What is it with /pol/trenders and the "instinctively siding

Because they feel out of control and want to be part of something that is drastic, regardless if it's for the better or even if it's in their own interests.

Look at the Trump supporters. Trump just wants to pump money up to the top of the financial food chain but that doesn't stop a bunch of poor guys who still live with their parents from supporting him.

File: 1850.jpg (104KB, 857x601px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 857x601px

>>36232596
Men are sociopaths. They identify being an evil asshole with "strength". Men are a so insanely fucked up. That's why they always vote republican, even though the republicans are literally trying to destroy civilization and the environment and benefit nobody but the hyper-wealthy.

>>36232596
>4chan posters aren't all the same

oh wow

File: weather.jpg (61KB, 800x411px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x411px

>>36232596
you're noticing that /pol/ folks idealize traditionally masculine displays of power, i guess?
it goes hand-in-hand with their military fetishism

>>36232629

There are a lot of men who vote for all sorts of all political parties.

It's not that we're sociopaths, it's the problem with the spread of true power in this country, and the world. People rally behind other people who are radical and want immediate change for whatever reason, because immediate change is perceived to be effective change.

And there are a lot of moderate republicans who just want to let Farmer Joe plow his crops without having to fill out a million government forms, or let local businesses run their operations how they see fit.

>>36232691
No there aren't. White men vote like 75-90some% republican EVERY election. Like clockwork.

>It's not that we're sociopaths
Yes, yes it is. You're fucking sociopaths. That's literally the reason men cause so many fucking problems.

>>36232728
All I want is to be able to shoot guns and not have my country flooded with illiterate, 3rd world, religious fanatics. Maybe if democrats weren't for mass immigration and gun control, I'd vote for them.

>>36232768
>All I want is to be able to shoot guns
Why? Guns are tools to kill living things. That's all they're fucking for. Period. Men fetishize violence, oppression and death. Again, proving my point, you filthy cunt.

>and not have my country flooded with illiterate, 3rd world, religious fanatics
You mean like European christan immigrants? Most of white trash America fits that description. Fucking kys.

Sure is a good thing you proved me wrong about men fetishizing being an evil, violent prick though.

File: 141402148452.jpg (62KB, 531x731px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 531x731px

>wanting to be a crusader AND a nazi AND a Carabiner AND a NKVD apparatchik
Some people want to be a crusader, and some want to be a nazi or a carabiner. /pol/ isn't one person. I personally hate NatSoc, but it's still better than communism or normal socialism.
Also noone wants to be in a fucking NKVD; if there's one thing /pol/ agrees on, it's that commies are subhuman.

>>36232768

Maybe if you guys actually understood and respected the constitution, then Democrats would be more willing to work with you on gun control and immigration.

>>36232728

Probably because Republican values (gun control, limited government, ease on taxes, strong military, etc) are representative of white male Americans. Strong, free, and eager to keep a hold of their money.

I will agree on war-mongering though, that shit is just dumb.

>>36232629
While woman are naive wreckers, that put to the ground all what men has achieved through sweet, blood and tears; for they will never experience what's like to give your life for a cause, to be brother-in-arms with your fellow companion, dying for something that you believe in.

You always vote democrat because you prefer living in a deluded, comfortable life, than making your life in the world through your own means.

>>36232792
>Why?
Because guns are fun to shoot. You should try it sometime.

>You mean like European christan immigrants?
If we're talking about the colonization of America, yes I agree with you. They were bad.

>Most of white trash America fits that description.
I know, they're bad too.

>>36232806
>are representative of white male Americans
Yeah, they are: sociopathy. It's not that fucking hard to grasp until you start making excuses.

>>36232811
>wreckers
Yes, men sure have done a fine job with this old world, huh? My god the pristine forests from sea to shining sea on every continent and the prosperous, peacef- oh fuck wait, I don't know what the fuck planet I was thinking of, but it's not this one. Men have done nothing these past few millennia except prove they have no business governing anything ever again.

>>36232806
>Democrats would be more willing to work with you on gun control and immigration.
What is there to work with us in? I don't want any form of gun control and if you're here illegally, you have to go back.

>>36232795
Well, what about like Titoists and Stasi? I mean, it's just a few miles.

>>36232661
It's kind of annoying that these people are like "listen to me, listen to me, change your life for me"... And then their actual plan is, "wouldn't it be cool if we could kill shit and feel good about it".

