If radical feminists sucked all existing porn into an enormous

I dunno. I'll cross that bridge if I get to it.

But I don't think you or they can make me stop masturbating and avoiding women.

There's something wrong with the society feminism wants to build.

Humans aren't meant to pair bond after having different loves.

>>36248972
I don't watch 3D porn so it's not a problem for me whatsoever

unless you meant including 2D porn, and that really gets into the philosophy of what is porn and what isn't

National geographic

Go back to jerking off to my imagination/suggestive images.

>>36249047

2D porn would also be banned. They wouldn't bother philosophizing about what constitutes porn and what doesn't, anything that could be considered pornographic which men are deriving pleasure from would be banned or censored.

Don't radfems see porn as somehow liberating?

>>36249118

that's earlier fems, new rad fems think all sex is rape.

Feminists want to partake in the production of porn by acting in it but they also want to ban it for the consumer.

It all goes to show you that feminism isn't about equality of genders but about using you for their own gain.

All done under the name feminist equality.

>>36249118
I think there is a schism between radfems who think porn is debasing and women only do it for profit under the capitalist system, and radfems who think that the ability to do porn is the ability to have complete control over ones self.

>>36249095
Do you want to see a Chad endorsed beta-uprising? Because this us how you get a Chad endorsed beta-uprising.

It would be beautiful. Imagine whole football teams aprehending feminist anti-porn squads while robots throw piss jugs and shit covered tendies at them.

And feminist tactics to get what they want from men is to withhold sex and to ban sexual outlets for men.

Feminism is just a con game it's not equality of gender, there's no avenue for discussion because they refuse to acknowledge men as equals, as peers.

>>36249118
I think TPTB are pro-porn because it keeps the goyim under control.

File: 1488650856010.png (132KB, 318x321px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 318x321px

Kick it old school and jack off to Victorias Secret catalogs.

>>36249179
this is why pornographers should be put to death
revolution would happen overnight

>>36249179

Does Chad think he's some leader of the robots? He's a goon and he can partake in his own uprising.

Robots are men who withdraw.

>>36249153

Feminism is a broad category, the same feminists who want porn banned are not the same feminists who want to act in porn.

>>36248972
Start a rape gang and begin raping women until the connection is made.

>>36249047
I find 2D porn strange and lost the ability to watch it after the age of 15 or so. Now I look at it and it just looks fucking stupid.

>>36249242

That doesn't really matter after all because all feminism is a sham and a con to cheat and manipulate men by withholding sex and removing sexual outlets.

Feminism is high school infantile Staceyism but all done under the false flag of gender equality.

>>36249238
No mang. If Chad is neutral or on the robot side, there is literally nothing can stop us. Nu male white knights will disappear after the first shit jug is thrown. Betas will be able to end feminism overnight.

Feminism puts on a united front but their way of getting what they want is withholding sex and removing sexual outlets for men.

It's basically basic bitch the movement.

At least non feminists don't pretend they're any different.

>>36249302

That isn't true, a lot of feminism is just sheer resentment towards men and society.

>>36249179

Chad can get pussy though, as long as penis in vagina sex isn't banned as well.

>>36249326

I don't know what you're talking about and you come off as a low iq goon.

Are you lost? This isn't reddit.

>>36249326
if you think I'm leaving my house to publish protest for pen then you've got another thing coming bud

I've got enough porn stashed to last me for at least a decade

>>36248972
I haven't watched porn in ?? months.

I grew up without the internet, so really it just feels like a return to nature sort of thing.


I can't imagine what it's like ebing some 20 year old kid who was born with an internet connection and was watching all the porn in the world before he could even beat off.

>>36249356
hah, now you're trying to tell me that people of one gender might harbor unfounded resentment towards the other? and towards our societal constructs as well? I can not believe this...

>>36249356

Then it's just a private lesbian club. And therefore not suitable for society because it only involves women unless you made a nation that was for women only.

