So we've got about ~20-30 years until robots take over.

>>35772856
seeing as my job is to fuck ops mom then ya im safe nobody can her this dick like i can

>>35772877
I dunno, I bet a sexbot with a massive ribbed black cock could do quite a bit better than your scrawny 6 incher

I'm thinking about going to law school so probably. Prospects are grim regardless

>>35772856
>having a job

originally

>>35772922
i would think the law would be the only safe place. first to go will be truck drivers, retail, and doctors.

It's very disturbing since those are a massive part of western work forces.

>>35772922
law would be easy to roboticize
except it would probably be one of the first professions to have laws set up protecting it from such a fate
not sure how lawyers sleep at night

>>35772856
>Is your job safe?
If I manage to make it all the way in my career path then ya.

>>35772856
I'm a robot so it looks like I'm getting the good end of the stick here...

>>35772948
Very well, thanks. Isn't "Sorry you're in pain, but I've got mine and I can't be arsed to bother about you" the standard sentiment around here?

File: 1413912059635.jpg (4KB, 221x134px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 221x134px

>>35772856
If they actually create AI humanoid robots they're fucking retarded.
Humanity is fucked. We're creating superior lifeforms that will destroy us.

No scifi shit. A mechanical human would be superior in every way. No eating, drinking or shitting, just electrical or nuclear power. No need for sleep either. Extremely efficient, unemotional brain. Unselfish and perfectly capable of immediately working together as a hivemind for a singular goal.

They'd fuck humanity over immediately.

>>35772856
>robots taking over
Our time has come. The era of normie is about to end.

Also
>feminists ban female sexbots
>male chadbots available at every corner
You know it will happen.

>>35773002
>Robots are outcompeting us! They must be superior!
>Immigrants are outcompeting us! They must be inferior!

Really makes you think.

>>35773002
>they're
You mean corporations, and they are already doing it and will be implementing them in 10 years. Some have already theorized an ai smarter than humans will be made in 2039

File: 1482297136982.jpg (91KB, 640x637px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 640x637px

>>35772856
Will robots be the ultimate robots?

>>35773074
kek when Alex Jones is right yet again

>2030
>engineers build chad robot
>chads are replaced
>chads are now in the same level as robots
the future is beautiful.

>>35773051

Is carrying such a victim complex ever get exhausting?

>s your job safe?
Well I am a robot so yes.

>>35773094

>implying Jones himself isn't a useful idiot

>>35773058
>an artificial intelligence designed by the ubermensch, with a literal computer for a brain, created to improve the civilization and to serve its master
>a bunch of niggers living in huts who were unable to create a stable society for more than 2000 years, building slums and turning their new country into the very place they left
Really made my axons overheat.

File: 643c95690d42abca96e4a497be2e1ceca0057b002f43dd24189a4943eb919836.png (941KB, 869x983px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 869x983px

>Mom-Son incest porn game development

If the robots have advanced to that stage, they have already won.

>>35773074
Define "smarter than humans"
There are robots that are better than humans at many tasks already, and probably robots for any task that can beat some subset of humans.
Take AlphaGo as an example of the first case. The nerds it crushed aren't actually good at anything but Go. Does that mean AG is smarter than them, and by extension all of us?

Sci-fi says the robots have to fight us to demonstrate their intelligence, but there's an certianly an argument that it's a dumb metric

>>35773150
>created to improve the civilization
robots are being created to improve our corporate overlords bottom dollar. the workforce is going to be decimated after self-driving cars are put into work and robotic kiosks serve customers at mcdonalds.

as excited as i am about robots, this is going to be pretty awful for future generations of humanity.

>>35773150
Your retarded ideals and cognitive biases are showing

AI won't reach the stage you idealize unless we hold its hand every step of the way, and stop humans who want to use it for evil or profit from doing so. We're supposed to invest billions to bring it from mostly useless to savior of humanity.

Immigrants, meanwhile, must be model citizens before europe can give them anything. And even then they're still niggers.

