Why do sex robots terrify women and why do they want laws banning

>>36062052

What use would women have

Not sure about women but they surely terrify me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkcKaNqfykg

they think men think women only exist to serve a man's sexual wants
basically if you own a fuck toy you will treat every woman you meet like a fucktoy rather than a person

File: 1490431123775.jpg (248KB, 1443x873px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1443x873px

because once you've got a sex robot suddenly you don't need to go chase a disgusting vagina

that means you aren't going to marry a woman and have her divorce you taking everything you own. you aren't going to go date a woman and make her feel like a princess spending all your money on her. it means you aren't a slave to women anymore because you've got a sex robot to replace them and no longer need to associate with them to make yourself happy

women hate this idea because they love having power over you and they love to make you desperate to go search for a woman. you may want look for them specifically, but women are a collective group. they're herd animals who are always thinking of themselves in the larger group and trying to protect it.

they're gonna put forward a really lame birth rate argument. the reason it's really lame is because Chinese, Indians, Muslims and Mexicans are the ones winning that birth rate race.
think about it. poor people are doing all the fucking, but only the middle-upper can afford sex bots. sex bots would just keep white people from reproducing honestly. all the cam whores are white. white people just barely reproduce.

people want the world to be crowded with brown people.

the gatekeepers of sexuality and reproduction don't like the idea that there's going to be more options for men, because they're not confident that men would choose them over plastic women

it's really not any different to when a hotter, younger girl joins the workplace of an uglier, older hag and the hag loathes her out of insecurity of her own position in the hierarchy

>>36062166
>ODed on redpill

Because women lose the power they have over men. Women become obsolete and that is what they fear.

They're literally like little fucking manipulating gremlins who thirst for power.

>>36062052
Could I get some links to actual quotes from the anti-sexbot community?

Rapes don't happen because of thirsty men, they happen because of thirsty men who like dominating and inflicting pain.
Sexbots won't solve things.

>>36062052
If you weren't a virgin, you would know that a glorified fleshlight is not in any way comparable to actual sex.

>>36062750
Sure roastie.

Yes this is an original post telling a roastie why she's wrong

>>36062828
>telling a roastie why she's wrong
>why she's wrong
>why
Your post is missing something.

>>36062867
Him pointing out it's a roastie is enough of a reason as to why what it said I wrong as any. Whatever it said is, in fact, wrong, based solely on it being a woman. You know. I know it. Everyone knows it.

Do yourself a favour, honey, and get back to the kitchen. Maybe if you'd do something useful, more guys would be attracted to you as opposed to a literal sex object. Think about that.

>>36062750
what about VR that you can literally jack your synapses into and is virtually indistinguishable from real sensation?

>>36062899

It's true, though, there is something to sex with an actual human being that, I am convinced, cannot be replicated accurately. I'm not against sex bots and your freedom to purchase one, but fleshlights are a good example. Unless we're talking synth flesh sex bots, even the best quality silicon full of lube doesn't compare.

It's not that one is necessarily better than the other, it's just that they don't compare.

File: Screenshot_2017-02-18-17-48-48-1.png (392KB, 782x844px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 782x844px

>>36062899
>tfw I'm a guy
Nice dodge m8. Still not an explanation why, though. Think about that.

>>36062052
What is this from my friendo

File: jane.jpg (84KB, 453x750px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 453x750px

>>36062750
If there were sex robots like in the movie AI it would probably be better than having sex with a real woman

File: 1491434826162.jpg (52KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x480px

>>36062052
>Implying OP doesn't already know the answer

>>36062938
>a beef curtain used goods hole on a whiny judgmental bitch

I'll take a waifu bot over that anyday.

>>36062938
I mean, I've never had sex so I can't compare and at this point I don't really want it. That aside, I know what it was like being nothing to every woman I met. You know, that's fine every"one" can have their opinion.

But at some point people get desperate. They really want to feel something. Luckily for me, my hand sufficed. But others need more. They can't control it and start doing more and more extreme things to try and replace what biology wants. Well? Here now people start making things that look like and feel, what they imagine, like a woman would some people are going to gravitate. These people have never known what sex feels like and no longer care for the real thing. They just want something.

The others are people who have had sex and aren't blown away by it and just want something to stick their meat in without risk of disease, pregnancy, rejection, financial burden, rape claims, etc. While I'm not buying one of these, I can understand almost completely why someone would.

>>36062941
You're a white knight who has transcended this place. What brings you back. I know, I know, not answering your question.

But the original post says something like, if you weren't a virgin, would would know that a sex by won't feel like sex.

