Can women do anything better than men, other than being a requirement for procreation?
If not, why did nature shape a dead weight on us?
Unlike with other animals, where the female serves other roles (sometimes hunting, protecting, feeding and raising the offspring), the majority of human females are borderline, if not complete parasitic. If left alone they will create an abomination out of the children, thus failing even at the most basic task which should be naturally successful to them. What are they? Why do they do this? Where did we go so wrong?
(ATTENTION: If you didn't fail, this post doesn't apply to you. This post is targeted towards the rising wave of failures.)
>>36749021
>Unlike with other animals, where the female serves other roles (sometimes hunting, protecting, feeding and raising the offspring
But that's exactly what women do in a more natural, tribal environment of hunter-gatherers.
The first problem in your beliefs is thinking women can't do anything other than be used for procreation, then call them useless sluts.
>>36749021
>If not, why did nature shape a dead weight on us?
Because the genetic variation in men goes both ways. Men exist to weed out weak genes.
Your man-tits can't breastfeed
Unfortunately modern society puts almost no value on child care; everyone needs to work to be valuable apparently
That one wilderness survival show on discovery, seemed real for a tv show and that one blond woman btfo of everyone cept like one guy. She just had just had a dry spell for food once cuz bears were stealing her fish n they had to take her to civiisation cuz she got weak. P badass mane
First ost your virginty fagget
Op is a fag
>>36749021
Is that on PC or Android? Is it a dark theme or seperate application?
>>36749104
Trannies can breastfeed with female hormones
i just want a tranny
>>36749104
Men can breastfeed, just not as well;>>36749158 hormones aren't required
However breastfeeding wouldn't exist as replication would take another form
>>36749086
I don't consider them useless, nor do i believe that they cannot accomplish other tasks. Just not as efficiently, thus the question rises what kind of superior life-form we could've been without them, it's just from a logical point of view, and why did nature shape it this way, as in why did it create an inefficiency.
But I guess long ago they could perform just as well, and this unforeseen inefficiency manifested itself over time.
>>36749152
PC, dark theme
>>36749021
>If not, why did nature shape a dead weight on us?
This is rather recent thing, tied mainly to our civilizational and technological development.
men hunt
women gather
pretty simple concept eh?
The reason women make better gatherers than men is due gathering in a tribal sense is very mind numbing and men will rage with testosterone (much like how office shooters are created)
now go get laid virgin
>>36750118
>now go get laid virgin
My commanding officer is Major Cockblock, for the time being, I cannot. I'll have to wait 3-4 years more for that. But it's better to come here and tell myself that I can't get laid because I hate women, not because I'm being cockblocked.
>>36750241
then you belong at wizchan not r9k
>>36749021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqfAt7TshLw
They may are, may its like that, buts not their fault.
Theres a simple solution to literally every world Problem.
Build sex robots
> no overpopulation
> less rapist
> less CO2 because declining population
> more intact famillys, because fathers marry because they love the charackter of women and want a child
> less aggression in men
> women dont get reduced on vagina like feminists want
> you can be happy with much less because you dont have to impress a woman
> Land gets cheaper because less population
EVERY GOV ON THE WORLD SHALL START RESEARCHING SEXROBOTs