File: pol autist.jpg (72KB, 631x461px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 631x461px

>>36232596
>/pol/ isn't logical or coherent

How long did it take you to figure this one out?

>>36232907
It's almost like /pol/ isn't one person.

>>36232596
It probaly stems from a suppression/lack of masculine identity. Ever notice how the figures that pol idolizes tend to either be paternal or a vulgar simulacrum of a past masculine identity.

>>36232848
You live in a world built through that, you just are, as I said, too naive to comprehend that in order for achieving progress, sacrifices must be made. Just fucking observe nature, obstinate women. See how far will you go if you are left to your own means and the kindness of strangers.

As the saying goes, the weak are meat, and the strong do eat.
The problem with women in power is that then we all become meat, for the weak can't lead to anything to anywhere.

>>36232918
Bingo. They're a bunch of whiny pussies trying to compensate for perceived self-weakness but have only the most idiotic ideas on how to actually self-improve.

>>36232888

>any form of gun control

Yes, let's give guns to people in prison, allow violent criminals to walk into gun shops to buy guns for cheaper than they would on the streets, and allow people to carry them wherever they please, because that is the best solution.

>>36232937
Not give prisoners guns but yes to everythinh else.

>>36232960

BUT THAT'S GUN CONTROL

Remember, even prisoners have constitutional rights.

>>36232596
>What's going on here? Am I noticing anything legit?

A lack of a sense of purpose in modern society.
Young men don't feel a sense of belonging, they don't feel like they're contributing to anything larger than themselves.

We live in a society where displays of masculinity or even just assertiveness are demonised, and they are admiring men who were able to band together and fight for something they believed in.

Hillary, the CIA and Jews are not going to inspire the same feelings.
They work on corruption, and the people idolised by /pol/ are honourable, at least in some way.

>>36232596
why don't you go /pol/ with your bullshit?
why here of all places?

>>36232992

>displays of masculinity or assertiveness are demonised

I gotta disagree with you on that. There are plenty of men all over the country who are making waves in different areas whether it be science or business or politics. They're being groomed by the previous generation to take on the podium when it's time.

Browsing the internet makes it seem like men are getting shit on left and right, but realistically men who can separate themselves from online lives are very empowered.

>>36232937
To be quite honest, not allowing felons to have guns creates a perverse incentive to make everyone who hates you a felon so they can't own guns, while the people who still like you remain armed

>>36232968
No, criminals don't deserve right. You give those up once you decide to break the law.

>>36232926
Actually, you are the ones that like to believe in that, through wishful thinking, when in fact you know very well that you wouldn't ever be capable of taking a strong stance about anything, be resolute in something, which even a /pol/tard is capable off.

So instead, you prefer to ridicule those that actually believe in something and aren't willing to guilt trip into dumb choices just because it's "kool" to blindly take stances about issues you poorly understand or care about, at least until they have relevancy in social media so you can superficially show your moral values, impacting nothing and no one, besides your own ego.

File: 1478164455024.png (136KB, 348x288px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 348x288px

>>36232596
Being masculine or pretending to be makes you feel happy, pretty simple, the most happy guys i know are pretty masucline or if they are not some have a mental disorder or they take drugs, but the drug guys are not fucked up or sth, pretty chill.

I think Hillary is not really represnting masculinity ( not because shes a woman , because of her values)

I dont know whats up with the jew, i think just a maymay

>>36233029
>"""criminals"""
You realize that random everyday people can easily become criminals in burgerland right? Like some guy can catch charges from getting laid off and not being able to pay child support.

>>36232596
>2017
>not wanting to be a crusader in the holy war

>>36233029

Hm, interesting. Then what laws should be covered by your proposition? Felonies, misdemeanors, violations, all of them? Should you lose all of your constitutional rights over a speeding ticket? Or maybe murder? What if it's involuntary manslaughter? Should you lose the right then?

But then if you have enough cash, you can get the charge dropped, so you broke the law and you still get to keep your rights.

File: 1491356442255.png (207KB, 1746x1364px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 1746x1364px

>>36232596
Because society is actually being controlled by the Jews, and most /pol/acks want to get rid of them. The Jews are trying to exploit the shit out of our nations in the west and use us as pawns to create a greater Israel.