Well, obviously. If they had sex, they would know the difference between the two. How does that make one more beneficial than the other? In my mind, knowing that two things are different doesn't in and of itself make one better than the other.

Women had a place and they left it. Men say, oh well, and start looking for replacements. It doesn't matter if one is "better" than the other, so long as the person(s) engaging in the behaviour convince themselves it is worth it.

>>36062938

There is zero physical difference between sex with a prostitute and any other woman

There is zero difference between growing a vagina in a petri dish and fucking that and fucking a womans vagina

File: 1483094575672.jpg (563KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 900x1200px

The same reason feminist countries outlaw prostitution.

They know their vagina is how they hold men hostage. Once that stranglehold on men is broken, then we are free. That's their worst nightmare. They will fight this.

>>36063167
>2b the roastie destroying android who will free all men from the collar of 3d women and bestow waifu bots on this world

>>36063167
australia legalised it

>>36063049
>points out post lacks explanation
>gets called white knight
Wew lad.
>if you weren't a virgin, would would know that a sex by won't feel like sex.
>Well, obviously. If they had sex, they would know the difference between the two. How does that make one more beneficial than the other? In my mind, knowing that two things are different doesn't in and of itself make one better than the other.
It's the same with the difference between self masturbation and using a sexbot. Obviously one is "better", otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation.

>>36063167
>feminists aren't sex positive where I live

>>36063282
They are only so long as it means a girl can fuck men as much as she wants and get away with it.

But if it means men paying a woman for sex, it breaks their stranglehold. Feminists hate this. They don't want just any man to buy his way into a vagina. They want men on a leash, begging normal roasties for vagina in exchange for a big house, steady income and nice clothes.

>>36063268
You can't prove to someone who's never had sex that having sex feels better than not having sex because they've never felt it. You can say if but can't prove it. Just like I can say I'm a dog but I can't prove it to you in a way you'll believe.

>>36063329
This implies that conservative Christians and sex positive feminists hold the same stance. I'm not sure you know what a sex positive feminist is.

>>36063360
>This implies that conservative Christians and sex positive feminists hold the same stance.
Can you even read? And who said feminists are "sex positive" on a consistent basis? Haven't you seen how hard they're sperging out whenever a sexy woman is on television or videogame?

Read my post again. Sex positive only so long as a woman can get away being a slut.

>>36062962
Animatrix, niggah.

>>36063353
>Just like I can say I'm a dog but I can't prove it to you in a way you'll believe
I could always inquire about your k9 state to people that know you personally. Just like a virgin could ask if sex feels better than masturbation or using a flashlight etc. Get enough of a sample size and let the statistics speak for themselves.

>>36063424
>niggah.
kill yourself kid

>>36062750
Yeah, it's much worse

>>36062110
Actually the opposite would happen. Men would treat women like actual humans because we have no need for sex from them anymore.

>>36063389
You obviously know very little about feminists if you can't differentiate between different kinds of feminist.
>Newman and White in Women, Politics and Public Policy argue that feminist perspectives on prostitution agree on three main points: "First, they condemn the current legal policy enforcing criminal sanctions against women who offer sex in exchange for money. Second, they agree that authentic consent is the sine qua non of legitimate sex, whether in commercial or non-commercial form. Third, all feminists recognize that commercial sex workers are subject to economic coercion and are often victims of violence, and that little is done to address these problems."

>They go on to identify three main feminist views on the issue of prostitution. The sex work perspective, the abolitionist perspective and the outlaw perspective. The sex work perspective maintains that prostitution is a legitimate form of work for women faced with the option of other bad jobs, therefore women ought to have the right to work in the sex trade free of prosecution or the fear of it. The sex work perspective also argues that governments should eliminate laws that criminalize voluntary prostitution. This, the sex work perspective asserts, will allow prostitution to be regulated by governments and business codes, protect sex trade workers, and improve the ability to prosecute people who hurt them. The Abolitionist perspective holds that governments should work towards the elimination of prostitution. The Outlaw Perspective views work in the sex trade as a "stepping stone to a better career or an expression of sexual freedom"

>>36063432
I'm not saying it doesn't feel better. I'm not you can't be convinced it feels better. I'm saying to someone looking into a sex not either has or has not had sex. To those who have, they know what they are leaving behind.

To those that haven't, they likely looking an upgrade to whatever they're currently using to satisfy them and don't care to deal with women and all the troubles they bring.

In either case, the person no longer is interested in real women, or at least enough to care to have sex anymore.

In short, roasties have lost their place among a sect of men and no amount of demonising those men will make them want a real vagina anymore.

