. It's your fault, actually. They see you as inferior, as if you were a little boy, and so they talk to you accordingly. When two or more men of the same "level" meet, their conversations flow a lot better and can become much deeper, because they actually want to talk to each other. Women, on the other hand, talk to pretty much everybody because they mostly talk about themselves anyways.

>>36995548
that sounds like awful circular logic that could work in the opposite direction

>>36995352
Either:
a) You are stupid
b) You are a female

>>36995352
Here's your (You) pal excellent work.

>>36995397
Some men "started" philosophy therefore all men are smRT.

>>36995352
because men don't spew ceaseless meaningless bullshit in every conversation

>>36995352
The majority of men and women have no opinion about anything at all, ever.
But the majority of women are pretending.
Out of the minority of decent people, I guess there's a 50/50 ratio.

File: spider.jpg (425KB, 1901x1605px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1901x1605px

>>36995724
>men continued the field of philosophy shaping it into what it is today
>almost every philosopher that's contributed greatly to philosophy has been male
>barely any well-known female philosophers besides Ayn Rand, who's considered a joke by pretty much everyone who's studied it

And that's just for philosophy, look at things like science and engineering, not even trying to be sexist here.

>>36995352
>Why are women so much more mature than men?
Are the only women and men you live around old ladies and teenage boys respectively?

Men are laughably more mature than women.

File: 1471201705477.jpg (19KB, 501x443px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 501x443px

Women are superficial retards who know nothing. All they talk about is clothes, gossip and whatever is on TV.

>>36996224
can you dump more of these primal drawings?
i didn't save them in the initial thread and i'm having regrets

File: 1488998485149.png (157KB, 409x410px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 409x410px

>Yet women are able to think before they speak,

>>36995352
Very interesting observations, anon. Mine just so happen to be the complete opposite.

>>36995352
Maybe you are just trying to talk about interesting subjects with uninteresting people...
Most of the intelligent discussions I have are with other men. But I do agree that many tend to lack nuance in their point of view, which is by far the most annoying...
But I also tend to think women are too indecisive, sitting in the middle of the fence if you like: they don't want to pick a side, and end up being unable to hold arguments, not because they can't, but because they don't want to.
Maybe you should try to speak with more diverse people, and see if this situation is really the same: I think a lot just has to do with the social background you're in.

>>36995352
Literally false. Men think with logic, women think with emotions.
You're just mad that no one wants to listen to you sperg out about politics. Women are just polite enough to entertain your bullshit.

File: [Ayako]_Minami-ke_-_02_H264_[BBDE7410].mkv_snapshot_04.39_[2016.02.09_15.07.39].jpg (356KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1280x720px

>>36995352
>Yet women are able to think before they speak
Original smug.

>>36995352
Isn't your anecdotal evidence the exact kind of anti-intellectual conversation you're railing against? How are you in any way better if you reason through things like that? So you haven't met intellectual men. Big deal. Is it possibly your environment/the people you hang out with? Can you find scientific evidence or social theory that might back up your claim? Otherwise we should treat this thought of yours about as seriously as you treat your peers.

File: Tips bowler hat.jpg (98KB, 538x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 538x720px

tips fedo-do bird

>>36995397
Men started it. Overly emotional manbabies like you are not men. The closest you come is effeminate male.

The interesting thing is you robots are all saying the same thing. Great originality friends!

Taking conversational advice from a bunch of robots is like taking women advice from a bunch of robots.

Never met a smart woman in my life orgo

>>36996432
agreed, first one was one of the best reaction images I've ever seen

Great bait anon, got me to respond.

>>36996642
(You) ruined OP's lil white knight gapehole without even insulting him

>>36996657
>tips fedora the explorer
>underneath pokes out OP's back-up fedora

>>36996739
i have but she was diagnosed asperger's

oh and some really unstable daddy issue girl who was a dentist student stacy platinum at starcraft 2

they're rare and they're often really fucked up
comes with the bell-curve (men have more zettai retardos AND >tfw to smarts, women have less variation but same average)

File: 123123.jpg (171KB, 1045x1452px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1045x1452px

>>36996432
sure, gimmie a min

>>36996918
This. You ahve a lot of smart men, but you also have a lot of idiots, while women tend to be more average, in the middle.
Maybe they end up having less geniuses, but they also have less Darwin-award winners...

