just a friendly reminder to the niggers who browse this board.
On 22 January 1879, at Rorke's Drift on the Natal border with Zululand, in South Africa, a tiny British garrison of 140 men - many of them sick and wounded - fought for 12 hours to repel repeated attacks by up to 3,000 Zulu warriors.
>>36429588
>being this insecure
wew. i knew white people were pathetic, but this? this is just sad desu
>>36429588
Wow. That is a nice historical fact. I did not know this, Anon. Thanks for sharing.
140 men with guns*
i love the Zulu war because the Brits are unironically proud and think they're brave warriors for mowing down thousands of naked men with sticks
>>36430011
Wearing feathers and furs and loincloths of oxhide, etc., and armed mainly with assegais and large ox-hide shields, the Zulus also had a few muzzle-loading percussion smoothbore muskets at Isandlwana. Captured Martini-Henry rifles were used, however, the same afternoon and evening at Rorke's Drift, against the gallant British defenders. Fortunately the Zulus were bad shots.
(Ignoring the battle prior)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Isandlwana
t. White south African