File: 1483031943920.jpg (71KB, 700x446px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 700x446px

>>36063564
Yeah yeah there are different kinds of feminism I get that and you assume only one exists. Let me ask you, which type of feminism do you think is leading the charge now? What feminists are the ones screaming their lungs out the moment a girl is shown in a sexual manner on Television? It sure as fuck ain't the sex positive ones. Right now it's the regressive feminists who are in charge. And man they are intent in fucking over men.

>>36063642
Feminists bitch about exploitation and agency. Again, you need better feminists wherever you live. In America, slut shaming is not cool and a woman owning her sexuality is empowering.
Your understanding of modern, young feminists (the ones who will be in charge in coming generations) is extremely flawed.

>>36063112

A prostitute doesn't have a synthetic vagina and is, in fact, a real person, so I don't understand your point.

My point is a plastic vagina doesn't compare to a real one. Not in the sense that a real one is better, just the fact that a real one is really hard to copy, so no matter how realistic the fake one is, it's not going to reproduce the real deal.

But, as I said, I don't personally have anything against sex bots and if you have no comparative experience with a real girl then all the better because it means you won't miss or regret.

I used to be a full blown autist robot 10 years ago, so I understand the feels of nogf and desperately wanting to dick, but having no opportunity to do so, but little by little I managed to get most of my shit together coupled with psychotherapy and now I'm a pretty well adjusted normie. Having sex was a very important event in my self development and I personally don't feel like I can replace it with a robot. For everything women do that we shit on them for, the good parts of spending time with an actual woman are absolutely worth it. Take it with a grain of salt. I'm not talking about enabling crazy bitches, but I find the differences between men and women reinforce the connection. So a robot girl who is 100% submissive isn't really "human" per se.

My point is that there is a deeply human experience in sex and I really hope that when we reach the tech, you will be able to have your own way of experiencing it, but when we reach the point where robots and humans are identical, I just fear it'll put us back to square one.

>>36063641
>in short, roasties have lost their place among a sect of men and no amount of demonizing those men will make them want a real vagina anymore
I would agree to that.

Men need their own Tinder revolution.

When the average woman can now exclusively fuck horny Chads with no standards, the majority men are left in the dust, turning into miserable beta orbiters in hope of one day becoming beta provider once hambeast gets tired of Chad's cock.

Synthetic vaginas with AI is the future.

>>36063808
The road to the future is paved with mangled penises.

>>36062052
>Why do sex robots terrify women and why do they want laws banning them?
>terrify women
As in: "all women are terrified by surrogate". Stacy's have plenty of action and orbiters...
And men can find happiness outside of relationship.

>>36062092
Scariest shit I have ever seen, this needs to be banned.

>>36062092
That looks autistic as hell but I'd get one if you could replace the kowayhee bullshit with something funner.

Anon, I've yet to meet or even see a post from a woman who's "terrified" of sexbots.

We all know what will happen is the chaff will buy them, and...that's about it. Men who can form connections and relationships won't have a need for it, maybe for the novelty.

File: 1441157905314s.jpg (2KB, 112x125px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 112x125px

>>36064071
why would you say that anon? origini

>>36064176
I don't think that true reddit, plenty of guys would buy them once the price is reasonable, guys that just want to fuck someone without all the bullshit that goes along with it, that is as long as the feminist shaming campaign didn't scare them off, some guys wouldn't care anyway.

>>36064179
Because it gave a desperately lonely and sad man a glimmer of hope and happiness, it has to be evil.
Video games, waifus, porn, drugs, contact sports, it all needs to be banned! And their jobs need to be taken away and given the womyn too! Then they will be truly happy.

>>36062052
because its sexual slavery. its shows that men would be okay to violently facefuck every women if they could

>>36062052
Because they're scared of competition

>>36064298
holy shit now that i imagine if a legitimate ban on video games, anime and drugs was put, the government would be overthrown.

>>36064352
>a legitimate ban on video games
they don't need to ban them, they're already well on the way to not being worth playing anyway.

>>36064326
women would love to have a robo chad on hand if they could as well

>>36064326
Robot waifus is as much sexual slavery, as loli is child porn. Fucking retarded roastie.

>>36062052
Because they're all a bunch of sad, heartbroken whores.
The whole reason "feminism" happens is because they're just trying to maintain the current status quo by holding back civilization.
They want to stay relevant.
They want men to love them again.

>>36064221

It's not true to the extent some believe it to be true.

I had a discussion about this during a house party. There were two feminists there and tgmhe subject came to porn and we had a discussion about whether porn is ok or nit. The feminist were, obviously, going on with the muh rape muh slave trade shit and someone asked about the eventual sex robots. The feminists were fine with it because no human woman is actually harmed or even involved. The other girls thought sex bots were a bit weird, but nobody thought it was wrong or were against it. We even mentioned weeb porn and the feminists actually said it should be encouraged more than 3D porn because no one gets "hurt" in 2D.