File: 1269596197.png (1MB, 1409x2129px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1409x2129px

>>36997026
and another
originale

>>36997031
>>36996918

So this would mean there are more dumb men than women, and therefore men are dumber.

ouch.

File: 0012.jpg (256KB, 1777x1105px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1777x1105px

>>36996660
lol, can really feel the anger comin' off this guy, calls me overly emotional then throws out a bunch of buzzwords in an attempt to make himself sound tough.
>>36997036
another

>>36997031
their bell curve would be a bit to the left though. Do betas here unironically believe your typical stacy is some kind of savant?

File: 3535235112.png (2MB, 2105x1561px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2105x1561px

>>36997071
this 1s my favorite

>>36997069
Not really. If you average it out, both sexes are equal. It only means that the distribution is greater among men than with women, if you were to map it out on a graph. You have more idiots, and more smarties.

>>36997072
I hope not.

>>36997072
But robots are always below average iq. You aren't this big of a failure because you're smart.

File: safari.jpg (405KB, 2013x1555px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 2013x1555px

>>36997103
last one i have, safari grandpa.

>>36997121
But more idiots for men. Thus making men dumber.

File: 1494001053822.png (139KB, 878x738px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 878x738px

>>36997122
So women make 70% a man does because they aren't as smart? Gotcha sweetie

>>36997151
Now I have the certainty you are just doing it on purpose.
Here's your (you).

>>36997153
Who said that?

Also I'm a man. Rare on r9k I know.

>>36997122
Robots here usually have 130 or so IQ(I have 135).

>>36997168
Sorry basic logic offends you

File: 1474121256723.jpg (66KB, 360x335px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 360x335px

>>36997170
>You aren't this big of a failure because you're smart.

women make less than men are thus less successful and are then not as smart according to you.
Is logic too hard for the roastie brain to grasp?

>>36995352
I do not think woman are capable of philosophical discussion, but lots of men arent either, its just some men are, I think it really needs a certain type of person and they need to be male.

>>36997184
No, they don't. Maybe 86 for the smart ones.

>>36997212
They also take more time off.

>>36997195
Let's just agree on the fact you are doing in on purpose. I just couldn't imagine it otherwise...

>>36997212
Yeah but robots are on government assistance and make less than women. What now?

>>36997242
they also take less lucrative careers like babysitters and stay at home mum while men are becoming engineers and doctors

>>36997258
I'm outsmarting a bunch of idiots on purpose? Sure.

>>36997217
If you have 86 IQ you are most likely outside doing some kind of degenerate activity. In my estimate, it would be rare to find a person with an IQ of less than 100 posting here, simply because the content of this place would next to impossible for him to access mentally.
There are a lot subtleties and tempered reflections here, not so much in your face 9gag humour.

File: efd.jpg (29KB, 600x584px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x584px

ENOUGH WITH THESE WOMEN THREADS FOR FUCKS SAKE. IT'S ALL THE FUCKING SAME. EVERY FUCKING FEMBOT THREAD IS EITHER A THREAD THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GENDER OR ONE THAT IS JUST ABOUT ROASTIES COMPLAINING ABOUT BEING ROASTIES. AT LEAST WHEN WE COMPLAIN ITS ABOUT BEING LOVED OR OUR FAMILY OR OUR JOB OR OUR LIVES JUST BEING GENERAL SHIT

>>36997310
Well then, let's just take an example, to be on the safe side...
If I were to simplify the situation, let's say that the group "men" have two people: Joe and Albert. Joe has 75 IQ and Albert has 125. They therefore both average out to 100. The group "women" tend to be like with Stacy and Sarah, with Stacy being at 90 and Sarah 110. Both groups end up averaging at 100, the only difference is wit the distribution, which tends to be less concentrated. In other terms, both are statistically equal, but the group of men tend to be less precise.

>>36997281
women have affirmative action. Without the state protecting them women would be objects

>>36997281
Wtf are you on about. Women are probably on more government help than a robot ever could. Besides affirmative action, all women have to do is have a child and boom government support

>>36995352
Stop gaslighting.

Psychological warfare tactic used by narcissists

>>36997416
Huh? I'm not sure you know what affirmative action is.

>>36997529
In what country?

>>36996660
>women are smarter!
>effeminate men are retarded!
Kek, you know the truth deep down in your heart.

>>36995352
This is b8 right? The only politics girls will legitmatly discuss is sjw bullshit, they literally have no interest in anything outside of that realm.

>>36995528
this

f;oihdsafa;oihef;oihewa