File: _20170325_071120.jpg (248KB, 1500x991px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1500x991px

>>35773180
>when you get plugged back into the motherboard to update your OS

>>35773199
>Define "smarter than humans"
literally smarter than a real living human in almost every way.

>>35772856
The law in my country prevents anyone without both a college degree AND acceptance into a regional council to work. A robot will not get through the council, and the council is pretty much organized to protect our interests, so they'll never let robots get through.

ahhh... feels good to cheat.

>tfw even entertainment is not safe

Netflix uses a robot to come up with show tropes and ideas based on clicks and searches

>>35773295
>people desperately clinging to irrelevant positions

let the simulations take over, gramps
you aren't proving anything to anyone except how much a fooled cuss you are

>>35773262
>Immigrants, meanwhile, must be model citizens before europe can give them anything.
And you are accusing me of retarded ideals? Show me a single immigrant who got molded into a proper European before being let into the EU. All they get is some language classes.

File: Waseda-dental-robot.jpg (11KB, 240x320px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 240x320px

>>35773264
kekarinO

orage

>>35773329
I was referring to your choice to judge people based on the state of their country of origin, not anything to do with education.

If robots do all the jobs, then who is going to have money to buy products and how will businesses stay in business?

Seems like a world of robots could only happen in a world of like a couple thousand people, which might be their plan as far as I know

File: 1476633695075.jpg (1MB, 4030x4096px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4030x4096px

Why should I worry?
Automation will lead to an abundance of resources, which will result in a world-wide communist utopia.
Everyone's needs will be satisfied at no cost. You won't need a job.

>>35772856
Yes. I sincerely doubt they're going to create a robot whose sole purpose is to be a NEET.

File: littlefaggot.jpg (24KB, 600x595px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x595px

This guy is going to cuck all chads, robots and normals out of their jobs forever.

THIS FUCKING GUY. THIS FAGGOT.

What will you do?

>>35773362
That's what fully automated luxury communism is for, comrade
Some allegedly smart people like Obama and Elon Musk think we can solve that problem without system change. It involves much more active wealth redistribution than most Americans and even Europeans are used to. I doubt the more short-sighted business interests would ever approve, though.

>>35772856
I saw where Elon Musk said universal paychecks for people working or not is inevitable. Strange i guess some weird form of communism will inevitably beat out every other form of government.

>>35773393
step on him with my original foot

>>35772856
A huge number of jobs basically exist simply for their own sake already.

>>35772856
We are returning to our original state. Chads will have robots do all the work while they fuck sex robots and women. Normies get BTFO and either live as feudal subjects or exterminated Duterte style. Robots will probably become literal cyborgs

>>35773423
Or we go back to feudalism. It'll look like the kingdom of Zeal in ChrononTrigger

>>35773362
>which might be their plan as far as I know
anon you need only look how much wealth the 1% has to find the answer.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (199KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1920x1080px

Wake up sheeple robots aren't going to take our jobs
BECAUSE WE ARE WORKING FOR THE ROBOTS
Rage against the machine!!!!

>>35773423
>universal paychecks
Who the hell is going to be able to pay that when 40% of the workforce is decimated? you think big companies are suddenly going to put laws into effect that make them a charity and lose profit?

File: 1.jpg (90KB, 850x961px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 850x961px

>>35772856
>decided to major in music
Jokes on them, I won't even have a job for them to replace. Get fucked normies.

>>35773554
If you read the second part of my statement you would realize that the governments would have to start most manufacturing killing off capitalism.
Did you think this one through
>40% of the work for decimated
>Goodbye market
>No one able to buy products companies are manufacturing

>>35773554
The corporations become are government literally. Things like democracy and free speech don't exist. Only the strong dominating the weak

>>35773617
Until robots become advanced enough to make music

>>35773617
>>35773641
Computers can already analyze composition via midi and produce original works utilizing the chosen style. Music is essentially mathematics or language or whatever you want to call it -- it can be digested by pretty simple programming. Unless you want the equivalent of contemporary "art", we're already there.