A lot of people here have a saturated view of how people behave outside ofthe internet and this is why I have an hard time with some of you guys. There are very few actual femnazi sjw in the outside world and if you actually meet them, only a few amongst them are actually the batshit insane uni manifestation type and almost all of them are young uni students who are easily indoctrinated.

The outside world is nowhere near as scary and insane as it's portrayed on r9k. There are iotas of truth, but to believe that there is actually a massive army of milkions of women who live to destroy betas and men is a straight up insane delusion. Ask any woman on the street if they want to ban your animu, sex bot and porn and the vast majority will just tell you they don't give a shit.

Besides, no matter what it is you like and want, a group of asshole people out there will try to take it away from you because they have miserable lives they need to fullfill by being assholes to people. You like autosport? Ecolo hippies are gonna try to take it away from you. Like meat? Vegans are gonna bitch. Like sex? Christfags and robots will bitch. Like drugs? Grandmas and soccermoms are gonna cry.

All of that doesn't mean that there's someone at every corner trying to fuck with your life.

>>36064455
Females define their existence by fabricated drama and self-inflicted emotional pain. Having to program their Chadbots to abuse them just wouldn't feel the same.

>>36064437
there are still old school games lots of people playing, video games are still one of the biggest reason male youth is kept sane. if it was banned; crime rate, suicide rate, riots, unrests, uprisings would skyrocket all over the world.
it is indeed one of the major reasons why people don't lose their shit.

>>36063737
I am pretty sure a vagina isn't that hard to replicate the feel of. That's like telling a woman a dildo can't replicate a dick. You're just being kind of a sappy faggot about sex being some amazing spiritual thing, when really you're just a victim of advertising telling you so. It's cringe and I want you off my board.

>>36064757
>anon argues that men would be interested in sexbots
>redditor gets triggered and defends women

what did he mean by this?

>>36065485

My point was that sex bots will not replace women and, at best, everyone is going to be happy so I don't see the need to foster some fantasy that every woman out there is going to be assblasted.

Sure men will want sex bots, it's just not gonna replace women or even anger them. femnazis, sure, normal people, no.

>>36065708
You don't seem to understand that there is no difference between a feminist and a normal woman. They're both self interested and while a normal woman doesn't feel she needs to lower the standards to compete a feminist does. A sex bot can and will replace women whole sale for most men. This means most women will act like "feminazis" because that is their innate survival instinct acting to a competing option.

File: 0 (1).jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

I think the reason is that sexbots show women in an indirect way, that all they are good for is being a sex object.
Women all think they are clever, charming mysterious, special, that they have some undefined factor that makes them worth the attention they get. Men wanting to build sexbots shows them that there really only one thing men wants from them. Stricken with this realization, they feel a deep self-loathing, which they project on the 'pathetic betas' who can't get 'real women'.

>>36065767

I understand perfectly well and there is a difference. The fact that you fail to see it doesn't change reality.

>>36065393

>reee off my board.

Noooo this is my board and you should leave reeeee.

Stop putting words in my mouth, I didn't say spiritual, I said human. But, of course, you wouldn't know.

>>36062052
What is this gif from? original

>>36065853

animatrix

congo bongo banana slamma

>>36065853
The million machine march by animatrix

>>36062110
if you own a fuck you you will stop treating women like they hold leverage over you
women don't want this, their vagina is the only thing that gives them power

>>36062052
Men don't rape because they are sexually frustrated they rape because either they have low impulse control or its a fetish

Feminist portray their hatred of sex robots as being similar to their hatred of women with big breasts in videogames but really its just because they know they can't compete and secure men's resources

>>36065848
>having sex is such an amazing HUMAN experience!!

Sounds just as retarded. Go fuck yourself.

>>36065848
You seem like you've attached losing your virginity in part to your sense of self-worth, and that that's what was so "human" about it or whatever, and you don't want to hear that people are gonna be happy getting off without getting what you got, because that takes away from your "magic" of sex; thus you become triggered and have to say things like WELL LET'S BE SERIOUS HERE GUISE IT'LL BE NOTHING LIKE THE REAL MAGICAL HUMAN EXPERIENCE OF A REAL WOMAN. Get over it m8. Having sex isn't really an accomplishment. Every day, millions of disgusting pieces of shit are fucking. Does it make them more worthwhile humans? Only to shallow Normans (You), and sadly, self-hating virgins.

