I've fucked like 10 - 15 different girls and every single one of them never had a visible butthole like this while being fucked from behind. How do you make this happen? What are we doing wrong?
I'm talking hands free specifically here, no grabbing and spreading.
>>36597046
porn isnt real anon
name plz tho
>>36597046
that's because the anus isn't a sexual organ.
>>36597046
Sounds like you're into fat chicks.
>>36597046
FUCK OFF CHAD
REEEEEEEE
oregano
>>36597046
The girl has to have no ass for this to happen
>>36597046
I realized the same thing awhile back. I can only think of one girl I've fucked that I noticed her butt hole while doing her from behind cause she would tell me to put my finger in it.
69 is cool though. I love having the ass hole right in my face while eating the pussy.
her head has to be at a lower level then her butt
and she has to arch it a bit( which some find uncomftorable)
>>36597104
>porn is not real meme
kys
>>36597046
99% of girls are bad at being sexy or good at sex so don't bother looking for this shit.
It's the angle you're seeing it from. When you do doggy, you're looking at her lower back from above. In porn, to capture doggy, they're usually at hip/dick level with the guy to capture the girl's whole package. Lean back a little bit next time during doggy style and you'll see what I mean.
>>36597046
Fat or they don't do the ass popping back arch. When she is o her hands and knees her spine should be arched in a valley, not a hill.
>no visible butthole
Anon are you sure you're not fucking aliens?
>>36598120
99% of girls are good at sex? I've been fucking the 1% most of the time then
>>36597046
probably prolapse. when you see girls like that in porn they probably whored around a lot before hand. I never seen anyone think it's a good thing unless they are shilling it.
>>36597046
you gotta fuck a skinny girl.
>>36598513
??are you dyslexic or something??
>>36598513
can you read English, anon
>>36598611
Are you dyslexic? Proofread your own god damned post:
>99% of girls are bad at being sexy OR good at sex
What...THE FUCK??? does that mean
>>36598665
I think he's trying to say that they are bad at being good at sex? which is probably the most retarded thought articulated in the history of this retarded board.
>>36598778
Yeah, he's since left the thread but it's nice to rub it in for whoever's still lurking. That might have been one of the most retarded posts I've ever read.
>>36598611
>>36598645
SHAMEful same-fagging