>be robot >complain about genetics >still born male

>>36719236
Women only love genetically superior men.
Men can love any type of woman.
There's still hope for even the ugliest of women. Even downie women get normal guys as bfs and husbands.

Are you saying females can't into output? Inferior.

The system is MUCH more forgiving for women though. Even a 4/10 has her orbiters, meanwhile a 6/10 dude that doesn't "get out there" won't see any pussy in his life

Eh, to a degree. But as far as being able to make it through life at a base level, they still win. Because if a man loses that lottery he could die from it - either from starving on the streets or suicide. A woman won't because at the absolute lowest she is capable of falling, she'll end up in a very cushy shelter and very soon get used by a man who will feed her in exchange for sex and let her be a perfectly happy ugly housewife.

I'm not saying either situation is desirable - they aren't. It's awful. But it's statistically proven that men are by far both the ones who die from the elements *and* suicide the most.

>>36719236
An ugly female is at roughly the same privilege level as a 6/10 male

>>36719236
>>females who lose the genetic lottery have it worse off since males are much more defined by their output than females whose worth is almost solely defined by genetics
what the fuck does this even mean?

>>36719428
It means a man does things. A woman is just there to be pretty to look at.
Even the elephant man can be good at something.

>>36719428
He's talking about women that aren't Stacy. You know the ones with 10 orbiters instead of 100.

>>36719481

B-but none of those orbiters are chad so she may as well have 0 ; _:

>>36719472
I still fail to see your logic why exactly can't the elephant woman be good at something?

>>36719325
All you've said is hypergamy exists. A 4/10 male can still work hard, have a good career/job, have interesting hobbies and be funny/witty. Sure he won't have the same opportunities in mate selection as an 8/10 male with the same attributes but he will be much more likely to achieve satisfaction and better mating options (quality over quantity) than a 4/10 female who sits around waiting for prince charming.

>>36719335
Do you really think men care about a woman' output? Men for the most part select based on physical attractiveness. The output is mostly irrelevant.

>>36719363
No it's not at all. You're talking simply sex, but in terms of overall life quality/satisfaction a man has much choice and direction; agency. 99% of males get laid, a 6/10 isn't going to be in that situation unless he has serious social interaction problems.

>>36719420
t. never left the house

An ugly woman will even have trouble finding a job, while a 9/10 woman will find numerous jobs just because she exists. The same kind of barriers for the most part don't really exist for men.

>>36719472
This anon gets it. It's like how no one really gives much of a shit about female sports, and it's not just because they're less physically capable.

>>36719481
>You know the ones with 10 orbiters instead of 100.

You're deluded if you think ugly women have orbiters. Sure if they try online dating they might have some men want to fuck them because they have a vagina, but that doesn't make them happy. Securing a high value male in a monogamous relationship and procreating with said male is what makes women happy. An ugly woman has an infinitesimally small chance of achieving this.

>>36719599
Because a woman's output does little to nothing to improve her chance of finding a quality mate.

File: e9d.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x600px

>>36719236
Very shitty bait, you don't deserve the effort to be debated.
Gtfo

>>36719325
>men can love any type of women
Objectively wrong, speaking as a man.