>when you mull over a thread idea for one to two months, ironing

File: 1491268925281.gif (227KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 600x600px

>>36248595
>it took OP two months to come up with this thread

File: 0w0.jpg (137KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1920x1080px

I'll give you a reply anon! I hope you have a good day!

>>36248626
This isn't the thread I'm referring to. It's an emotional reaction to the thread I took two months with to iron out, which got less than 10 replies...4-5 of which were me replying to anons.

>>36248691
if you come up with a good thread, don't post it once, keep doing almost daily

>>36248776
dont say that, OP is obviously autistic and will take your advice.

>>36248776
I have another thread idea. It's meant to cause a deep discussion on the human psyche. I'm just afraid like all my past endeavors to create a thread that gets people talking, debating, and discussing, will fail miserably. That it will be glossed over in favor of click bait threads and stale reposts. But perhaps I'll post it one day, and it will get people discussing, thinking, etc.

>>36248595
What was the thread about? I write down thread ideas and try to find the courage to create them.

Stop planning them, getting few/no replies hurts less

>>36248835
do like the /britfeels guy, repeat the thread until every possible discussion is done over months maybe years

File: 1489372633026.jpg (83KB, 1375x645px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1375x645px

>>36248595
Christ I know that feeling.

>>36248837
This was the thread. >>36247276. Please no bully. It was something that was bothering me emotionally for months. I had to get it off my chest. My aim of the thread was to get anons discussing and sharing similar feels. But alas that didn't happen.

>>36248873
I'm not sure if /r9k/ as a board is ready for this thread, considering the quality of threads that get more than 10-20 replies. They are almost always troll, clickbait, flame threads. I always see genuine discussion threads, and threads that make you think be glossed over. And their replies are always meme responses, not genuine. Yet I feel the content of this thread idea I have is very relevant to r9k and the mindset of a robot. I feel it is the best place to discuss this topic.

>>36248881
no one replied because it was a shitty normie thread like the 50 others we have daily. this is just constructive feedback so you can improve.

>when your thread idea gets lukewarm responses in focus groups
Literally no worse feeling.

>>36248940
I guess being a beta low self-esteem loser is different than being a robot. I'm sorry for confusing the two categories. Good bye.