ITT: /r9k/ logic. >if a woman has had sex with more than

File: 1491854155227.jpg (75KB, 651x555px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 651x555px

>>36196652
OP logic: These nigger dicks sure are tasty

>>if a woman looks good/dresses nice, she is a slut
Wrong. It's:
>if a woman dresses revealing then she is a slut
Revealing clothing =/= dressing nice.

>>36196693

Lmao, what is this, the fucking middle east? You virgins sure are amazing.

>>36196681
>that image
>calling someone nigger
You poor soul.

File: 1466203947415.jpg (294KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 900x900px

>>36196738
No, it's called "standards", which have been lowered so much that there are no good women anymore. They're willing to slut themselves to the point where they're disgusting whores. Give me a woman who looks nice in a classy sun dress over a yoga pants "I'm wear it for muh comfort" whore.

>>36196816
>standards were the only thing keeping women from being sluts
>chads still love them
what fags, am I right

File: 1491413156717.jpg (161KB, 866x838px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 866x838px

>>36196816
>there are no good women anymore. They're willing to slut themselves to the point where they're disgusting whores. Give me a woman who looks nice in a classy sun dress over a yoga pants "I'm wear it for muh comfort" whore.

Hahahahahahahaha, you sad fuck!

>>36196816
>had to come up with a slutty piece of clothing to make his point
>decided on yoga pants
Anon get out more

>>36196738
i know right? doesn't he know that it's the current year?

I smell some samefags ITT.

worst thread I've seen in years, slut apologists get out