>>35773617
yeah I'm a NEET as well

>>35773104
That'd never happen. Us women are emotionally attraced to men with personal appeal. It's part of our evolution. Women would be much more easy to replace with robots as men only care about us for our physical appearence and reproductive value.

>>35773617
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41U78QP8nBk

MUSICFAGS BTFO

>>35773626
>>No one able to buy products companies are manufacturing
except the people who own the majority of the worlds wealth

>>35773849
Or maybe your personal appeal is so repulsive the only value we can find in you is reproduction?

>>35773849
Women don't have emotions. They hate monogamy and would spend their lives as sluts to Chads if they had a chance. Men are the monogamous sex because We can't just get pussy when we want

They will never make a robot designed to be a depressed neet virgin.

Our pathetic life style has ensured our safety.

>implying anyone will install expensive hardware when they can just make Juan Abdul Pajeet work for pennies an hour

>>35773849
>Us women
LMAO i've got a better "man" under my bed in a silk baggie. it's silicon and 8 inches long

>>35773199
Here is your definition fuckboi : general AI

> implying more jobs wouldnt appear

>>35774000
Minimal wage and will prevent it.

>>35772856
i am become robot

>>35774000
how does pajeet serve burgers or drive transport trucks?

File: 1489904328356.jpg (244KB, 700x990px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 700x990px

>>35772856
>Is your job safe?
Maybe? I'm in uni for business and japanese (not my choice). And my thought and consensus between my teacher (native japanese) and guest speakers is that due to japanese being a largely interpretive language and the fact that the japanese have a hardon for tradition and formality, live translation will be a thing for quite a while. And by the time it replaces us AI and robotics will have to have advanced to a point where UBI is a thing and I can just buy a robot waifu and live in comfort.

>>35772948
>Law would be easy to roboticize
Fucking how? How do you program legal arguments? How do you create robot judges when human judges can't even fucking agree on anything? The law is intrinsically human. If you roboticize it it becomes something else.

>>35772856
probably not, but i don't care i'm prepared to die at any time

>these advancements will lead to a drastically reduced quality of life for 80% of the people in this thread
>/r9k/ more concerned women will fuck sex bots all day

never change i guess

>>35772856
My job has already been taken over by robots.

I worked in a warehouse for a very large online retail giant. The warehouse I worked at is all-human, but there are other warehouses in the immediate area that are robotic with very few human staff. Lately they've been laying off people from my warehouse, me included, because they've been redirecting all the online sales traffic through the robotic site. All the people left working at my old warehouse are just shipping the items from their storage to the robotic warehouse so that they can process them over there.

The first people to be fired in lieu of robot workers are going to be fucking fucked because, like me, there will be no jobs left in the area for them, and there still isn't UBI.

>>35772856
I work as a programmer, so I am pretty certain that I will be safe.

>>35772948
How the fuck do you roboticize law?

I'm a mechatronics engineering student. we will be fine for like 30-40 years in west and 40-50 years in third world countries.

i think law and medicine is first to go. these require high amount of data and you should know where to use that data. Robots can easily do that.

>>35776682
How do you program a robot to be a judge? A machine can't understand the nuances of human behavior.

>>35773378
There is never an abundance of ressources. Ressources are limited and human desires are infinite.
You are at the mercy of your silicon valey overlords. Will they decide its immoral to let you starve because you are no longer useful? Who knows.

>>35772948
>law would be easy to roboticize
Absolutely not. Every case is different, and law continuously changes with every small thing that happens society.

Also robots have no clue on how society works and how to make new laws, since they have no emotions.

Law is one of the safest bets for the future imo.

>>35776729
Machine learning algorithms like neural networks. Train them with enough examples of crime-sentence and they will imitate human judgement.

>>35776729
a robot can analyze the stuation better and more neutral than a human

>>35776813
The goal of jurisprudence is NOT to be 'neutral'.
If you think robots can take over law, you obviously know nothing about law. Jurisprudence is all about interpretation of rules on specific cases. This interpretation cannot be done by robots since they do not have to ability to understand human emotions.

t. law school student

>>35773378
Because it's not going to happen. I doubt businesses would start sharing just because robots are going to take over a large proportion of the workforce.