Jews hold an oligarchic level of power in our society and they use it to exploit us. Most /pol/acks hate ultra capitalism, and aside form the Donald trump shills from reddit, most did not place much trust in Trump.

White men are being forced out of our own societies by lower-IQ shit skins who are being puppeted by the Jews for their own ends.

I used to think this was all bullshit, but I did my research and found out that it's actually true.

>>36233050
>Like some guy can catch charges from getting laid off and not being able to pay child support.
And? I'm not responsible for his poor life choices. No one put him in that situation but him.

File: 1490832913406.png (236KB, 1016x622px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1016x622px

>>36233045
This is now redpill thread.

>>36233017
I meant more so in a cultural sense, not so much in the workplace.
An men who are making waves in science, business and politics aren't really representative of the majority of men.

>but realistically men who can separate themselves from online lives are very empowered

>men who can ignore the world except for what is happening in their immediate surroundings, at the present moment, won't be bothered by it

What about those who cannot ignore the world around them, including potential future developments?

>>36233078

You know if you're speeding and a guy walks out into a crosswalk and you kill him, you're responsible for his death? Boom, in a split second you're now a criminal.

Or if you get a traffic ticket and it gets sent to the wrong address and you don't pay it, then there's a warrant out for your arrest and BOOM you're a criminal AND a fugitive.

File: 1474302258475.jpg (356KB, 1600x2812px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1600x2812px

>>36232937
Aside from giving prisoners guns, everything you said in that post makes sense. It's called the second amendment.

Fuck off if you don't like it. What you are preaching goes against it.

File: 1463698648311.jpg (60KB, 550x366px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 550x366px

>>36232612
>Because they feel out of control and want to be part of something that is drastic, regardless if it's for the better or even if it's in their own interests.
This, sadly can be said for both the left and the right. Look at the liberals and the antifa, they too want to "fight" something real bad, to be part of something.
I don't know man, maybe living in the west is just too easy. This is some fightclub tier shit.

File: 1490619047878.png (381KB, 693x983px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 693x983px

>>36232926
>Bingo. They're a bunch of whiny pussies trying to compensate for perceived self-weakness but have only the most idiotic ideas on how to actually self-improve

Keep telling yourself this you retarded liberal faggot.

>>36233091

Even in a cultural sense there are still a large amount of men who are at the top of the food chain.

And you can use the internet to read the news and gather information without having to dwell on your peers' social lives or talk via forums.

>>36233068
If you get sentenced and serve time in jain. You should lose all your rights as a citizen. Murders, rapists, and drug dealers/users should be executed or given life.

>But then if you have enough cash, you can get the charges dropped
Why would that be legal if I was making the rules?

>>36233040
The moment everyone in the internet can analyse your mind.

"they just mean because they have a bad life"
Even the "cool kids" and "succesfull" bully, maybe because its fun or the memes on pol are just for fooling around and especially women have to think theirs a deeper meaning.

Thank you anon and anons like you that stop these woman forcing this "you just have a bad life " on to us :)

And be carefull robots, tumblr and some HWNDU people talked about to infiltrade our bords, so dont think their opinions are the majority , these guys just profit from the not upvooting system.

But sth good in it, maybe we have to discuss our values from time to time

>>36233102

Oh yes, let me take gun control tidbits from someone who never leaves their house. Please, do give me all of your life's wisdoms.

File: thinking-face.png (53KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 256x256px

>>36233079
If Jews have higher IQs, wouldn't they naturally end up in leadership positions more often? Isn't this just proof that it's better to be smart than not?

Isn't this a lot like looking at marathon runners and assuming that the crafty Africans have established a conspiracy which prevents non-black athletes from winning races?

>>36233129

What about people who are incarcerated for tax evasion or money laundering?

And see, the beauty of all of this is that

>you don't make the fucking rules

>>36233101
>You know if you're speeding and a guy walks out into a crosswalk and you kill him, you're responsible for his death? Boom, in a split second you're now a criminal.
Are you trying to say that speeding and manslaughter should be legal?

>Or if you get a traffic ticket and it gets sent to the wrong address and you don't pay it, then there's a warrant out for your arrest and BOOM you're a criminal AND a fugitive.
Obviously that would be wrong.

>>36233129

>drug users

Literally kys.

