>men get tired of women's shit >men create artificial

Not if they get to have a word in it. Which unfortunately they do in this day and age.

>>36638697
women should be kept in rape dungeons

>>36638676
At last, the "woman" meme can end. Can't wait til they lose their pussy privilege and find themselves on equal footing with men.

So you fuck the plastic bag to get the babby in?

It won't make a difference, women always have far more power and men are never able to organise. 'Patriarchy' never existed, it's just a myth that serves gynocentric interests by appealing to male naivety and desire for self-esteem.

It's already essentially impossible for a single male to adopt or raise a child without intervention by the social-services state, it's not going to happen.

>>36638797
Patriarchy never existed for 99.99% of men. Women see it's always men in control, but they are psychopaths that don't care about other men.

Still need eggs though. And what would you do with female children?

>he thinks he only has to ejaculate into a plastic bag to conceive a child.

File: 1485555062895.jpg (63KB, 453x604px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 453x604px

>>36638676
>will women become obsolete?

they already are.

>>36637856

File: comfy artificial womb lamb.png (1MB, 1067x600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1067x600px

That lamb looks really comfy

File: activates the brain almond.png (58KB, 633x633px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 633x633px

>>36638865
The implication here is not just artificial wombs but also designer babies. Give every child a Y-chromosome and you're golden. Since men have both an X and Y chromosome you could theoretically also create egg cells from a mans DNA. I think OP is onto something here.

>>36638676

Finding a woman and making a family was once an integral part of the human experience.

>>36639466
>human experience

We're living in a world that considers the "human experience" to be a relic of pre-industrial society. We're making "progress" towards something more ideal though, when our minds can be stored on servers on Mars or something. Isn't that great?

File: 635812078611421709-1277796026_Screen-Shot-2014-09-26-at-11.57.32-PM.png (128KB, 614x401px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 614x401px

>>36639466
rip that

>>36638676
Yes, dating a flesh and bones woman will be a fetish and a sign of poverty

Women will actually have to have "character" to be viable in dating market, maybe they will even behave in a way that isn't unbearably annoying

>>36638676
I want to be put into one of these

>>36639736
all natural woman will definitely be a thing

>men create perfect sex robots
They need to get on with it. Fuck progeny I want that itch scratched without having to deal with women drama or the /lgbt/ fools.

>>36638740
Nee this technology is for premature children.The lamb was put at 3 months in this thing.Earlier and it couldn't have survived.As for now they don't even know if it developed correctly or if it has brain damage since it wasn't even ''born'' yet.

It's not human unless it's born in the loving womb of a mother. It's not human if it's born in bag in a cold hard laboratory.

>>36640022
>has dna structure and everything
>not human

File: 1492946547121s.jpg (7KB, 250x183px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x183px

>>36638676
It would save all world problems
> world population would decrease repeadly
because sexual desire is satisfied for man
> land price is cheap, everyone can afford place to live
> the guys who really want a family not just fucking can try to get along with woman
> only fathers because they father want to be one, less damaged kids
> women desire for man will increase because they dont get attention anymore and have now to point with there charackter instead of vagina

ALL GOVERMENTS OF THE WORLD SHOULD LITERALLY CONCENTRATE ALL RESEARCH ON SEXROBOTS NOW

>>36638676
One could use this same "logic" to argue men will become "obsolete" and with sperm banks we're closer to that reality than this one.

Technology will permit less interaction with the opposite sex if so desired but how do you jump from this to obsoleteness?

>>36640176
women just can't afford it