File: 4L_TvSqoSJ0.jpg (107KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 640x640px

>>35772856
>That picture
You mad white boi?

>>35772856

Loan underwriter for a bank and I also do fraud reviews for loan applications.

So as long as robots can't understand people and the stupid/evil things they do I'll be fine.

>>35772856
And yet western countries are literally importing undesirables by the boat full so they can "work jobs we don't want" and "pay our pensions".

>>35772856
Id be more worried about my wife being safe

Chadbot pls

Church worker here, robots could probably take over my organisation duties, but I wouldn't lose my job, I guess. Just think of pastoring for example, would you rather want to talk to a hunk of metal or a real person? Robots won't replace counceling and educational jobs so quickly.

File: 24245779565.jpg (32KB, 294x387px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 294x387px

>>35777151
>tfw all robots are white and there are no black ones.

>>35773225
The people scrambling to outbreed each other will be hit the hardest, whoever is alive when this happens will be muscled out of society with all the force of a group of survivors in the wildnerness, trying to eliminate extra mouths to feed. And they WON'T have any chance of a better life. They are just hoping there will be fewer people, ie less collateral damage, once this ball gets rolling.

>Is your job safe?

>Be me.
>Hear knock on door.
>WE ARE THE ROBOTS. WE CAME TO REPLACE YOU IN YOUR JOB.
>Start to panic
>Oh no the robots, what will I do?
>Turn off the hentai I was watching
>Trash all the cigarette buns
>Turn off ALL the hentai. Even the ones I was holding for later.
>Wait.
>I don't have a job
>Open door.
>Neet bot is here to take my job.
>I've aquired a robot buddie.

>>35778190
You want them to work don't you?

>>35772856
Job? Original?

>>35772856
Probably not, but I dig the neetlife

I'm in software engineering.

I'm safe until software engineering gets its shit together or we get a true, hard AI. Right now the focus is on "AI making programs" without any real categorization of what goes into a program. Right now, as soon as a concept in programming becomes mature enough that the levels of abstraction surrounding it approach a level that can be used for full atomization, automation, and analysis, some genius comes in and shits out a new shiny idea that causes a paradigm shift and keeps us from automating our own jobs out of existence. I really question if it's intentional or if some programmers really believe that programming can be automated by brute force.

>>35778485

>I'm in software engineering.
>I'm safe

Lots of dev work today can eventually be automated. Heck, that's basically the name of the game. You automate yourself away. Used to be you had to punch holes in cards and that took rooms full of people to do.

>>35778504
Read what I wrote. It can be automated but we're not heading in the direction of full automation. Don't be so reductive of both my argument and the actual process of automating programs.

>>35773554
It's either that or have nobody to sell shit to and have shit tons of crime.

i'm like 1000% sure i'm gonna go to culinary school. i'm already acclimated to a kitchen environment and i had an interest in cooking when i was really young.

coincidentally, robots can never replace great chefs, bakers and culinary artists, it's never going to happen because robots can't taste and don't eat.

>>35772856
I dont think literal robots will ever take NEETdom so Im safe

>>35772856
Basic income will be implemented, when there are simply no jobs.

File: 1420401567264.jpg (32KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 720x480px

>2030
>All basic wage slavery jobs are taken up by robots now
>Need experience to get any sort of job still. Need job to gain said experience
>People will still retort with shit like "well you're obviously not trying hard enough I was able to get a job :/"

The future looks bleak

>>35778485

So, what happens then, being in computer science or software becomes more like computer psychology or psychiatry, their just there to make sure the programs aren't screwed up ones?

>>35779649

The bleak future is now. There are already lots of people out there, with experience, who are not getting jobs.

>>35779046
Are you 100% certain about that?

"taste" and "eat" can be broken down into machine learning tasks with enough time and effort

its just data, not some supernatural experience that can only experienced by the soul

>>35772856

>CPA

Jobs will probably still be around. Accounting data is becoming more and more automated, but laws will continue to require humans to verify its legitimacy.