>>36249369
I thought I'd turned off autocorrect this morning but I guess not

>>36249302
>withholding sex and removing sexual outlets.
>>36249346
>withholding sex and removing sexual outlets for men.

Are you going to go three for three?

You sound like class-A virgin retard.

Part of feminism is sexual liberation and being free to slut around without being called a slut unless they are ironically calling themselves that.

The very thing /r9k/ always REEEs about, and which you claim doesn't exist.

Besides >>36248972 the only people who want to ban porn are religious conservative men, the opposite of feminists.

>>36249413

I don't think it's unfounded, but yes.

>>36249424

That's retarded. Feminists think society is unnecessarily biased against women in exactly the same way society might be unnecessarily biased against any other people. It's ridiculous to suggest that an agenda is unsuitable for society because it doesn't benefit everyone in society. Should consequences for assault be illegal because it doesn't benefit the assaulter as well as the assaultee?

>>36249455

Ok where is the sexual oppression of women then? Sexual liberation implies that there is an oppressive force holding them back.

There isn't. And if they can't handle some dude calling them a slut, then they should grow thicker skin or maybe a spine and stand up for themselves.

You're quick to call me a class a retard for repeating myself but all you're saying is a tired old cliche repeated and dissected in every single way already.

You're nothing, just a slut who can't handle being called a slut. Yet you have no filter for yourself and have no problem calling me a retard or a virgin or both.

You stupid fucking slut.

>>36249455

Have you not been exposed to all the anti-porn feminist literature and sentiment?

>>36249561
I like how you threw a raging nonsense autistic wall of text at me based entirely on the assumption that I'm a girl :^)

>>36249551

No. Feminists just want everyone to drop their opinions and their lives and just start following the feminists around for no reason other than the feminists told you so. It is unsuitable for society at large because at its core it's actually about sexism against men and to manipulate them by withholding sex.

It's basic bitch the movement. You're not special for being a feminist, you're just a deceitful slut pretending you're not.

>>36249561
feminism is like r9k for women. robots complain that they have to be dumb chads or girls won't date them and feminists complain that they have to be dumb bimbos or guys won't date them

in both cases the real problem is unattractive abdominal fat and autism

>>36249577
I obviously haven't.

I have seen loads of old Christian politicians and preachers go on and on about the evils of sin.

You can show people getting shot and killed on American network TV. You can't show a single titty though, and that's not the fault of feminists.

>>36249603

It's not non sense, girl or not you can dismiss it as nonsense but that make it so. It just means I'm right and you have nothing to rebut me with.

>>36248972
Get porn from the dark web

File: 1491777178068.gif (455KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 256x256px

>>36248972
I dunno, but I think there will be lots of mass shootings and feminists will be the main target. Denying the last thing a beta could do to find relapse could be dangerous

>>36249629

And that's what I said - it's just private lesbian club and therefore not suitable for society.

File: IMG_2725.jpg (27KB, 224x225px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 224x225px

>>36249683

You are a beta dumbass. Get a clue , retard.

>>36249621

>Feminists just want everyone to drop their opinions...

Well yeah, most people with an agenda want to advance their agenda. You're trying to advance an anti-feminist agenda by arguing for it in a similar way to feminists arguing for their agenda.

>and their lives...

I don't know what you mean by this.

> It is unsuitable for society at large because at its core it's actually about sexism against men and to manipulate them by withholding sex.

Feminism is too broad to have a simplistic 'core' like that, just like robotism is too broad to have a similar 'core'. Sociological issues are usually more complicated than an entire faction deciding to arbitrarily hate another faction.

File: BushLaughing-Right.jpg (18KB, 232x273px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 232x273px

>>36249650
It's nothing worth rebutting

>WAH! THIS IS WHAT FEMINISTS BELIEVE I KNOW THAT EVEN THOUGH I NEVER EVEN SAW ON IN REAL LIFE! I'M THE VICTIM HERE! GIVE ME SEX WHERE IS MY SEX

>>36249733

>it's too broad to be dismissed

This is your position basically. But I've summed it up very well what it really is.