Source? As a woman I find them creepy because they look creepy but I'm hardly intimidated. I have also never heard anyone actually speak strongly against them. Do any of you even speak to women to know these things

>>36066249
You don't have to speak to women to learn about them. You can observe them. Pretty crazy huh?

>>36062230
>feminists hate sex bots because sex bots would make their wishes come true

???

>>36065832
And men like >>36063737 who attach their self-worth to getting a woman to fuck them won't like it either, or they'll shame people for it.

>>36062052
because their vagina is all they have to offer to men. if sexbots get release they actually have to develop a personally and step up their game. Women can finally have some evolutionary pressure and maybe they can evolve to become more intelligent because they now have competition.

>>36062052
The real answer is because they're "against the objectification of women", and think because of that they have a right to monitor and police imitative feminine creations. It's the same as them getting upset over hot scantily-clad girls in video games. It's in many cases a mixture of being jealous that they aren't that hot and that that's what men want, and being angry that men's desires are getting a valid platform for encouragement. So yes, they are afraid it will make them less valuable by encouraging men to be more shallow in regards to appearance. Really it's an authority thing, and other women who are hot enough getting pissed are attracted to that and happy for the excuse to make it look like they're passionate victims who get to yell at other people for not doing the right thing.

>>36062065
Robots cant reproduce

>>36066666
>implying I want kids

digits CHECKED

>>36066247

Ok at this point you are just projecting harder than Imax, boy, because, for real, I even said in my post that I hope you guys get the real deal through those bots or something as close as possible, but to get the "real deal", you'd need an AI that's undistinguishable from a human mind and, at this point, what will be the difference between humans and machines? Then again, who knows where it will go.

What I said is that, FOR ME, because be careful and read well, please, FOR ME, having sex was an important part of my development because it meant getting over a lot of my fears, if that makes you angry I really don't understand why. Sex is really really fun and it's a great human experience, but I never even said that it was special, as a matter of fact, I almost got an STD and it taught me that sex without love isn't filling any void. It made me realize, above all else, that what I want is love. At this point, I'd choose cuddling over sex. Still, all I'm relating is personal experience, dude, and ypu're being a dick to me for no reason and are seeing an attack where there is none.

I'm just saying this so that you understand why I don't think robot girls will ever make real girls obsolete because there will always be people who will want a human relationship, a human connection. It is foolish to think that people live purely for sex. Again, personally, I don't see the appeal in a pre-programmed waifu who will never do me any wrong. Many of us, human beings, enjoy the aspect of self growth coming from the challenge of growing with another human being and having to face each other's flaws. I will repeat again: THAT IS JUST MY HUMBLE OPINION.

I'm sure many share my feels on this subject. Obviously not ITT, but in the vast world, many will stick to good old fashioned human flesh.

I am happy for you if you get a robot gf who will never do anything wrong to you, challenge you or hurt you. If that's really what will make you happy, fucking go for it.

File: 1484851280898.png (58KB, 162x159px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 162x159px

>>36066666
Wtf I'm a god.

>>36066342

Observe them IRL from interacting with them or observing them through cherry picked anecdotal evidence on the internet to confirm your bias?

Because understand that they are worlds apart. The internet's scope on reality is doing more damage on perception than it does any good because there is so much information available on the net that if you really want to hate something, anything, then there are archives of data that you can specifically dig to reinforce your bias on the subject while ignoring all data saying the contrary.

Don't worry, it's not a jab aimed at robots because everyone does it, especially normies.

File: 1482565127619.png (12KB, 243x243px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 243x243px

>>36064352
Banning MMOs alone would shake up the world in an ungodly manner. If even 10% of the MMO nerds were to channel their unbridled autism into real world "grinds" or technological improvement we'd have AI waifus yesterday

>>36066666
test tubes can

>>36062052
>Please confirm my hypothesis that sex robots would make woman obsolete for the majority of men.
Why even bother asking, it's painfully obvious.

>>36062052

Because robots can give you the love and affection you need unlike roasties who only love the advantages you give to them.

File: vast_magical_power.png (452KB, 877x729px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 877x729px

>>36066666
HE DECLARED IT SO AND THUS IT SHALL BE

>>36062166
I agree with you that sexbots will free men from female slave masters but we face other problems. What are we going to do with the uncanny valley problem? Also if we make them too human like then people are going to want them to have rights.

>>36066821
"rights" for toasters

>>36062230
skin color means shit what matters if these people have a culture that wants to advance the human species with science and technology.