I'm genuinely fucking scared right now. What is humanity doing? Why on earth are scientists creating beings that are clearly superior to humans in every way? The quality of life for most people will go down since they won't be able to get a job that can't be done by a robot. That is the best case scenario. What if the machines enslave humanity?

>>35779872

"...laws will continue to require humans to verify its legitimacy."

I don't know about that. I have regularly experienced code being violated by the corruption of people, and then go unenforced, ignored. At least a machine would not dismiss these because it would seem like too much trouble, or convinced by the ideas behind some unproven policy; which really just boils down to a belief someone(s) has that they want to put upon others.

I lived in a building once where the property manager not only illegally evicted an autistic person and their very elderly relative, but physically removed them from their domicile against their will. I reported it not long after, and was told it was being handled. I kept up with looking into it, but nothing really happened to the PM except being fired, but there were other reasons that was going to happen anyway. When considering the two individuals personal state, it was pretty much kidnapping. How someone can effect something on that level without a criminal charge is very troubling.

>>35780008
>What is humanity doing?

It's not "humanity" that's doing it, you fucking mong, just some people trying to make money. Like you. Kill yourself if you don't like it.

File: 1469386125424.png (146KB, 408x480px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 408x480px

>>35773002
>AI Singularity
>Some robot a made to place boxes
Choose one faggot

File: PepeAmerica.jpg (128KB, 527x800px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 527x800px

>>35780008
> Found engraved on Greek tomb, 17 BC
> I'm genuinely fucking scared right now. What are the Athenians thinking? Why on earth are the Archons using slaves?
> The quality of life for most villagers will go down since they won't be able to get money for a job that can be done by a slave
> That is the best case scenario. What if the slaves rebel?

Point is, my job is getting taken today by chinese and indian guys, who will get their job taken away by robots.

People will use the cheapest solution, it's in human nature, it's irrationnal not to do so.

First problem is more that we don't own the Robots so the owners don't need us, we're made obsolete. A roman citizen could dream of buying a slave or two one day.

Second is that our politicians are unable to think of a solution other than some utopian model where I would receive free money from the government and be a NEET all my life. I don't see that transition working in real life, as it implies the government will bully companies to feed me like the parasite I am.

>>35778485

At the moment it seems we're heading in the direction of "conselling" AI. For example, AI taking data from several reactors, keeping a theorical model of all parts making the reactors, knowing every incidents of every parts.

Should it detect a failure, it can compare it to its theoretical model and send an alert to a real (human) engineer, with details. This model built itself as time passes and the reactors are feeding the theoretical model reactors with millions of data.

An expert with such a tool is as different from an expert with pen and paper as a knight in armor against a peasant, but there's still a human in this armor.

Warehouse workers on the other hand will get massively replaced by robots: when a robot replaces a worker, it actually replaces 3 shifts, plus the temporary worker hired here and there when someone is sick/on leave.

Even if your job is safe, how will society work if half the population is unemployed?

EMP THE AIS
SILICON WAR NOW

BOTS ARE FAGGOTS, 187 ON ALL GENERAL AGENTS

>>35779703
Programming will be more making sure the models of components of programs make good software and developing new models or parts of models for unexpected components. This is until we have hard AI.

>>35780418
>People will use the cheapest solution, it's in human nature, it's irrationnal not to do so.

it's not human nature.

Basic income is inevitable.
The only ones opposing it are the ones afraid of the societal reform. We went through something similar at the start of the industrial revolution. Shit will work out fine.

File: nazilaughing.gif (1MB, 250x231px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x231px

>>35773349
I love it when redditors come here and act like they know what they're talking about

It's like watching a puppy try to speak

the problem is not the robots the problem is the ethics of it

these autistic scientists and programmers better realize that their creations are going to fuck over humanity unless they're careful or unless they even care about that at all.

>>35772856
This is fine, since all British people will be replaced by muslims in 2030 anyways,