>>36233127
>Even in a cultural sense there are still a large amount of men who are at the top of the food chain.

Yes, and what difference does that make to the overwhelming majority of men who are not?
I somehow don't think the people LARPing about being Crusaders are 6'4 CEOs.

>And you can use the internet to read the news and gather information without having to dwell on your peers' social lives or talk via forums.

People shouldn't be expected to avoid social media altogether.
There are plenty of things in the news that could make a person very concerned about society.

>>36233160
>Tax evasion and money laundering
Yes, they should lose their rights.

>You don't make the fucking rules
Obviously but were we not speaking hypothetical?

>>36232612
>Trump just wants to pump money up to the top of the financial food chain

Yeah thats why big business went all in on him. /sarcasm

>>36233155
I dont know, you now the movie Idiocracy, so the world gets populated by dumb people because they have more children then high IQ

I dont think its a race think, its a Geo thing.
It doesnt matter that much wich colour the vagina has you come out, It depends more where you come out i think. For the West atleast

>>36233168

I'm saying that your punishment doesn't fit the crime.

>>36233171
Imagine what that poster's going feel like once hotsplicing becomes mainstream. Imagine him trying to argue with a person who's given himself a 280 IQ with federally prohibited Hong Kong Black and Red implants.

File: 1490832416236.jpg (296KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1024x1024px

>>36232629
>Men are sociopaths

Men are fighters and are built to enforce and control tribal boundaries and fight off foreign threats. Women are selfish and cowardly, and are meant to take care of kids. They also aren't very smart compared to most men, so when they see men doing something that runs contrary to their nurture instincts they whine and cry without considering it's greater purpose. This causes problems for society in the long term (like when hordes of savage Muslim barbarians are being openly welcomed into Europe by the millions by weak-willed female politicians.

We do not live in a fair world, might makes right, and the strong survive. Hence why men are more prone to violence and crave power.

>>36233171
>Literally kys
Literally just don't do drugs

>>36233155
I'm a centrist but I'll bite.
>If Jews have higher IQs, wouldn't they naturally end up in leadership positions more often?
Yes, and they do. The 2-2.5% (depending on your source) of American population are Jews. Still, they make up 40-45% (again, depends on the source) of the 1%. You could also look at the demographics and see how many of them are in the upper class too. Sure, there are exceptions, but that's generally how it goes.

Being in power isn't really a concern to me, but how that power is used is. People like Soros disgust me, the world economy and politics are just big fucking playthings to him.

>>36233210
But the DEA will define new things as drugs so it can keep making arrests. You can't win.

>>36232890
>It's kind of annoying that these people are like "listen to me, listen to me, change your life for me"... And then their actual plan is, "wouldn't it be cool if we could kill shit and feel good about it".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TtKBWU2fhY

>>36233173

>Yes, and what difference does that make to the overwhelming majority of men who are not?

What do you mean? There are always going to be a very small percentage of people who are rulers and leaders vs those who are ruled and led.

And as far as the internet thing goes. Too much time on the internet = lack of interpersonal social skills. It's like trying to become a great basketball player by watching old Jordan vids instead of going out onto the court.

>>36232629
>even though the republicans are literally trying to destroy civilization

>>36233203
I guess breaking the law and killing someone should just go unpunished.

>>36233151
>Oh yes, let me take gun control tidbits from someone who never leaves their house.

Excuse me asshole, I have job and a girlfriend.

It's amazing how delusional and snarky most liberals are. If you have a different opinion than them they call you a loser. The fact is though, most hard-core liberals are ugly as fuck. A huge portion of Antifa member live with their parents.

>>36233221
What do you mean you can't win? What all are you taking? The only two things you should be taking are caffeine and alcohol(and not even that if you're a good person).

>>36232792

Obvious troll is obvious. Oregano

>>36233235

So you believe that involuntary manslaughter is worth losing all of your constitutional rights.

>>36233232

I wouldn't go that far. More like republicans just bought a dairy farm and want to take the free-roaming, grass-fed, happy cows and instead shackle them up, hook them up to tubes 24/7, and extract every little drop of milk that they can from those udders.

>>36233267
Well, they tried to ban alcohol once. So, yes, you actually cannot in fact win. They'd go after large sodas, if they had to.

>>36233271
Yes, if you're making a voluntary decision to break the law and it results in someone's death, you deserve to lose your constitutional rights.

