>mom who's supposedly an intelligent woman (STEM degree back in the day it was even more rare)
>unironically thinks women have had it worse in wars
>"getting raped is worse than fighting on the front lines"
There's no hope with biological women. They are not capable of reasoning therefore they have no value other than their sexual one. Yet they demand they're seen as more than cumdupsters. Interacting with them has no value you're better of with hookers. And sure, 1 in a million might be worth something and you might somehow have that luck and get one, but it doesn't make it less dumb to play the dating game as it is to play the lottery regardless if you end up winning.
Robots and AI might turn the tie but otherwise they're a lost gender.
The worst part about women is that most do not even have the capacity to realize their own inferiority.
and I have doubts whether or not the ones that do, do so fully.
>>36701228
Y u batin' son?
Blame Marxism
are you serious or do you really view women this way?
also I hope you realize the more "realistic" AI gets, the more they will just end up more like real woman. that is kind of the point and why people keep trying to make them better. but that also means they can say "no" to you and maybe even have free will like real women, too. I don't understand why men always think making a machine exactly like a human woman is going to solve all their problems with real women lol.
>>36701504
>implying men want more realistic robots rather than sex slaves who are also programmed to actually have meaningful conversation
I can't even begin to describe how delusional you women are not that you'd be able to comprehend...