Reminder that if you like the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, you are a normalfag.
>>36461362
>Reminder that if you like the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, you are a normalfag.
why?
I think Emil Cioran might fit /r9k/ well, but have yet to read him
>>36461362
I like SMT Nocturne and that's loosely based on his philosophy
>>36461478
i've read it, and while he grasped nice understanding of certain hopelessness of life, it still remains only one perspective of life, no more accurate than any other.
>>36461362
Reminder that Albert Camus IS THE ULTIMATE NORMIE
>had at least 3 girlfriends at everytime
>chad
>played football
>just b yourself and don't think about suicide senpai
Fuck him
>>36462104
his philosophy helped him break out of robot state of mind... why is that bad? isn't that everything ppl on this board look for?
schopy is /ourguy/
>>36461433
>Just be yourself
>It is worth to struggle for you desires
Basically it is the philosophy that modern normies have adopted.
>>36462217
>Be yourself only if it's socially acceptable, otherwise change yourself, until your 'self' becames' socially acceptable.
that's normies standpoint on 'being yourself'. you've clearly haven't read anything he wrote. maybe few of his quotes on the internet...
>>36461362
What about schopenhauer ?
>>36462208
I thought that was Stirner, my eigentum
>>36461362
i dont bother to even know what his philosophy is because im not a fucking faggot
>>36462373
Schopenhauer is the official philosopher of /r9k/.
>>36462373
>>36462208
a true robots guy desu
if you can't relate to this fine man you're a fucking normie and need to gtfo
>>36462373
He has a whole essay on how monogamy is bad and how Chads like Byron should have more than one wife or rather arguing in favor of polygamy.
>>36462104
>read his books
>follow his philosophy
>realise he's a chad
If you "like" philosophy then you are a wierdo by default
>>36461362
Nietzsche was fapping to traps
>>36462465
true robot phylosophy
>>36461362
Now that's a mustache
So who's the most robot philosopher ?
>>36463859
None. anyone who has a theory of life doesn't qualify. All robots wander through life in a state of pathetic blaming and manchild ways