Why do /pol/ and other dogmatic ideologues decide to preach their

>>35799555
/r9k/ browsers are full of the hatred and repulsion for others that goes perfectly with /pol/'s brand of far-right politics.
>Does /pol/ want more losers in its movement?
Numbers are important in political movements, they'll probably take anyone as long as they're not a jew.

you've convinced me to respect your faggot social liberal opinions on account of not wanting untermensch to dilute our dear home board

congratulations, your wife's mixed race son must be proud to have a betacuck like you in his household

>>35799984
I'm not a social liberal you alt-right /pol/tard.

I am a traditionalist, and while I do not seriously take in much of the spooks myself, I still reached the conclusion via a naturalistic analysis of human societies and personal inquiry into the utility of tradition and morality.

I agree with the race realism shit you people scream about because it's backed by actual statistics, I'm not triggered by any of this anti-mud people stuff at all. If white people want to try and reverse the demographic time-bomb in this late hour, that's fine by me, let them try.

The thing is though- if your ideology is so great, why do you preach it and talk about it in a board full of losers and failures? Is that who you want in your movement?

>>35800276
if half of these cucks (your traditionalist nigger loving self included) stopped waiting for a hand out and started working they wouldn't be losers.

Don't just preach to the converted.
>but they'll still be losers though so wouldn't you rather oh I don't know rather shitpost on sci or diy?? I mean realistically speaking they're better people

you aren't wrong, but doing that won't get anyone off of the state's tit

>>35799555
because lonely people are often vulnerable to cult like beliefs.

>>35799555

Are you seriously trying to put logic behind a group that hates other people for shits and giggles?

Also nice triple.