>tfw just saw that Subway is owned by a company called Doctor's Associates Inc.
It really is just one big conspiracy isn't it?
>>36870827
You bet it is, goy.
>thinking subway is healthy
Fun fact: the calories and nutrition info is for the base sandwhich with absolute no toppings, and it doesn't factor in your drink/chips. When you factor in all the toppings and extras it's about as healthy as a big mac is; and probably more calories too
>>36870827
> in the following year, they formed Doctor's Associates Inc. to oversee operations of the restaurants as the franchise expanded. The holding company derives its name from DeLuca's goal to earn enough from the business to pay tuition for medical school, as well as Buck's having a doctorate in physics.
sounds legit to me
They did have a legit child molester as a mascot for years tho
>>36870891
It's usually fine if you don't get like, a double steak bacon chicken footlong or something.
I only get a 6-inch turkey sandwich when I go to Subway and my weight is still dropping.
>>36870957
Well yeah, same could be said that if you only go to McDs for just chicken nuggets occasionally you'd still lose weight
The point I was trying to make is that a lot of fatties think that eating subway = losing weight
>>36871008
Of course, but I think an actual sandwich with real vegetables on it would be better for you than chicken mcnuggets. Unless there's something wrong with subway toppings I don't know about.