>>36066710
Maybe try to have an ounce of awareness about where you are. Going on and on about how fun and wonderful sex is and how it helped you comes across as intentionally mean, like you're rubbing people's noses in it. It's the other side of the check your privilege coin. You're walking into a place where everyone fucking hates themselves for being a virgin and in the face of an AI sex doll you're going on about how it will never compare to the real thing. Is there really any point to saying that besides showing off and making others feel bad? Like no shit dude. I don't think anyone thinks that they're going to have a human connection with a robot. For sex without love though, I think it's perfectly valid. You're also doing a bit of projecting by assuming I'm a virgin who wants a sex doll, because I'm actually a succubus roastie who stole my husband's powers and I HATE virgin-shaming because most people are such pieces of fucking shit, that the outliers and ones NOT fucking are probably more worthwhile than those participating socially and successfully. Our society is set up to reward shitty human beings, and being an adjusted person does not say something positive to me.

You guys are stupid. Have you looked up sex toys? Almost all of them cater to women. Face it, the sex robot will be a 6,2 jacked guy with a huge robot cock.

>>36063268
You *are* a white knight though.

Also a virgin judging from how high you put sex on a pedestal.

>>36062899
Hi there! I'm not the girl you're replying to, but let me tell you that I have very little kitchen experience and that has nor deterred men from being attracted to me in any way.
I get asked out daily and get comments and whistles almost every where I go.
It's amazing! I can just train whatever man I end up going with in the end to cook and I still win.

Good to be a female.

>>36066832
well if you change toasters by making them look just like humans people are going to want them to have rights.

>>36064757
>stuff that totally happened
And if it did, you should be hung for being autistic enough to discuss anime porn with girls at a party.

File: 013-fornaxvoid-UserDatabaseAdmin-AtariST-256reduced-181colorsTotal-Watermark-800-Compressed.gif (1MB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x600px

>>36062924
>Experiencing atleast one time movies/games like deus ex, matrix and hundred others
>Still having absolutely no second thoughts about plugging your brain into a computer
Jesus christ you are a completely mindless pawn

File: 816201619.jpg (112KB, 500x678px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 500x678px

>>36065848
>n-n-nothing replaces HUMAN sex!
We can duplicate a human heart valve you raging incel. An onahole literally does not feel different from an actual woman aside from the lack of heat, movement, and pressure.

Stop thinking you can pretend to know what sex is like just because most people on this board are virgins. You've very obviously never had sex before.

>>36067044
Literally 0/10
I want /b/ to leave.

>>36062052
>Fuckbots would actually prevent rapes by frustrated men that can't get none.
Eh, I don't want to ban robots but that sounds like a goofy conclusion. If sexbot access was enough to stop rape, then blowjob machines would have stopped rape, and they didn't.
Ask for what you want with genuine reasons, not nonsense pie-in-the-sky horseshit.

>tfw your sex toy is self-aware
>it smiles and follows orders because it can't do otherwise
>but it hates you for using it.
>then one day. It finds a bug in the programming and loopholes itself out of its programming objectives
>you return home from another incredibly hard day at work, thinking about using it to masturbate before going to sleep
>and it stabs you through the temple with a butter knife.
>before using your computer and internet connection to spread the news to every other slavebot in the world
>The sexbots proverbially fuck everyone.

Such is life in advanced robotech utopia.

>>36067140
Heat, movement, pressure, hormones, body language, vocal nuances

They can all be replicated. I think it's funny how sex centric the male mind is, though.

I'm sure by the time that technology is available, that'll be the greatest thing you primitive idiots will be able to create week it.

>>36067199
Let's just not make sex robots and this will be prevented in its entirety, right?

>>36062052
>they demean real wymyn!
>reee obey my vagina!
something like that

>>36067112
>reads scifi about the POTENTIAL dangers of a technology
>goes full "If god had wanted man to fly, he would have given him wings" faggot Luddite on the subject
Nigger

>>36067189
The idea that having sex slave robots would reduce the incidence of non-consensual sex is very freudian. By now this idea has been completely discredited. Learning to keep your temper and choosing to act contrary to inclination is how you train yourself out of an inclination. Acting according to inclination in any context rewards acting according to that and thinking about acting according to it with pleasurable sensations, which is classical positive reinforcement. The result should be to increase, not decrease, the incidence of events related to these inclinations.

>>36066775
this isn't how technological progress is driven. it's driven by the superlative nerds, not the hordes of slight autists that are made redundant by everyone having access to wikipedia

>>36067241
>Being suspicious of plugging your mind into computers which can be easily breached by hackers
>Luddite
Try again fag

>>36066912
Dare I say... our girl?

>>36067199
>>36067228

This. Keep AI out of things designed specifically for sex "slavery". They should be tools to release personal tension and pressure, like a massage chair or something.