>>36233310
Good, I wish alcohol wasn't legal.

>>36233332
Damn, I was so close to that get.

>>36233321

But you're not making a voluntary decision, you don't even have to be speeding. If you hit -anyone- while they're in a crosswalk, you're always at fault.

>>36233332
What about polygamy and magic underwear?

File: LibertarianismIsJewish.jpg (60KB, 401x482px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 401x482px

>>36233155
>If Jews have higher IQs, wouldn't they naturally end up in leadership positions more often? Isn't this just proof that it's better to be smart than not?

No, not at all. Jews make up 2% of the population but control 65% of the Media. The average IQ of Ashkenazi jews in the US is 112. There are more white in the US with IQs of 130 or more than their are Jews in the US total. Yet Jews are massively over-represented in positions of power (especially in the media and finance).

The truth is that Jews have an insular racial mentality where they hire and support other Jews at the expense of non-jews. Once they gain a strangle-hold over a country they try and milk it's population for all it's worth until they get kicked out. The way they are doing this right now is by promoting ultra-capitalism and modern liberalism to dissolve the institutions of the nations they inhabit (pic related). They want to turn everything into a market which they can then dominate. In Europe, many of the promoters and agents of mass-muslim immigration into Europe are Jews. They want to flood the west with Lower-IQ races to dumb the population down to a point where it can no longer pose any threat to them.

Watch this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ

They have been kicked out of every nation they have ever resided in for this exact reason. Over the course of history Jews have been expelled over a hundred times. If you were approached by a man seeking shelter who had been kicked out of every house on your block, would you let him in?

>>36233229
>What do you mean? There are always going to be a very small percentage of people who are rulers and leaders vs those who are ruled and led.

Yes, and using those few successful men to dismiss the idea that the everyday man gets shat on from all directions is silly.

>Too much time on the internet = lack of interpersonal social skills.
I could spend about half an hour on the internet and find enough to piss me off for a week.
It's not about interpersonal skills, my personal relationships don't change world events and trends that concern me.

Are you under the Shia Lebeouf-tier impression that the only reason a person might have /pol/ views is because they are lacking a social life?

Can you stop talking about gun controll and talk about if men are sociopaths? shall men rule?
will men rule? Why pol like masculinity so much?

And actually i am pretty sure some feminist girl wants to change our mindset, so if any femminist wants to change us just be our girlfirends, super easy

>>36233415

I don't get shat on? Do you? Do people approach you and tell you to stop being assertive?

Every woman I know thinks an assertive, rational, and level-headed man is the sexiest thing ever.

File: 1491439186072.jpg (227KB, 1114x730px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1114x730px

There totally isn't an agenda being pushed here...

>>36233407
Is this average IQ the mean or mode, or what? Like, if there's a lot of IQ 112s, but the rest of them are all 150+, that's a lot of horsepower.

>>36233127

>talk via forums

Forums died out because they were controlled and populated by neckbeards and snarky betas with a superiority complex. Places like 4chan and even Facebook are far more free than the forums of virtual days gone by.

File: 1490926272004.jpg (869KB, 2048x1654px) Image search: [Google]

869KB, 2048x1654px

>>36232596
You have an absolutely false view of why /pol/ believes what it believes.

>>36233464
4chan is just a forum, though.

>>36233441
>I don't get shat on? Do you? Do people approach you and tell you to stop being assertive?
Not directly, because I don't hang around people who piss me off.
Academia is full of feminist shit, and a lot of those guys are in college.
The media often contains similar messages, and it is reflected in a lot of popular culture.

And I am not talking about "I will decide where we're eating" assertiveness, I am talking about "That thing is a threat to my society and I am going to oppose it" assertiveness.

>Every woman I know thinks an assertive, rational, and level-headed man is the sexiest thing ever.
As long as he's doing those things in the right direction, which is usually a politically correct one.

File: 1490832653494.jpg (298KB, 1516x810px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1516x810px

>>36233454
>Like, if there's a lot of IQ 112s, but the rest of them are all 150+, that's a lot of horsepower

Learn math. That statement is not accurate, nor does it discount what I said earlier about the fac that there are more whites with IQs of 130 or more than their are Jews total in the US (with an average IQ 112). It does not discount the fact that they have such a massive monopoly over the media and banks. Nor would it justify their malevolent intentions towards the goyim they manipulate.

