Looks like your employer will be looking into your browser h

>>36374190
If I have a scat fetish does that improve or hurt my chances of getting a job involving sewage?

File: a1d7736f.jpg (235KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1280x960px

>>36374190
Employer already knows that I love Ballbusting and have made my own videos. Do jobs really give a shit what porn you look at?

File: f0ad188b.jpg (176KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1280x960px

>>36374295
What is the appeal of scat. Not judging I just truly don't get it...is it a humiliation thing or is the poo actually the fun oart

>>36374607
Why does your employer know that?

>>36374688
Not him but I just enjoy watching attractive women do dirty shit.

>>36374190
>implying everyone's internet history isn't completely obscene

I think we'll be fine, NEET-Sama.

That's why I plan to google search religious topics a lot. They can't deny me for religious reasons so I'll just REEEEE about how they hate me Cuz I'm catholic

Surely there will be lawsuits and constitutional challenges to this in the states.

This seems so wildly unconstitutional.

VPN and Tor should take care of that problem. Besides unless you apply to some big corporation with an oversized HR department no will bother digging through that shit.

>brother is a anmerican-sized chad for is the food dept manager at nearby walmart with his blob sized gf

could they get fired because of google hire?

>>36374190
It's just Google's version of LinkedIn. The "journalist" is conjecturing that Google could give future employers access to your search history, but why would they? They don't show your search history to your Google Plus contacts right now.