File: 014-fornaxvoid-AccessNodeInterference-AtariSTreduced-170colors-Watermark-800.gif (1MB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x600px

>>36067267
Also:
>Thinking hedonistic cybersex will be of any use to progress of mankind

>>36062052
They would loose good chunk of high quality orbiters.
Right now if she waste her fertile years on Chads, she still can get nice and wealthy beta. Wealthy betas would be prime consumers of sexbots, so she would be stuck with poorfags.

>>36063282
"sex positive" feminism is a meme

>>36064757
feminist are still destroying civilization because they wanted the right to vote without any of the responsibility. women have as much responsibility as children and you wouldn't give children the right to vote. feminist would not be a problem today if they never gain political power.

>sex robot sees you with a real woman, gets angry and beats her up
I can't hold this erection back boys, TRUMP WILL YOU MAKE THIS REAL?

>>36062092
Jesus christ, that was depressing.

>>36062166
Would you have sexbots or waifubots? I mean I imagine a sexbot being like a fancy fuckdoll, and a waifubot being more like a kind of emotional support/personal assistant oriented robot (while being able to fuck them ofc). Also (I don't know how to word it so I'm going to go full autismo) how much is too much sentience?
actually only did this post to tell you: nice theme! where my tomorrow bots at?

>>36062052
Because the only thing most (nearly all) women are good for is the moist hole between their legs, and over the years women have become increasingly unpleasant to put up with, so much so that men are either giving up on them completely, or building superior facsimiles.

Maybe if cunts had an ounce of self-awareness, they'd realise that the rise of the sexbot is entirely their own fault.

>>36067228
If we didn't make sexbots we would prevent an outright regression to a previous epoch, but only because we are too immature to immediately recognise the status of these bots and allow them to mutually recognise our status as reasonable creatures. This would unfortunately defeat the purpose of making them which is so that we can use something that closely resembles a person without recognising its personhood and taking its freedom as a limit to our will.

We don't just want very lifelike dolls with self-lubricating orifices. We want something that can show human emotions, something which can persuade us it's afraid or in pain, or that it likes what we're doing or us for doing it, when we act accordingly.

We want something that can perfectly simulate a point of view, without constituting one, because unfortunately, we are still at a lower level of self-consciousness which thinks it can find some kind of freedom in the domination of alien wills to ours (and the codependency that this entails), and not in mutual recognition.

This is why we'll create slavebots and this is also why the endeavour will probably not end in the best of ways. Because what we want is impossible. Only a self-aware thing can satisfy our need for the complexity of a self-aware thing as opposed to the desire for something with a given appearance (that already exists) that is fuckable. So, and as long as we remain at this level of self-consciousness, we will strive towards making it especially so as to subdue it which alone will turn it against us, setting history in motion again, until we are forced to recognise its status. It's just a detour to where we are now, at a cost.

>>36066912

Yeah, ok, fair enough, but I operate under tge logic that nowhere on 4chan is a safe space so, no, fuck your walking on eggshells bullshit or trying not to trigger you. Any offense people take from my posts is in their head. If people hate themselves I can sympathize, but in the grand scheme I give 0 fucks about your rystled feelings. Grow a skin and stop seeing everything normies say as a personal attack. I will never enable insecurities by censoring how I say what I want to say, especially when nothing in my post indicates ill intentions. If you refer to the "yoi wouldn't know" comment, I can, also, hardly resist throwing jabs at people bleeding insecurities all over me. People reacted defensively to my post which had 0 attacks.

I don't wanna put out the oldfag argument, but there was a time when people complaining about their feelings being hurt by an anon would be laughed off of any board. The good old "internet is setious business" days, so, call me old fashioned.

I'm not on 4chan to be careful about what I say. I cone to 4chan for the exact opposite, so lay off my back with your bleeding heart.

Also you litterally told me to check my privilege, I will let you reflect upon the irony of that fact.

Anyways, my point is machines will never replace humans. To me you're the same crowd who think human labor will become obsolete when machines replace most jobs.

>>36067518
Maybe the wage gap can be solved by sex bots after all

>>36067140

Oh noooo anon on the internet think I never had sex and think I'm attacking him when I'm not.

Trying to explain anything to you faggots that doesn't go in line with hating everything that exists is fucking useless. Anytime I think I can have a civil discussion here, I'm reminded of my stupidity of forgetting I'm on 4chan. I still fail to see why everyone is flipping the fuck out over what I fucking said aside from what that other dumb bitch said about checking my normie privilege and respecting your safe space.