Jews are born parasites.

>>36233489

It's a very unique imageboard where the snarky beta factor hardly exists. Many people here are right-wing and there is no expectation of anybody being nice. We are notorious for being cruel to each other.

>>36233553
What if you have twenty IQ 130 whites, and sixteen jews, and of the sixteen, nine are IQ 112s, but the remaining seven are IQ 250 von Neumanns? The mode of the jewish population would be 112, and mode is a kind of average, but you'd still have a comparatively huge population (a little over a third of the white population) of very smart people.

>>36233563
>the snarky beta factor hardly exists. Many people here are right-wing and there is no expectation of anybody being nice
???????????

File: 1330839496286.jpg (60KB, 649x650px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 649x650px

>>36233563
>It's a very unique imageboard where the snarky beta factor hardly exist

Check out this newfag. 4chan has always been home to snarky pranksters and neckbeards.

>>36233583
>What if you have twenty IQ 130 whites, and sixteen jews, and of the sixteen, nine are IQ 112s, but the remaining seven are IQ 250 von Neumanns?

The the average jewish IQ would be much higher than 112. Learn math.

The reason I mention 130 or more for whites is because that is usually the point at which people are stands-out-from-crowds level intelligent. That's the IQ ranged of many engineers and scientists.

Yet despite there being more of with people with 130 or more than there are Jews, the jews make up a massively disproportionate amount of those in power.

And it's because of racial/ethnic nepotism rather than just exceptional talent. See the pic on this post:

>>36233120

>>36233653
No, I said the MODE. The mode is the most common value in a distribution.

>>36233196
Not big business, only mass media. Most of his office is made of wall street CEOs, dumbass.

>>36232890
>"wouldn't it be cool if we could kill shit and feel good about it".

It would though. Not just that, it's necessary, it's a male drive just as natural and necessary as sex or eating.
I can see why you'd hate how they try to sugar-coat it in bullshit, but the core of it is not insane.

What if WASPs never died out, they just transcended their bodies with black magic and installed their souls directly into the Harvard campus

File: 1476390931771.png (25KB, 507x565px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 507x565px

>implying /pol/ is one person

>>36232596
Jesus christ shills, take a break, you're posting these threads 24/7, do you take turns?

>>36233597
>>36233602

4chan is more right-wing leaning and there are almost no usernames here or avatars. It's an entirely different way of communicating as opposed to the forums of old. So since we are right-wing leaning, we treat each other like shit just because that's our reputation, and there are hardly any usernames or avatars it makes the entire dynamic different.

>>36233867
Freedom of communication and identification, leads to an highly honest enviroment.
We are honest with ourselves and others in our shitposting, pranking and rusing.

The conservative part came just due to the fact that by renouncing to our ego of identification, we can reach real truths that are objectively true, and do not stimulate any egoistic feelings.

File: you can't just go around turning people into jews, it's illegal.png (75KB, 1165x2000px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1165x2000px

>>36233814
text goes into this box here

>>36233920
and absence of identification*

>>36233450
>3 magazines
>Taking the headline and not reading the article
>8 example

Ok where are the jews and how do we kill them?

>>36233920
Counterhypothesis: The userbase is influenced by large groups of people who have nowhere else to go. Currently, that's the alt-right, who are banned from Facebook, Twitter, and most of Reddit.

File: 1492079758089.png (51KB, 1165x2000px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1165x2000px

>>36233928
fixed
>>36233963
Hypotesis wrong, this place has changed organically, all the shills trying to force a change are just failing miserably, or converting only the weak willed ones.

>>36233963
How can you be banned from reddit if you can make your own boards, appoint moderators etc?
Persecution complex?

>>36233928
You know, we wouldn't call everyone a shill or a jew if we weren't actually fucking invaded by them all the time. (((Mods))) are actually confirmed to be compromised with JIDF.

>>36233992
Weak willed and least informed i'll add.
The amount of evidece and hints present on the internet is astonishing.

>>36233992
>this place has changed organically
What is the difference between organic and inorganic change on a forum? and 2) is organic change necessarily better?

>>36234006
Not JIDF, but probably shareblue, i remember them being SJW, but not affiliated to any shilling group, this is news to me.