It's stupid and it's a soft War on men. Lie to me lie to yourself but you don't fool me so go bother lesser minds with your lies because here your vagina is meaningless.

File: IMG_2688.jpg (53KB, 500x340px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x340px

>>36249803

You just got even worse, good job. Keep dancing for pussy you stupid mangina beta cuck bitch.

>>36248972
it would probably improve my life

>>36249733
>You're trying to advance an anti-feminist agenda by arguing for it in a similar way to feminists arguing for their agenda.
>just like robotism is too broad to have a similar 'core'.

I've been saying for some time that feminism and robotism have a significant amount in common.

>>36249853
lmao why are you even trying to call me these things, why are you so mad, I'm not even a feminist you paranoid retard.

>>36249812

>This is your nuanced position, but I prefer my simplistic one which is obviously correct.

Okay.

>It's stupid and it's a soft War on men. Lie to me lie to yourself but you don't fool me so go bother lesser minds with your lies because here your vagina is meaningless.

In general it can be described as a 'soft' war on men, because feminists feel as though they're not getting a good deal in society and men are largely the cause. You can argue that women are not getting a bad deal if you want, but it's absurd to argue that if they're getting a bad deal the real issue is that it will negatively impact men. If there was a slave revolt because the interests of the slaves are fundamentally opposed to the interests of their masters, you'd sound like an idiot for protesting because you feel bad for the masters.

>Lie to me lie to yourself but you don't fool me so go bother lesser minds with your lies because here your vagina is meaningless.

I don't have a vagina.

>>36249951

>lmao duh duh I'm not

Fuck off then

>>36249962

I don't know what you're saying, trim it down a bit and just leave the main points.

If you did you'll see that what you want to say is about 2 sentences long.

>>36250013

So instead of three sentences it would be two?

>>36249118
You're talking about sex-positive feminism, which comprises of most liberal feminists (the more mainstream, moderate counterpart) and a portion of radical feminists. Many radfems on the other hand are sex-negative and see pornography as, at it's very core level, exploitative and dehumanizing of women with the only solution being the complete dismantling of the entire sex work industry. They are also against consensual sex work and brothels, no matter how regulated they are, for them, the whole thing has to go; all of it.

An example of a sex-positive feminist is Laci Green, and an example of a sex-negative feminist is Andrea Dworkin.

>>36249966
all I did was explain that the people who ban porn are religious conservatives, and point out how dumb it is for you to repeat your meme talking points, and then you got #TRIGGERED

>>36248972
Jerk off to naughty stories.

I deleted my porn a year ago fampais this wouldn't even slow me down.

>>36250175

I didn't even read your dumb post.

>>36250066

Dworkin is a real philosopher because she can explain the connections. And although she lived in a previous time, her theories from Men Possessing Women hold true , although if Dworkin was alive today maybe she would see the inverse of what she wrote about.

>>36250175
>the people who ban porn are religious conservatives

There's still some anti-porn push from the religious right, but its long since become outweighed by that from the trigglypuff left.

>>36250276
>I didn't even read your dumb post.

So you got triggered over literally nothing. Congratulations on being more sensitive than any tumblr-tier pink-haired trans feminist

I'd be amazed we agree on something for once.

>>36250307
>the trigglypuff left.

Which isn't in power, and never has been.

>>36250318

You're the triggered one , I don't take you seriously anymore. In fact I dismissed you a couple posts back you just keep stubbornly responding for some reason.

We stopped having a discussion a long time ago.

ask my girlfriend for photos

File: IMG_2742.jpg (22KB, 175x215px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 175x215px

Modern feminists are a sham.

Real feminism died with Dworkin. This sex positive feminism is an oxy-moron because it's degrading and objectifying of women.

Sex positive feminism is basically saying "it's my power to degrade myself into a sexual object, a concubine for the highest standing men". It's degradation of self for the highest bidder, for the highest social standing. And since it's a choice, it's not degrading it's empowering. This is the lie.