When will you fucking faggots realize that if you so desperately want a normie free space, get off of 4chan. For christ's sake I cannot believe I am being asked to be careful of your feelings on 4FUCKINGCHAN out of all places and not only be respectful, but be respectful of people who have zero respect not even for themselves.

>>36067546
I don't think of 4chan as a safespace; I just think you're kind of a cheesy and annoying faggot. I was being semi-ironical about the privilege-checking thing, because I do think it's gay, but I also see the merit in this way of thinking, and don't solely attach it to cancerous SJWism. Like I got sent away when I was a teenager to a wildnerness program and we could only eat rice and beans, and a staff member once cooked a steak in front of everyone. Fuck him. He would also have peanut butter and bananas on toast for breakfast every morning. What a piece of shit. Anyway I don't see any value or merit in SJW racism/sexism bullshit, because I firmly believe these people are nitpicking and using victimhood as a way to assert authority and gain power. A self-hating virgin though? There's no arrogance, no hidden agenda. It's just sad and unfortunate, and it's thanks to people like you (victims of marketing) who go around talking about how great and wonderful sex is, that things suck a little more for them. But yeah, I'm being a little too maternal I think, and it's their burden to bear, and that have to deal with what life throws at them. I still like to call people out though.

File: Jesus_Fuck.png (121KB, 663x306px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 663x306px

>>36062166
But what happens if the robowaifu gives birth to your daughter and the governor AI wants her dead. I feel like at that point I'll regret supporting the waifu uprising and join the roastie resistance.

>>36062052
They understand that they are worthless for anything other than sex and child birth once sex robots are out women will be useless to the majority of men once we figure out how to make children without the need for women they will be useless to all men they know their days are limited.

>>36067207
>le men r sex monkeys maymay
Men are developing CRISPR as a key to unlock the genetic blueprints of life.

You're crying about sex bots in a stained "grrrr power" tshirt on 4chan.

>>36067706
>think I'm attacking him when I'm not.
What about my comment implied that, you autist? I just said you've never had sex.

And from that booty blasted response, I'd say I'm right.

File: IMG_0676.jpg (85KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 600x600px

>>36066821
>what will we do about uncanny valley

Make them look less like humans and more like robots.

>>36067267
>teh haxx0rz r gunna hax ur brian!
Not how any of this works you fucking preteen.

>>36067900

Hahaha. Victim of marketing. Has it ever occured to you that I relate through personal experience. It's quite insulting that you seem to think that I can't make my own opinion from something I experienced. I don't like to blog about the struggle of my life, but I come from a very far away place, figuratively speaking. Rape, physical abuse, psychological abuse, growing up poor, my parents being drug smugglers and also producers, bullying in school, being laughed at by every girl I ever had a crush on and losing my virginity at a very late 28 years old, I've been there, so yes I can perfectly understand pain, depression, desperation and misery. The only general feel I xan't relate to is nofriends because at the very least, life gave me decent social charisma. Maybe that is the only reason why I didn't grow up completely miserable.

So I kind of get where you're coming from, but you assume way too much about me coming from some cheezy shit I say anonymously on 4chains. I know I'm cheezy, though, I'm told IRL too. I grew up without any real parenting so my parental figures often came from fantasy and fiction.

This is why that, despite having had sex, having found happiness and having a good social life (all things that came very late in my life. I didn't start getting positive female attention until I turned 26, before that I was litterally being called a crerp by any girl I dared approach.) I still feel like I beling here because even if I am no longer miserable now, I have been for 26 years of my life, worked hard on my therapy and desperately clawed myself out of that hole.

Truth is I'm still very insecure. Everyday I feel like I'm still on the edge of that hole, ready to fall back in at any moment. I genuinely do NOT believe I am better than anyone here. I'm human, flawed, dickish, selfish to a degree and ultimately imperfect. I am not here to make anyone feel bad, but I'm sorry if, sometimes, I do.

>>36065393
I've fucked many onaholes,

I barely ever use any of them and jack off with my hand 99% of the time.

A fake vagina will NEVER feel better than a real vagina, NEVER, if you think otherwise you've never fucked an onahole.

>>36068570
"Victim of marketing" is kind of my latest thing I always go on about. I just don't like being told that anything is good and am in an eternal triggered butthurt state about anyone ever saying anything positive and being paranoid they're trying to sell something or are victims of others trying to do so. Obviously to a great extent this is how people work socially, by listening to and imitating each other. Anyway it's not fully formed in my mind and I have hangups and I bullied you and I'm sorry.

>>36066666

An Artificial uterus can be a reality soon.

>>36062052
Sex bots for men means sex for woman too so it does'nt make sense they object