>>36234006
I'm gonna get into a shitload of trouble for mentioning this, but you know Christians, right?

Yeah, go look up Rabbi Yeshua's past. Especially his dad and "Miriam".

>>36234024
Organic change leads to an actual progress of a board, and a subsequent reproduction of it (it dies as the userbase grows, and it spawns a better one, like spreading its DNA in a fresh new body).

Inorganic change leads to stagnation and probably degeneration without reproduction and improvement, or as an inpetous cancerous spread that would die on itself later on (see tumblrism).

>>36234062
But boards are inorganic and driven by people. They're purely artificial. There's no such thing as "organic" change on a forum.

>>36234087
There is, the difference between organic and inorganic is this.
1) Organic change happens when a board is left on itself doing what it usually does and being home to a certain type of people that would be assimilated overtime. Once the critical mass of people is reached a part of the userbase will divide and be the new building block of a newl spawnd board. This happens because once too many people populate a place (just like in a society) too many interests and differences start clashing with each other, and homogeneity is lost, and to renew it something new has to be born.

2) Inorganic change happens when an external organization sends a batch of users (like a virus) trying to spread its made up ideas (injecting cells) in the board and convert as many users as possible to their present interests. Now if the board has a strong board culture (immunitary system) it will repeal the attack, if it doesn't well... just look at /r9k/.

>>36234062
>it dies as the userbase grows

Post quality certainly decreases on the larger boards i.e. /b/ /v/ /a/ /pol/
However I think it's way too simplistic to claim a board "dies" just from having too many people on it. There's still no real alternative to /a/ on the English speaking internet, and by all accounts its suffered a sharp decline in quality and increase in userbase since 2011.

Comparing tumblr to 4chan isn't really accurate, because it lacks shared boards. Facebook, twitter and tumblr certainly have cancerous elements, but they're not going to die any time soon.

>>36234188
Death not by crumbling on itself and losing the userbase, but death of content and ideas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iC9xpDSXyI

>>36234218
oh and nice dubs.
>>36234188

/v/ /b/ /a/ and /pol/ are dead to me on this chan.

>>36234158
But boards are never left to themselves. There's a group of admins and janitors constantly altering the culture.

Plus, "Inorganic change happens when an external organization sends a batch of users (like a virus) trying to spread its made up ideas" could easily describe the current /pol/ification of /r9k/.

>>36233267

Yeah, I'll let some stranger on the internet tell me what to do.

Fuck off.

PS: ethanol is worse than THC.

>>36234268
>ethanol is worse than THC
But the effects are more fun

>>36234218
>>36234232
I understand, but what about the "natural" offspring of the board. Considering there's still no real alternative to 4chan, your ideas about how forums should change naturally don't really hold water.

>>36234248
You miss to realize that one user visits multiple boards, so the culture itself is most often than not chanwide.

Also when janitors and administration is not corrupted, it simply follows the rules of eliminating content against the rules and low quality content. Also discussing things already confirmed and overly discussed and verified will lead to deletion often.

/r9k/ was never /pol/ified, /pol/ users are the same ones on /v/ /a/ /b/ etc... aswell as /r9k/.
That's probably why there's constant shilling on 4chan as whole these months.

>>36234307
>there's no real alternative
There are a lot of alternative chans with higher quality content and specialization, you just have to look better.

I'll be back later by the way.
>>36234319

>>36233464

Exactly. You dont want to run afoul of a bisexual tyranical negro moderator.

>>36234362
>implying there were niggers on the internet to begin with those days
It's like you're asking to be stereotypied anon with that post.

>>36234336
>There are a lot of alternative chans with higher quality content and specialization

Specialised forums are only alternatives to boards with live posters, not actual replacements. They can be more interesting, but often they're simply not as entertaining.

>>36234319
But /r9k/ never used to have such /pol/-type opinions. We used to be a board full of PUA-type stuff.

>>36234394
Chan = imageboard not equal (Non-ASCII text is not allowed) forum

And for me? I'd be perfectly fine with 4chan gone, i'd just miss /vg/ and some other confy niche boards.
>>36234415
Stop the bullshit, it always was, the PUA-type stuff went hand in hand with early /pol/, it was inevitable.

I'm gone for real now FFS.

>>36233995
Why the fuck would you talk about something you clearly have no knowledge of, you retard.